February 11, 2009 5:22 PM

Clashes Erupt At Jerusalem Holy Site

(CBS/AP)  Hundreds of angry worshippers threw stones at police and scuffled with them on Friday in an eruption of outrage over contentious Israeli renovation work at a disputed holy site in Jerusalem's Old City.

CBS News correspondent Robert Berger reports police threw stun grenades as a few dozen protesters barricaded themselves inside the Al-Aqsa mosque.

About 200 police streamed on to the hilltop compound known to Muslims as the Noble Sanctuary and to Jews as the Temple Mount, to try to quell the violence, police spokesman Micky Rosenfeld said.

Several dozen protesters barricaded themselves inside the Al-Aqsa mosque at the compound, which is Islam's third-holiest site.

Live video from the area showed stun grenades landing amid gathered protesters, who scattered as the police moved onto the scene.

It was not immediately clear whether Israeli forces had entered the mosque, a move which would ignite furor across the Muslim world.

Several injured people were seen being taken from the scene on stretchers.

Israeli security forces had tripled their usual numbers around Jerusalem's Old City Friday morning as the city braced for possible riots during Muslim prayers at the Holy Land's most contentious religious site.

Jerusalem police chief Ilan Franco told Israel Radio that around 3,000 security officers were posted around the city because of "intelligence indications" that disturbances could erupt over Israeli repair work on an earthen ramp leading to the hilltop compound.

Israeli authorities promised that the plan to replace a centuries-old ramp damaged in a 2004 snowstorm would not damage the compound, about 60 yards way. But when work began earlier this week, it drew fierce protests in the Arab world, where many leaders accused Israel of plotting to harm Muslim holy sites.

Friday prayers at the site, attended by thousands of Muslims every week, often have been a flashpoint for clashes.

Around 50 Palestinians protesting the work scuffled with police in east Jerusalem ahead of the prayers Friday, police spokesman Micky Rosenfeld said. In the West Bank town of Hebron, teenagers threw stones at soldiers, who responded with tear gas. There were no injuries in either incident.

On Thursday, a fiery Islamic leader appealed to fellow Israeli Arabs and Muslims around the world to rise up against the Israeli renovations.

"The aggression happening now is a tragedy, a crime," Raed Salah, a leader of the Islamic Movement in Israel, told The Associated Press. He accused Israel of declaring "a regional, religious war."

Israeli officials have said Muslim radicals are using the renovation work as a pretext to stoke anger against Israel. Speaking during a visit to Spain Thursday, Israeli Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni accused "political extremists" of trying to "exploit this situation."

On Friday, though, a prominent Israeli archeologist weighed in against the project.

Meir Ben-Dov, who has led excavations near the Temple Mount, said the existing ramp should be renovated rather than replaced. The government, he added, lacked the proper construction permits.

"There is no reason to take any action there," Ben-Dov told Israel Radio.

An Israeli government official, speaking on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the construction project, rejected Ben-Dov's claim, saying "all legal issues are being addressed." The new ramp was needed because the old one is unsafe, the official said.

The compound, home to the golden-capped Dome of the Rock shrine and Al Aqsa mosque, is the third-holiest site for Muslims, who believe that it is where the Prophet Muhammad ascended to heaven. For Palestinians and Israeli Arabs, it is also a focal point of national pride.

The compound is sacred to Jews as the site of their biblical temples.

Police spokesman Micky Rosenfeld said entrance to the Friday prayers would be restricted. West Bank Palestinians would be barred, as would Israeli Arab and east Jerusalem men under 45, he said.

Israel has controlled the compound since the 1967 Mideast War, but has left the administration of its Muslim holy sites largely to the Palestinians and Jordan.

In another major development, Palestinian factions have agreed to a national unity government in which the ruling Islamic militant group Hamas and rival Fatah faction will share power, Berger reports.

Israel has given a cool reaction to the Palestinian agreement, however, saying it must meet three international conditions: recognition of Israel, renunciation of violence and accepting previous peace agreements.

Berger says the new government falls short of that — it says it will "respect" previous peace agreements but there is no mention of recognizing Israel or renouncing violence.

© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Add a Comment See all 176 Comments
by lars008-2009 February 11, 2007 4:08 AM EST
ISLAM EMPTIES BETHLEHEM OF CHRISTIANS
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Printab
http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=36406

'Greedy monsters' ruled church
SPECIAL TO THE WASHINGTON TIMES
BETHLEHEM, West Bank %u2014 The Palestinian gunmen holed up in the Church of the Nativity and later deported by Israel seized church stockpiles of food and "ate like greedy monsters" until the food ran out, while more than 150 civilians went hungry.
They also guzzled beer, wine and Johnnie Walker scotch that they found in priests' quarters, undeterred by the Islamic ban on drinking alcohol.
Angry Orthodox priests yesterday showed two reporters about 20 empty bottles of whiskey, champagne, vodka, cognac and French wine on a kitchen shelf and on the floor of two rooms.
"They should be ashamed of themselves. They acted like animals, like greedy monsters. Come, I will show you more," said one priest, who declined to give his name.
"Palestinians took candelabra, icons and anything that looked like gold," said a Franciscan, the Rev. Nicholas Marquez from Mexico.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/world/20020515-89391238.htm
Reply to this comment
by feelfree1 February 10, 2007 7:19 PM EST
bluestardad,

"The middle east is not in Americas interest! Pull out 50 years of investment in blood, money, and effort has proven no results!"

Good points, and thanks for the information on the AIPAC.
Reply to this comment
by mitdgreenb February 10, 2007 4:14 PM EST
And in terms of aid... your contribution to Israel was roughly $15. In return for your $15, you got the chip in the PC in front of you (if it's a new PC), technology in your Cell phone, produce, and more. You got a trading PARTNER.

Your contribution to Egypt was $12. For your $12, you got a mediator in the Middle East. I think you'll agree that that was worth it.

Your contribution to Native Americans was a lot less (unless you frequent casinos).

And your contribution to Arab states (through the purchase of gasoline and heating oil) was a lot more. In return for your gas money, you sponsored suicide bombers. Well done.
Reply to this comment
by bluestardad February 10, 2007 4:13 PM EST
Hey Congress, We know you cannot protect innocent high school pages in the Halls of Congress nor put Pedophiles in Jail like Mark Foley, how about thieves of billions of dollars, and Liars that cause the deaths and Maiming of Thousands of American Soldiers and sends our country to a war on a lie? The Middle East is not in American Interest, we have invested 50 years of blood, and money is enough is enough! Did the Israeli or Saudi Arabian Neocons slip you some money how about thirty pieces of silver for your vote or compliancy in this war?
Write your congressman and let them know how you feel! firststatehttp://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm
Reply to this comment
by mitdgreenb February 10, 2007 4:12 PM EST

To the contrary, I am not trying to justify one set of violence with another. I am trying to give people -- people who have clearly not traveled much -- some perspective. The rest of the world views time a bit differently from Americans: the entire European invasion of the Americas over the last 500 years represents just 1/10 of history in the Middle East and Asia. So most of the rest of the world sees things that Americans did "a long time ago" from our perspective as having happened a much shorter time ago from their perspective. When Americans say things like Apartheid are bad, others say America had Apartheid until 50 years ago... which to them is as 5 years of our history. Get it? Just take a minute to think about how hyporitical and arrogant we look to people who were building great cities like Alexandria and Jerusalem and Beijing when (most) of our ancesters were busy living in caves and deforesting Europe. For instance, Americans who argue that Israel is "occupying" land it won (in a war that was not started by them)... should remember that places like California and Texas were annexed in the not too distant past. Americans who argue that Israel has misappropriated "native" Palestinian land... should remember that places like South Dakota and Oklahoma were given to the Indians "as long as the Sun rises in the East." I am not arguing right and wrong... I am simply arguing against hypocracy.
Reply to this comment
by bluestardad February 10, 2007 3:41 PM EST
The middle east is not in Americas interest! Pull out 50 years of investment in blood, money, and effort has proven no results!

Founded in 1953 by Isaiah L. "Si" Kenen, AIPAC's original name was the American Zionist Committee for Public Affairs. According to UCLA political science professor and author, Steven Spiegel, "the tension between the Eisenhower administration and Israeli supporters was so acute that there were rumors (unfounded as it turned out) that the administration would investigate the American Zionist Council. Therefore, an independent lobbying committee was formed, which years later was renamed [AIPAC]." [SPIEGEL, p. 52].[citation needed] Today, AIPAC has over 100,000 members.[1]
Activities and stated goals
AIPAC's stated purpose is to lobby the Congress of the United States on issues and legislation "to ensure that the U.S.-Israel relationship is strong so that both countries can work together" to meet the challenges of "stopping Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons, fighting terrorism and achieving peace".[2] It regularly meets with members of Congress and holds events where it can share its views. It also provides analysis of the voting records of U.S. federal representatives and senators with regard to how they voted on legislation related to Israel. The New York Times described AIPAC on July 6, 1987 as "a major force in shaping United States policy in the Middle East."
Reply to this comment
by feelfree1 February 10, 2007 12:44 AM EST
MITDGreenb,

Re: "FeelFree -- I believe there are some Sioux or Mohegans or Seminoles who see you as the occupier. When will you stop provoking them?"

What a shameful testimony it is, that the best defense that the miserable Israelis can offer is to point to the misdeeds of others, as if that might provide some justitfication for their many horrific crimes and atrocities. It does not.

If there is one issue that most Americans appear to be united on, it is that the billions upon billions of dollars of U.S. tax dollar funded welfare payments to the Israeli state, is an extremely poor investment, and should stop immediately.

Most of the people on this earth will celebrate mightily, when the Israeli terror-State finally collapses. Israel is the perfect example of the disasterous consequences of constructing a State based on religion.
Reply to this comment
by mitdgreenb February 10, 2007 12:25 AM EST

FeelFree -- I believe there are some Sioux or Mohegans or Seminoles who see you as the occupier. When will you stop provoking them?
Reply to this comment
by mitdgreenb February 10, 2007 12:19 AM EST

Sharn -- Only you and Mel Gibson seem to hold to the belief that the Jews killed Jesus, in contradiction to the New Testament that you cite, the Catholic Church, and just about every other sane person. And how is it that, although Christians hold both Testaments as holy, you somehow have divined that one has been altered?

And Jews don't deny that Jesus existed. They deny only that Jesus was any more than an outstanding Jewish rabbi... a great teacher with Jewish disciples in a troubled time. You take it on faith, literally, that he was more and criticize those who disagree with your interpretation. Shame on you.

And you mention Wiccans, victims of a prolonged propaganda campaign by Christians. Goebels was right: if you say something loud enough and often enough, the weak-minded [like you] will come to believe it's the truth. I don't believe in an animist religion... but I don't think people who do are heathens... or somehow more legitimate than Jews (as you imply) or less legitimate than Christians.

Rick -- I forgot about killing witches. Christians did that too, but I am sure this counted as "lovingly and gently" advising them of their sins. Somehow the visions that those hanged (not burned) in Salem saw were heresy, while the visions John saw were Gospel. Not sure how that works without hypocracy. Oh wait, that was a LONG time ago and Christians are much more enlightened now. Like your friend Sharn.
Reply to this comment
by feelfree1 February 9, 2007 11:59 PM EST
Once again, the Israeli terror-State tries to provoke a fight with the victims of their occupation.

What a disgusting country.
Reply to this comment
See all 176 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook