NEW YORK, Feb. 6, 2007

Immigration Fueling White Supremacists

Study: Ku Klux Klan And Neo-Nazis Are Gaining Members As Immigrants Become More Visible

  • Groups linked to the Ku Klux Klan, skinheads and neo-Nazis grew significantly more active between 2000 and 2005, a new study says.

    Groups linked to the Ku Klux Klan, skinheads and neo-Nazis grew significantly more active between 2000 and 2005, a new study says.  (AP)

  • News Tools Immigration Reform Plan

    President Bush lays out his vision for comprehensive immigration reform.

  • Video Archive Hot Topic: Immigration

    Video Coverage: CBS News examines the heated debate over immigration in the United States.

  • Interactive Immigration And Naturalization

    Who's coming to America? Find out what's being done to screen for terrorists and take a citizenship quiz.

(AP)  Huge street protests made millions of immigrants more visible and powerful last year, but they also seem to have revived a hateful counter force: white supremacists.

Groups linked to the Ku Klux Klan, skinheads and neo-Nazis grew significantly more active, holding more rallies, distributing leaflets and increasing their presence on the Internet — much of it focused on stirring anti-immigrant sentiment, a new report released by the Anti-Defamation League says.

"Extremist groups are good at seizing on whatever the hot button is of the day and twisting the message to get new members," Deborah M. Lauter, ADL Civil Rights director, said Monday. "This one seems to be taking hold with more of mainstream America than we'd like to see."

Old Klan chapters have been revived and new ones started throughout the South, historically the heart of the group, and in other places such as Michigan, Iowa and New Jersey, says the report, which was scheduled for official release Tuesday.

Last May in Alabama, an anti-immigration rally included slogans such as, "Let's get rid of the Mexicans!" according to the document, titled "Ku Klux Klan Rebounds."

"The Klan is increasingly cooperating with other extremist groups and Neo-Nazi groups," Lauter said. "That's a new phenomenon."

Between 2000 and 2005, hate groups mushroomed 33 percent and Klan chapters by 63 percent, according to Mark Potok, director of the Southern Poverty Law Center, which tracks hate crimes.

Precise data are difficult to pin down, but Potok's group counts as many as 150 Klan chapters with up to 8,000 members nationwide. More than 800 hate groups exist around the country, Southern Poverty research shows.

In the late 1990s, memberships in such groups was crumbling as they lost leaders and struggled to organize, said Brian Levin, director of the Center for the Study of Hate and Extremism at California State University, San Bernardino. Many hit bottom around 2000.

"Whenever you think the Klan is down and out, they find another way to reinvent themselves," he said of the recent resurgence.

Historically, the Klan's focus had been to terrorize African-Americans — through race riots, lynchings and other killings — but it reached peak membership at more than 4 million in the 1920s by focusing on immigration.

Newcomers from Ireland and Germany were portrayed as Catholic usurpers invading the United States, taking jobs from native-born Americans and undermining national fabric, Levin said.

Said Potok: "It's remarkable to look back at the nativist sentiments toward Catholics — it's very similar to what we're seeing with Mexicans now."

Today, many white supremacists blame immigrants, particularly Hispanics, for crime, struggling schools or unemployment, for instance. With many Americans already divided on how to revamp laws and practices to address the nation's swelling immigrant communities, immigration "is an issue that works for hate groups," Potok said.

Many Latinos are feeling the effects firsthand. Last September, a Kentucky family originally from El Salvador found a wooden cross burning on their front lawn just weeks after they moved in. Earlier last year, a Latino teenager in Houston was brutally beaten and sodomized while one attacker screamed "White Power!" The victim barely survived, and one attacker was sentenced to life in prison.

"I've been doing (Hispanic advocacy work) for a long, long time and the atmosphere has never been as poisonous as it has been in the last few years," said Lisa Navarrete, a vice president at the National Council of La Raza. "The level of vitriol is new."

Increasingly, fear permeates many Hispanic communities as individuals and businesses are targeted. Last year, La Raza held a workshop at its annual convention titled "Keeping Our Institutions Safe."

"It was very well attended, unfortunately," Navarrete said.


© MMVII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment See all 56 Comments
by case_core February 9, 2007 7:25 AM EST
Here in california, these immigrants have turned nice towns into complete dumps. Everywhere they go it looks like mexico. Now most whites are looked down upon because we don't know spanish. The mexicans won't even try to learn english. I praise the Klan and any other group that will stand up against these parasites. WPWW
Reply to this comment
by agnim February 7, 2007 7:44 PM EST
"Immigration Fueling White Supremacists"

That is a lot of bull!

Evil does not need 'fueling'.

White supremacist have historically exhibited their evil in America from their own devilish 'nature'!
Reply to this comment
by r-u-kidding February 7, 2007 7:14 PM EST
Had Clinton stood up for us Osama Bin Laden would have been out of service long ago....since he didn't Bush had to clean up his mess and so many Americans lost their lives on 9/11. Clinton was given Osama on a silver platter but was too "politically correct" to take him and look where that got us. Someone has to make the tough, often unpopular decision for the good of the people and Bush had to do it.
Reply to this comment
by rafterman1 February 7, 2007 7:03 PM EST
"Oh, and RaferMan, the terrorists started the war by killing thousands of innocent people on 9/11. Wake up, we need to stand up for ourselves because nobody else is going to do it...."

The terrorists didn't come from Iraq. Oh, but they are there now though, aren't they? Thanks to Bush's glorious war on terror, all we did was trade Afghanistan for Iraq as a terrorist base. Bush could have been a hero if he stopped at Afghanistan. But there wasn't much oil or reconstruction jobs for Haliburton in Afghanistan, so it was off to Iraq. Good job Bush. I hope he doesn't "stand up for us" any more, our security as a nation can't afford it.
Reply to this comment
by r-u-kidding February 7, 2007 6:27 PM EST
Oh, and RaferMan, the terrorists started the war by killing thousands of innocent people on 9/11. Wake up, we need to stand up for ourselves because nobody else is going to do it....unless we're gay, then Ted Kennedy and John Kerry will.
Reply to this comment
by r-u-kidding February 7, 2007 6:07 PM EST
RafterMan,
Would that be the war against the people that kill fetus babies?? Is that the one you were referring to?
Reply to this comment
by rafterman1 February 7, 2007 5:04 PM EST
By the way, I don't get the "conservative morality" these days. Its alright to hate gay people and legislate against them but not OK to oppose a war with questionable objectives that has killed a lot of innocent people.
Reply to this comment
by rafterman1 February 7, 2007 4:58 PM EST
"not passing gay marriage laws is standing up for morals, dumb-@ss. Read the bible...men shall not lye with men. Ever heard of Adam and Eve or Mary and Joseph? Don't say conservatives don't stand up for morals, they stand up all the time."

Pretty presumptious of you to think everyone believes in the Bible. Why should a non-Christian or an ahtiest be forced to follow a Christian rule? I thought America was for everyone, not just Christians? You can believe in what you want in YOUR church and in YOUR house, but in OUR government, the laws are for EVERYONE - Christians, Jews, Muslims, Hindus, Buddists and none of the above.
Reply to this comment
by r-u-kidding February 7, 2007 4:39 PM EST
not passing gay marriage laws is standing up for morals, dumb-@ss. Read the bible...men shall not lye with men. Ever heard of Adam and Eve or Mary and Joseph? Don't say conservatives don't stand up for morals, they stand up all the time.
Reply to this comment
by rafterman1 February 7, 2007 4:10 PM EST
"Legendary240 makes a good point, what's wrong with standing up for our country, for our people, and for our rights?"

Again, as I said to legendary240, how is being against gay people "standing up for your country"? Sounds like some people just want to stick their nose in other people's business, not protect the morals of the country. Also see my below comment about illegal immigrants.
Reply to this comment
by r-u-kidding February 7, 2007 3:56 PM EST
RafterMan,
Legendary240 makes a good point, what's wrong with standing up for our country, for our people, and for our rights?

I don't think that you can blindly put people into the republican or democratic camp, because many people don't believe all of the issues that these party's stand for. I'm sure that there are pro-life democrats and that there are pro-choice republicans. That's just one example as there are too many to list.
Reply to this comment
by rafterman1 February 7, 2007 3:39 PM EST
"They care about defending our country. They care about defending the family."

How are illegals attacking the country? Unfortuanately, the illegals everyone wants to kick out are the ones doing cr@p jobs, trying to make a living. The bad illegals (i.e., terrorists) won't be stopped one bit. In fact, most terroists will probably be legal, on student visas or something like that.

And exactly how does being against gay people and gay marriage "protect" the family? I hear all the conservatives say that, but no one has yet to prove it. What, is there only a certain number of marriage licenses allowed and if *** take them all up, straight people can't get married? Don't tell my girlfriend, she might make me rush and get married before it's to late because they gay people have arrived. If a gay couple moves in across the street, will all the straight people in the area become sterile and stop having babies?

It's your business to like or not like ***, but if you don't like what they do, then don't look, mind your own business. And it's also not people's business to try and stop what gay people do in their private lives. What if *** came to power and tried to get laws passed to stop straight people from getting married? Wouldn't care for that I'll bet.






Reply to this comment
by rafterman1 February 7, 2007 3:29 PM EST
"George Bush is trying to give them amnesty as we speak so that they can all stay here."

Yeah, and republicans are fighting him tooth and nail.

Again, if you are a cetain race and given traits based on that race, that is stereotypical. You can't change your race or origin. But political views will put you into one camp or another. You can change your political views over time and you can match your political views to a party or a political philosophy. You have a choice in that matter. And right now, in 2007, people that support things like anti-gay marriage, tough immigration bills and cutting welfare and such will gravitate towards the republican party and are generally conservative in other matters. If they didn't support those things, they would gravitate towards dems and liberals. In this case, people go to the politcal allegiance, the political allegiance doesn't come to them. That is not being stereotypical. While few people join the KKK and a vast majority of conservatives aren't racists, the ones that do join the KKK and are racist, the majority of them are conservatives.

Reply to this comment
by legendary240 February 7, 2007 3:27 PM EST
I love it. Republicans and conservatives are by your own admission the ony people in this country with sense enough to care.(or fear as you call it)
They care about the border. They care about defending our country. They care about defending the family. They care. Okay, I get it. I guess that the inverse of that is true with democrats and liberals then. You plainly infer that no one would be taking issue with any of this if the republicans and conservatives weren't carrying the flag for it. You are right.
Reply to this comment
by legendary240 February 7, 2007 3:22 PM EST
WHOA! Pull the reins Rafterman. The republicans and conservatives are not BANNING anything. You can't ban what doesn't exist. They are responding to the threat of these agendas because the electorate are demanding it. Why hasn't the same-se+ marriage issue been voted in? Because the people don't want it and a lot of them are democrats.
Reply to this comment
by legendary240 February 7, 2007 3:19 PM EST
I didn't mean that you were trying to arrest my thoughts. I meant this POLITICALLY-CORRECT nonsense that is pervading the whole country. You know, the FEELINGS crowd that are like a Hindu who is afraid to walk through grass because they might step on an insect and kill it. Ii watch people try to tap-dance around people feelings everyday. That's why we have feelings. If they hurt you respond to the person hurting them - but I guess that might hurt their feelings too. And we wouldn't want that now would we? Be a nice boy and play nice.
Reply to this comment
by r-u-kidding February 7, 2007 3:12 PM EST
RafterMan, why are you stereotyping conservatives as the ones trying to kick ILLEGAL immigrants out?? George Bush is trying to give them amnesty as we speak so that they can all stay here.
Reply to this comment
by rafterman1 February 7, 2007 3:04 PM EST
"But I am courageous enough to tell you that I don't accept everyone. I refuse to be straight-jacketed into a politically-correct position to where I am allowed no other form of thought except that mandated by another."

And I am courageous to tell everyone that I don't give a cr@p is someone is gay or an immigrant or whatever. It's not my business. You never heard of live and let live? There's nothing "politically correct" about that. H3ll, I don't even care if someone is a racist, again, their business (unless they try and make racist laws or commit crimes, then it's everyone's business). But this is a discussion forum, so we discuss. I'm not trying to force you into anything.
Reply to this comment
by rafterman1 February 7, 2007 3:00 PM EST
R-U-Kidding,

No, it isn't the same thing and you know it.

legendary240,

I came into the forum and saw people complaining about how republicans were being blamed for a surge in racists' recruitment. The usual liberal media conspiracy stuff that repubs like to blame for, well, pretty much everything that goes wrong. I pointed out that conservative policies on things like banning gay marriage and anti-immigrant legislation were creating a climate where bigoty can become acceptable and even legislated into our laws. It gives hope to these racists that they still have a voice in America. That's no stereotype. Are liberals the ones pushing to ban gay marriage or to kick out all the illegal immigrants out? No, the conservatives, along with some moderate democrats are doing that. That's what's helping to create the climate. Throw in a good dose of anti-Muslim, terrorist fear (agains, stoked mainly by conservatives), and the racists are more encouraged than ever. Identifying political and social trends among politicians and voters is not stereotyping.
Reply to this comment
by legendary240 February 7, 2007 2:51 PM EST
Liberals are not accepting of all others unless those "others" are too young to vote. Why try to ascend a pedestal, you'll only fall off. I am a white, conservative, born-again Christian, middle-class, legal citizen of the USA. But I am courageous enough to tell you that I don't accept everyone. I refuse to be straight-jacketed into a politically-correct position to where I am allowed no other form of thought except that mandated by another. This country was formed by independent thinkers and it will preserved by the very same. Consider yourself tolerant all you want, just why don't you tolerate the intolerant?
Reply to this comment
See all 56 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie." Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
  • Day in Pictures Day in Pictures

    A Glimpse at the Day's News as Seen Through a Camera Lens

  • Fort Hood's Fallen Heroes Fort Hood's Fallen Heroes

    A Look at Those Who Lost Their Lives in the Fort Hood Massacre

  • Veterans Day 2009 Veterans Day 2009

    Respects are Paid to Soldiers Around the Country and Abroad

  • BMI Country Awards BMI Country Awards

    Country's Finest Walk the Red Carpet for the 57th BMI Country Music Awards

  • Day in Pictures Day in Pictures

    A Glimpse at the Day's News as Seen Through a Camera Lens

  • Celebrity Circuit Celebrity Circuit

    James Woods in Court, Michelle Obama on "Sesame Street"; Plus, Premieres for "The Road" and "A Single Man"

Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: