Rep. Ridicules Gov't Policy Toward Gays
N.Y. Congressman Jokes Administration May Fear "Platoon Of Lesbians" More Than Terrorists
-
Photo
(AP)
-
Interactive
Military 101
Basic training to learn all about America's fighting force.
-
Interactive
Gay In The U.S.A.
State-by-state laws on gay issues, the marriage debate and photo essays.
Rep. Gary Ackerman's criticism of Pentagon policy came as Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice testified before the House Foreign Affairs Committee.
Ackerman, a New York City Democrat, complained to Rice that the military had fired Arabic and Farsi translators after learning the translators were homosexuals.
"For some reason, the military seems more afraid of gay people than they are against terrorists. They're very brave with the terrorists, and if the terrorists ever got ahold of this information, they get a platoon of lesbians to chase us out of Baghdad," said Ackerman, prompting laughter in the hearing room.
The lawmaker, who in 2002 voted for the invasion of Iraq but is now a fierce opponent of the war, made one other crack, too, this time in reference to the Bush administration's opposition to gay marriage.
Ackerman suggested the State Department could hire dozens of outed — and ousted — former military translators.
"Can we marry up these two — or maybe that's not the right word. ... Can we have some kind of union of those two issues?" Ackerman asked, prompting a fresh outburst of laughter.
Rice, in diplomatic fashion, played it cool.
"Congressman, I'm not aware of the availability of people, but I will certainly look," she said, adding that her department has quadrupled the number of employees in critical languages.
A Washington-based gay rights group, the Human Rights Campaign, said Ackerman was right to criticize the military's policy of "don't ask, don't tell" concerning gays.
"It is clear the congressman was underscoring the ridiculousness of the 'don't ask, don't tell' policy and how it's hurting our efforts to fight the war on terror," said HRC spokesman Luis Vizcaino.
© MMVII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.



You couldn't make this stuff up - write a fictional novel about some department firing a bunch of much needed translators who help track down terrorists because they're gay, and it'll be rejected as unrealistic by any editor. But here it is in our capitol.
Is that like a gaggle of geese or a covey of quail?
Which president constructed the current regulations regarding Gay's in the military and made them federal law?
Bill Clinton with the infamous "Dont ask, dont tell" Policy.
The policy was an attempt to allow good servicemen and women to keep serving the country and to begin to move the miltary towards tolerance. Before that if you smelled gay you were out.
People in Tennessee and Texas and wherever there's a Nascar flag hanging off a front porch, need to start learning that gay and lesbian people are no different than the people in their own family, and a lot of them are very intelligent and could be used wisely by our country.
VOTE DEMOCRATIC OR VOTE FOR CORPORATE LOVIN', YOUR CHOICE
cafepress.com/warisprofitable
JOHN 3:16 - you unbelievers - read it and weep for the love that CHRIST has for you in your life, that He'd die for all of our sins and give us victory over sin and death to WHOSOEVER BELIEVES!
The Bible is a book. Deal with it.
I do not ascribe my adherence to what is good and right to some manmade words in a book - I enjoy that gift directly from the higher power without the need of metaphorical, institution-serving fiction. Deal with it.
There are people who do not believe the Bible is the spoken word of God, but rather of men - just like you. Deal with it.
The United States of America is a free country. Deal with it.
I trust you are aware that the word "homosexual" did not appear in the Bible until 1946? What was God's view on the matter during World War II?
Second, the admonitions that some so-called "christians" use against homosexuals only show THEIR ignorance of the book they deem so inviolate. They only read into it what they choose, negating the context and believing erroneous translations over facts and evidence that would show them they are wrong.
If "christians" will lie about something as serious as that, what else are they lying about?
Lastly, the "don't ask, don't tell" policy was a badly conceived compromise made necessary because the GOP controlled congress would not allow Clinton to completely open up the military for gay people to serve openly. It is rather disingenuous for GOP'ers to now blame the policy on Clinton. But then, that is the GOP way, isn't it?
LOL perfect, this is so true. They are just 30 years behind the times and don't forget those with their confererate flags too!
Posted by singinrick at 08:28 AM : Feb 08, 2007
+ report this comment
Well Ricky Dazzle us here!! Here's your chance!! List all the great and glorous things the Religious Reich has stood for! Give us all those great leaders who have stood and fought on the RIGHT side of Social and Moral issues in our past! That's the posters point and a VERY good point indeed. What have you low lifes EVER done in the history of this nation except keep a brain dead woman alive while putting the iron boot of the federal government on the neck of the husband. When I left college and went to Selma during the 60's I approached your kind and asked for you to step up and help us in our fight to overturn those laws that allowed citizens to be treated as garbage because of their skin. What did I get? I got clowns like you quoting from the Bible why it was necessary to drag a man out of his house and lynch him. So come on Ricky Boy, dazzle us here! Give us some names of those Great Leaders of the Religious Reich who stepped up to the plate during that or any other debate on these things. Where was Robertson, Falwell, Kennedy, Dobson when we were being hit with water cannons? Well??? Oh you are NOT allowed to use the actions of LIBERAL Christian's by the way. LOL Don't quote from the Bible and expect that to justify your past Sparky... won't work. Sieg Heil!!
Posted by singinrick at 08:15 AM : Feb 08, 2007
Of course not you babbling moron!! LOL The leaders of this nation have since the FIRST Congress used the term "Seperation of Church and State" to explain ALL the provisions of our constitution that they used to make sure what we have fought against would NOT happen in this nation. It was used by President U.S. Grant in 1876 in a speach to defeat an attempt to get PUBLIC funds for Religious Schools. It's even been used by Southern Fascist, Southern Baptist had it in their policy until just recently. How do you moron's get through a day... you are so stupid you are dangerous!! LOL If you like merging State and Religion you should move to Iran!!
-- Adolph Hitler
President U.S. Grant, Des Moines IA 1876
Well so much for Dobson and his attacks on the ACLU! Let's NOT allow our son's and daughters to die trying to SEPERATE Church and State while allowing this 200 plus idea be wiped out. We have allowed the Religous Reich, through their choosen one, George Bush, to distroy ONE American Belief over 200 years old. That Belief? The United States will not attack a nation that has NOT attacked us. You see our founders BELIEVED in Compromise and Negotiations... it's a shame the Religious Reich and George Bush NEVER found that out.
Instead of the "heartland" people rising up angry and booting the Republishit Party out of office, these ignorant, green-teeth Baptist Cracker idiots voted them in time and time again - because of their insistence that GOD was on the side of the Republicrap Party...that they would save America from the kweers and would protect the tadpole babies (unborn 'rights' over a mother's health and well-being). The goofs fell for it all - and here we are.
The tide has finally turned - Republiscum Party dispatched out of power and the Democratic majority put back in place. Soon to be "Madame President Clinton," but it will take DOZENS of years to get America back from the Fundamentalist Trolls that still think they matter.
Republishits...........buh bye.
And yeah, that last comment is so completely non-PC of me.
Israel and England - both accept gay/lesbian soldiers in their armies, and the world hasn't collapsed. Big surprise there. Meanwhile we lead the back of the pack once again thanks to fringe Christianists who feel a need to deny people the right to serve their country.
Bks59, the Government's current military policy is based on a specific interpretation of the Bible. Like it or not, this debate is ALL about religion.
American men are so backward when it comes to sexuality. They are like middle school children. It is time they grow up and act like men, whether they are gay or straight.
You are aware that the word "homosexuality" does not appear in the Bible before 1946?
You are aware that the word "homosexuality" does not appear in the Bible before 1946?
Posted by Fryedbread at 02:42 PM : Feb 08, 2007
+ report this comment
Now now! You shouldn't confuse this fraud or you'll face a good 15 minutes of quoting from the bible. I have gone up against his kind time after time and one story sticks in my mind. When in Selma in the 60's we went to one of the Religious Reich's Church's to ask them to help us stop the Lynching and Bombing. We stood in front of them and explained how these citizens had a right to due process and a right to have the kids of people NOT taught that Equal but different was the word of God. They stood and looked at us with a glazed look in their eye... it was obvious we were not getting through to them. They then attacked us, the "Police" threw us in Jail and if not from their HATED ACLU Attorney, there is little doubt they were going to KILL us. Why? Because we did NOT look at "Christianity" right! LOL That's what they told us... honest to God!!
-
by bm6005
February 9, 2007 9:20 AM PST
- bm6005, why do you think anyone should send themselves or anyone else into this misbegotten war? Fighting for a reason I can understand, but fighting to save Bush's PR image? Screw that!
-
Reply to this comment
-
See all 35 CommentsPosted by pakaal
Because they (rightwing nutjobs) support sending someone else to fight their war. Because Iraq had nothing to do with the W.O.T. It was & is an illegal war of their choice. Because they ignored and continue to ignore the facts.