Palestinian Government Asks For A Chance
But Impasse Overshadows Mideast Summit, Rice
-
-
Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, also known as Abu Mazen, talks to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice during their meeting in the West Bank city of Ramallah Sunday, Feb. 18, 2007. (AP/Palestinian Authority)
-
U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice waves as she arrives to a meeting with Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, not seen, in the West Bank city of Ramallah, Sunday, Feb. 18, 2007. The U.S. and Israel have agreed ahead of a three-way meeting with the Palestinians to shun any new Palestinian government that does not renounce violence, recognize Israel and accept existing peace agreements, Prime Minister Ehud Olmert said Sunday. (AP Photo/Emilio Morenatti)
-
-
Interactive Mideast Conflict Events, key players and a history of the world's most unstable region.
-
Interactive Fast Facts:
Middle EastLearn about the people, economy and history of the Middle East.
Rice was the latest U.S. official to lower expectations for Monday's meeting even as she described a deep commitment to the larger goal of peace.
"Nobody is at the point of talking about a deal," Rice said. "We're talking about ... what the destination might look like."
Many of the core questions that frame the hoped-for destination — an independent Palestine alongside Israel — apparently would not be on the table Monday. Those include the borders and the fate of disputed areas of Jerusalem.
Israeli leaders were lukewarm about the session even before Abbas' deal; some have been openly skeptical since.
The United States, United Nations, European Union and Russia have said jointly that a Palestinian government must renounce violence, abide by past agreements with Israel and others and accept Israel's right to exist.
The four-member group, known as the Quartet, is the steward of a mothballed 2003 peace plan. The group has taken no position yet on whether Abbas' pact with Hamas meets that test, but Rice said Palestinian statehood rests on it.
"I don't think that there's any doubt that ... an agreement to have a Palestinian state and then the actual standing of a Palestinian state is going to have to be on the basis of a government that accepts the right of Israel to exist," Rice said. "I can't imagine it any other way."
Abbas has had a simple message for U.S. diplomats unhappy with his planned coalition: Take it or leave it. On Sunday, he told Rice the deal with Hamas was the best he could get and asked her to give it a chance, his aides said.
Abbas had tried during months of coalition talks to press Hamas to agree to abide by existing peace accords, something that would imply recognition of Israel. He yielded after many rounds of deadly Palestinian infighting.
More than 130 Palestinians have died in street clashes and other attacks that have alarmed both Palestinians and Israelis, sapped political momentum and threatened to erode Abbas' authority.
"The Americans told us that this agreement is not meeting (international) conditions," for diplomatic recognition and vital aid, said an Abbas aide, Yasser Abed Rabbo. "But we have an understanding with Rice that they will wait until we see this government declare its program."
Olmert said at the start of the weekly Cabinet meeting Sunday that he and President Bush had spoken by phone on Friday about the deal and agreed the Palestinians had to go further.
"A Palestinian government that won't accept the Quartet conditions won't receive recognition and cooperation," Olmert said. "The American and Israeli positions are totally identical on this issue."
© MMVII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie."





- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
... - 7
- next
See all 124 CommentsPosted by grazinggoat at 09:48 PM : Feb 18, 2007
I have no idea what an ineterests is. Maybe thats why hypocrits hide behind it. It must be a good hiding place, eh?
Posted by formrusmcsgt at 05:34 PM : Feb 18, 2007
I already invited you to prove that WMD's were a lie, you fell flat on your face.
Wanna try to prove that anyone lied now? From what I see, the only liar is formrusmcsgt. You can take that to the bank "former Marine". (ya, i know your a wanna be, once a marine always a marine, there is no such thing as a former marine...)
Posted by lars008
-Yo larsehole007. Is it free for all in this world. Can someone define what are the USA or any other nation's INTERESTS?
Every hypocrit hides behind the INETERESTS.
HEY this is the Nation's INTEREST... interest... my A$$, in the last IRAQI war, there were no interest for the USA. It's only Cheney's Haliburton and PNAC's interest.
Posted by feelfree1 at 06:00 PM : Feb 18, 2007
Agreed They want status quo ad infinitim while giving lip service to real progress.
It seems reasonable that the Palestinians would take a similar position with respect to Israel.
Is Abbas a fool or a tool? The present Israeli and U.S. rulers are not interested in negotiation.
Posted by feelfree1 at 05:52 PM : Feb 18, 2007
Sad, but true.
Ha, ha!
Nice list!
Posted by elgraz at 05:13 PM : Feb 18, 2007
Yeah...they'd probably lie about someone having WMD's to justify an illegal invasion.
I think that you need a piece of arse. Your wife is not cooperating with you as I can see.....that is very evident. Check Hillary Clinton she may be of help. Bill really could care less.
Impeach George ******** Bush before we all perish.
---------------------------------------
bildooreilly, and i suppose all the students at The University of Texas are all cult-loving "devil worshippers" because of their hand gesturing the "sign of the longhorn." Boooooo! Com'on, you need to get out of the house more often. You're a card!
Posted by mdc76082 at 03:39 PM : Feb 18, 2007
+ report this comment
Why do you call people "skippy"or "Haji".Can you try to grow up a little bit?
Saturday she said it is working
Sunday now is it working
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
... - 7
- next
See all 124 Comments