February 11, 2009 5:24 PM

Reports: Ad Ploy Suspect Told Keep Quiet

(CBS/AP)  Friends of a Boston-area man charged in connection with a marketing ploy turned bomb scare say he was told to keep quiet even after the devices they had placed began causing a stir.

The Boston Globe and ABC News are reporting on e-mails purportedly sent to a friend by Peter Berdovsky on Wednesday, while bomb squads were responding to electronic devices around the city.

In the e-mail attributed to Berdovsky, he writes that an executive of the marketing agency that hired him to place the signs had called and told him to "keep everything on the dl" — dl standing for "down low" or quiet.

The marketing firm — Interference Incorporated — has not returned calls from the Associated Press since Wednesday's episode.

Toshi Hoo, a friend of Berdovsky's received an e-mail from him Wednesday afternoon that read, "My boss at the Cartoon Network's ad agency just called — she is asking that I pretty please keep everything on the dl [down low; quiet]," according to ABC News.

Berdovsky and Sean Stevens pleaded not guilty to charges of placing a hoax device and disorderly conduct. The men were released on $2,500 cash bond — and were apparently amused by the situation. They face up to five years in prison.

After getting out of jail, they met reporters and television cameras and launched into a nonsensical discussion of hair styles of the 1970s. But as they walked off, Berdovsky gave a more serious comment

"We need some time to really sort things out and, you know, figure out our response to this situation in other ways than talking about hair," Berdovsky said.

He later released a statement through a Boston law firm.

"I regret that this incident has created such anguish and disruption for the residents and law enforcement officers of this city," Berdovsky said. "I certainly never intended to do anything to frighten this community, which has welcomed and nurtured me for 10 years."

Officials found 38 blinking electronic signs on bridges, a subway station, a hospital, Fenway Park, and other high-profile spots in and around the city.

By contrast, in New York City, officers went to the various locations amid the hysteria in Boston and found only two of the devices — both attached to a highway overpass. Police said it did not appear any were placed on the subway or landmarks such as Empire State Building or Brooklyn Bridge.

Meanwhile, Turner Broadcasting System apologized to Boston-area residents on Friday for the security scare caused by the electronic signs that were part of a nationwide marketing campaign for its subsidiary Cartoon Network.


© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Add a Comment See all 17 Comments
by thespyshop-2009 February 5, 2007 4:44 PM EST
Because I live in Rochester MN - home to Mayo Clinic, I've programmed the LED window sign at my business to inform the Homeland Security that the sign isn't a bomb - it's an LED sign. I'd hate to see HL S shut down Roch and the clinic over my advertising sign
Reply to this comment
by idfirsttime February 4, 2007 2:42 AM EST
I feel badly for Boston's Mayor....he did a bad thing wasting peoples time and money. I understand that there were some pipe bomb scares in Boston earlier and perhaps this played a part in all this and explains why no other city in the USA was affected by these lite-brites.

Come on Mayor, apologies to the people....and stop calling this a BOMB HOAX...a hoax would be when somebody would try to make it out to look like a bomb but these were lite-brites. You see bombs but people see lite-brites. Grow up!
Reply to this comment
by bildooreilly February 3, 2007 1:50 AM EST
See Ted Turner knows what it's all about, it's all about the $$$$$$$ that's why boston city "officials" are so angry other than the fact that they made themselves look like Jacka sses...

Turner spokeswoman Shirley Powell said the company is in discussions with Boston city officials on how to best make amends.

Mayor Thomas Menino has estimated the costs in Boston alone would be more than $500,000. Costs incurred by the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, state police and the cities of Cambridge and Somerville could amount to another $500,000, officials said.
Reply to this comment
by bildooreilly February 3, 2007 1:47 AM EST
Hey "ad ploy suspects" if you're reading this.. this might come in handy at your trial.... or any of you ever brought up for bogus charges such as posession of marijuana... JURY NULLIFICATION....

Jury nullification occurs where a jury, apparently ignoring the letter of the law and the instructions by the court, and taking into account all of the evidence presented, renders a verdict in contradiction to the law. Although a jury's refusal relates only to the particular case before it, juries are reluctant to pass a verdict contrary to law. Jury nullification may signal an unwillingness by the members of the jury to accept the law and may have far reaching implications. In a case of jury nullification, the jury sometimes bases its verdict on the jury members' view about the validity of the law itself, a consequence of recognising a right to trial by one's peers.[1]

I consider trial by jury as the only anchor yet imagined by man by which a government can be held to the principles of its constitution.

%u2014Thomas Jefferson, 1789 letter to Thomas Paine

Reply to this comment
by mjmri1 February 2, 2007 11:40 PM EST
I think its hilarious how people are somehow blaming this on Bush. What does he have to do with it? Nothing.

I find it utterly amusing that Boston officials are so stupid. A thin piece of plastic with lights on it shaped like a cartoon? A bomb? Hah, right. If they are worried about those, I would be worried about all those trash cans standing around in Boston. Hell, you could just throw a bomb in there and no one would know. Why place bombs in obvious places.

Someone told me that what "tipped" them off was one that had fallen and broke apart. If that is the case ... HELLO! A bomb doesn't break apart and not explode!!!

Now Boston wants to have Turner and the ad agency pay for the bill for causing mass panic??? Turner and/or the ad agency didn't cause mass panic. Boston and all their officials involved caused mass panic over light brights. Whosever idea it was to close everything down without investigation should be fired and barred from any public position. In fact, that person should foot the bill.
Reply to this comment
by cdegolier February 2, 2007 11:27 PM EST
It wasn't the government or Bush responding to this, it was Boston other cities did not seem to have a problem or overreact, just Boston overreacted. The overreation had nothing to do with the patriot act or free speech or Bush. Just Boston overreacted and now wants someone to pay for their stupidity.
Reply to this comment
by texasiptv February 2, 2007 9:50 PM EST
A light bright is not hoax device but a toy. Luckily, this incident did not happen during Christmas or the police would have arrested Santa Claus. That would be a true war on Christmas that the idiots at Fox News promote.
Next news flash: dog chases tail. Dog arrested and on $5,000 bond. Morons. Next War on Sponge Bob.
Reply to this comment
by susanhelit February 2, 2007 8:53 PM EST
We really think terrorists are dumb enough to plant a bomb that looks like a bomb? A real terrorist would just put this thing in a backpack, or cover it with paper - not have a light-up bomb that tries to draw your attention!

It's just dumb that we're so paranoid right now. Boston overreacted, and now they're trying to hide that by making everyone else pay.
Reply to this comment
by rhondam5 February 2, 2007 7:05 PM EST
As long as they (the government) can keep us frightened about another impending terrorist attack they think we will blindly let them lead us into further economic destruction. I'm all for "erring on the side of caution", but there has got to become a time when we are no longer afraid of the boogey man.
Reply to this comment
by February 2, 2007 5:56 PM EST
The fact that these guys could face 5 yrs in prison is another example of how the patriot act has destroyed our free speech rights and people are buying right into it.


Reply to this comment
See all 17 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook