Gore, Branson Announce Climate Prize
Former VP, British Tycoon Team Up On "Global Challenge" To Give $25M To Global Warming Innovator
-
Play CBS Video
Video
Prize To Save Planet
Former Vice President Al Gore and Virgin CEO Richard Branson tell Harry Smith about a $25 million prize they are offering to fight global warming.
-
Video
Japan And Global Warming
As Al Gore's "An Inconvenient Truth" is released in Japan, Barry Petersen takes a look at global warming and how it's affecting the country.
-
Video
GQ Men Of The Year
ShowBuzz RAW: GQ paid tribute to celebrities such as Jay-Z, Al Gore, Will Farrell, Forrest Whitaker and Leonardo DiCaprio at its 11th annual Men of the Year event in Los Angeles.
-
Photo
Sir Richard Branson , left, throws a globe into the air watched by former U.S. Vice President Al Gore, right, at a presentation to announce the Virgin Earth Challenge, in London, Friday Feb. 9, 2007. (AP Photo/Kirsty Wigglesworth)
-
Interactive
Global Warming
The greenhouse effect, a look at the Kyoto Protocol and a history of the Earth's climate.
-
Photo Essay
Global Warning
Stars turn out for the California premiere of Al Gore's global warming documentary.
-
Interactive
Eye On The Environment
Find out how global warming, air pollution and alternative forms of energy impact our world.
In an exclusive London interview with CBS News Early Show co-anchor Harry Smith, Gore said: "What we are facing is a planetary emergency. So some things you would never consider otherwise, it makes sense to consider."
Branson announced the "Earth Challenge" prize Friday morning at a news conference in London with Gore, who served as vice president under Bill Clinton, and then failed in a 2000 White House bid before becoming a vocal environmental activist.
His recent documentary film, "An Inconvenient Truth," is credited with bringing the issues of global warming and carbon emissions much nearer to center-stage in the American media - in addition to creating an Oscar buzz and rumors of Gore being considered for a Nobel Peace Prize.
Branson, chairman of the wildly successful Virgin Group, said the prize will go to whoever comes up with the most innovative way of sucking harmful greenhouse gases out of the atmosphere.
"The Earth cannot wait 60 years. We need everybody capable of discovering an answer to put their minds to it today," Branson said at the news conference. "The Earth cannot wait 60 years."
When Smith asked the men whether their prize campaign might distract attention from the important drive to get politicians onboard the push for a greener planet, Branson acknowledged, "it's going to be a problem to get the political will of, you know, some countries, in particular America, to actually get out there and encourage people to go for smaller cars, to encourage people to use less carbon."
Gore told the Early Show co-anchor that there had been a "big shift" in American public interest in global warming, and that such a shift was the only thing capable of driving a change in the political policy of the country.
"I think you really are going to see change in the way people demand politicians in both parties make this their top priority," Gore said.
But, Branson said if the political will isn't there yet, that's just more evidence that there's an urgent need to give the private sector new incentive to solve to the problem, and that's the goal of the prize money.
Judges of the competition, which applies the basic business theory of creating a huge incentive to get a problem solved, are looking for a method to remove at least one billion tons of carbon from the atmosphere every year.
The judges include a NASA scientist and several top environmental researchers from around the world.
This is not the first time Gore and Branson have joined forces to bring attention to climate change. Gore backed the English tycoon's September 2006 pledge to devote all the profits from his transportation businesses - which include air and rail - to fight global warming.
Branson said that over 10 years, the amount allocated from his business ventures could total $3 billion.
© MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.



- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 104 CommentsPosted by bigwhtpony at 08:15 AM : Feb 09, 2007
+ report this comment
How so? You fascist have been doing this *** now for 30 years and all the while we continue to slide toward third world status. I'd say YOU clowns are the genuine zeros!
http://youtube.com/watch?v=Jcy3JbGjQwo
Good idea.....problem is liberal environmentalist's have successfully blocked construction of new Nuk plants since the 1970's. During that same time France has built 60 Nuk plants......
There is a "conflict of interest" because the environmentalist's are big donors to the Democrats............... so we may continue to have issues building them.........
We will see.
thanks Mark
A. Plant trees. Lots of them, in lots of places, and done by lots & lots of people. (Planting any long-lived vegetation will also help)
B. Stop cutting down trees (unless under highly controlled circumstances and only when absolutely necessary).
Anyhow, trees grow using carbon in the air. This can only help the vast preponderance of all people.
KH
What I take issue with is ..."before becoming a vocal environmental activist."
Please have the courtesy to research a man's work before making these ridiculous statements. Al Gore was in the forefront of environmental consciousness BEFORE he became our Vice President.
What I take issue with is ..."before becoming a vocal environmental activist."
Please have the courtesy to research a man's work before making these ridiculous statements. Al Gore was in the forefront of environmental consciousness BEFORE he became our Vice President.
Posted by marcodele at 12:22 PM : Feb 09, 2007
+ report this comment"
Close, marcodele ... actually, they'll use deisel-powered chainsaws. Machetes don't pollute, you see, and it's slow work cutting down rainforests with them.
The difference (well, one difference)between the NeoCons and real humans is that they are incapable of separating their personal dislike of an individual from that person's accomplishments, so of course this has to be bad as Gore's involved.
If Bush ever did anything worth praising, it would be a first, but assuming he ever did, I would congratulate him on it, not dismiss it because of who the person involved is. But then, I'm not stupid, bigoted, narrow-minded and ruled by hate and greed.
GREAT HEADLINE
Because after 8 feet of snow up here in New York, we need some global warming to help us with our heating bills.
.....
I mean, what's in it for them to continue to buck the overwhelming volume of supporting evidence?
GREAT HEADLINE
Because after 8 feet of snow up here in New York, we need some global warming to help us with our heating bills.
.....
In his Aliens movie, there were these huge constructs that were labeled Atmospheric Processing Stations - which were tasked with taking out all of the nasties from a planet's atmosphere to make it safe for humans during teraforming.
I've been telling people for years that these are what we need! Giant IonicBreeze machines from The Sharper Image basically.
Now if only we could get them without the aliens with acid for blood. Yes, that would be a good thing.
I mean, what's in it for them to continue to buck the overwhelming volume of supporting evidence?
Posted by briannorwood at 12:40 PM : Feb 09, 2007
+ report this comment"
Sure, several things are in it for them:
1) For the average NeoCon, the idea threatens their asinine world view that industry and money are the all-important drivers of the world, and that as long as the fat cats are getting rich and there's a war somewhere, everything is fine. They can't conceive that their plan for the world could possibly have a downside, because (like our president) they are stupid and delusional.
2) Equally, nothing their political opponents could do can ever be good. They operate on personal ideaology and antipathy towards others, not upon fact. In their world, someone always has to be wrong, but it can't be them. Their black and white thinking makes it impossible for them to realize that people who disagree with them can have good ideas - quite likely, in fact, better than theirs.
3) They are arrogant and bullying. It makes them feel good to put people down as "libs" or "hippies" or "tree-huggers". Feeling right at someone else's expense is more important to them than being right.
4) For the ones in power, they are getting massively rich from oil, and they don't care in the least what the longterm effects are, because by the time the worst of the damage hits, they'll be dead. They are so utterly selfish that it's more important that their bank balances swell than that the planet remain habitable.
Basically, it's because they are stupid, greedy, arrogant, bullying, wasteful jerks, or worst yet, toadies and wanna-be jerks. Didn't we already know that, though?
I could try to explain to you about the ability of air at particular temperatures to hold moisture, and the lake effect generating snow ... but it would be like explaining electric light to a caveman.
Oil has a thick consistancy which acts as an insulator between the earths surface and the earths core.when we pump out the oil salt water is usually pumped in to fill the void.As you know salt water has a much thinner consistancy thus allowing more heat to rise up from the earths core.
Two things need to be checked
1.ground temp from the last 100yrs.
and ground to air temp ratios.
2 We need to find out if the polar ice is warming up from the bottom side.to do this we need to look at temps from the ocean floor around the cap.
Is there any coralation between alaska`s prudhoe bay running low on oil and the changes that we`ve seen (rising water levels,weather changes)recently.
Can we make the filler agent the same consistancy as the oil being pumped out with somekind of additive or another differant agent?
Or find some kind of insulating blanket to cover the whole oil feild.
the easiest solution is to start using other sorces of power and force the major companies to release their best tecnology for transportation,standardize all parts for equipment,and think about the enviroment and not money.
P.S. I`m definitly NOT a tree hugger.
GREAT HEADLINE
Because after 8 feet of snow up here in New York, we need some global warming to help us with our heating bills.
.....
http://www.hytechapps.com
Fuel from WATER!
Conservatives in general and Republicans as a class are not the only ones who challenge the hypothesis that Global Warming (GW) is caused by human activity. Libertarians also object when the science is mostly conjecture that either GW is caused by human activity and that government suppression of human activity will solve the problem.
As many people post here can show you there are competing hypotheses such as the solar cycle, precession, and our solar system's location in the Milky Way galaxy. Also there is debate if elevated CO2 levels cause GW or does GW cause elevated CO2 levels, ie. solar heated sea water and hayfields release CO2.
The recent meeting of climatologists that voted to declare that GW is associated with human activity is suspect. If the world had a similar meeting to determine the best flavor of ice cream and everyone who liked chocolate or strawberry was excluded, vanilla would win the contest.
Consider this, 90% of the world's population does not have access to the Internet and using the Internet generally means more CO2 in the atmosphere. If those people were whipped into a panicked frenzy believing their lives were in peril, it will be safe bet they would vote to deny the Internet to those of us who have access to it and can use it for the betterment of mankind. Are you ready for that?
While all of you were talking freaking politics, and hashing over old ground, did anyone stop to even read my note (Hm?):
1. Plant trees.
2. Stop cutting down trees.
Do this all over.
Why not?
It will be good for everyone. So why not?
KJH
I would recommend you for the prize but I think the Arbor Day Foundation has beaten you to it. I was already planning on planting more Live Oaks and Pecan trees on my private wildlife preserve (the Walnuts are thriving on their own). Anyone care to make donations to offset the costs? Mr. Branson, sir?
("You're plugged into the power grid??? You're not exclusively using solar power in your northern Alaskan home???? Oh, that's baaaaad! We're gonna have to TAX that!")
They don't intend to use the taxes for cleaning up the environment, either...just to keep themselves in power, and pay for bigger Party Planes, like Nancy Pelosi wants.
Don't forget to bring your bras to throw!
Posted by bigwhtpony at 01:25 PM : Feb 09, 2007
+ report this comment"
Bigwhtpony, I see you've now given up even trying to make sense. There's no possible meaning to be gleaned from that meaningless cluster of words.
It's probably a wise choice on your part. When you try to make a point, you just embarrass yourself anyway.
You're just jealous because the only "musician" who supports Bush and the NeoCons is Britney Spears (which is telling in itself), so benefit concerts for the right are out of the question. Besides, the "Concert to Ruin the Planet" or the "Concert for Murdering Iraqis" or the "Concert to Kill More American Troops" lack drawing power among the public as a whole.
Planting trees is great, but don%u2019t stop cutting. Young trees grow faster and consume more CO2 per acre than old slower growing trees. Just use the lumber don%u2019t burn
Nobody is "jealous" about idiot liberal politicians paying Hollywood w-h-o-r-e-s to support junk science.
Get over yourself.
You get it straight.
Republicans are the elephants.
Democrats are the JACKASSES.
Do you get it now?
You may even have a point about global warming being used as an excuse for taxation. Everything else is, so why not?
I still maintain the left-wing has all the cool musicians, though.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 104 Comments