Study: Children Bombarded With Online Porn

66 Percent Of Children Who Have Seen Internet Porn Images Said It Was Unsolicited

(CBS/AP)  More children and teens are being exposed to online pornography, mostly by accidentally viewing sexually explicit Web sites while surfing the Internet, researchers say.

Forty-two percent of Internet users aged 10 to 17 surveyed said they had seen online pornography in a recent 12-month span. Of those, 66 percent said they did not want to view the images and had not sought them out, University of New Hampshire researchers found. Their conclusions appear in February's Pediatrics, due out Monday.

Parts of the study were released last November and found that one in seven had received "unwanted sexual solicitations or approaches in the past year."

Some kids, like cyber-savvy 10-year-old Ryan Morano, already know how to cope, CBS News technology correspondent Daniel Sieberg reports.

"Something could pop up at any time," Morano said. "And if you don't have a pop-up blocker, you could be exposed to these bad pictures."

Online pornography was defined in the study as images of naked people or people having sex.

"It's so common now, who hasn't seen something like that?" said Emily Duhovny, 17.

The Marlboro, N.J., high school senior said X-rated images pop up all the time when she's online. Duhovny said the first time she saw one, it was shocking, but now, "more than anything, it's just annoying."

"It doesn't have to be a negative thing, but that shouldn't be how you learn about sex education," said Duhovny, an editor for Sexetc.org, a teen-written Web site on sexual health issues affiliated with Rutgers University.

In the survey, conducted between March and June 2005, most kids who reported unwanted exposure were aged 13 to 17. Still, sizable numbers of 10- and 11-year-olds also had unwanted exposure — 17 percent of boys and 16 percent of girls that age.

"It comes as no surprise that teens are exposed to both wanted and unwanted sexual material online. That’s all the more reason for parents to keep in close touch with their kids, keep computers in a central area of the house and – if necessary – use parental control software that blocks inappropriate sites," CBS News technology analyst Larry Magid said.

More than one-third of 16- and 17-year-old boys surveyed said they had intentionally visited X-rated sites in the past year. Among girls the same age, 8 percent had done so.

The results come from a telephone survey of 1,500 Internet users aged 10 to 17, conducted with their parents' consent.

Overall, 36 percent had unwanted exposure to online pornography, including some children who had willingly viewed pornography in other instances. The 2005 number was up from 25 percent in a similar survey conducted in 1999 and 2000.

The latest survey has a margin of error of plus or minus 2.5 percentage points.

Online use that put kids at the highest risk for unwanted exposure to pornography was using file-sharing programs to download images. However, they also stumbled onto X-rated images through other "normal" Internet use, the researchers said, including talking online with friends, visiting chat rooms and playing games.

Filtering and blocking software helped prevent exposure, but was not 100 percent effective, the researchers said.

Better methods are needed "to restrict the use of aggressive and deceptive tactics to market pornography online" without also hampering access to legitimate sites, the researchers said.

University of Chicago psychiatrist Sharon Hirsch said exposure to online pornography could lead kids to become sexually active too soon, or could put them at risk for being victimized by sexual predators if they visit sites that prey on children.

"They're seeing things that they're really not emotionally prepared to see yet, which can cause trauma to them," Hirsch said.

Exposure also could skew their perceptions about what constitutes a healthy sexual relationship, said Janis Wolak, the study's lead author and a researcher at the University of New Hampshire's Crimes Against Children Research Center.

Still, many survey participants said they were not disturbed by what they saw, and Wolak said research is needed to determine how exposure to online pornography affects kids.

[bluestardad]

Yea the little beggars pull the stuff up on their own! Then say it was an accident when they get caught!

[nothappyatall]

Oh come off it, TRAUMATIZE?? boys age 10-17 seeing nudephotos and porn??? I've been on the net for 13 years and hard core porn does not simply pop up by "accident" unless you are visiting an adult oriented web site.


"Still, many survey participants said they were not disturbed by what they saw,"

Then what's the PROBLEM? those were obviously not "traumatized"

How MANY were in this survey? it doesn't even say, so the number of kids surveyed could drastically affect the results and not be correctly extrapolated as an accurate national representation.

[politicalnow]

I am in legal suit to prevent pornography from being forced on children. It is very simple to stop but litigation shows that the Federal Judiciary in is immoral accord like watching and getting free porn.

You already know I am suing over this criminal behavior. The problem being is that some people like a corrupt judiciary.

[anopinion1]

most statistics out their are just plain garbage, and this one follows the trend.
Some idiots call 1000 households out of the millions of households we have around the U.S. and spoon feed the people to get them to say what they wanna hear.
(even if they dont do this it is still way way way to small of a # of people talked to in these studies)
I hate the ones that say their is a +/- 3 % margin of error like they any clue what is going on.

[olebd]

Heck, I can remember being 7 or 8 back in the 70's and my friends and I stumbled upon our parents porn without any ill effects. Kids 10-17 know exactly what they are doing on the computer and are not "victims" by their own (intended) actions. They'll "find" it any way they can! Just part of the hormonal urge.

[sanityindeed]

This is very misleading... Let's see. an adult calls up a parent and gets their permission to talk to their child about on-line pornography... and the kids are expected to be giving open and honest replys? I mean with mom or dad probably in the room listening to the conversation? "So have you ever seen on-line porn?" "Well, yes..." "And did you go there deliberately?" "OH NO, OF COURSE NOT... it, err, JUST POPPED UP ON MY SCREEN!!" Riiggghhhttttt...
If you know ANYTHING about the Internet you know things usually don;t "just pop up" unless you are looking for them. If you go to Google and search on "Care Bears"... a naked couple engaged in *** acts RARELY 'pops-up' on MY SCREEN!!!???
I must be doing something wrong... hummmmm....

[syphlis]

in the 17 YEARS i've been using the F**king internet i've never just *stumbled* on porn unless i was searching for it, this "survey" doesn't prove anything

[swiftyj1]

I agree - it does NOT just pop up on the screen. Those kids were searching for it.

[CBSTV]

When will Americans stop squirming in their seats and giggling nervously when they see images of naked humans and adults having ***? Is there something inherently evil about the body in its natural form? Is sexual activity a shameful act?

I think our uneasiness with nudity and *** stems from the misguided lessons of our parents and religious institutions. When I was a kid, I didn't feel that images of *** were taboo until my mother said they were "dirty" and "forbidden." When you grow up with these values around you, it's hard to dismiss them even as an adult.

How does society advance beyond this Puritanical nonsense? Begin by letting young people pursue their own natural curiosity about ***. The sky will not come tumbling down, and the next generation of Americans might have one fewer silly hang-up.

[CBSTV]

If we need another example of society's bizarre attitude towards S-E-X, notice how the "S" word was replaced by asterisks in the below message.

[olebd]

Pre-internet, mom and dad kept it in their nightstands.

These days, go to your local video store. Some of the covers on the DVD are pretty revealing. If I was a kid, I could sore those images in my head for a while to assist my bursting libido :)

They are going to see it in one form or another. It's our job as parents to educate them on exactly what they are seeing. It's normal behavior to be curious....only when you completly take it away will they turn to more deviant methods of trying to stave off their urges and gain a more confused sense of good and evil (much like the Taliban who routinely rape)

[drudge2]

"More children and teens are being exposed to online pornography, mostly by accidentally viewing sexually explicit Web sites while surfing the Internet, researchers say."

From the first line we see the political abuse of language. What is the definition of pornography? Is it really something different than "sexually explicit"? This article is just propaganda in the war on a free and open Internet.

[thgdriver]

66 Percent Of Children Who Have Seen Internet Porn Images Said It Was Unsolicited.

Yeh, Right, and they all "never" skip school or "cut"classes either. When they tell their parents they are going to the library to study, or a sleep over at Sue Smiths house, thats where you will always find them. They have never tasted beer or smoked weed either.

Those kids were searching for it at one time or another and then the pop ups begin.

The kids are lying their butts off so as not to get in trouble with mom and dad.

Who did this survey anyway, if someone called my home taking a survey on S-e-x and wanted to talk to my 10 year old, I probably would hang up but even if I said yes, I would have to be on the extension and my 10/12 year old would know that.

[michellem99-2009]

I am in my 50s and I use the filters that are on the computer. I don't allow anyone to use my computer. I think porn and nude photos should have their ending or colour code not used by the commom web sites. I know what the human body looks like for both genders so I don't care for the trash. No child should view such trash. I DON'T. I feel that Mum and Dad need to teach and lay down the rules and stick to them no matter what Jane/John Doe does that break the family rules. No ifs ands or buts here. Mum and Dad are the care takers of the children. Why didn't/don't the parents block such trash from the family computer in the first place? I love Google and they are good. There is good out there on the web for everybody. The computer is a tool. I feel that them dirty sites are not good places to be if you are a child, close the sites and not view them.I don't think the sites are accidents. Some grown up didn't block the nasty sites when they should when there is children in the home. Know what your children do on the computer. Have a nice day.

[johnax88]

I must be missing something important. I never seem to get unsolicited porn just lots of offers to buy unwanted stocks on wall street in my in box.

I personally think those having a problem with porn have a problem with themselves and a strong desire to determine what others should be allowed to see.

If a kid actually does "stumble" on a porn site it is pretty easy to close the window.

I am quite surprised at all the kids that did not want to see the porn. This is a good sign for our country and the morals of our children. These kids should be congratulated and the researchers pleased that most kids simply are not impacted by the porn.

[gunownerdan]

Why be a responsible parent when the TV and the computer can raise your kids for you?

thgdriver

you make a good point about the parents knowing. What teen or preteen in their right mind would admit to things when their parent is around!

[olgreyghost]

Bombarding is a proactive, aggressive military activity. What these children are seeing are accidental (so they tell their parents) glimpses into the world of pornography. I don't think there is a conspiracy amongst "smut-sellers" to shove this down the children's throats (grant you, some pedophiles use pornography to seduce children into sexual behavior) but after we censor pornography out of existence, what other subversive communications can we suppress in the name of saving the children? Posting of some radical political opinions here at CBSNews, maybe?

[anopinion1]

When i was 13-14 i believe my dad sat me down and put in a porno one day after i had been asking him about *** repeatedly.

just depends how morman your parents are or something.

[bildooreilly]

I worked for a webhosting company for awhile at one time that had a lot of adult sites on it. Those people don't want your bratty kids on their sites, they want adults with credit cards. Since when was everything in this world supposed to be meant for children... Are we going to turn the whole freakin world into disneyland?

[cadmantwo]

I don't even want to get in on the argument. But, I have to make a comment. After reading the article, all I can say is that the headline writer needs to back to school and take a course in journalistic responsibility. "Bombardment" is not 42% encountering porn online(and some of them were looking for it). Bombardment is totally inescapable, and targeted. London was bombarded during WWII. This isn't even close!

[bildooreilly]

Almost all of my spam is for Bob Doles Viagra.


----------------------------------------
must be missing something important. I never seem to get unsolicited porn just lots of offers to buy unwanted stocks on wall street in my in box.

I personally think those having a problem with porn have a problem with themselves and a strong desire to determine what others should be allowed to see.

If a kid actually does "stumble" on a porn site it is pretty easy to close the window.

I am quite surprised at all the kids that did not want to see the porn. This is a good sign for our country and the morals of our children. These kids should be congratulated and the researchers pleased that most kids simply are not impacted by the porn.
Posted by johnax88 at 12:36 PM : Feb 05, 2007
+ report this comment

[tuckerndfw]

Did not seek them out?

That's odd, I have never encountered porn unless I sought it out.

And, I've been using the I'net since it became available to the public. Maybe these little darlings aren't being quite honest when they claim they didn't seek it out.

Or, maybe the researchers actualy work for Jerry Falwell or some other Christian terrorist organization and aren't being quite honest.

In any case, with rare exception, no one is exposed to porn unless he seeks it out.

Finally, why would porn producers target kids? They can't buy anything, so why bother?

[mahdeealoo]

I was shocked to go on line using my daughter's (12 years old) computer that she shared with her older sister and was assaulted with a pop up of a *** act being performed that was as graphic as it can get. It turns out that my 18 year old's boyfriend had used her computer to access porn. She was still playing with dolls back then. No matter what I did to the computer to stop it, the explicit hard core porn pop ups kept coming. We replaced the computer. Now many years later, thankfully, there are programs to quell the onslaught.

[seanv137]

And, I've been using the I'net since it became available to the public. Maybe these little darlings aren't being quite honest when they claim they didn't seek it out.

---------

exactly. they are acting like they just turned on the computer, went to cbsnews...and then a pornsite popped up.

my guess is that they knowingly went to the pornsites first, and then unknowingly picked up some spyware that is now tracking them and hitting them with pop-ups all the time.

want to truly avoid all porn sites?...then use search engines that filter adult content and use a good anti-spyware and a good cookie blocker program.

very, very simple.

[bildooreilly]

Here's the deal, online porn makes a lot of money. The feds know this, pornorgraphers get W-2's and pay taxes just like everyone else. So they want to regulate it more so they can make more money off of it. Also Rupert Murdoch of Fox owns the biggest adult sattelite tv channel, and GM is putting pay per view porn in hotel rooms and these people are raking it in off the smut. They all donated a lot of money to the politicians in both parties though so you never hear about your kids being exposed to that..

[rikedoid]

If you use Internet Explorer and have any semblance of adware or spyware on the pc, you'll get popups. (This stuff gravitates to IE with active X component).

Use Opera or Firefox and the problem abates. Opera is particularly resistant to this, hit F12 and select your options.

[charlesdjohn]

This is exactly how prohibition came into law. This is how the Gun Ban crowd works their magic. Why then, should the Porn Control Squad be any different? Bottom line, the tactics work! Conjure up a study, inflame the public, shove a law down their throat and then praise yourself for such a wonderful job. And while you are at it forget about the 15 year old boy in Arizona that was convicted of a Class 6 Felony for showing a Playboy to one of his friends at school! Hell, come to think of it the prosecutor and most of the justices are probably guilty of the same Class 6 Felony! They just haven't been prosecuted for it. I believe the term "To the victors go the spoils..." applies here... The beauricats can have their porn and prosicutions too!

[charlesdjohn]

This is exactly how prohibition came into law. This is how the Gun Ban crowd works their magic. Why then, should the Porn Control Squad be any different? Bottom line, the tactics work! Conjure up a study, inflame the public, shove a law down their throat and then praise yourself for such a wonderful job. And while you are at it forget about the 15 year old boy in Arizona that was convicted of a Class 6 Felony for showing a Playboy to one of his friends at school! Hell, come to think of it the prosecutor and most of the justices are probably guilty of the same Class 6 Felony! They just haven't been prosecuted for it. I believe the term "To the victors go the spoils..." applies here... The beauricats can have their porn and prosicutions too!

[anopinion1]

the only way i ever stumbled across porn was when i first used kaaza (downloading search engine a supped up version of napster with pirated movies music porn everything games) it has been banned now i think but anyway. I searched for song names and sometimes it came up with a entertaining video their on the list that i could download.
but still i had to click to download the video.

[cantshutup]

Now it is true that you won't get porn unless you've looked for it at some point, and then you get the pop ups...However, even with a good filter some smut will still pop up even without searching for it...For example, your kids are googling images of hello kitty and even though you've got strict filtering, some stuff gets through and the kids are gonna see some "kitty" alright...you have to be deligent, keep an eye on what they're doing instead of using the computer as a babysitter as some parents do with the tv...control what goes on in your own house or the government is gonna do it for you!

[cantshutup]

and you don't have to use internet explorer which sucks anyway, use firefox or mozilla!

[tuckerndfw]

CharlesDJohn,

to go along with your story, there was a recent story about some kid whose computer had become infected by a virus that used his computer as a proxie to send "porn" to others via e-mail.

And, the prosecutor's office was too incompetent to determine it was a virus, so they charged the kid with distributing porn.

Witch hunts rarely result in good laws.

"Porn laws" should all be repealed and anyone who advocates passing "porn laws" is unqualified to hold office.

If mommy & daddy can't control their little darlings, taxpayers have no obligation to do so.

[tuckerndfw]

If parents do not want their little darlings to see images of naked humans doing what dogs do every day in public, then DO NOT allow them to use the I'net without personal, direct supervision.

Which includes a preview of all images before the little darling might be exposed to such things.

Maybe they can watch people being blown to pieces on some commercial tv station while their parents are busy screening their computers for harmful images of naked people.

Moralists' hypocrisy is tiresome to the extreme.

[lavampire]

Prior to 1995, when the first browser appeared, men and woman in civilized societies learned by reading books and listening to lectures in a classroom setting. Moreover, Sesame Street and Mister Rogers too taught many of us men and woman who are now running the country a thing or two about life and about our A,B,Cs. So please tell me why on earth a child of less than 18 years of age needs the Internet to learn and to develop intellectual skills.
Parents of America, pull the plug on the Internet and head back to the libraries of America. You do not need a computer image or the Internet to enlighten the mind. From what I know, at least Abraham Lincoln, Thomas Jefferson, Issac Newton, or even Albert Einstein or Madame Currie never never required of it, and they surely accomplished much in life.

[seanv137]

Maybe they can watch people being blown to pieces on some commercial tv station while their parents are busy screening their computers for harmful images of naked people.

Moralists' hypocrisy is tiresome to the extreme.

----------


you know it has always amazed me how in our culture it's so ok to watch violence, gore, people getting maimed, butchered, and tortured on tv...but show two people having mutual pleasure and expressing love in their natural nakedness and they flip their wigs, go to code red and call in the national guard.

this country really is backwards.

[tuckerndfw]

Seanv,

We agree.

It has been a life long puzzle as to why people consider a watching people engage in what are for the most part healthy, normal activities to be a crime, yet consider a watching a criminal act to be acceptable or normal.

Americans appear to be one of the most sexually deviant societies on the planet based on our method of censorship. And, it's no wonder the US has more sexual crimes & deviants than any other nation or society.

[agnim]

"Study: Children Bombarded With Online Porn"

The children can't even use the Net as medium for school work without being deliberately distracted by unnecessary adult stuff.

There is absolutely no good reason to allow porn to minds that are yet too young manage well the unnecessary stimulation from the porn that are deviously plastered across the Net.

Why should we be surprised; America is filled with a lot of ignorant, irresponsible, deviant, perverted and low-life adults and lawmakers with little or no wisdom, and who feel no obligation to protect younger minds/bodies.

Matter of fact, many of these same deviant and perverted low-life adults at all levels of the society deliberately seek to exploit the young.

[mdc76082]

This is a parental issue, not a city, state or federal issue. If you don't want your kids exposed to it, then set the parental controls. It's simple, it's easy and it works. You can filter out anything now a days, even from their email accounts. the resources are there, the parents have to use them. The only time it doesn't, is when the parent gives them the password and the kids are exposed to all sorts of filth. I believe most parents don't set parental controls because they want to be "COOL PARENTS". This is where the parents egos jeapordize the childs well being. Parents should remember...YOU ARE IN CONTROL.

[gaye5]

I would have to agree and disagree with some of you here. I agree that many kids look for it and then say it was an accident, but I also know that it can just come up when looking for something, I have had it happen to me twice and I couldn't get rid of the darned thing, I actually had to turn my computer off and start again, they weren't at all pleasant and from having seen this I can understand that if a child saw what I saw that he would be disturbed, it was not the normal sort of ***.

Also, my husband found at school that even if the children were careful about what they put into the computer when looking up subjects for school projects, that an innocent looking subject which was in reference to what they wanted could also produce porn...it is done deliberately for the reason of getting at kids or weak people, the ones who want to see porn go straight to the subject...
I have actually written to a vitamin company complaining that they had porn on their site, to be told that they didn't know what I was talking about...it had just popped up...hmmmm and I tried twice thinking that I had pushed the wrong keys the first time...

[gaye5]

Use Opera or Firefox and the problem abates. Opera is particularly resistant to this, hit F12 and select your options.
Posted by rikedoid

Oh thankyou rike, so this is why I havent had any trouble for about three years,,,
Yes there is a lot of stuff kids can see in shops etc, but does that make it right??? we now also have school shootings, rapes are up, violence is up, murders are up etc but does that make it right, maybe it is just because of what our kids see on TV, companies seem to think TV has a massive effect on us that is why they spend trillions of dollars on stupid few second adds, if it didnt work they wouldnt waste their money..
and you are right that kids naturally want to see it also. A further bit from my last bog, in my husbands school some kids used the school internet to axcess their own home hotmail account on which they had already stored porn material so as they could go into that and access porn from school..

[seanv137]

again if you want to "make it all go away" and don't want to spend any money use:

Firefox browser
Spybot Search and Destroy
Spyware Blaster
CookieCop

they are all free programs that work very well. i see zero advertisements from anyone, and zero pop-ups.

if your kid is still hunting for porn pay the $35 and buy Net Nanny.

[thgdriver]

Someone needs to do a study on studies.

Do you lie when taking a study?
Do you hang up when told "this is a study"?
Do you get pisse& at caller taking the study?
Do you lie to impress your friends whentaking study?
Do you always tell the truth, bend it or lie outright when taking a study?
Do you lie to your boss, parents, wife, husband or "study taker".
Are you lying now?

And on and on. You all get the idea.

[lily_ayanami]

Firefox, Spybot Search & Destroy, and Adaware seem to get most of it for me. But that's the ads. I've heard NetNanny is good, but you have to know that these programs are NOT infallible. The best thing to do is to talk to your kids and watch what they're doing.

I feel bad for the parents who are not technologically-inclined. In their cases, using these programs won't work if they don't know how to use them properly.

[klingon69]

I remember sneaking copies of my father's playboy mags when I was about 8 or 9. Checking out the mags on the rack in the corner grocery store at 11-12. I remember buying Hustler, OUI, Gallery...etc from the local 7-Eleven and EZ-Mart. Not to mention all the friends in the neighborhood who would sneak out mags. And let's all not forget playing doctor with the neighborhood girls growing up. Anybody else remember this'"I'll show you mine, if you show me yours."

Nothing really changes, just gets easier or more difficult.

[cooltherapy]

I am a college student and use the internet religiously for contact with old friends, research, fun, etc. I have NEVER run across random pornography popups. If you haven't had someone on your computer viewing it before, I see no reason why it should pop up. Just watch what websites your children (and you) are looking at and there shouldn't be a problem.

[nothappyatall]

The internet was originally a military/Govt communications, then it became public and it was basically adults using it, when did these dam KIDS get involved in all this? kick em off, shut off their computers and unplug them instead of forcing all the rest of us to deal with other people's kids!
I've seen 12 year olds coming into chatrooms for people over 18, we don't want babies in there and have to adjust our words BECAUSE a stupid minor is there- where is MOM and DAD and why is a 12 year old up on a chat room for people over 18 at 11 on a Sunday night?

[lavampire]

r_bayless,
my point has nothing to do with the access to pornography, but rather to the Internet being an easy vehicle to access not only pornography but also violence, lewd acts, and just behavior that robs a young mind of the most precious commodities: time and innocence.
Surely, before the Internet, we as adolescents boys could easily go into a liquor store and view the pages of the Hustler, the playboy, or the Oui that were just next to Sports Illustrated or US News and World Report, but we had to go outside the home, walk to the store and hope to God that some adult we knew did not catch us. Now, a couple of clicks of the mouse and a few www....., and bingo, we are in the world of the flesh.
My point is that why complain about the problem if after all parent's rely on the Internet for education purposes. Afterall, does not the Internet provide various learning and education websites, such as www.whitehouse.com. OOOPPSS!! I mean, whitehouse.gov (whitehouse.com is a pornsite).
Anyhow, 30% of young people nationwide failed to graduate from high school in 2006, regardless of race or ethnic background, and young children simply do not need another vehicle or medium that can rob them of their learning time and youth.
Books work and have worked, and I do not mean Penthouse or Playboy, I mean non-fiction and fiction books.

[gaye5]

hey CoolTherapy, there are no children in this house, I gather it can come in piggy backed on something else???? can anyone tell me if this is true????

[love_you-2009]

When i was 14 or 15 years old kid i spent half of my free time watching porn movies!

And sometimes i was ready to give one of my legs to see a proper porn movie.

I think you guys don't remember your early ages!!

Those studies are ***!