WASHINGTON, Feb. 14, 2007

Military Granting More Criminal Waivers

Army, Marine Corps Allowing More Recruits With Felony Convictions To Join Up

  • Photo

     (CBS/AP)

  • Interactive Military 101

    Basic training to learn all about America's fighting force.

  • Interactive Battle For Iraq

    The government, the insurgency, key players, background and photos.

(AP)  More recruits with criminal records, including felony convictions, are being allowed to join the Army and Marine Corps as the armed services cope with a dwindling pool of volunteers during wartime.

The military routinely grants waivers to take in recruits who have criminal records, medical problems or low aptitude scores that would otherwise disqualify them from service. Most are moral waivers, which include some felonies, misdemeanors, and traffic and drug offenses.

Defense Department statistics show that the number of Army and Marine recruits needing waivers for felonies and serious misdemeanors, including minor drug offenses, has grown since 2003. Some recruits may get more than one waiver.

The Army granted more than double the number of waivers for felonies and misdemeanors in 2006 than it did in 2003.

The number of felony waivers granted by the Army grew from 411 in 2003 to 901 in 2006, according to the Pentagon, or about one in 10 of the moral waivers approved that year. Other misdemeanors, which could be petty theft, writing a bad check or some assaults, jumped from about 2,700 to more than 6,000 in 2006. The minor crimes represented more than three-quarters of the moral waivers granted by the Army in 2006, up from more than half in 2003.

Army and Defense Department officials defended the waiver program as a way to admit young people who may have made a mistake early in life but have overcome past behavior. And they said about two-thirds of the waivers granted by the Marines are for drug use, because they — unlike the other services — require a waiver if someone has been convicted once for marijuana use.

Lawmakers and other observers say they are concerned that the struggle to fill the military ranks in this time of war has forced the services to lower their moral standards.

"The data is crystal clear. Our armed forces are under incredible strain and the only way that they can fill their recruiting quotas is by lowering their standards," said Rep. Marty Meehan, D-Mass., who has been working to get additional data from the Pentagon. "By lowering standards, we are endangering the rest of our armed forces and sending the wrong message to potential recruits across the country."

Army spokesman Paul Boyce said Tuesday he is concerned because the Pentagon data differs from Army numbers. But overall, he said, "anything that is considered a risk or a serious infraction of the law is given the highest level of review."

"Our goal is to make certain that we recruit quality young men and women who can keep America defended against its enemies," Boyce said.

The data was obtained through a federal information request and released by the California-based Michael D. Palm Center, a think tank that studies military issues.

"The fact that the military has allowed more than 100,000 people with such troubled pasts to join its ranks over the past three years illustrates the problem we're having meeting our military needs in this time of war," said Aaron Belkin, director of the center.

Belkin said a new study commissioned by the center also concludes that the military does not have any programs that help convicted felons adjust to military life.

In recent years, as the Iraq and Afghanistan wars have dragged on, the military has also relaxed some standards in order to meet recruitment demands. The Army, for example, increased its age limit for recruits from 35 to 42, and is accepting more people whose scores on a standardized aptitude test are at the lower end of the acceptable range.

In its report, the Pentagon said, "The waiver process recognizes that some young people have made mistakes, have overcome their past behavior, and have clearly demonstrated the potential for being productive, law-abiding citizens and members of the military."

According to the Pentagon, nearly a quarter of new military recruits needed some type of waiver in 2006, up from 20 percent in 2003. Roughly 30,000 moral waivers were approved each year between 2003 and 2006.

The military in its report divides moral waivers into six categories: felonies, serious and minor non-traffic offenses, serious and minor traffic offenses and drug offenses. Because many states have different crimes categorized as a felony or misdemeanor, the groupings are more general.

About one in five Army recruits needed a waiver to enlist in 2006, up from 12.7 percent in 2003. In addition, the report showed that the Army granted substantially fewer waivers for drug use and serious traffic violations last year than in 2003.

More than half of the Marine recruits needed a waiver in 2006, a bit higher than in 2003, and largely due to their more strict drug requirements. Felony waivers made up about 2 percent of the Marine waivers, while other lesser crimes made up about 25 percent, both up slightly from 2003.

About 18 percent of Navy recruits required a waiver, up only slightly from 2003. Two-thirds of the waivers granted by the Navy were for misdemeanor-type crimes and about 5 percent were for felonies.

Just 8 percent of Air Force recruits had waivers, down a bit from 2003. Nearly all of the waivers were for the misdemeanor-type crimes.


© MMVII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Video and Galleries from U.S.

Add a Comment See all 36 Comments
by migrainegram February 14, 2007 1:53 PM EST
Not surprising, the line to enlist isn't exactly out the door.

Actually, it's kind of a smart decision because a) the government scores a live body to send to Iraq, and b) the tainted enlistee gets to go to Iraq to kill people.

What a novel concept -- geeze!
Reply to this comment
by beehive21-2009 February 14, 2007 2:11 PM EST
Great idea,most of the people are not evil,just in the wrong place at the wrong time.The job market is limited for inmates,given the chance they shall become productive human being,and get out of the revolving door.Most inmates return to crime because they land in the same place they started .Good luck to all the people.
Reply to this comment
by dallison7 February 14, 2007 2:43 PM EST
If the Bush doctrine of global domination is not stopped we will most certainly see a reinstitution of the draft.
Reply to this comment
by bigwhtpony February 14, 2007 2:55 PM EST
Great...that's all we need. The lowest common denominator. Bring back the DRAFT!!!!
Reply to this comment
by bigwhtpony February 14, 2007 2:58 PM EST
If the Bush doctrine of global domination is not stopped we will most certainly see a reinstitution of the draft.
Posted by dallison7 at 11:43 AM : Feb 14, 2007

You are such a "global" moron. The man has 2 years left in office....care to explain how he plans "global domination"? I'd LOVE to see your worthless liberal a** inducted into the Army - not ours, maybe France's .....bald head an all!
Reply to this comment
by antoniof123 February 14, 2007 3:28 PM EST
I am so sick of you right wing wackos do you not see what is happening. I can not believe that people are as stupid as you. Yet each day you provide me with more entertainment thank you because I am laughing at you not with you. You are the most corrupt and vile of all our nation.
Reply to this comment
by jimkun February 14, 2007 3:29 PM EST
It's nice of the Bush supporters to make light of this subject. It's not their lives on the line in war...

For those of you who have sons, daughters, brothers, fathers and are serving in Iraq, do you feel comfort that their lives may now be in the hands of someone who scored less than what was previously considered acceptable on an aptitude test? When you are in a battle situation, you need to be able to depend on everyone in your squad. One weak link could risk the entire squad. And considering the pressure to meet recruiting objectives, do you really believe that only those who "have clearly demonstrated the potential for being productive, law-abiding citizens and members of the military" will receive waivers?
Reply to this comment
by scott4261 February 14, 2007 3:31 PM EST
Great...that's all we need. The lowest common denominator. Bring back the DRAFT!!!!
Posted by bigwhtpony at 11:55 AM : Feb 14, 2007

Wow, I can%u2019t believe I'm posting this, but I actually agree w/you on this one. Part of the problem w/this war (besides the fact that it never should have been started in the first place) is that the poor are disproportionably represented. Much of that has to do with the fact that, for many of our nations poor, joining the service provides an opening to a better life they otherwise would not have. While deferments would still occur among the very elite, a more diverse service would emerge.

I still say that we just need to get the h e l l out of there, though.

Reply to this comment
by bigwhtpony February 14, 2007 3:47 PM EST
Wow, I can%u2019t believe I'm posting this, but I actually agree w/you on this one.

Posted by scott4261 at 12:31 PM : Feb 14, 2007

See! Hope springs eternal! :)
Reply to this comment
by down-ndirty February 14, 2007 3:52 PM EST
"...perhaps if the previous democratic administration didn't gut our military things would be a bit different. For an administration that took terror as a real threat they sure gutted our military." Posted by janem4

GI Jane is back, still blaming everything on the "previous administration."

WAKE UP, jane!! This is 2007!! Clinton left office SIX YEARS ago!!

FACE FACTS!! Bush didn't even properly equip the Armed Forces that he sent to do his dirty work!!

He let BIN LADIN excape in Tora Bora.

Wake up, jane. Wake up!

Reply to this comment
by bluestardad February 14, 2007 3:56 PM EST
Most criminals should be able to work off time serving in the military!
Reply to this comment
by rafterman1 February 14, 2007 4:01 PM EST
"...perhaps if the previous democratic administration didn't gut our military things would be a bit different. For an administration that took terror as a real threat they sure gutted our military."

Actually, the "gutting" started under Bush I after the cold war ended. And most of those slashes under Bush I and Clinton were big ticket items.

The biggest problem now are small but vital things - armor protection for vehicles and vests. And, as down-ndirty said, Clinton is gone six years now. Even if troops were shorted on these small things with Bubba, Bush has had more than enough time to get this small stuff to our troops and he hasn't done it. It takes six years to build an aircraft carrier. But it doesn't take six years to make body armor.
Reply to this comment
by agnim February 14, 2007 4:03 PM EST
Just what the nation needs to represent us -- A CERTIFIED ARMY OF CRIMINALS; because the atrocities of the present lot is not perverted enough.

The homosexual and terrorist soldiers already serving aren't deviant enough in Iraq; let's raid the prisons and turn the inmates loose across the planet.

We wail on the Chinese for allegedly using prisoners to provide goods and services for export; but we are exporting criminal soldiers who are even more deft at murder, robbery, rape and sodomy. LOL
Reply to this comment
by rafterman1 February 14, 2007 4:05 PM EST
"Great...that's all we need. The lowest common denominator. Bring back the DRAFT!!!!"

The eternal question: What's better? Or, in this case, worst? A convict who wants to be there or a draftee who doesn't?
Reply to this comment
by agnim February 14, 2007 4:06 PM EST
Seriously though, who would want to serve in an army (gang?) of KNOWN criminals?

Doesn't one's status go down as a military person with one's service and association with KNOWN CRIMINALS? LOL
Reply to this comment
by randalds February 14, 2007 4:17 PM EST
If they grant more criminal waivers then there's still a chance to get Cheney on active duty after all. Maybe even get Bush back in too! They're so all ****king fired up over this war let their cowardly as*ses go fight it!
Reply to this comment
by getcentered February 14, 2007 4:18 PM EST
Nice!

Lets put criminals in the military!
Maybe they'll be rehabilitated?

The military is desparate for new recruits?
I wonder why.

Reply to this comment
by getcentered February 14, 2007 4:22 PM EST
I can't think of a better way to teach discipline to felons.

This could be an option for people who are going to go to prison.

Go to jail or join the Army.
I could clean out our prisons.
Reply to this comment
by randalds February 14, 2007 4:32 PM EST
Go to jail or join the Army.
I could clean out our prisons.

Posted by getcentered at 01:22 PM : Feb 14, 2007

In the late 60's (and probably before) an amazing number of people were offered that choice. More then a few criminal cases were settled with a plea bargain that included going to Vietnam.
Reply to this comment
by bluestardad February 14, 2007 4:54 PM EST
You may have noticed the coming surge of American public opinion against using our military to promote the agenda of other Countries interest! American people are learning it is ok to disagree with a President who is friends of Saudi Arabia and gives them special treatment on the world stage at the expense of American lives. For years no one would say anything against promoting Israeli agenda for fear of being labeled an anti-Semitist but now America is learning it is also acceptable to disagree with Israeli promoters like AIPAC members, Joe Lieberman of Connecticut and William Kristol of the Weekly Standard who would gladly sell thousands of American soldiers lives to promote Israeli interest! Now these same policies and neocons are pushing our soldiers toward another war in Iran. American military is made to protect American interest not the interest of other countries! Our blood and treasure should be spent only in American interest! The statue of liberty stands in New York Harbor not in the desert of the Middle East!

Reply to this comment
by j-whitman February 14, 2007 5:21 PM EST
After slamming Kerry for his comment on some troops signing up for an education,, These republicans must think,, criminals are good for our TROOPS..
Reply to this comment
by wordsmythe-2009 February 14, 2007 5:53 PM EST
Much ado about nothing.
The numbers don't justify the hype, nor do the men and women who have served their time in jail/prison. They are trying to help our country because we the civilized have closed off jobs, housing, and other services here at home. It seems some within the ranks, or those so called quality people, have also committed crimes. What about those at Abu Gharib? They weren't criminals before they entered.The military is not a monastery or convent.
Reply to this comment
by crater7 February 14, 2007 6:49 PM EST
THIS IS NOT A BAD POLICY. WE SOLVE TWO PROBLEMS HERE. HELP REDUCE OUR OVER CROWDED PRISONS, WE CAN SEND THE CROOKS TO IRAQ FOR TRAINING SO THEY WILL BE EXPERIENCED FOR THE WAR IN IRAN, THEN WE CAN ISSUE ALL THE ILEGAL ALIENS A NEW NATIONAL DRIVER LICENSE AND A BANK AMM##CA CREDIT CARD,AND SEND THEM TO IRAN TO RE-ENFORCE THE CRIMINALS. NO NEED TO BUILD THAT 700 MILE FENCE ON OUR 2OOO MILE BORDER WITH MEXICO. THINK OF ALL THE MONEY WE COULD SAVE. AND, THERE WOULD BE NO REASON TO ARREST AND PROSECUTE OUR BORDER PATROL AGENTS FOR DOING THEIR JOBS.
Reply to this comment
by agnim February 14, 2007 7:03 PM EST
Yes, let's fill the military with even more criminals for them to gain more experience at preying on people.

When they return to society, they will be 'well trained' and better equipped to wail on defenseless Americans. LOL
Reply to this comment
by sclaires February 14, 2007 7:03 PM EST
I used to work at the largest basic training base in the United States. The number of recruits who came through was large. But, the most important thing is that they are given an urine test for drugs as part of their initial processing. The number of positive tests for various drugs was tremendous. This was back in the 1970s. Then you had the ones who received waivers for various offenses. The stockade was always full of basic trainees who could not adjust to military life because of the discipline. They ended up wasting the taxpayers money since it does cost to process them into the military, give them training which they never finished, put them in the stockade, and tnen ending up discharging them. If they were drug abusers, then they had a year of counseling to go through to try to keep them off drugs for good. No, waivers just don't work!!!
Reply to this comment
by formrusmcsgt February 14, 2007 7:36 PM EST
Defense Department statistics show that the number of Army and Marine recruits needing waivers for felonies and serious misdemeanors, including minor drug offenses, has grown since 2003.

Geee....I wonder why that is? Let's see, could there be some kind of cause and effect relationship here?

Well, iraq was invaded in '03....hmmmmm. Maybe the better quality recruits decided they didn't want to be endangered in a ridiculous neocon boondoggle? Maybe???
Reply to this comment
by formrusmcsgt February 14, 2007 7:41 PM EST
AND, THERE WOULD BE NO REASON TO ARREST AND PROSECUTE OUR BORDER PATROL AGENTS FOR DOING THEIR JOBS.
Posted by crater7 at 03:49 PM : Feb 14, 2007

Cite one instance where an INS employee has been arrested and prosecuted for "doing their job".
Reply to this comment
by luckygirl042 February 14, 2007 7:43 PM EST
"Got in a little home town jam, so they put a rifle in my hand.Sent me off to a foreign land,
to go and kill the yellow man.
Bruce Springsteen, "Born in the USA".
-------------------------------------
When I was a senior in high school, in 1965, a boy I had a crush on stole a car and got caught. Instead of going to jail, since he was of draftable age, he went to Viet Nam. He made it thru, but came home addicted to heroin, he OD'd and died about 5 years later. Shoulda went to jail, I guess.
This is nothing new.
Reply to this comment
by formrusmcsgt February 14, 2007 7:47 PM EST
luckygirl042-

I saw many take to the needle in Viet Nam. A big part of it was that we all knew it was an American boondoggle, just like many of our warriors feel about Iraq.

I correspond via email with a young female warrior in Iraq and she states that most of them have to "drink the Kool-Aid" in front of the cameras to avoid courts martial, but privately, they have the same feelings we had in Viet Nam...a ridiculous and total waste.
Reply to this comment
by formrusmcsgt February 14, 2007 7:53 PM EST
Gee, I thought it was because the meals provided by Halliburton just aren't as tasty as the old stuff ... and the uniforms laundered by Halliburton just aren't as well starched. But, then again, maybe you're right. ;-)
Posted by r_bayless at 04:44 PM : Feb 14, 2007

Bro, we would have killed to have these MRE's these kids today get. We made do on C-Rats, and a lot of stale ones at that! lol.
Reply to this comment
by bildooreilly February 14, 2007 8:06 PM EST
War-huh-yeah
what is it good for?
absolutely nothing
Say it again
War-I despise
'Cos it means destruction
Of innocent lives
War means tears
To thousands of mothers how
When their sons go off to fight
And lose their lives
I said
War-huh
It ain't nothing but a heartbreaker
War
Friend only to the undertaker
It's an enemy of all mankind
the thought of war blows my mind
war has caused unrest within the younger generation
induction then destruction, who wants to die?
It ain't nothing but a heartbreaker
War
it got one friend that's the undertaker
War has shattered
Many young men's dreams
made him disabled, bitter, and mean
life is much too short and precious to spend fighting wars these days
war can't give life, it can only take it away
It ain't nothing but a heartbreaker
War
Friend only to the undertaker
We've got no place for it today
They say we must fight to keep our freedom
But Lord knows there's just got to be a better way
War
War
War-Good God, yall
Give it to me, yeah
What is it good for?
Reply to this comment
by beckestr February 14, 2007 8:18 PM EST
maybe we can say to illigal alians they can gain citizinship if they join the war in Iraq, that could help us too.
Reply to this comment
by gramto7 February 14, 2007 10:34 PM EST
BILDO-
Thank you for the words to ths song!! It has been a favorite of mine ever since it first came out....
Reply to this comment
by wordsmythe-2009 February 15, 2007 1:18 AM EST
to r-bayless

I appreciate your concern that what I wrote may be interpreted as being disrespectful to those serving. Apologies, as it was not intended that way.
However, by the same token, not all ex-cons are untrustworthy, nor are they disloyal to their country, nor would they not want to serve this country. The news article itself described the small increases in waivers, not exactly flooding the system. Also, felons covers a large group of crimes including some traffic violations. These are not murderers, rapists, arsonists nor even violent assaultive criminals. That the military would accept them is neither degrading to the military nor is it putting our country or servicemen and women in greater danger. The issue is trust; and trust is earned regardless of past. If a person, i.e. ex-con, can make it through boot camp and through the required training, why would I have reason to assume that at the last moment or the vital moment this singular person--based upon some drug incident in his past or some larceny--will now abandon his squad? The logic doesn't fit; the fear does, but not the logic. "Once a con always a con" is a faded stereotype.
Reply to this comment
by mikevilkin February 15, 2007 4:59 PM EST
How come klinton became commander-in-chief after inhaling, or did he not?

If klinton did not need a waiver when he applied for a job to keep his dirty finger on the nukelar button, then, sure as hell, those young guys do not need no stupid waiver for smoking marijuana or for been in some fist fight.
--Michael Vilkin
Reply to this comment
by frankbowers February 16, 2007 6:00 PM EST
I would like to remind this mikeevilkin if Mr Clinton (correct spelling don't blame everthing on Clinton a blow *job* which you would have enjoyed)not dumb nut* like gwb I would like for you to think who received a scholarship to the best college in the world & if he did inhale he would not have been admitted to the army in those days deserters in those days wern't allow to run for president.If U think for one minute gwb wasn't a deserter I lived in Houston from 61 to 79 on Terrydale 77037 and can recall in 72 the AP's were looking for a drug user/deserter, lt. g.w.bush. That is a fact.The best of good byes FBowers
Reply to this comment
See all 36 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
  • Viewed
  • Commented
Latest News
Featured Blogs