Gay Marriage Group Tries New Tactic
Seeks Measure Mandating That Married Couples Have Children Within 3 Years
-
(AP)
-
Interactive Same-Sex Marriage Debate State-by-state coverage, opinions, history, photos and a look at the amendment process.
"When we talk about defending the institution of marriage, we're talking about the union of a man and a woman," she said. "Some of those unions produce children and some of them don't."
With I-957, "you're dictating people's choices in a way that is utterly ridiculous," she said.
However, Gadow noted that the Supreme Court's majority decision specifically mentioned procreation throughout.
The opinion written by Justice Barbara Madsen concluded that "limiting marriage to opposite-sex couples furthers the state's interests in procreation and encouraging families with a mother and father and children biologically related to both."
Gadow said the argument is unfair when you're dealing with same-sex couples who are unable to have children together.
"What we are trying to do is display the discrimination that is at the heart of last year's ruling," he said.
Even the Legislature's most prominent proponent of same-sex marriage, Sen. Ed Murray, D-Seattle, said he thought the initiative was misguided. While the "absurdity" of the Supreme Court decision should be discussed, that discussion needs to take place in the Legislature, he said.
"I don't think the initiative process should be used to determine the rights and protections of marriage," he said.
Murray, one of five openly gay lawmakers in the Legislature, is sponsoring a measure that would create domestic partnerships for same-sex couples and another to allow same-sex marriage. The domestic partnership measure has passed out of committee and a vote on the Senate floor could come within weeks.
The sponsor of the same-sex marriage measure in the House, Rep. Jamie Pedersen, said he supported the effort "to draw attention to the hypocrisy of some of those who oppose marriage equality" but opposed the initiative.
"For the same reason I don't think same-sex couples should be excluded from marriage, I don't think heterosexual married couples should be forced to procreate," said Pedersen, D-Seattle.
Supporters of I-957 must gather at least 224,800 valid signatures by July 6 to put it on the November ballot.
The measure's backers said the two additional initiatives they plan would prohibit divorce or separation when a married couple has children, and would make having a child together the equivalent of marriage.
Gadow said he hopes to raise $300,000 to spend on advertising on the first initiative.
© MMVII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie."





- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
... - 8
- next
See all 145 CommentsGet your facts straight.
1. You mentioned several times that Jesus is God. According to the "bible" he even states that he is not.
2. Secondly, the bible was written by MAN!!!!! Get it together. The lord god above did NOT just come down onto earth to pen a manuscript. MAN wrote down what HE thought god meant. Have you ever wondered why there is such inconsistencies in the gospels? It's because each apostle had his own version of what happened. And on that note, why were some of the gospels chosen to be in the bible and some not? The answer is simple...certain MEN didn't want the ideas of certain other MEN to be considered "truth". Sound familiar?
3. If in fact, you ARE going to use this man-made novel as a basis for your beliefs, you shouldn't disregard the chapters on tolerance. Or the commandment supposedly made directly by Jesus which states to "love one another as I have loved you"...love includes tolerance and acceptance.
Such a hypocrite...you make me sick.
And there are plenty of non-Christians who are pro homosexual, as there are plenty of Christians who are pro homosexual. What's your point?
"this is because some people can distinguish between right and wrong."
Yeah too bad so many say they're right using contradictory texts to try and prove it. If you're going to quote Leviticus as doctrinal evidence supporting your position, you should make sure you yourself are adhering to ALL the injunctions (like not planting mixed seeds: Leviticus 19), and don't just cherry-pick the ones that support your argument.
So much for not being judgmental. In any case, what I'm reading here is one Christian saying that other Christians aren't Christian. Y'all should discuss this amongst yourselves, I think.
But since you're quoting Leviticus, how 'bout this, from Leviticus 19:19 "You are not to wear clothing woven with two kinds of thread, wool and linen together." Wearing any mixed fabrics ninjabob2?
Or how about Leviticus 23, where we're told not to eat fruit from a new land we live in for three years?
Or perhaps Leviticus 27 - You haven't "cut the hair at the sides of your head or clip off the edges of your beard" have you ninjabob2?
And any denomination that is pro homosexuality is not built on scriptural truths, and therefore is not a christion denomination. So i realy don't give a flying *** is space what any CULT religion says.
Leviticus 18:22 "you shall not lie with a male as with a woman. it is an ABOMINATION". its not christians saying they are wrong its god and if it wasnt wrong this COMANDMENT would not have been issued, furthermore, sodom and gommorah would not have been destroyed, throughout the bible and history homosexuality has been looked down on, as peverse and unnatural. this is because they go against gods will... also it is not only christians that are against homosexuals... their are plenty of none christians who shun it as well. this is because this is because some people can distinguish between right and wrong. homosexuality is a sin that is all their is to it and to push that is like saying abortion or bestiality or necrofellia is ok, would you like it if their was a law allowing people to screw dead bodies or animals. I DONT THINK SO!!!!!! and yes they are the same thing.
How often we hear this pious refrain from those who (despite vocally denying they're judging people) then go on to say things like "it's disgusting", "an abomination" etc.
Your interpretation of the Bible is just that - an interpretation. And you have a right to believe in that interpretation. I just wonder why you write as if all Christians believe the same thing, when many denominations have no problem with g a y people being married.
"you shall not lie with a male as you would with a woman.it is an abomanation." Leviticus 18:22
I'm not judging others for being gay, God is.
I am not perfect, and i don't try to push my belifs on others, I just want people to know what the creator says about all this. He calls homosexuality an "ABOMANATION". Further more, if *** wonder why they have to defend themselvs all the time, they just need to read levivicus 18:29 "for whoever comits these abomanations(homosexuality murder ect..) they will be cut of from amung there people."
They're not pushing their beliefs, they're just demanding Christians stop telling them their beliefs are wrong. We don't live in a theocracy after all.
they need top think about what there dishing out before they complain about what other people are doin to wrong them.
singinrick, it's important to YOU, who are a member of one of many Christian denominations to make that disctinction (although I have to say I'm surprised to hear that only "some" Catholics believe in the Bible - I'd assume the vast majority of them do, since it's their religious text). To those on the outside of the mess, y'all are a bunch of folks who seem to have the same basic beliefs but who in the end differ on many, many doctrinal points, including Gay Marriage.
I can only hope God shows them the advantage of allowing others to love in their own way, rather than denying them the right based on their own specific interpretation of one specific religious text.
-John Adams
%u201CThe legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. But it does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods or no God.%u201D
-Thomas Jefferson
%u201CStrongly guarded as is the separation between Religion & Govt in the Constitution of the United States the danger of encroachment by Ecclesiastical Bodies, my be illustrated by precedents already furnished in their short history.%u201D
-James Madison
%u201CThere are in this country, as in all others, a certain proportion of restless and turbulent spirits - poor, unoccupied, ambitious - who must always have something to quarrel about with their neighbors. These people are the authors of religious revivals.%u201D
-John Quincy Adams
%u201CThe Infinite Father expects or requires no worship or praise from us.%u201D
-Benjamin Franklin
%u201CThe most detestable wickedness, the most horrid cruelties, and the greatest miseries that have afflicted the human race have had their origin in this thing called revelation, or revealed religion.... I would not dishonor my Creator's name by attaching it to this filthy book.%u201D
-Thomas Paine
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
... - 8
- next
See all 145 Comments