8 U.S. Troops Killed In Afghan Crash
Military: Chinook Helicopter Reported Engine Problems Before Going Down
-
Photo
A U.S. military humvee guards the scene of a U.S. CH-47 Chinook helicopter crash in the Shahjoi district of Zabul province in southeastern Afghanistan on Sunday Feb. 18, 2007. Eight American troops were killed and 14 were wounded when the helicopter crashed. (AP)
-
Interactive
Rebuilding Afghanistan
Learn about the nation's geography, history and people and find out what is being done to rebuild.
Officials immediately ruled out enemy fire as a cause of the crash, which left charred wreckage of the twin-rotor Chinook scattered on a dusty, open plain in Zabul province, just 50 yards from the main Kabul-Kandahar highway.
This area of southern Afghanistan is one were Taliban fighters are known to be active and the Chinook workhorses are often used to transport troops around the rough terrain, reports CBS News foreign correspondent Mark Phillips. But U.S. military spokesmen won't say whether the soldiers who died today were on a combat mission.
There were no immediate claims of responsibility for any attack on the chopper, which went down under overcast skies in a region where Taliban militants are active.
It was the deadliest single incident this year for the 47,000 U.S.-led coalition and NATO forces in Afghanistan.
The helicopter was carrying 22 U.S. service members when it had a "sudden, unexplained loss of power and control and crashed," U.S. military spokesman Lt. Col. David Accetta told The Associated Press, adding the cause would be investigated.
"It was not enemy-fire related," said Col. Tom Collins, spokesman for NATO's International Security Assistance Force. "The pilot was able to radio in that he was having engine problems. We're confident it was not due to enemy action."
Seven U.S. Humvees and three Afghan military vehicles parked around the crash site. About 35 American soldiers and 15 Afghan army soldiers blocked reporters from entering the area. Afghan troops searched every passing vehicle and their passengers.
Zabul provincial Gov. Dilber Jan Arman said it was possible that the helicopter crash was due to bad weather.
A U.S. military statement said details of the crash or the helicopter's mission would not be released until "completion of recovery operations."
Afghanistan is a war being fought in Iraq's shadow, reports Phillips, but it is becoming deadlier and U.S. and NATO commanders here fear the Taliban have been quietly building up over this winter, preparing for a renewed offensive in the spring.
Zabul province has long been a hotbed for militant supporters of the former Taliban regime who have stepped up attacks over the past year.
In May 2006, another U.S. CH-47 Chinook crashed attempting a nighttime landing on a small mountaintop in eastern Kunar province, killing 10 U.S. soldiers.
In 2005, a U.S. helicopter crashed in Kunar, after apparently being hit by a rocket-propelled grenade, killing 16 American troops.
Another crash of a civilian helicopter last year in southeastern Khost province killed up to 16 people, including the wife and two daughters of a U.S. civilian worker.
© MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.



Sounds like a case of Stinger missile-itis.
Re: "not an appropriate time for lame humor or sarcaism"
Suit yourself.
Monday, February 19, 2007
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
However, having been initially drawn into the Iraq war's "coalition of the willing" by the same scam the Bush administration worked on the American people, the Europeans fast tired of providing troops at U.S. behest. Their reasoning ran, if the United States can devote 140,000 troops to the Iraq war, which the Europeans do not support, why should the Europeans provide troops for Afghanistan only to free up U.S. forces for use in Iraq? At this very minute, as Mr. Bush calls on the Europeans to increase their forces in Afghanistan, he is increasing U.S. forces in Iraq by 21,500.
The president now believes that the water is rising on the Karzai government in Kabul. The United States has solicited the Europeans many times to increase their forces in Afghanistan, with little success. That sets them up in Mr. Bush's eyes to take the rap for the impending collapse in Afghanistan. It is not unlike his current effort to blame the mess in Iraq on Iran.
Those mean terrorists aren't giving "THE SURGE" a chance to work.
Bush must be so annoyed at them...
When Bush heard that bin Laden was in Tora Bora, he sent massive numbers of troops to the South Pacific, thinking that's where Tora Bora was.
Precious time was lost getting them back to Afghanistan.
Mark my words, central Europe is slowly going back to being a bunch corrupt commies.
C'mon, voice your crapola, bozos. After all, your heroes want a pullout in Iraq. Why not Afghanistan? Your friend Osama can come down from his cave and you can break bread with him.
That is, if he doesn't slit your pathetic necks.
Tee Hee.
Of course you'd have to fight your friends, but that wouldn't be much of a stretch for a Gallowayite like yourself, would it.
I don't think you could subdue three or four counties in the US with the size of the force in Afganistan. Of course the British established a precendent for losing there a century ago. Our great commander in chief's war experience was a few months hiding in the Air National Guard in Alabama working on reublican campaigns. Sure I want to let him lead me into battle.
http://www.aipac.org/forms/join_aipacClubs.htm
The Elite Minyan group - you mean for a minimum of only $100,000 dollars
a year I too can shape world policy? Tell me more!
I especially like the bit about enjoying "the exclusivity you deserve."
This thing borders on parody, but alas, unfortunately it is all too real.
Tee Hee." -- Lieberman181
Your surge of humor is about as effective as THE BUSH SURGE in Baghdad.
Weren't you declaring VICTORY the other day ?
I told you it was too soon to pop open the champagne bottles.
You should have listened.
I don't think you could subdue three or four counties in the US with the size of the force in Afganistan. Of course the British established a precendent for losing there a century ago. Our great commander in chief's war experience was a few months hiding in the Air National Guard in Alabama working on reublican campaigns. Sure I want to let him lead me into battle.
Posted by talkingham at 12:32 PM : Feb 19, 2007
Had Clinton accepted the Sudanese offer of Bin Laden, 9/11 would not have occurred. HIS mess was to Bush to clean up!
Posted by mbcsmith at 03:56 PM : Feb 19, 2007
They would have gotten someone else to do it. They could never have gotten congress%u2019s go ahead to invade Iraq without 911, or something like it.
-
by thgdriver
February 19, 2007 11:50 PM EST
- How awful, damR junk that should have been retired long ago. Clinton striped our military to the bone it's all his fault. That womanizing basta$d.
-
Reply to this comment
-
See all 23 CommentsWe must put it in perspective, how many folks were killed on our highways today??