Putin Rejects Western Criticism
Russian Leader Also Denounces U.S. Missile Deployment In Eastern Europe During Annual News Conference
-
Russian President Vladimir Putin leaves the hall following a news conference at the Kremlin in Moscow on Feb. 1, 2007. (AP)
-
Fast Facts Russia Learn about the people, economy and history.
-
Photo Essay Moscow Meeting While Air Force One refuels, two presidents chat over lunch in Russia.
Addressing 1,200 reporters at his annual news conference, Putin rejected allegations in the West that price disputes with Ukraine and Belarus — which triggered interruptions of Russian oil and gas deliveries to Western Europe — amounted to using Moscow's vast energy reserves to achieve political aims.
"The thesis is being thrust on us all the time that Russia is using its old and new economic efforts to attain foreign political goals. It is not so," Putin said. The price increases, he said, are driven simply by Russia's desire to get fair prices for its gas and oil after years of providing energy at below-market prices to former Soviet neighbors.
"We're not obliged to subsidize the economies of other countries," Putin said. "Nobody does that, so why are they demanding it of us?"
Putin uses the annual news conference, televised live on two nationwide state-run channels, to burnish his image domestically as a competent, caring president in control of a resurgent country with a growing economy and global clout.
But Moscow's international reputation has been battered by the killings late last year of two critics: investigative journalist Anna Politkovskaya in Moscow and former KGB agent Alexander Litvinenko in London, who blamed Putin for his radiation poisoning in a deathbed statement.
Asked about Litvinenko, who died after someone slipped him radioactive polonium-210 in London last fall, Putin described him as a figure of little importance.
"Before being fired from the Federal Security Service, Alexander Litvinenko served in the escort troops and had no access to state secrets," said Putin, himself a former KGB officer.
Litvinenko had accused Putin's Kremlin of involvement in his poisoning and the death of Politkovskaya — which Russian officials deny. In Russia, officials and journalists seem to favor the theory that the killings were committed as part of a plot to discredit the Kremlin.
Putin endorsed neither theory. "Openly speaking, I don't believe in the conspiracy thesis," he said.
He declined to speculate how Litvinenko came to swallow the rare radioactive poison that killed him. "Only the investigation can answer that," he said.
Putin rejected Washington's claim that possible deployment of U.S. missile defense sites in central Europe was intended to counter threats posed by Iran and warned that Russia would take countermeasures.
U.S. officials have said that proposed missile defense sites in Poland and the Czech Republic would be designed to intercept a missile attack by Iran on Eastern Europe, and would not affect Russia's security.
But Putin said the Kremlin did not trust that claim.
© MMVII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie."





The damning irony is Bush re-ignited the strategic arms race, himself, abrogating the Helsinki ABM treaty negotiated by former Pres. Ford. Bush also seems blissfully unaware there will be not only the traditional players but new ones, as well. The new contest, as Putin points out, is now assymetrical. The problem with assymetrical defense is we cannot afford even a few warheads to penetrate our defenses.
In addition to a blundering Bush, Americans also have a second impediment. With each year, it becomes clearer the principal focus of the American defense industry is not national defense, but profiteering at taxpayer expense. There are volumes written about Pentagon waste, and some of the spending is no longer even tracked by Pentagon auditors. America spends more than all other powers of the world combined, yet must watch the goal of national security recede like a mirage.
American defense industry spokesmen traditionally assure congress and the joint chiefs our money is well-spent, and that our rivals could not possibly match our military might or effectiveness.
Time and again, however, Russia and other potential adversaries have brought surprise and dismay to defense industry hawks in Washington, as rival nations manage some exceptional performance. This is not a prescription for American despair, but a warning about pride and ignorant presumptions-- and a firm counsel to use diplomacy for what diplomacy does best, to heed the counsel of reason.
Oh, I know.....you'll just sell more nuclear technology to the middle east. You're a real pal!