U.S., Russia Clash Over Syria Mideast Role
Moscow Suggests Including Syria In Israeli-Palestinian Peace Settlement
-
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, right, accompanied by members of the Quartet, speaks during a news conference at the State Department in Washington, Friday, Feb. 2, 2007. From left are, German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and Rice. (AP)
-
Fast Facts Syria Learn about the people, economy and history.
-
Interactive Mideast Conflict Events, key players and a history of the world's most unstable region.
-
Fast Facts Russia Learn about the people, economy and history.
"Syria could play a constructive role," Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said after a meeting of world powers to discuss Mideast strategy.
However, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice expressed little enthusiasm for such a prospect. "I hope that it (Syria) will in fact try and play a positive role rather than a negative one," she told reporters.
The Bush administration has resisted expanding diplomatic ties with Syria, which it blames for lending support to radical Islamic groups Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in the Palestinian territories.
The U.S. has also expressed reluctance to reach out to Syria and Iran in a regional effort to reduce violence in Iraq, arguing that both countries' actions show they have little interest in stabilizing the area.
Still, said Lavrov, "It is counterproductive to isolate anybody."
Rice said that dormant Mideast peace talks should resume despite an outbreak of violence among Palestinian factions.
"It doesn't help to talk about a timetable, but it does help to talk about a commitment," Rice said after her meeting at the State Department with foreign ministers from the United Nations, the European Union and Russia.
The gathering of would-be peacemakers came amid renewed fighting between Hamas militants and security forces loyal to the former ruling Fatah Party that has raised new alarm about a possible Palestinian civil war.
More than 100 Palestinians have been killed in internal violence since Hamas won parliamentary elections last year and formed a Cabinet.
Despite that violence, "there's simply no reason to avoid the subject of how we get to a Palestinian state," Rice said.
The international leaders reiterated the conditions they set for the Hamas-led Palestinian government to receive vital overseas financial aid and international political recognition.
Those include recognition of Israel, renouncing violence and embracing prior agreements between Israel and the Palestinians to work toward peace.
That statement was signed a year ago, days after Hamas won a surprise victory in Palestinian elections.
Hamas has refused to meet the terms, however, leading to a cutoff of direct international aid and a breakdown of services and order in the Palestinian territories.
World powers have largely abandoned hope that Hamas radicals will drop the anti-Israel positions and are looking for a new approach.
Rice was asked about the violence in Gaza and other Palestinian areas.
"We expressed our concern about events on the ground in the Palestinian territories. Obviously innocent people are being caught up in this violence and it needs to stop," she said.
But, she said, "The Palestinian people have waited a long time for a state and the Israeli people have waited a long time for the peace and security that would come from having a democratic neighbor."
The four-way meeting, convened by Rice, risked appearing irrelevant in light of the internal Palestinian disarray.
Any eventual political accommodation with Israel would require a Palestinian government unified and capable enough to negotiate lasting terms.
State Department spokesman Sean McCormack said the internal divisions are issues for the Palestinians alone to resolve.
The United States is looking for ways to revive peace efforts partly as a way to reassure Arab allies that it wants to improve the Palestinians' plight and solidify those allies against Iran.
Shiite Iran has close ties to Hamas, which the West considers a terrorist organization.
One goal of the session was to demonstrate tangible support for secular Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas.
"The international community is going to do everything it can to settle the conflict between Israel and the Palestinians," German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier said before the meeting. He attended the session because Germany currently holds the European Union's rotating presidency.
Cease-fires between the two sides in recent weeks and months have quickly fallen apart — the most recent was announced early Tuesday.
In the latest fighting, gunmen waged battles in the streets with mortar shells, rockets and heavy machine guns.
Abbas appealed Friday for calm.
"I call on all parties in Gaza to stop these actions that harm the Palestinian people," he said.
© MMVII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
- U.S is a slave of Israel.
Israel conrol almost everything inside usa. - Reply to this comment
- Why does the US pretend to be an unbiased negotiator in the Middle East?
Posted by tuckerndfw at 06:40 PM : Feb 02, 2007
The neutrality was abandoned 6 years ago, man. Where've you been?
In Bush's term it's been "bash the Palestinians and turn a blind eye to Israel's transgressions".
What "neutrality" are you referring to? - Reply to this comment
- CBS: 'U.S., Russia Clash Over Syria Mideast Role'
One may believe they clash over more than the role of Syria. Must be clashing on the ground in Iraq. - Reply to this comment
- Why does the US pretend to be an unbiased negotiator in the Middle East?
Why doesn't the US come out and admit that Israel's religious freaks & zealots control the US Congress, White House & judicial system?
There is zero chance the US will actually offer anything constructive to the process. - Reply to this comment
- He sure sounds like he's due for a promotion bluestardad, and a definite runner up for the freedumb medal... awarding failure is the name of the game, just as long as you keep your mouth shut and don't let out any "Secrets."
------------------------------
This General currently is suppose to be the General in Charge of the Iraq War! General Casey is now under consideration for the Chief of Staff of the Army! Can you accept that he is not aware if the Iraq Surge Plan we are debating had ever been War Gamed to determine plausibility, probability of Success, or any type of supporting Course of Action Analysis had been done to determine a possible outcome! It is criminally negligent to send 21,000 more troops to a war where the plan had never been analyzed for success!
Posted by bluestardad at 06:09 PM : Feb 02, 2007
+ report this comment - Reply to this comment
- Jews are not the only liars! What about Syria and Iran? They are doing the same! Their policies are entirely masked! They want to be like the Octopus for they ache to spread their power all over the adjacent countries (to fight Israel!!!!!) Those who say that this is wrong then they have to prove it.Iraq, Palestine and Lebanon suffer beacuse (as it seems so far) Syria and Iran want to challenge the United States! but Why? Let these people live alone! Let the war be in Iran and Syria why Iraq, Palestine or Lebanon??? The Irony is that at the end of the day Syria and Iran are like "Oh, we have nothing to do with that!" What an Irony indeed!
- Reply to this comment
- For anyone with a bit of military experience you will know that even at platoon levels plans are analyzed. The tools may be a stick and some dirt but they are analyzed. At Company level and above they are analyzed to a greater degree up to computer planning analysis. Computers like the Advanced Field Artillery Tactical Data System (AFATDS) serve this purpose giving real time variable analysis to commanders. The AFATDS computer analyzes all types of data to give Course of Action Analysis for possible scenarios. This Computer is in use now in the military in the Middle East and the data is available for all commanders! On CSPAN General Casey Jr. told Senator Warner that he was not aware of any War Gaming for the New Surge! He was unaware if the plan had even been tried on Paper! The Government spent multi Millions of tax dollars giving him a computer that would analyze possible courses of action for him. This General currently is suppose to be the General in Charge of the Iraq War! General Casey is now under consideration for the Chief of Staff of the Army! Can you accept that he is not aware if the Iraq Surge Plan we are debating had ever been War Gamed to determine plausibility, probability of Success, or any type of supporting Course of Action Analysis had been done to determine a possible outcome! It is criminally negligent to send 21,000 more troops to a war where the plan had never been analyzed for success!
- Reply to this comment
- JewsJewsJews.
Lies Lies Lies.
Wars Wars Wars. - Reply to this comment
Ex-NBA ref Tim Donaghy 



