February 11, 2009 5:21 PM

Reporters Name Other CIA Leak Sources

(CBS/AP)  Three prominent journalists testified Monday that Bush administration officials volunteered leaks about a CIA operative, as I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby's attorneys sought to suggest he was not responsible for exposing her.

The jury in Libby's perjury trial heard a 66-second snippet of one of the deep background interviews given to Washington Post editor Bob Woodward for use in one of his books. They also saw a parade of Pulitzer-prize winning journalists discuss who did and did not leak the information that set off a scandal and ultimately brought Libby to trial.

Woodward, who never wrote about Plame, and columnist Robert Novak, who first identified her in print, testified that then-Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage first told them in the summer of 2003 that the wife of prominent Iraq war critic Joseph Wilson, Valerie Plame, worked at the CIA.

Washington Post reporter Walter Pincus testified that former White House press secretary Ari Fleischer, not Libby, was the first to tell him the identity of former ambassador and prominent war critic Joseph Wilson's wife in 2003, reports CBS News Justice Department reporter Deirdre Hester. This contradicted a point in Fleischer's testimony last week.

The Post's Bob Woodward and syndicated columnist Robert Novak testified they heard it from Deputy State Department Secretary Richard Armitage.

A major government witness, Fleischer testified Libby told him about Plame — earlier than Libby has told investigators he thought he first learned about her from NBC reporter Tim Russert.

On cross-examination, Fleischer also testified that he did not recall telling Pincus about Plame. The reporter's testimony Monday was the most direct hit the defense made on the prosecution's evidence that Libby lied to FBI agents and a grand jury about his talks with reporters about Plame and obstructed an investigation into how her name leaked.

Libby, the former chief of staff to Vice President Dick Cheney, is not charged with the actual leak.

The defense did show Libby had numerous opportunities to leak Plame's identity to reporters and did not. But none of Monday's testimony went directly to the precise charges that he lied about his conversations with three other reporters about her.

The day's highlight was the tape of Woodward's June 13, 2003, interview with Armitage about how Bush decided to go to war. Armitage's name was never supposed to be connected publicly to what he said. The scandal prompted him to release Woodward from his pledge of confidentiality, which freed Woodward to share the tape with lawyers in the case.

Armitage has said he revealed the name accidentally, off-the-cuff, and didn't realize that Plame's employment was classified information.

With Armitage's frequent profanities deleted, the jurors heard him tell Woodward no less than four times where she worked.

Woodward asked about Wilson's 2002 fact-finding mission to Africa for the CIA that the ex-ambassador says helped him debunk prewar intelligence on Iraq.

"Why would they send him?" Woodward asked.

"Because his wife's a (expletive) analyst at the agency," Armitage replied.

"It's still weird," Woodward said.

"It's perfect. That's what she does. She is a WMD analyst," Armitage said.

Later Woodward asked if she was the WMD chief at CIA. Armitage said she wasn't but was in a position there to suggest that her husband had contacts in Africa.

Finally, Armitage said: "His wife is at the agency and is a WMD analyst. How about that (expletive)."

Novak described trying to get an interview with Armitage in 2001 and being told the deputy secretary was "not too busy. He just didn't want to talk to me." Novak said he was rebuffed again after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

Then in the last week of June 2003, Armitage's office called to set up an interview. "I had not pressed my request for one in two years," Novak said. Once he asked about the Wilson trip, Armitage said "it was suggested by his wife, Valerie, who is employed in the counterproliferation division at CIA," Novak testified.

Novak testified he got confirmation from White House political adviser Karl Rove, who replied to him: "Oh, you've heard that, too."

After the testimony, Novak told reporters it was "uncomfortable" talking about sources in court.

"I'm glad it's over," he said.

Defense attorneys got Woodward, Novak, Pincus, New York Times reporter David Sanger, Washington Post reporter Glenn Kessler and Newsweek reporter Evan Thomas all to say they had talked to Libby about Wilson's allegations during the summer of 2003, but Libby had not disclosed Plame's identity or employment to them.

But Sanger, Kessler and Thomas said they didn't ask Libby about Wilson's wife. Woodward and Novak testified they didn't recall asking about her but said Libby didn't talk about her if they did. Pincus said Libby said he didn't know how the trip was arranged but their conversation occurred before June 12, when Libby now recalls he first learned the information from Cheney.

Defense attorneys brought out that Woodward, Pincus, Sanger and Kessler had all shared in Pulitzer Prizes.

"I believe you're the third Pulitzer Prize winner to testify this morning," Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald quipped when he began questioning Sanger. He used the moment to bring out that an earlier prosecution witness, Judith Miller, also had shared a Pulitzer Prize while working at the Times.

© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Add a Comment See all 63 Comments
by david1737 February 13, 2007 5:57 PM EST
bigwhtpony

After reading you posts, it seems like your swinging at a political pinata.
Reply to this comment
by ademeyer February 13, 2007 1:43 PM EST
This article is a muddy puddle...CBS needs new writers...here's the facts: Armitage, Rove, Libby, and Fleischer are all on record for having told Gregory, Woodward, Novak, Pincus, Sanger, Kessler, Miller, and Mitchell that Wilson's wife worked at the CIA. In other words, it's not a stretch to to see there was a concerted effort to retaliate against an administration critic by uncovering his wife's role in sending him to Niger. But the deliberate leaking of a CIA agent's identity is not the crime being prosecuted here. Fleischer received immunity from prosecution, by agreeing to testify against Libby who is accused of lying to the Grand Jury about his role in leaking the information. Fleischer states that Libby told him about Plame three days before Libby claims to have heard of it from Russert (who testifies he never discussed Plame with Libby.)Libby is on trial for the cover-up, not for leaking cassified information to discredit a war critic, which is not to say he and the other Rovians are not unethical, slimey, wormy, un-patriotic, inept, doodle-heads and a sorry reflection on the quality of people running the White House under George Bush. Them's the facts.
Reply to this comment
by abbe7 February 13, 2007 1:20 PM EST
"I observed last night that Chris Matthews, Hardball--MSNBC, failed to report that Libby had the opportunity to leak to the reporters that Wilson's wife worked for the CIA but did not. Obviously these facts do not fit Matthews agenda. At least CBS reported the facts."

Facts irrelevant to a trial where Libby is accused of perjury and obstruction. Who actually organized
the leak is somthing else and goes higher ...
P and VP ...
Reply to this comment
by bigwhtpony February 13, 2007 1:08 PM EST
Uh oh....the leftests nothing case begins to unravel like a LaCrosse DA. OMG.....what will Jerry Springer and Al Frankin do now????
Reply to this comment
by reflections4 February 13, 2007 12:31 PM EST
I observed last night that Chris Matthews, Hardball--MSNBC, failed to report that Libby had the opportunity to leak to the reporters that Wilson's wife worked for the CIA but did not. Obviously these facts do not fit Matthews agenda. At least CBS reported the facts.
Reply to this comment
by dallison7 February 13, 2007 11:23 AM EST
ROVE WAS INVOLVED?? WHAT A SURPRISE!!

WE WANT SOME INDICTMENTS... NOW!!!
Reply to this comment
by luvny-2009 February 13, 2007 11:07 AM EST
They threw Ol'Martha in camp cupcake for something so less important than this...interesting to see who all walks!
Reply to this comment
by bluestardad February 13, 2007 9:24 AM EST
Put them in Jail, all the treasonous idiots! This trial is good but Congress needs the balls to take action.
Reply to this comment
by karlimhof February 13, 2007 7:15 AM EST
Libby is charged with lying to a federal inquiry -that's enough to make a felon out of him, which he deserves.

If this trial brings out the name(s) of those who did the actual outing, bring them to court Fitzgerald!
Reply to this comment
by fascistusa February 13, 2007 2:38 AM EST
The Ministry of Propaganda has spoke.

Trust YOUR media.

Trust YOUR Government.

Big Brother LOVES you.

The Elite love their American SLAVES.
Reply to this comment
See all 63 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook