BAGHDAD, Feb. 2, 2007

Intel Report: Iraq Challenges "Daunting"

NIE: Inadequate Iraqi Forces, Sectarian Fighting Makes Situation Tough To Improve

  • Play CBS Video Video Corruption, Waste In Iraq

    As violence continues in Iraq, a new report outlines waste of American aid dollars and possible corruption within Iraq's police force. Aleen Sirgany reports.

  • Video Iraq War Debate Grows Louder

    As support for Sen. Joseph Biden's symbolic Iraq resolution proposal dies, opposition resolutions from Republicans are gaining momentum. Sharyl Attkisson reports.

  • Video Capitol Bob On Iraq Opposition

    CBS News chief Washington correspondent and host of "Face The Nation" Bob Schieffer chats with Harry Smith about the Senate's ongoing opposition of President Bush's new Iraq plan.

    • An American Apache helicopter provides air support as a U.S. Marine takes aim after being fired upon by insurgents near the Euphrates River February 2, 2007 in Ramadi , Anbar Pronvince, Iraq. Photo

      An American Apache helicopter provides air support as a U.S. Marine takes aim after being fired upon by insurgents near the Euphrates River February 2, 2007 in Ramadi , Anbar Pronvince, Iraq.  (Getty Images)

    • An Iraqi injured in Thursday's suicide bomber attack is wheeled in a hospital in Hillah, a city about 60 miles south of Baghdad, Iraq, Friday, Feb. 2, 2007. A pair of suicide bombers detonated explosives Thursday among shoppers in a crowded outdoor market in Hillah, killing at least 73 people and wounding 163. Photo

      An Iraqi injured in Thursday's suicide bomber attack is wheeled in a hospital in Hillah, a city about 60 miles south of Baghdad, Iraq, Friday, Feb. 2, 2007. A pair of suicide bombers detonated explosives Thursday among shoppers in a crowded outdoor market in Hillah, killing at least 73 people and wounding 163.  (AP Photo)

    • People clean up after a car bomb blast in a predominantly Shiite area in eastern Baghdad, Jan. 31, 2007. At least one person was killed and six were wounded in the blast. Photo

      People clean up after a car bomb blast in a predominantly Shiite area in eastern Baghdad, Jan. 31, 2007. At least one person was killed and six were wounded in the blast.  (AP)

    • A man wounded in a car bomb blast in predominantly Shiite area in eastern Baghdad waits for treatment in al-Kindi Hospital on Jan. 31, 2007. At least one person was killed and six were wounded in the blast. Photo

      A man wounded in a car bomb blast in predominantly Shiite area in eastern Baghdad waits for treatment in al-Kindi Hospital on Jan. 31, 2007. At least one person was killed and six were wounded in the blast.  (AP Photo/Ali Abed)

    Previous slide Next slide
  • In The Spotlight Bush's New Iraq Strategy

    A glimpse at some of the key elements in President Bush's new plan for Iraq.

  • Photo Essay Shiites Mark Ashoura

    One of the holiest days of year for Shiites marked amid increased tensions with Sunni Muslims.

  • Interactive American Heroes

    Profiles of U.S. soldiers who've died in Iraq, a look at the war's toll and pictures of mourning.

(CBS/AP)  Iraqi leaders will be hard pressed to craft a lasting political settlement or improve their security capabilities in the next year and a half, the U.S. intelligence community concluded in a report that raises new uncertainty about the prospect for withdrawing American troops.

Months in the making, the collaborative assessment by 16 spy agencies says that growing and entrenched polarization between Shia and Sunni Muslims, inadequate Iraqi security forces, weak leaders, and the success of extremists' efforts to use violence to exacerbate the sectarian war all create a situation that will be difficult to improve.

The report, which is called a National Intelligence Estimate, or NIE, says the problem is not just a civil war. Rather, Iraq is spiraling toward implosion, reports CBS News national security correspondent David Martin.

“The NIE does a very nice job of making clear the trajectory that Iraq is on,” says former CIA analyst Kenneth Pollard. “And that trajectory is straight down.”

"We think it is accurate," Stephen Hadley, Bush's national security adviser, said in a briefing on the document, called a National Intelligence Estimate. "We would emphasize the ‘hard-pressed,' because we will be pressing them hard and the Iraqi people will be pressing the government hard."

Rep. Ike Skelton, chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, said it "demonstrates that the situation in Iraq is indeed dire and deteriorating. It saddens me that the pessimistic impressions I gained during my recent trip to Iraq are reinforced by the conclusions of the latest NIE."

The report said that "even if violence is diminished, given the current winner-take-all attitude and sectarian animosities infecting the political scene, Iraqi leaders will be hard-pressed to achieve sustained political reconciliation" any time soon.

It used much the same language about the prospects for Iraqi security forces, saying that despite recent improvements, they too "will be hard-pressed in the next 12-18 months to execute significantly increased security responsibilities" and take on Shiite militias.

In other developments:

  • A U.S. helicopter went down Friday in Iraq for the fourth time in two weeks, killing two soldiers on board, and America's top general acknowledged that its aircraft were increasingly in danger from ground fire. Witnesses and local police said two helicopters were flying together when gunmen opened fire, sending one of the aircraft crashing to the ground near Taji, an air base just north of Baghdad. Gen. Peter Pace, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said Friday that clearly, "ground fire ... has been more effective against our helicopters in the last couple weeks." The comments marked the first time a military official has publicly acknowledged the recent crashes were caused by ground fire.

  • The Bush administration will ask for another $100 billion for military and diplomatic operations in Iraq and Afghanistan this year and seek $145 billion for 2008, a senior administration official said Friday. The requests Monday, to accompany President Bush's budget for the fiscal year beginning Oct. 1, would bring the total appropriations for 2007 to about $170 billion, with a slight decline the following year.

  • U.S. forces said 18 insurgents were killed in fighting Thursday night and Friday after insurgents opened fire on the Americans from several positions in Ramadi, 70 miles west of Baghdad, the military said. No civilian or U.S. casualties were reported, the military said.

  • The outgoing top U.S. general in Iraq, Gen. George Casey, diplomatically aired his differences with the commander in chief on Thursday, telling lawmakers that President Bush has ordered thousands more troops into Iraq than needed to tamp down violence in Baghdad.

  • Two suicide bombers blew themselves up Thursday in a crowded outdoor market in a Shiite city south of Baghdad, killing 45 people and wounding 150, police said. The attackers strolled into the Maktabat outdoor market in the center of Hillah about 6 p.m. as shoppers were buying food for their evening meals. Police said they thought one of the men appeared suspicious and stopped him. The bomber then detonated his explosives and the second attacker, who was walking behind him, set off his, police added.

    Continued



    © MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.

    Video and Galleries from Iraq After Saddam

    Add a Comment See all 287 Comments
    by exusmcsgt February 2, 2007 11:39 AM EST
    "However, he cautioned that stability depended on bringing an end to sectarian violence and fighting all extremist elements."

    Talking about stating the obvious! Sectarian strife will never end in Iraq. It will degenerate into secular states regardless of how many warriors and how much treasure we waste.

    Continued investment of both will only temporarily stave of a foregone conclusion.


    Reply to this comment
    by luvny-2009 February 2, 2007 11:47 AM EST
    Sadly this is why Sadam ruled the way he did because that's the only way to keep them in line and the only way he knew. They just dod not value life, well at least most of them.
    Reply to this comment
    by rafterman1 February 2, 2007 11:49 AM EST
    "Sectarian strife will never end in Iraq."

    Unless a new dictator forces everyone together. Get rid of one Sadaam, another will just pop up in his place.
    Reply to this comment
    by grumpas February 2, 2007 11:52 AM EST
    A lot of us knew this little tidbit before Bush ever invaded them! It was the same way with the old Yugoslavia! They won't curb the violence in Iraq until they start with Saddam's tactic's either! Bush really opened a can of worms this time!
    Reply to this comment
    by zoroastor February 2, 2007 11:56 AM EST
    No control in Iraq?
    Really?
    No $H!T Sherlock!
    Well, I spent a year there as part of the original invasion force and I can tell you we NEVER had any control in Iraq.
    Spending lives, spending money, buying votes.
    Reply to this comment
    by observantx February 2, 2007 11:56 AM EST


    Well, DUH!

    Like the majority of the country hasn't figured that out yet.

    Now it's time for GeorgenDick and the rest of the Rovettes to get it too.

    Reply to this comment
    by exusmcsgt February 2, 2007 11:58 AM EST
    Sadly this is why Sadam ruled the way he did because that's the only way to keep them in line and the only way he knew. They just dod not value life, well at least most of them.
    Posted by luvNY at 08:47 AM : Feb 02, 2007

    I disagree a might, luv, with your assessment. They value life, in my opinion, much as we do. The problem is their intolerance with each other's religious beliefs.

    Tito had a similar situation in the former Yugoslavia. He kept it cobbled together though an iron-fisted dictatorship. When he died, Yugoslavia disentegrated.

    Planning to topple Hussein was a strategy that was guaranteed to produce the exact same results in Iraq.

    Whoever formulated this boondoggle was not a history buff, to say the least.
    Reply to this comment
    by migrainegram February 2, 2007 11:58 AM EST
    Has anyone briefed the Shrubster? Maybe he missed the news this morning -- not!
    Reply to this comment
    by zoroastor February 2, 2007 12:03 PM EST
    exusmcsgt and I have a lot in common. He's an ex Marine non-com, I was an Army mustang Officer. We've both been saying the same thing for a long time.

    What disgusts me is that Dubya was able to snare so many of your votes last time. Some of you have started to wake up, while some won't grasp the truth so obviously thrust in front of them, as it will mean admitting they and the GOP might have made a mistake. Worse, it may mean their candidates didn't really have the best interest of the country in mind.
    Reply to this comment
    by migrainegram February 2, 2007 12:09 PM EST
    Zoroaster

    I didn't vote for the man in either election. Why? I found his demeanor arrogant, condescending, and patriarchal.

    He speaks with a smirk (the tone of his voice is even irritating) and he lies with his eyes.

    It was a gut feeling for me at the time, but as Ann Landers always said, if it smells fishy, it probably is. Now it really stinks!
    Reply to this comment
    by exusmcsgt February 2, 2007 12:10 PM EST
    Zoroastor-

    Agreed. I would add that it has been historically difficult for America to admit its mistakes. I think this is why it has taken so long for a consensus to build regarding Iraq.

    American's are conditioned to think that we know better than anyone, do everything better, that we are destined to run the planet.

    This ridiculous mindset makes admitting errors that much more difficult and makes correction that much more prolonged.

    This same national superiority complex is what the neocons cashed in on. They had an audience ready and willing to believe that we were entirely justified in invading a sovereign country and installing the politcal system for them that we thought best.

    Reply to this comment
    by changeit4 February 2, 2007 12:12 PM EST
    "122 Levees At Risk; US Has Little Control Of Iraq..."

    That just about does it for W, don't it? Now he'll sink his claws into the economy and NCLB and pray that their underbellies aren't exposed too.

    Reply to this comment
    by migrainegram February 2, 2007 12:14 PM EST
    Hey exusmcsgt

    I haven't seen any of lieberman18's rants the past couple of days. Have you?
    Reply to this comment
    by exusmcsgt February 2, 2007 12:15 PM EST
    I haven't seen any of lieberman18's rants the past couple of days. Have you?
    Posted by migrainegram at 09:14 AM : Feb 02, 2007

    I think I gave him a migraine last time out. lol
    Reply to this comment
    by migrainegram February 2, 2007 12:16 PM EST
    Ha, ha, ha! And I thought I was the only one who could set him off.

    Think someone turned him in?
    Reply to this comment
    by zoroastor February 2, 2007 12:20 PM EST
    How is lieberman18 going to validly argue with a story like this. It isn't like it's some reporter's opinion. It's National Intelligence (oxymoron?) data. Or maybe he's out trying to manufacture a way to use Cheney's grandaughter as a prop.
    Reply to this comment
    by exusmcsgt February 2, 2007 12:22 PM EST
    How is lieberman18 going to validly argue with a story like this.
    Posted by Zoroastor at 09:20 AM : Feb 02, 2007

    Facts, logic, and common sense have never impeded lieberman in the past.......
    Reply to this comment
    by migrainegram February 2, 2007 12:23 PM EST
    Zoroastor

    He can't argue (debate) anything without insults and comments leaving little to the imagination.

    My guess is someone became highly offended and finally got someone at CBS to read this stuff.
    Reply to this comment
    by johnshaft4 February 2, 2007 12:24 PM EST
    US Has Little Control...

    Ya', think?
    Reply to this comment
    by exusmcsgt February 2, 2007 12:25 PM EST
    Think someone turned him in?
    Posted by migrainegram at 09:16 AM : Feb 02, 2007

    He certainly deserved to be reported. I didn't report him because I enjoy spanking his silly a$$ so much.

    I know that others have threatened to do so in the past. jimibear maybe?
    Reply to this comment
    by bluestardad February 2, 2007 12:26 PM EST
    For anyone with a bit of military experience you will know that even at platoon levels plans are analyzed. The tools may be a stick and some dirt but they are analyzed. At Company level and above they are analyzed to a greater degree up to computer planning analysis. Computers like the Advanced Field Artillery Tactical Data System (AFATDS) serve this purpose giving real time variable analysis to commanders. The AFATDS computer analyzes all types of data to give Course of Action Analysis for possible scenarios. This Computer is in use now in the military in the Middle East and the data is available for all commanders! On CSPAN General Casey Jr. told Senator Warner that he was not aware of any War Gaming for the New Surge! He was unaware if the plan had even been tried on Paper! The Government spent multi Millions of tax dollars giving him a computer that would analyze possible courses of action for him. This General currently is suppose to be the General in Charge of the Iraq War! General Casey is now under consideration for the Chief of Staff of the Army! Can you accept that he is not aware if the Iraq Surge Plan we are debating had ever been War Gamed to determine plausibility, probability of Success, or any type of supporting Course of Action Analysis had been done to determine a possible outcome!It is criminally negligent to send 21,000 more troops to a war where the plan had never been analyzed for success!

    Reply to this comment
    by zoroastor February 2, 2007 12:27 PM EST
    Oh I know, I've seen (and been the target of) his tirades and diatribes before.
    exusmcsgt, was it my imagination, or was the fact that I was prior military arguing for the other side some sort of lighting rod for that guy or what?
    Reply to this comment
    by roger_inkart February 2, 2007 12:27 PM EST
    But...but...Clinton had an affair and lied about it!

    In other words, somehow the rightwing nuts will blame someone other than the morons in the White House for this disaster.
    Reply to this comment
    by migrainegram February 2, 2007 12:28 PM EST
    I know that others have threatened to do so in the past. jimibear maybe?
    Posted by exusmcsgt at 09:25 AM : Feb 02, 2007

    Maybe, maybe not. It's hard to say because he tended to go off the deep end on occasion. What happens when the moderator or hire ups cut one of us off? Are our email addresses blocked or what?
    Reply to this comment
    by observantx February 2, 2007 12:30 PM EST

    exusmcsgt, Zororaster, etc:

    I mentioned this yesterday, butI thought it was appropriate to mention it again because of the findings of the NIE.

    I suggest everyone google "washingtonnote" and check out the link about the third story down that takes you to the text of Zbigniew Brzezinski%u2019s testimony to the Senate Foreign relations Committee yesterday.

    He laid out the very logical and compelling reasons for why we should be getting out of Iraq and how to do it. Staying there is lighting the fuse for a much larger crisis in the region.

    Reply to this comment
    by migrainegram February 2, 2007 12:30 PM EST
    Sorry...

    Deep end MOST of the time!
    Reply to this comment
    by exusmcsgt February 2, 2007 12:31 PM EST
    Oh I know, I've seen (and been the target of) his tirades and diatribes before.
    exusmcsgt, was it my imagination, or was the fact that I was prior military arguing for the other side some sort of lighting rod for that guy or what?
    Posted by Zoroastor at 09:27 AM : Feb 02, 2007

    Lieberman is a reserve reject. He has a hard on for anyone who's been there, done it. It's pure envy in regards to former military with him.
    Reply to this comment
    by zoroastor February 2, 2007 12:32 PM EST
    You are right on target bluestardad! It is inconceivable, inexscusable and indefensable. But, I am no longer surprised at ANYTHING that comes out of this administration.
    I suspect something. You know why they all don't seem the least bit worried that the administration is nearing its end? Late in '08 they are going to unveil the plan to install the first American ***-Tater-Ship.
    Reply to this comment
    by exusmcsgt February 2, 2007 12:33 PM EST
    What happens when the moderator or hire ups cut one of us off? Are our email addresses blocked or what?
    Posted by migrainegram at 09:28 AM : Feb 02, 2007

    I would assume that the account is deactivated. But there's nothing to stop them from setting up another account under a different name.
    Reply to this comment
    by exusmcsgt February 2, 2007 12:34 PM EST
    Late in '08 they are going to unveil the plan to install the first American ***-Tater-Ship.
    Posted by Zoroastor at 09:32 AM : Feb 02, 2007

    Where have you been for the last 6 years, bro?
    Reply to this comment
    by crisericson February 2, 2007 12:34 PM EST
    The war in Iraq is costing tax payers BILLIONS
    AND
    the "war on drugs" is costing tax payers BILLIONS.
    IF
    marijuana becomes legalized
    THEN
    terrorists will have one less source of income.

    a href="http://2008winner.com" 2008 WINNER /a
    Reply to this comment
    by crisericson February 2, 2007 12:36 PM EST
    a href="http://2008winner.com" 2008WINNER.COM /a
    HTTP://2008WINNER.COM

    SAVE THE TAXPAYERS BILLIONS
    BY LEGALIZING MARIJUANA
    FOR ADULTS 21 AND OVE
    AND TAXING IT.

    END THE "WAR ON DRUGS".
    THE "WAR ON DRUGS" IS JUST AS MUCH OF A FAILURE
    AS THE "WAR ON IRAQ".
    Reply to this comment
    by rafterman1 February 2, 2007 12:38 PM EST
    "I would assume that the account is deactivated. But there's nothing to stop them from setting up another account under a different name."

    They could block the IP address, but if it's a DHCP address, sometimes they change when the lease renews and that sort of blocking doesn't work.

    But based on the stuff they allow here, which is pretty much anything, even if they cut someone off, I doubt they are too concerned at keeping them out. They may do it just as a speedbump kind of thing, to annoy someone that they have to re-register with a new name.

    Reply to this comment
    by exusmcsgt February 2, 2007 12:39 PM EST
    crisericson-

    Shut up about the dope already and go hit your bong.
    Reply to this comment
    by zoroastor February 2, 2007 12:39 PM EST
    Yeah, but it hasn't been official.

    Hey, maybe that's where Lieberman18 has been. He's being prepped for the Ministry of Propiganda, uh... I mean Marketing.
    Reply to this comment
    by exusmcsgt February 2, 2007 12:40 PM EST
    They may do it just as a speedbump kind of thing, to annoy someone that they have to re-register with a new name.


    Posted by Rafterman1 at 09:38 AM : Feb 02, 2007


    That is what I perceive. It appears to me that some have multiple accounts.
    Reply to this comment
    by exusmcsgt February 2, 2007 12:41 PM EST
    Yeah, but it hasn't been official.

    Hey, maybe that's where Lieberman18 has been. He's being prepped for the Ministry of Propiganda, uh... I mean Marketing.
    Posted by Zoroastor at 09:39 AM : Feb 02, 2007

    You know what "signing statements" are, bro?
    Reply to this comment
    by rafterman1 February 2, 2007 12:43 PM EST
    "Late in '08 they are going to unveil the plan to install the first American ***-Tater-Ship."

    Announcement from the White House on October 31st 2008: "Due to unspecified security threats, the election has been postponed until Dear Leader, er, the President has "decider-ed" that it is safe to proceed. Or until he dies in 20 years or so. Whichever comes last. Then the Bush twins will take over."


    Reply to this comment
    by skyk-2009 February 2, 2007 12:44 PM EST
    Thank God for the American People. Sure this is bad, very bad indeed but imagine if the Majority of us were like the Religious Reich? We'd still be hearing and buying "Stay the Course" and would end up the same way the Soviet's did. When you have the most powerful Military in the history of the World and you are so incompetent that you can't take that military and accomplish a mission in a Nation the size of Iraq it's very sad indeed. In the history of the World this has to be the most embarrassing Butt Whoopin ever... EVER!! Sir Lies-A-Lot lacks the mental capacity to understand that he is getting a whoopin and the Honor to turn over the leadership to someone competent. That's so sad!!
    Reply to this comment
    by dallison7 February 2, 2007 12:47 PM EST
    GOOOOD MORRRNING IIIIIRAK!!
    Reply to this comment
    by exusmcsgt February 2, 2007 12:49 PM EST
    When you have the most powerful Military in the history of the World and you are so incompetent that you can't take that military and accomplish a mission in a Nation the size of Iraq it's very sad indeed.
    Posted by skyk at 09:44 AM : Feb 02, 2007

    Anyone with an understanding of military strategy knew from the outset that this could never work.

    I refer to the fact that a standing army can never defeat a competent guerilla force that has the support of the local populace. It makes no difference how much conventionl force is brout to bear.

    Colombia and the Phillipines have been failing for fourty years to defeat their guerillas.

    Guatemala failed for 36 years and then sat down to the peace table.

    We failed for 20 years in Viet Nam and then sat down to the peace table.

    The USSR failed at it for 12 years in Afghanista and then packed up and went home.

    It just can not work. Period.
    Reply to this comment
    by rafterman1 February 2, 2007 12:50 PM EST
    "and the Honor to turn over the leadership to someone competent."

    Cheney? Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!

    The only thing worse than an incompetent dictator is a compentent one.

    Reply to this comment
    by exusmcsgt February 2, 2007 12:50 PM EST
    Good morning, dallison. How are you bro?
    Reply to this comment
    by dallison7 February 2, 2007 12:51 PM EST
    Hey Sarge, not bad & you?
    Reply to this comment
    by clestes-2009 February 2, 2007 12:51 PM EST
    "Iraqi-on-Iraqi violence as the primary source of conflict and the most immediate threat to U.S. goals"

    This is their conclusion, but still can't say that it is a civil war?? What is wrong with these stupid people??

    This surge isn't going to stabilize Baghdad and Iraqi politicians aren't capable of controlling the violence anymore than the US troops can. It is perfectly obvious that nothing is going to improve the violence.

    BRING THE TROOPS HOME NOW BEFORE MORE DEATHS!
    Reply to this comment
    by exusmcsgt February 2, 2007 12:52 PM EST
    dallison7-

    doing well thanks, especially now that I have been so enlightened by this report. lol
    Reply to this comment
    by dallison7 February 2, 2007 12:54 PM EST
    I'm frankly surprised that Negroponte didn't come out with something a little more rosey.
    Reply to this comment
    by dallison7 February 2, 2007 12:57 PM EST
    Hey sarge, is your email .net or .com?
    Reply to this comment
    by exusmcsgt February 2, 2007 12:57 PM EST
    .net
    Reply to this comment
    by exusmcsgt February 2, 2007 12:59 PM EST
    dallison7-

    Speaking of email, a gal serving in Iraq picked it up when I gave it to you yeaterday and sent me a very lengthy email late last night.

    Totally disenheartened with the whole situation. A real heartbreaker, bro.

    Reply to this comment
    See all 287 Comments
    • MOST POPULAR
    • Viewed
    • Commented
    Latest News
    Featured Blogs