Pelosi Jet Request Sparks Debate
Does Size Matter When It Comes To Speaker's Military Jet? Republicans Say Yes
-
Play CBS Video
Video
Pelosi Pushes For Bigger Jet
Since 9/11, the Speaker of the House has been able to use a small military jet. New Speaker Nancy Pelosi raised some eyebrows when she reportedly asked for a larger plane. Sharyl Attkisson reports.
-
Video
Pelosi: Why I Need A Jet
CBS News RAW: House Speaker Nancy Pelosi responded to questions about her use of an Air Force jetliner, saying security concerns and lengthy travel distances make it a necessity.
-
Video
Pelosi Wants A New Plane
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi ignited a political firestorm when she requested a larger jet that would allow her to travel non-stop from her San Francisco home to Washington, D.C. Susan Roberts reports.
-
-
Photo
This undated image provided by Boeing Company shows a US Air Force C-32 in flight. (AP Photo/Boeing)
-
Photo
Newly elected Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi addresses the 110th Congress in the U.S. Capitol, Jan. 4, 2007. Pelosi reportedly is asking for a much bigger jet than her predecessor, a request that has drawn fire from critics. (AP)
-
-
Interactive
110th Congress
The balance of power shifts and new leadership takes control as the latest session convenes.
-
Who's Who
Leadership Shuffle
The Democrats' success in the 2006 elections means changes at the top in the House and Senate.
-
Face The Nation
Madam Speaker
Watch an exclusive interview with Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi on Face The Nation.
Before the 2006 elections, the speaker was Republican Dennis Hastert of Illinois. Now it's California Democrat Nancy Pelosi, and she may be getting some more leg room. Pelosi reportedly is asking for a much bigger jet — a government version of the Boeing 757 that can make the trip between Washington and her San Francisco home without stopping to refuel.
The speaker's critics have dubbed it "Pelosi One." Military officials are said to be grumbling about it, and she finds herself on the defensive. Today, she insisted that size doesn't really matter.
"It's not a question of size. It's a question of distance. We want an aircraft that can reach California," Pelosi said.
A Defense Department spokesman said Wednesday that the Pentagon informed Pelosi's staff that she would be provided with a plane but that its size would be based on availability.
But an aircraft like that can also comfortably seat 50 — and Republican leader Roy Blunt of Missouri is among those questioning how all those extra seats might get filled.
"If you can say to your supporters 'Do you want to fly with me from San Francisco this week, spend the week in New York and fly back with me,' that's an incredible perk. It's an incredible fundraising tool," Blunt said.
Pelosi's office told CBS News she'll follow all the appropriate guidelines. The problem is there aren't any yet. Because of the flap, the Defense Department are said to be quickly writing the rules for the speaker's plane — with regulations on everything from size to who can go along for the ride.
A Defense Department spokesman said Wednesday that the Pentagon informed Pelosi's staff that she would be provided with a plane but that its size would be based on availability.
Video and Galleries from CBS Evening News
- Latest in CBS Evening News
- The Story Behind the Skating Babies
- Sagging Sales, Even in a Beach Paradise
- Grief, Outrage over Grave Desecrations



- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
...
- 6
- next
See all 274 CommentsIf in the future the next Speaker of the House lives in NC or PA or close by to DC, and needs to visit their home. Does that huge aircraft traveling non-stop to CA become the assigned aircraft because of a past policy change?
She should have known she'd get flack for this.
Culture of Corruption? That's Fancy Pants Nancy!
I suppose it doesn't matter to liberals that she would be using a $22,000-per-trip taxi just to fly her across the country...ALONE.
Where is the outrage, liberals?
Fat-cat got your tongue???
They will be more than happy to cart her back and forth so long as she ponies up the few thousand it will take to ride in first class where she seems to think she belongs.
This *** has gotten totally out of hand. Politicans should be riding buses if they are using tax dollars to pay their way.
Bush wants to give Halliburton 30 Billion dollars.
I can solve both problems:
For Nancy: You need a Gulfstream G-IV it can fly from San Fran to DC no problem. You don't need a frickin 757!!
Bush: You need to be impeached.
----
Strange. Only a few months ago, there was no need for DOD to write rules for jet travel options-- that is, when a different party had congressional majority.
Now that Dems need such conveyance, DOD is suddenly concerned about perks and overspending?
Check foxnews.com, for ALL the info....22 THOUSAND DOLLARS an hour to run THIS private missle and not a word about it in this story....come on CBS.....you should check fox for the truth, AND educate the blue balled left following you have here.....
I thought there was a global warming crises? Wont a bigger jet leav a huge carbon footprint? Why not give her a kite made out of hemp to get around with?
fairandbal, This news is actually bigger than the Iraq war!
Pelosi should get whats available and be satisfied. When I see the likes of some TV evangelists flying around in their private jets it sickens me. Kenneth Copelnd, Jerry Falwell, Paul Crouch (TBN), and others . . . I have to think who is paying for those multi-million dollar planes. Of course, its the people who send money to [their] ministries!
She's third in line for the Presidency. If something terrible should happen to the President and V.P. then she would step in as the acting President. Therefore her security is a matter of national security. Every time her plane has to set down and refuel it makes for a less secure situation. Hastert's home district was much closer to Washington so he didn't need a larger plane to make the trip without refueling.
OMG. That's frightening.
She's not asking for a big plane, seating capacity is not the issue. An aircraft that can consistently, safely fly between DC and San Francisco. The plane that took Hastert to Illinois does not meet that requirement without a stop to refuel, especially west bound. The government has lots of aircraft from the Gulfstream 450 and up, based in the DC area with sufficient range. The G-450 seats 8 passengers. The G-350's range would render it marginal. Any combination of weather, the jet stream, and ground or air traffic delays could require it to stop and refuel.
None of these critics had a problem with Hastert sending "his" plane to pick up Shimkus of the page board at Scott AFB to return to Aurora to be joined by Hastert for the flight back to DC to deal with the Foley scandal. She's not asking for a commercial sized aircraft despite splendiferous reporting to the contrary.
If someone at DOD says that they don't have enough jets with a G450's range or greater for the speaker to be able to use one of them, that someone is telling a noteworthy whopper, even for GWB's DOD.
The total cost per year would be better spent on those brave people trying to maintain our democracy than on total over the top luxury flight.
I appreciate the importance of her position but $300,000.00 per flight......come on.
After W and his evil sidekick, dickey, almost anybody would be an improvement. I also believe that she would simply be sworn in as President to serve the rest of this term. Since she would have served less than half the term, she could run twice more. On that cheery note, good night.
N320AW
The G-350's maximum range is 3,800 nm. She's not requesting a specific aircraft, she's requesting a specific range. Apparently the Air Force is smart enough to consider taxi time, including possible ground delays, weather, head winds especially the jet stream westbound, possible ATC reroutes, and holds prior to landing. They wisely consider the range to SFO marginal, throwing an extra hour minimum into any kind of reasonable scheduling. The G-450 and up will consistently provide the range seating the same 8 passengers as the G-350.
I'm sure there's a Gulfstream available in the Special Air Mission fleet that would make the distance and not cost so much.
- from ThinkProgress
%u201DIt was House Sergeant at Arms Wilson Livingood who initiated inquiries into the aircraft. %u201CI advised Speaker Pelosi that the US Air Force had made an airplane available to Speaker Hastert%u201D following 9/11, Livingood wrote, and %u201CI offered to call the U.S. Air Force and Department of Defense to seek clarification of the guidelines."
Pelosi%u2019s office says %u201Cit is up to the Air Force to decide what type and size of plane will be required,%u201D and that %u201Cshe has never asked for a plane or space on a plane to accommodate %u2019supporters.%u2019%u201D
Pelosi%u2019s office has already said she %u201Cwill not use the plane for political travel.%u201D
Yes, to all you Faux News junkies, never let little things like facts get in your way. Drink some more of the kool-aid, you'll be foaming again real soon.
Guess you just haven't been paying attention. The SMALL plane, while good to travel to Illinois, does NOT reach to California. LOL What get's me is the fascist concern with an upgrade of the speakers plane but no complaints when 300 TON of AMERICAN DOLLARS were flown to Iraq and passed out to whoever wanted it. You people are truly UNBELIEVABLE!!
Posted by skyk
Very good post, skyk. This is just another example of the republican sh*t slinging machine in action. We've seen it a thousand times before, it is their only method of self-validation because their policies are so damaging to our country.
Posted by rray52 at 05:36 AM : Feb 08, 2007
+ report this comment
Sparky, She and the Democrats have ALREADY paid America back for putting them in power, the rest is gravy. Do you think, even for a minute, that Sir Lies-A-Lot would be telling us anything OTHER THAN we are winning in Iraq, if NOT for Ms. Pelosi? Do you think even for a minute that the wages of the lowest paid amoung us would be going up, regardless of how much WE THE PEOPLE wanted it, if not for Ms. Pelosi? All the investigations into all the corruption of the Bush White House, although just starting, would NOT be possible without this woman. Maybe it's time for you in the hood and sheet crowd to sit down and shut up don't you think?
Give her the 757 with her name on it in BIG letters. In bigger letters, under her name print,
BROUGHT TO YOU BY THE DNC, BOUGHT BY YOUR TAXES!
LOL,LOL,LOL,LOL
By all means, let's blow $100 million bucks just so Nancy won't have to gas up like the rest of us.
Pelosi's request smacks of "four legs good, two legs better" from Orwell's Animal Farm......
Wasn't part of the election about saving money?
Posted by tru_america1 at 07:49 AM : Feb 08, 2007
Actually, Air Force one is a Boeing 747, not a 757, which is a much larger aircraft.
The democrats and the republicans are DESTROYING OUR NATION!
Aristocracy?
Plutocracy?
Take your pick!
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
...
- 6
- next
See all 274 Comments