OAKLAND, Calif., Feb. 21, 2007
Medical Marijuana Advocates Sue Feds
Citing New HIV Study, Group Contests FDA's Claim That Pot Has No Medical Value
-
Photo
(CBS/AP)
-
Interactive
HealthWatch
Explore health issues including AIDS, cancer and antibiotics.
The lawsuit filed in federal court by Americans for Safe Access accuses the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services of engaging in "arbitrary and unlawful behavior" that prevents "sick and dying persons from seeking to obtain medicine that could provide them needed, and often lifesaving relief."
The Oakland-based advocacy group wants a judge to force the department and the Food and Drug Administration to stop giving out information that casts doubt on the efficacy of marijuana in treating various illnesses.
The lawsuit differs from previous legal efforts to decriminalize marijuana because it seeks to get a federal agency simply to acknowledge that pot can help reduce the symptoms of some conditions.
The change would make it easier for states to develop their own medical marijuana policies, said Joe Elford, chief counsel for Americans for Safe Access. In the past, supporters of medical marijuana have focused on getting the government to stop classifying marijuana as an illegal drug.
"We are not asking the federal government to change what it does about medical marijuana, we are asking them to change what they say about it," Elford said.
The Department of Health and Human Services did not immediately respond to a telephone call seeking comment on the lawsuit.
Besides discouraging people who might benefit from smoking pot, the agency's position bolsters the Drug Enforcement Agency's attempts to crack down on medical marijuana use in states where the practice is legal, he said.
California is one of 11 states where marijuana use is legal for people with a doctor's recommendation. But because the DEA considers pot illegal patients can still be arrested and prosecuted by federal authorities.
Jacqueline Patterson, 28, who moved to California from Missouri so she could get marijuana for a severe stutter associated with her cerebral palsy, said the government's insistence that pot has no medical benefits puts an unnecessary burden on people who get relief from using it.
"It really creates a dual stigmatization in the states that have no protections," Patterson said. "Not only do I have this profoundly humiliating disability, I smoked pot, and my family has been taught the same addictive narcotic story that I had been."
Last week, researchers from the University of California, San Francisco reported in the journal Neurology that a test involving 50 HIV patients showed that those who smoked pot experienced much less pain than those given placebos.
Americans for Safe Access said in the lawsuit that Health and Human Services has rejected its requests to retract the assertion that cannabis "has no currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States," a position the agency has advertised since 2001.
Countering that statement by petitioning the government and distributing evidence that marijuana eases the symptoms of cancer, multiple sclerosis, HIV and other conditions has cost Americans for Safe Access more than $100,000, the group said in its suit.
Since California voters approved medical marijuana use in 1996, 10 other states have adopted measures protecting qualified patients from state prosecution. They are Alaska, Colorado, Hawaii, Maine, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington.
© MMVII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.



And if the Feds had their way, they would arrest him and put him in jail, and I doubt very seriously that the FEDS would continue his "legal medications", much less his marijuana. Talk about Catch 22.
Any suggestion that the Feds decriminalize marijuana in states where medical use is legal, brings about screams and hollers form the DEA.
Oh well, he'll probably be dead in a few years if he's lucky.....and he's only 41.
Marijuana is America's #1 cash crop and it has been illegal for over 60 years. This means that 100% of the billions in profits goes directly into the hands of drug gangs and drug dealers.
Cops say LEGALIZE AND REGULATE MARIJUANA:
http://www.leap.cc
Law Enforcement Against Prohibition
Sad story Ali. Good point condumism. I'm almost completely for leagalizing it but I just can't say that it wouldn't have serious social side effects. I don't want the school bus driver stoned and picking up my child. How the heck could we afford to create a whole new governmental strategy? Health issues, the list goes on. It isn't cut and dry .. no pun intended .. maybe.
- Legalization would endanger billions of dollars
in prison and law enforcement spending, thousands of jobs would be at stake.
- It is useful in society to have some laws which virtually everybody breaks - that way undesirables can be arrested at will.
- Legal drugs would interfere with the existing pharmaceutical industry.
- Fully legal hemp would interfere with existing paper, rope, clothing and other industries.
- The war on drugs provides a convenient cover under which to project U.S. influence into many countries, particularly in South America and South Asia.
- The war on drugs is a critical revenue source for the prison industry, the CIA, and the DEA.
Its simple fool....they just need to undercut all of the drug dealers and put a few scientists to works grow stickiest chronic buds ever...
who would pass up better bud at a cheaper price...
What they need to do is find a way to test how high someone is, like a breathalizer....once they can do this and ban people from driving and going to work high it will be legalizied...
would you rather have an alcholoic working for you or a pothead????? which person do you think be healthier overall????
good point their to
this would free up sooooo much prison space its not even funny...
not to mention all of the time law enforcment is wasting looking for pot trafficers.
haha its the best cure for a hangover / nausea ever..
it would keep people from getting into trouble.. yea yea we would be even fatter because we would be even more entertained by television but who cares...
These people aren't hurting anyone-just trying not to hurt themselves.
If anything cigarettes should be ILLEGAL and banned, for look at the horrible things it does to your body. But it's OK to smoke that GARBAGE and KILL all the people around you while you do.
If you want to get real technical you should arrest all cigarette smokers for attemped MURDER
If anything cigarettes should be illegal and banned. People that smoke cigarettes KNOW it can kill them and the people around them.
If anything people that smoke cigarttes should be arrested for attemped murder for doing so around people that don't smoke and choose not to DIE from this self enflicted habit.
Leave the sick and suffering alone, not all the pill pushing doctors can help all the time.
their worry is people driving high..(which is dumb because people would no longer speed they will be content driving 55 in a 55)
and government jobs where people could go to work high.
also i have never seen 2 really baked people get into a fight..
but i have seen many really drunk people
Posted by Linfinster at 10:28 PM : Feb 21, 2007
Alcohol is legal and a school bus driver can't pick up kids if he's been drinking; there's no reason to assume that he'll be allowed to drive a school bus while stoned either.
http://www.leap.cc
Law Enforcement Against Prohibition
Marijuana has been illegal in America for over 70 years and today it is the #1 cash crop in the whole nation. The billions of dollars in profits from the prohibited sale of marijuana goes straight into the hands of drug gangs and drug dealers which creates MORE CRIME, MORE VIOLENCE, and even MORE GUN CONTROL as a result of the increase in crime and violence! The madness must end!
-
by pakaal
February 22, 2007 9:55 PM PST
- Even the DEA agrees:
-
Reply to this comment
-
See all 31 CommentsOn September 6, 1988, the Drug Enforcement Administration's Chief Administrative Law Judge, Francis L. Young, ruled:
"Marijuana, in its natural form, is one of the safest therapeutically active substances known....[T]he provisions of the [Controlled Substances] Act permit and require the transfer of marijuana from Schedule I to Schedule II. It would be unreasonable, arbitrary and capricious for the DEA to continue to stand between those sufferers and the benefits of this substance."