Bush Takes Aim At Huge CEO Pay
President Touts Good Economic News While Acknowledging Anger Over Executive Salaries
-
Play CBS Video
Video
Bush On State Of The Economy
CBS News RAW: President Bush gave his State Of The Economy address in New York. He touched upon many topics, including corporate salaries, protectionism, subsidies and George Washington.
-
-
Photo
President Bush shakes hands with traders during an unscheduled visit to the floor of the New York Stock Exchange in New York Wednesday, Jan. 31, 2007. (AP)
-
Photo
President Bush delivers speech on the economy at Federal Hall in New York, Wednesday Jan. 31, 2007. (AP Photo)
-
-
Interactive
Eye On The Economy
In-depth features on U.S. markets, taxes, employment and the Federal Reserve.
-
Interactive
Cracking Down
SEC investigations, a new task force at the Justice Department, action in Congress...learn about who's doing what to catch white-collar criminals.
-
Interactive
Bush Presidency
The president's agenda, plus facts, figures, major events and key personalities.
Mr. Bush's "State of the Economy" speech, delivered from the financial center of the world, was aimed at bringing his economic message out of the shadows of the Iraq war. On his second day in a row focused on the economy, the government reported faster-than-expected growth of 3.5 percent in the final quarter of last year.
The president acknowledged people's continuing nervousness about their financial picture, despite a string of similar reports that provide some reason for optimism. He said he realized that stories about the enormous salaries and other perks for CEOs, for instance, create anger and uncertainty that affect the country's investors.
The president does not endorse any government role in reducing those packages. Instead, Mr. Bush highlighted new federal rules that the administration thinks are a better path toward wise compensation decisions by companies.
"Government should not decide the compensation for America's corporate executives," he said. "But the salaries and bonuses of CEOs should be based on their success at improving their companies and bringing value to their shareholders."
In effect starting last month, the rules give investors access to clearer and more detailed information from public companies on their top executives' pay packages and perks. Their impact will become apparent as corporations begin issuing 2006 annual reports.
"America's corporate boardrooms must step up to their responsibilities," Mr. Bush said. "You need to pay attention to the executive compensation packages that you approve. You need to show the world that America's businesses are a model of transparency and good corporate governance."
Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, has said he will push legislation to require shareholder approval of executive compensation plans. And a separate bill before the Senate to raise the minimum wage would fund accompanying tax breaks to ease the burden on small businesses by capping executives' tax-deferred pay packages at $1 million a year.
Still, even Mr. Bush's words on pay were met with complete silence from the business crowd he addressed.
Huge salaries and other perks for CEO have drawn investor ire and made splashy headlines. Anger over executive compensation unrelated to performance, even as companies stumble, lay off employees or renege on billions of dollars in pension obligations for workers' retirement, has spread from shareholders to union activists and buttoned-down mutual fund trustees. The chasm between executives' salaries and the pay of rank-and-file employees continues to widen.
Home Depot chief executive Bob Nardelli was earning an average of $25.7 million a year — excluding stock options — before he was forced out in a furor over his hefty pay. He left with a severance package worth about $210 million.
In 2001, General Electric Co. paid chief executive Jack Welch $16.25 million. Welch was replaced that year with Jeffrey Immelt, who earned $3.4 million in total annual compensation in 2005.
© MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.



- 1
- 2
- next
See all 97 CommentsBu$h bristles over capitalistic American business practices. Maybe things would be more acceptable if the USA was a fascist dictatorship?
Halliburton has contracts worth more than $1.7 billion for its work in Iraq, and it could make hundreds of millions more from a no-bid contract it was awarded by the Army Corps of Engineers, The Washington Post has reported.
Dwight D. Eisenhower, January 17, 1961
I think everybody should listen to bush as he was such a big success in private business.
Does he really think Americans are falling for his "I'm mad at CEO's for making so much money" bit.
Bush could give a ***.
Who is he to say what CEO's should get paid anyways? He can't tell corporations how to pay their officers.
Watch out CEO's! Bush is coming after you!
That's the real gist of it, folks. The coporate crooks are trying anything they can to stay out of prison. The reason they don't want to sign their financial reports (a key provision in Sarbannes-Oxley) is because they know that their books are cooked. Note how the CFO of Citicorp just "changed jobs" in a mysterious manner within that company, that's precisly timed with the new accounting year and she would have had to sign the financial statements for the first time in accordance with Sarbannes-Oxley. But the dirty crook ditched the CFO role, she must know that Citicorp is commiting major felonies.
And here comes dirty George Bush carrying the water for corporate felons once again. The man is so dirty, we should call him mud boy.
I
What do you think of them?
Posted by tejasdemo at 12:33 PM : Jan 31, 2007"
LOL
It they would only share the companies' accumulated wealth with the WORKERS who help to create the wealth, things wouldn't be so bad. But this greed and selfishness on the part of the typical CEO is despicable.
And this is called fair market "business" and "land of opportunity"? Gag me. How about ROBBERY with a suit and tie instead of a mask and gun?
This I do know. The American people are fed up -many dangerously so. A calmer, more intellegent tact will be more helpful in the long run, than cussing and raising print hell.
This man has the audacity to publicly ask for a tie between compensation and performance? How do you spell HYPOCRITE?
while the middle class is watching decent jobs dissappear, losing its health coverage and pensions and falling into poverty more and more every year. We're all just beasts of burden to be ridden by the rich as empowered by their perennial protectors- the republicans.
NOTHING will change unless we REVOLT. Nothing.
Our News is Propoganda.
All the ideas and all the ******** in the World will NOT CHANGE A THING.
REVOLUTION IS INEVITABLE.
MJV: "It's through this world you'll ramble, you'll see lots of funny men, some will rob you with a six-gun & some with a fountain pen...It's through this world you'll ramble and through this world you'll roam, you won't ever see an outlaw drive a family from it's home."
Woody Guthrie - "The Ballad of Pretty Boy Floyd"
Great song - great post - sad how the song remains the same throughout all these decades.
I'll add Don Henley's line from "Gimme What You Got".
"A man with a briefcase can steal more money than any man with a gun".....
And this so-called "Surge." It is just ground troop placement for Iran. Could be a nuclear war with this demon in charge, who the hell knows. And, while I'm at it, he is about as "born-again" as the fleas on my dog's ***.
I love knowing so much about History and Human nature.
I know there were plenty of people like you who stood around George Washington and said, "Never Gonna Happen."
REVOLUTIONS HAPPEN.
IT"S ALREADY STARTED.
How can we take this seriously ?
What I hate most are idiots that keep blindly following this President.
Americans - Asleep at the wheel.
Not that I hate Bush so much as feel much pity for him, but let's see....
I'd have to say I hate the largest federal deficit ever, smallest job growth cycle ever (from 2001), hundreds of millions wasted on oversight-less projects in Iraq, growing wage disparity, witholding promised funds from public schools and Republicans blocking federal minimum wage increase.
These are a few of my least-favorite things, badaxmofo, thanks for asking.
1990: Although Harken has no international expertise, it gets the attention of the Bahrain National Oil Company, which unexpectedly appears on the scene and bypasses big oil's Amoco and Chevron to sign a production agreement with the little Texas concern. The contract grants Harken exclusive rights to what seems to be a promising offshore area squeezed between two productive tracts owned by Saudi Arabia and Qatar. The Wall Street Journal speculates Bahrain was trying to cozy up to Daddy Bush, who was plotting an assault on Iraq after Saddam Hussein seized Kuwait.
Bass Enterprises Production Company finances the Bahrain drilling with $25 million, and Harvard Management raises its investment. A couple of members of the Fort Worth Bass family have places on Team 100, an elite business group contributing to the Republican National Committee.
In June, Harken drills two dry holes in Bahrain. The future looks bleak. Dubya dumps two-thirds of his Harken holdings (212,140 shares), for $848,560. He uses some of this money to buy into the Texas Rangers baseball club. This is a lot of stock to dump on the market all at once, and brokers say it was purchased by an unnamed institutional investor. That August, Harken posts a loss of $23 million.
- 1
- 2
- next
See all 97 Comments