February 11, 2009 5:24 PM

Intel Report: Iraq Challenges "Daunting"

(CBS/AP)  Iraqi leaders will be hard pressed to craft a lasting political settlement or improve their security capabilities in the next year and a half, the U.S. intelligence community concluded in a report that raises new uncertainty about the prospect for withdrawing American troops.

Months in the making, the collaborative assessment by 16 spy agencies says that growing and entrenched polarization between Shia and Sunni Muslims, inadequate Iraqi security forces, weak leaders, and the success of extremists' efforts to use violence to exacerbate the sectarian war all create a situation that will be difficult to improve.

The report, which is called a National Intelligence Estimate, or NIE, says the problem is not just a civil war. Rather, Iraq is spiraling toward implosion, reports CBS News national security correspondent David Martin.

"The NIE does a very nice job of making clear the trajectory that Iraq is on," says former CIA analyst Kenneth Pollard. "And that trajectory is straight down."

"We think it is accurate," Stephen Hadley, Bush's national security adviser, said in a briefing on the document, called a National Intelligence Estimate. "We would emphasize the 'hard-pressed,' because we will be pressing them hard and the Iraqi people will be pressing the government hard."

Rep. Ike Skelton, chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, said it "demonstrates that the situation in Iraq is indeed dire and deteriorating. It saddens me that the pessimistic impressions I gained during my recent trip to Iraq are reinforced by the conclusions of the latest NIE."

The report said that "even if violence is diminished, given the current winner-take-all attitude and sectarian animosities infecting the political scene, Iraqi leaders will be hard-pressed to achieve sustained political reconciliation" any time soon.

It used much the same language about the prospects for Iraqi security forces, saying that despite recent improvements, they too "will be hard-pressed in the next 12-18 months to execute significantly increased security responsibilities" and take on Shiite militias.

In other developments:

  • A U.S. helicopter went down Friday in Iraq for the fourth time in two weeks, killing two soldiers on board, and America's top general acknowledged that its aircraft were increasingly in danger from ground fire. Witnesses and local police said two helicopters were flying together when gunmen opened fire, sending one of the aircraft crashing to the ground near Taji, an air base just north of Baghdad. Gen. Peter Pace, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said Friday that clearly, "ground fire ... has been more effective against our helicopters in the last couple weeks." The comments marked the first time a military official has publicly acknowledged the recent crashes were caused by ground fire.

  • The Bush administration will ask for another $100 billion for military and diplomatic operations in Iraq and Afghanistan this year and seek $145 billion for 2008, a senior administration official said Friday. The requests Monday, to accompany President Bush's budget for the fiscal year beginning Oct. 1, would bring the total appropriations for 2007 to about $170 billion, with a slight decline the following year.

  • U.S. forces said 18 insurgents were killed in fighting Thursday night and Friday after insurgents opened fire on the Americans from several positions in Ramadi, 70 miles west of Baghdad, the military said. No civilian or U.S. casualties were reported, the military said.

  • The outgoing top U.S. general in Iraq, Gen. George Casey, diplomatically aired his differences with the commander in chief on Thursday, telling lawmakers that President Bush has ordered thousands more troops into Iraq than needed to tamp down violence in Baghdad.

  • Two suicide bombers blew themselves up Thursday in a crowded outdoor market in a Shiite city south of Baghdad, killing 45 people and wounding 150, police said. The attackers strolled into the Maktabat outdoor market in the center of Hillah about 6 p.m. as shoppers were buying food for their evening meals. Police said they thought one of the men appeared suspicious and stopped him. The bomber then detonated his explosives and the second attacker, who was walking behind him, set off his, police added.


  • © 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
    • Scott Conroy

      Scott Conroy is a National Political Reporter for RealClearPolitics and a contributor for CBS News.

    Add a Comment See all 272 Comments
    by davey214 February 4, 2007 5:15 AM EST
    Also, even though you might disagree with GB on Iraq right now, you need to see the bigger picture. The US (GB specifically) gave his word to many in that area that we would see this thru to victory. If the US abandons them now they would all be slaughtered - those who trusted the US. Not too good for world opinion, but even worse for one's conscience. The Americam public (and the politically opportunistic Democrats) are now giving GB a fair and honest exit strategy - he's giving it his best, last try before bringing the troops home and telling the Iraqis we did our best but the problem was all YOUR fault. The Republicans know what they need to do before November 08.
    Reply to this comment
    by davey214 February 4, 2007 5:05 AM EST
    Many people worry about a civil war in Iraq, but it seems to me that having one's enemies fighting each other is a blessing. America, put your money into 100% energy independence ASAP and make the middle east irrelavent. The business of America is business - wasnt that the wisdom of the first George. The Republicans will eventually come to this view - they are slow to get the truth (as opposed to the other side of the aisle, who never get it).
    Reply to this comment
    by radiob-2009 February 3, 2007 10:07 AM EST
    bildooreilly
    tried the links, they didn't work.
    Reply to this comment
    by exusmcsgt February 3, 2007 9:38 AM EST
    This is a war initiated by those who cannot see and fought by those who can.
    Posted by heetseeker at 06:00 AM : Feb 03, 2007

    To paraphrase you, heetseeker, I would say that this war was initiated by those who wouldn't fight and is fought by those who will.
    Reply to this comment
    by heetseeker February 3, 2007 9:00 AM EST
    "Liberals D*** Liberals"

    What is the National Intelligence Estimate? Is it not the informed and critically evaluated judgment of the US Intelligence Community and the most authoritative assessment of the Director of National Intelligence? Nonsense! It is the informed view of traitors! They clearly do not back the President's "New Way Forward" nor our troops in harms way.

    The commentary above is my take on the default position of anyone who challenges the administration's rosy view of all things Iraq. If you disagree you are a liberal. If you are a liberal then you are unpatriotic. If you are unpatriotic, you are emboldening the enemy. If you are emboldening the enemy then you are a traitor. Why should we listen traitors?

    The problem is these "traitors" are popping up everywhere. They are Generals in the military,
    Republicans in the Senate & Congress and high-ranking officials in our intelligence community. Could it possibly be that these people are right and the administration is wrong?

    Statements of protest: "you are emboldening the enemy", statements of hope: "the insurgency is in its last throes" and statements of pretence: "we are winning in Iraq" are not policies. Rather they are statements of denial. Iraq has now become a monument to arrongance, an entalglement from which we cannot easily extricate ourselves. It is profligacy with blood and treasure on a grand scale.

    This is a war initiated by those who cannot see and fought by those who can.
    Reply to this comment
    by staff2--2008 February 3, 2007 5:49 AM EST
    TIME TO PUT OUR PRESIDENT ON TRIAL FOR WAR CRIMES...
    Reply to this comment
    by johnshaft4 February 3, 2007 5:06 AM EST
    Is the Kenneth Pollard referenced in the above quote any relation to great 'American' Zionist Mossad 'Hero' Jonathen Pollard? You know, cut out of the same Israeli Likud Party war propaganders/liars William Kristol's and convicted liar Michael 'the yellow cake/yellow belly' Ledeen? These 'great Americans' along with Wolfowitz, Wurmser, Feith, Abrams, Daniel 'the pig' Pipes, Perle, willsoon have their smiling faces is the Jew Hall of Deceit/Espionage along with fellow great Jew/Zionist 'Americans' Ethel and Julios Rosenberg. See 'traitors' A Bomb Russia... Screw Israel and you what to the Jews...
    Reply to this comment
    by johnshaft4 February 3, 2007 4:57 AM EST
    Yo, Stephen 'psuedo wannabe' National (In)Security Advisor...I've got your "Daunting", right here, right now...Come and get YOUR love...
    Reply to this comment
    by j-whitman February 3, 2007 3:37 AM EST
    Rick,,,,, That's talking about Bush, He insults us --

    "Blessed are you when people insult you, persecute you and falsely say all kinds of evil against you because of me. 12Rejoice and be glad"

    "UN AMERICAN" "UN PATRIOTIC" "EMBOLDENING THE ENEMY"
    Reply to this comment
    by j-whitman February 3, 2007 3:34 AM EST
    Conservative News DRUDGE REPORT -- Still has no article on NIE.... MEDIA BIAS THERE SINGINRICK ??
    Reply to this comment
    See all 272 Comments
    .
    Scroll Left
    Scroll Right More »
    CBS News on Facebook