WASHINGTON, Feb. 16, 2007

Murtha Vows To Stop Troop Buildup

Antiwar Democrat Says He'll Use Power Of Purse To Restrict Bush

  • Play CBS Video Video Congress Continues Iraq Debate

    Democrats are seeking to pass a non-binding resolution opposing the president's war plan for Iraq, even as Mr. Bush voiced his support for his strategy. Sharyl Attkisson reports.

  • Video '60' Preview: Iraq In Peace

    Watch a preview of Bob Simon's "60 Minutes" report on Kurdistan, a part of Iraq that's peaceful and stable, where business is booming and Americans are beloved. It airs Sunday, Feb. 18, 7 p.m. ET/PT.

  • Video House Debates Iraq

    The House began debating a resolution opposing the President's troop buildup in Iraq. Sharyl Attkisson reports it wouldn't force President Bush to change his strategy but could shape future policy.

  • Rep. Jack Murtha, D-Pa., plans to use the appropriations process to prevent more troops being sent to Iraq.

    Rep. Jack Murtha, D-Pa., plans to use the appropriations process to prevent more troops being sent to Iraq.  (CBS/AP)

  • Who's Who Congress Reacts To Plan

    Reaction to President Bush's new Iraq stategy, which includes an increase in troops.

  • Interactive New Plan For Iraq

    Key elements of the plan, excerpts from the president's speech, reaction and more.

(The Politico)  By The Politico's John Bresnahan.
Rep. Jack Murtha, one of the most vocal congressional opponents of the war in Iraq, is vowing to block President Bush’s plan to send another 21,500 U.S. combat troops to Iraq by restricting the administration’s military options in a new wartime spending bill.

“We’re gonna stop this surge,” the Pennsylvania Democrat declared in an interview posted on the Website MoveCongress.org.

Stepping up his campaign against the White House, Murtha, chairman of the House defense appropriations subcommittee, told Tom Andrews, a former congressman-turned-activist, in the online interview that he would attach so many conditions to an upcoming spending bill for Iraq that the Pentagon would not be able to find enough troops to carry out the president’s “surge” plan.

The Andrews group, the Win Without War Coalition, is part of a larger federation of anti-war groups sponsoring the site.

Murtha will oversee the $93 billion supplemental spending bill for Iraq and Afghanistan that the House will consider in mid-March. And he wants to impose new restrictions on how the president can deploy combat forces from the United States to Iraq, allow combat veterans to have at least one year stateside before returning to the frontlines and prevent the Pentagon from keeping soldiers and Marines already in Iraq in uniform after their enlistments expire.

“This vote will limit the options of the president and should stop the surge,” Murtha predicted of next month’s floor fight over the wartime supplemental appropriation. “We’re trying to force redeployment [of troops outside Iraq], not by taking money away but by redirecting it.”

Murtha is not pushing a total cutoff of funds for the war in Iraq. But he is considering measure to limit the military actions Bush can take against Iran, although the congressman was more cautious than his statements about Iraq.

“We are looking at the possibility of putting language in the bill that says you can’t go into Iran unless you have authorization [from Congress],” Murtha said.

Murtha also intends to push a provision to bar the creation of permanent U.S. military bases in Iraq and to raze the notorious Abu Ghraib prison.

The strategy being employed by Murtha and other House Democratic leaders would force Bush and Republican congressional leaders to accept the new troop restrictions, or face the possibility the supplemental spending bill would falter, thus cutting off all funding for the war.

Democrats are betting that Bush and the Republicans won’t take that risk and will go along with the Democratic proposals. And Republican leaders are not taking Murtha’s threats lightly.

The Republican National Committee has e-mailed supporters, urging them to contact newspapers and other media outlets to object to the congressman’s proposals.

The RNC was reacting to a story in The Politico on Wednesday that spelled out the Democratic strategy of cutting off the supply of troops available for the war, while retaining funding for forces already deployed in Iraq.

Without the troops to execute the surge, the Pentagon would find it increasingly difficult to keep U.S. forces in Iraq.

Republicans have repeatedly charged that Democrats want to “cut off funding for the troops,” and the Democratic strategy seeks to deflect those charges.

The Democratic plan was characterized in The Politico as the “slow-bleed strategy,” which was not a term used by any Democrats or the anti-war groups supporting their efforts.

The RNC, however, attributed the phrase to Democrats, and it was used in their e-mail alert.

“‘Slow bleed' is exactly the right name for this incredibly irresponsible and dangerous strategy,” RNC Chairman Mike Duncan wrote in his e-mail, which included a Web link to donate to the GOP.

“Cutting and running is bad enough,’’ he said. “But the Murtha-Pelosi 'slow-bleed' plan is far worse. It is a cynical and dangerous erosion of our ability to fight the terrorists while we still have men and women on the ground in Iraq.”

The National Republican Congressional Committee and Senate Republicans are also preparing to use the “slow-bleed” line in their own news releases, slamming Murtha and the Democrats.



By John Bresnahan
TM & © 2007 The Politico & Politico.com, a division of Allbritton Communications Company.



We cover politics with enterprise, style, and impact.

Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 687 Comments
by klingon69 February 19, 2007 6:43 PM EST
test
Reply to this comment
by firststate February 18, 2007 10:54 PM EST
rick
So, does that mean you oppose making sure our soldiers get the body armor, communication gear and up-armored humvees they need to be as safe as possible? Why shouldn't there be a maximum time for a deployment there and a minimum time between deployments? Do you really think it's right to keep a soldier in Iraq, even after his period of enlistment is over? Why shouldn't our troops receive the training they need to be as effective and as safe as possible?
Reply to this comment
by frankly6 February 18, 2007 3:43 PM EST


Go Murtha! This escalation is just more "stay the course".

Reply to this comment
by formrusmcsgt February 18, 2007 12:39 PM EST
blackberry1-

How does it feel getting spanked in public by a "nut case"?
Reply to this comment
by formrusmcsgt February 18, 2007 12:37 PM EST
C'mon, blackberry1. I'm ready to prove to your silly a$$ that I'm the real deal. What's up, no guts?
lol...your the real deal alright a nut case...
Posted by blackberryfl at 09:33 AM : Feb 18, 2007

And you think your third grade name calling makes you something, eh?
Reply to this comment
by BB101 February 18, 2007 12:33 PM EST
C'mon, blackberry1. I'm ready to prove to your silly a$$ that I'm the real deal. What's up, no guts?


lol...your the real deal alright a nut case...
Reply to this comment
by formrusmcsgt February 18, 2007 12:31 PM EST
You don't have to explain anything to me...I know who you are...Your so easy...I enjoy Marines...There easy to excite...You don't have to send me anything I believe you...My buddy I'm going fishing this afternoon served 30 years in the Corp...I rag him all the time...and he rags me...I'll catch you later..
Posted by blackberryfl at 09:28 AM : Feb 18, 2007

You accuse me of being a fake and when given the opportunity to get the truth, you punt. I can't imagine a former Marine running with the likes of you. Poor guy must be confined to a wheelchair or something......
Reply to this comment
by BB101 February 18, 2007 12:30 PM EST
Just as I thought. All blow and no show. Still hiding behind a rock calling others names. What a punk.

lol...REMF...
Reply to this comment
by BB101 February 18, 2007 12:28 PM EST
You don't have to explain anything to me...I know who you are...Your so easy...I enjoy Marines...There easy to excite...You don't have to send me anything I believe you...My buddy I'm going fishing this afternoon served 30 years in the Corp...I rag him all the time...and he rags me...I'll catch you later..
Reply to this comment
by formrusmcsgt February 18, 2007 12:22 PM EST
blackberry1-

Just as I thought. All blow and no show. Still hiding behind a rock calling others names. What a punk.
Reply to this comment
See all 687 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Grammy winner Shakira on her music career, philanthropy and being sexy. Watch Now

  • MOST POPULAR
Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: