February 11, 2009 5:21 PM

House Opens Iraq Debate

(CBS/AP)  The House of Representatives began an emotional debate Tuesday on whether President Bush's decision to add more U.S. troops to the nearly four-year-old war in Iraq is a mistake that has to be reversed.

Democrats won control of Congress in last November's elections and were determined to pass a resolution disapproving of the president's decision to deploy more than 20,000 additional combat troops.

"The American people have lost faith in President Bush's course of action in Iraq and they are demanding a new direction," said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif.

All 435 members get five minutes each to have their say, and the resolution will likely pass by Friday, reports CBS News correspondent Sharyl Attkisson. The only real question is how many Republicans will vote for it.

The measure was nonbinding, but, reports CBS News correspondent Bob Fuss, at no time in recent history has Congress formally voted "no confidence" in a president's military orders.

"No more blank checks for President Bush on Iraq," Pelosi declared.

Countered White House press secretary Tony Snow: "Members of the House and members of the Senate have the freedom to go ahead and write their resolutions and do what they want with them. The one thing we do expect is, we do expect those who say they're going to support the troops, to support them."

Republicans, in the minority for the first time in 12 years, issued emotional warnings of the consequences of undermining the president's policies in Iraq. "We will embolden terrorists in every corner in the world. We will give Iran free access to the Middle East," said Republican leader John Boehner of Ohio. "And who doesn't believe the terrorists will just follow our troops home?"

Read the House resolution on Iraq
Boehner teared up before reporters as he listened to Rep. Sam Johnson, a Republican, describe being a prisoner of war in Vietnam and learning of U.S. protests back home.

House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md., insisted that the Democrats had no intention of impeding the mission of those in Iraq. "There will be no defunding of troops in the field. There will be no defunding which will cause any risk to the troops," he said at a news conference.

The House rejected, on a 227-197 vote, a Republican procedural attempt to force a vote on a proposal that would have barred Congress from cutting off funding for American troops in harm's way.

Democrats expressed confidence the measure would prevail and said they would attempt to use it as the opening move in a campaign to pressure Mr. Bush to change course and end U.S. military involvement in the war. More than 3,100 U.S. troops have died in nearly four years of fighting and so have tens of thousands of Iraqis.

A new CBS News poll shows that while most Americans (63 percent) are opposed to sending more troops to Iraq, they are evenly split over whether Congress should pass a nonbinding resolution against the president's plan: 44 percent said they'd like to see it passed, 45 percent are against it.

Senate efforts last week to debate Iraq foundered when Democrats and Republicans couldn't agree on what they would vote on, but Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said Tueday he still hoped to revive the issue and that the House language could be a model. "We support the troops, oppose the surge, perfect," Reid said, summarizing the House resolution.

In the House, Democrats called on several newcomers who served in the military to make their argument against further commitments in Iraq.

Rep. Patrick Murphy, a Democrat and a captain in the Army's 82nd Airborne, said that "three years after I left Iraq, Americans are still running convoys up and down Ambush Alley and securing Iraqi street corners."

But Rep. David Dreier, a Republican, stressed that "we go to war to win, we go to war with a mission." He said "we dishonor the lives of those who have made the ultimate sacrifice if we in fact abandon that mission. .... We have a duty to pursue nothing less than victory."

Republicans conceded that the measure was headed for approval and said a few dozen party members were likely to break ranks and vote for it.

"The early line is that at a minimum, you'll get two dozen Republicans to go along with the Democrats in stating their disapproval of this action by the president to send more troops to Iraq. But even some Republicans are saying privately that they might get as many as 60," said CBS News chief Washington correspondent Bob Schieffer.

"Now, if that happens, that will mean by a margin of 2 to 1, the House of Representatives is telling the president that they do not approve of the plan," Schieffer said. "If that happens, I think it's going to be very difficult for the president to go forward with this because that will embolden Democrats and those who don't approve of the war to take stronger measures … moving toward finding ways to cut off funding."

© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Add a Comment See all 198 Comments
by david1737 February 14, 2007 9:16 PM EST
Bigwhtpony%u2026The statement that you make below establishes a corporate %u201Cconspiracy%u201D to influence the media:

"But, ask yourself why all the corporate giants are trying to divest themselves of these losers? Because people are leaving them in droves and they are losing money hand over fist. People are getting fed up with the bias......they just want the truth. As do I."

Posted by bigwhtpony

Corporate giants such Disney Corp. (ABC), GE (NBC), and of course News Corp. (FOX)? In the statement above you clearly state that the conspiracy is in fact on the part of the corporations/conservatives.

Reply to this comment
by formrusmcsgt February 14, 2007 6:53 PM EST
One of the many dangers of the Bush Admins. International policy is the loss of credibility at home and abroad. After repeated lies the vast majority of Americans simply don't trust Bush.
Posted by david1737 at 03:51 PM : Feb 14, 2007

Unfortunately for us all, that perception is not limited to our geographic boundaries.....
Reply to this comment
by david1737 February 14, 2007 6:51 PM EST
One of the many dangers of the Bush Admins. International policy is the loss of credibility at home and abroad. After repeated lies the vast majority of Americans simply don't trust Bush.
Reply to this comment
by formrusmcsgt February 14, 2007 6:03 PM EST
How can anyone conceivably beleive that pulling out of the middle east will bring an end to the problems related with it, these extremists will not stop period....
Posted by notblue at 01:51 PM : Feb 14, 2007

How can anyone be so naive as to believe that the U.S. is going to bring an end to centuries of religios hatred.......
Reply to this comment
by j-whitman February 14, 2007 5:29 PM EST
Notblue,,, Uncle Sam is calling for volunteers,, Sign Up & learn something,, You'll get a signing bonus, an education, world travel, a uniform & a gun -- Be proud & part of the solution instead of part of the problem.
Reply to this comment
by getcentered February 14, 2007 5:17 PM EST
ObservantX:

NICE POST!

What ever we do about Iraq at least the House of Reps understands that President Bush should not be making any more decisions.


notblue:
"join the fight for freedom."???
When are you signing up?
I get giddy when I hear Karl Rove talking point repeated so accurately!!

"CONTINUE pay the price, embolden them, destroy freedom agenda, fight for freedom."
Reply to this comment
by bluestardad February 14, 2007 4:57 PM EST
You may have noticed the coming surge of American public opinion against using our military to promote the agenda of other Countries interest! American people are learning it is ok to disagree with a President who is friends of Saudi Arabia and gives them special treatment on the world stage at the expense of American lives. For years no one would say anything against promoting Israeli agenda for fear of being labeled an anti-Semitist but now America is learning it is also acceptable to disagree with Israeli promoters like AIPAC members, Joe Lieberman of Connecticut and William Kristol of the Weekly Standard who would gladly sell thousands of American soldiers lives to promote Israeli interest! Now these same policies and neocons are pushing our soldiers toward another war in Iran. American military is made to protect American interest not the interest of other countries! Our blood and treasure should be spent only in American interest! The Statue of Liberty stands in New York Harbor not in the desert of the Middle East!

Reply to this comment
by notblue February 14, 2007 4:51 PM EST
Bluestardad must oversimplify in order to justify his sophmoric and naive opinions. The truth is that what happens in the middle east directly affects America and if you don't attempt to stabilize it we will all CONTINUE pay the price. How can anyone conceivably beleive that pulling out of the middle east will bring an end to the problems related with it, these extremists will not stop period and leaving the fight will not only embolden them but it will enable them to continue with there destroy freedom agenda. It's time for Americans like Bluestardad to pull his head out of his *ss and join the fight for freedom.
Reply to this comment
by bluestardad February 14, 2007 4:31 PM EST
It is ok to disagree with a president who is friends of Saudi Arabia and gives them special treatment on the world stage, it is also ok to disagree with Israeli promoters like Joe Liberman and William Kristol who would gladly sell thousands of American soldiers lives to promote Israeli interest! American military is made to protect American interest not the interest of other countries!
Reply to this comment
by bluestardad February 14, 2007 4:25 PM EST
We must impeach Bush he is killing our country and if he starts a war with Iraq instead of diplomacy he should be beaten from office in discrace!
Reply to this comment
See all 198 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook