Health Care Costs To Keep Rising
Economists Say Health Care Will Account For $1 Of Every $5 Spent In U.S. By 2016
-
Play CBS Video
Video
Health Costs Will Keep Rising
The federal government projected that health care prices - the cost of prescriptions, hospital care and other services - will likely double over the next 10 years. Byron Pitts reports.
-
Photo
(AP)
-
Interactive
HealthWatch
Explore health issues including AIDS, cancer and antibiotics.
-
Quiz
Medical Exam
Give your brain a checkup with these health quizzes.
-
Quiz
Fact Or Fiction?
Do you have a healthy knowledge of common medical misconceptions? Take this quiz to find out.
That means a rise in out-of-pocket expenses, such as the co-pays for medicine, from about $850 this year to about $1,400 in 2016, a 5.3 percent annual increase.
The cost of health insurance is projected to rise even more quickly during that same time — 6.4 percent annually.
Over the coming decade, spending on health care will continue to outpace the overall economy. By the year 2016, it will total close to $4 trillion, economists at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services said in a report being released Wednesday.
Today, the number is closer to $1 out of every $6, or $2 trillion.
"It's our expectation that by the year 2016, the end of our projection period, that health care costs, which currently consume about 16 percent of the total economy's expenditures, or GDP, by 2016 will consume about 20 percent of GDP," John Poisal, deputy director of the government's National Health Statistics Group, which did the study, told CBS Radio News.
Officials are worried by the news, reports CBS News national correspondent Byron Pitts.
"This report is cause for concern," says Herb Kuhn of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. "Health care costs are going up much faster than general inflation."
Consumers are spending more on the latest treatments, despite their rising costs. For example, federal officials cite a significant increase in the use of imaging to detect blockages or other diseases.
Income will also play a significant role in the greater health spending. Historically, when income rises 1 percent, health expenditures go up about 1.5 percent, officials said.
"What that indicates is a desire to purchase good health," Poisal said.
Health and Human Services Secretary Mike Leavitt has spent recent weeks traveling throughout the country, urging consumers and caregivers to give greater consideration to the price of various health procedures.
"People who have health insurance often don't care about price. People who don't have health care insurance can't find out the price even if they ask," he said in Detroit. "Medical pricing is a mystery to everybody."
The administration is pushing government agencies, insurers and health care providers to make information available that would help consumers become good shoppers. For example, Medicare lists the percentage of pneumonia patients at various hospitals who received a timely antibiotic, which is an indicator of the quality of care.
"We hope this information will help inform the discussions that go on at several different levels," Poisal said, "including those in Congress and other policy makers, other researchers and certainly the public needs to be informed of these things so that collectively we can make decisions about how to best proceed."
The economists said their study doesn't determine how much the rising costs will affect the average family in the U.S. There are too many factors involved, particularly when the federal government accounts for about half of overall health spending through programs such as Medicare, Medicaid and the Department of Veterans Affairs.
The economists also predict that government programs will gradually replace employers when it comes to providing health insurance for millions of Americans.
"We are moving incrementally away from traditional sources of insurance, such as employer-based coverage, to a system comprising more federal and state government-provided health care," said the economists, whose report will be published in the journal Health Affairs.
© MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.



- 1
- 2
- next
See all 59 CommentsKU Born
They instruct the FDA to prosecute natural proven and cheap remedies, they kill without a care for patients and worse still they exert dishonest influence upon governments, many of whom are in bed with them. They prevent honest meaningful research into cheap natural cures and create health scares such as Bird Flu to sell millions of their useless and dangerous vaccinations. Big Pharma have built a profitable mega business from cancer, whilst natural cures are outlawed at their request.
For God's Sake wise up folks these bloody people are wicked, they are Satanists, almost too powerful to be stopped. Even Bill Gates is in bed with them on the pretence of saving Africa and the poor. His money would be better used providing clean water and a good diet instead of killer Aids drugs.
Tell me, just when did they cure any condition, there 'aint no cash in a cure, it is all about dependency. Any government worth a light would totally clear out the FDA, ban the Pharma Lobby and sprip the assets from all those found to be in collusion with Big Pharma.
Should Mr Bush require a legacy he could put his Christian values to good use on this corruption.
The light on the horizon which will put a stop to the Illegal activities of Big Pharma is in this medium, the Internet. We may not as individuals have the money to fight corrupt officials and politicians who consort with the Pharma lobby but we have millions of friends out there with whom we can talk and influence. Together the people will break up this evil cartel who are way out in front of Muslim extremists when it comes to harming ordinary people worldwide. Their wickedness is almost unique in history and must be stopped sooner rather than later.
Look no further for the reasons causing the financial crisis than the pharmaceutical companies and their friends in government. They are the Real Snake Oil Merchants, it's time to run them out of town.
Yeah, it's great until you have acatastrophic illness - cancer, cardiac, debilitating disease, etc. Then you get relegated to the "cafeteria line" and wait on your turn. My Dad would be dead if he had lived in Canada when he had INOPERABLE adenoidal cancer 8 years ago. Without immediate (2 days later)access to radiation therapy and chemo he would have been beyond help.
Posted by son54c
PEOPLE should work for their own needs. ONLY when they have shown their WORK is not sufficient, should they be helped. Every town in the US has a skidrow of welfare housing projects packed with unproductive, unmotivated CONSUMERS of aid that should go to people who have demonstrated their desire to WORK and are in a "slow" period. Government is not Momma and Daddy - pull your own weight.
Posted by cherokee_133
That's pretty presumptious isn't it? Why is not your own responsibility to pay for at least SOME of your OWN needs? That's the attitude that just flips my switch! I worked at a company that was going to charge me $260 a week to cover my family of 5 members. I went out and bought a major medical policy with a $5000 deductible for $250 a month. I save money every month and pay myself another $250 a month into a savings account to cover my deductible. I PAY for all the dr. visits and meds with a discount program I joined that saves me 50% per visit or med. That program costs me $30 a month. There are ways to save money and still have healthcare. You just have to want to.
someone has to say it...why do we spend so much on the mentally retarted
or how about the person on life support brain dead for years because the family won't let their loved one go..
or people that bring their kids and them selves in for ever single bump they have ever gotten....they need to give classes on not being stupid
But we both have seizure disorders, and we are considered high risk, so don't assume that a fly-by-night health insurance company would accept us instantly. Believe me ... I have checked all over the place. You probably don't know what it's like to be discriminated against in the health insurance world if you have a seizure disorder. Don't be so quick to judge.
They could set the example by giving up their extravagant health care benefits including "free" routine checkups.
The president & vice president's retirement benefits should be totally eliminated so they can demonstrate taking ownership of their own futures instead of relying on taxpayers to support them in their "golden years."
Too bad that will never happen because the rich and powerful abhor paying their own way. They didn't get rich & powerful by using their own money. Or, their own (physical) effort.
They could set the example by giving up their extravagant health care benefits including "free" routine checkups.
The president & vice president's retirement benefits should be totally eliminated so they can demonstrate taking ownership of their own futures instead of relying on taxpayers to support them in their "golden years."
DITTO DITTO DITTO!
Problem: You just described social security. I will give up future benefits if they'll let me opt-out of present and future paying in.
Darlin' I ain't cheap, just frugal.
Insurance only provides coverage to those who don't need it or can afford to spend millions on lawyers to collect thousands in claims.
The US already has "universal health care" without the requirement for insurance. It is called the "emergency room." What needs to change is how that health care is provided. Taxpayers do not need insurance companies in the middle of that process. Insurance companies would do nothing other than add to costs while providing no services.
Private insurance companies should not be allowed to exist. They provide nothing worthwhile.
You asserted you are wealthy.
If that were the case, you would not be paying social security. Social security is a payroll tax that is only paid by those collecting a paycheck from an employer.
Wealthy people do not typcially collect a paycheck. They do not pay social security.
Don't be too quick to assume that we can afford being in the high-risk pool. I live in a part of the country (Oklahoma) where fortunately the cost of living is low, but the wages are lower than average (I make $11 an hour as a mental health medical transcriptionist); however, at the same time, the cost to be in a high-risk pool is in the neighborhood of $750-$100 per month. Also, as I said earlier, my husband utilizes socialized medicine (Indian Health Service) and he gets better care than I do. As far as medical procedures for myself, there are instances I have to put those off because I can't afford the deductible and the 20%-30% co-pay.
You asserted you are wealthy.
I have to pay in up to the cut-off just like everyone else on a yearly basis. Eh? What's the deal?
I just believe it is money shot up a hog's butt.
I just believe it is money shot up a hog's butt.
Posted by MITYWHITY at 12:34 PM : Feb 21, 2007
In other words, you are not wealthy, you are collecting a paycheck.
And, if you are wealthy, why would you be concerned about collecting a paltry social security check? Or, paying the trivial amount collected for social security?
Social security was not and is not intended for wealthy people. It is intended to provide basic subsistence for workers who are no longer able to work.
And, anyone who would deprive them of that basic subsistence is contemptible beyond words or understanding.
criminal.
Posted by Neojoker at 01:27 PM : Feb 21, 2007
No one has money in a Social Security account. Social Security is a name given to an obligation (tax) US employers & employees pay and employees receive from the federal government.
It is an employers' & workers' tax and benefit only paid to workers.
But, it is not an actual account in which anyone has money. There is no "social security trust fund" except as an accounting entry.
The US government borrows money from China, Saudi Arabia, Japan, and many others just to pay the bills each year, including Social Security or Medicaid/care. There are no "trust funds."
quit and ban everything to do with slowing the effect aids has on a person. let it do its course.
the longer someone wiht aids is kept alive the more and more it will be spread..
probably the same with alot of things.
put the money to finding ways to prevent these diseases.
this will never happen tho because the drug dealers (aka pharmacuticals) can make a raping on this countrys citizens.....and anyone that has ever ( and i am sure their are ) found a way to cure or prevent letst just say aids or cancer will be scilenced if at all possibly. because their is no money in this.
Personally, my wife and I do not enough consider future welfare for which we pay current taxes as part of our retirement equation. Our personal retirment accounts will sustain us, and if the big 3 welfare gigs still exist in 30 years, great!
Universal health care should not be the only option. Private insurance will always have its place. After all, I demand the right to purchase better services than YOU!!!! And believe me, no MD facing down 100K or more in student debt worth his salt is going to work for a universal health care system. A universal system will undoubtedly get the docs who graduated last in their class.
And that is the primary reason congress & the White House will ensure Americans pay more for less health care than the people of any other nation on earth.
They have turned cancer into a massive highly profitable industry, whilst a simple effective and natural cure, The Apricot Kernal as been banned by the FDA at thier suggestion and bogus report. I do believe however that they are being judged as of now, both they and those helping them to financially rape us and knowingly harm us, will soon suffer because of their evil deeds.
Think our politicians will respond - duh !!!!
I have known several people who had tried the holistic treatments for cancer, some of them did not seek actual medical treatment until it was too late and another allowed his tumor to grow so large that by treating it holistically that by the time he had it medically removed he lost most of his lower jaw and part of his neck.
No thanks, I'll take my chances with an actuall doctor whom most of you believe do not want to treat cancer but just take your money and let you die. Get a Clue
And of course at this forum illegals immigrants are caused by the Bush administration, just wait and see if anything will get done by the democrats, what was clintons proposal again?
- Require docs, clinics and hosptitals to post their prices.
- Forbid insurance companies from paying the providers, instead they must reimburse the patient directly.
- Figure out a way to get some of the government out of health care, docs and hospitals spend a lot of time of forms for the various gov agencies.
Those three things would drive prices down.
- 1
- 2
- next
See all 59 Comments