Jan. 30, 2007
Why White People Like Barack Obama
The New Republic: Race May Be An Issue, But It's Good News For Obama
-
Play CBS Video
Video
Obama On Health Care
CBS News RAW: At a news conference for Families USA, Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., calls for universal health care.
-
Video
Notebook: Report, Then Decide
Only On The Web: Katie Couric discusses the false claim that Sen. Barack Obama attended a radical Muslim school. Couric believes journalists should refrain from repeating unsourced gossip.
-
Video
Obama Reacts To Bush Speech
Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., was one of several presidential hopefuls listening to the State of the Union address. He tells Harry Smith he felt the president failed to make the case for his Iraq plan.
-
Photo
Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., has often highlighted his multiracial background. (AP)
-
Who's Who
2008 Democratic Hopefuls
Clinton, Obama and Edwards lead the chase for the Democratic nomination.
In 1994, two sociologists went to Red Hook, Brooklyn, to solve a mystery. Red Hook abutted the East River, and along the waterfront sat shipping companies and warehouses — all in need of low-skilled labor. Next door sat a housing project teeming with exactly that. But the locals — primarily African Americans — didn't get hired. Instead, the jobs went to workers from outside the neighborhood, often Caribbean immigrants. Employers, wrote The New Yorker's Malcolm Gladwell in summarizing the sociologists' findings, "had developed an elaborate mechanism for distinguishing between those who they felt were 'good' blacks and those they felt were 'bad' blacks." Were the employers racist? Yes and no. They clearly held anti-black stereotypes. And they discriminated against those who conformed to them, even by association. But they discriminated in favor of blacks who defied those stereotypes. A man named Bruce Llewellyn described the phenomenon this way: "White people love to believe they're fair."
As it happens, Llewellyn wasn't talking about Red Hook. He was talking about his cousin, Colin Powell — whose prospective presidential bid enjoyed mass white support roughly a decade ago. Like the employers in Red Hook, whites discriminated in Powell's favor because he challenged their negative stereotypes of blacks. First, he had succeeded in a respected white institution: the military. Second, he was the child of immigrants, a man whose family history highlighted America's opportunities, not its racism. Third, he wasn't ideologically radical. And, fourth, he didn't look or sound stereotypically black. No one was blunter about this than Powell himself. Asked in 1995 to explain his appeal to whites, he volunteered that "I speak reasonably well, like a white person," and, visually, "I ain't that black."
Barack Obama would never put it that way. But he surely understands the uncomfortable subtext behind the adoration being showered upon him by white America. Obama, too, succeeded at a prestigious white institution: Harvard Law School. He, too, is a child of immigration, able to declare in his 2004 Democratic convention speech — in words that could have come from Michael Dukakis or Joe Lieberman (but not from a descendant of slaves, without heavy irony) — that "in no other country on Earth is my story even possible." And he, too, doesn't sound or look too black. Fifteen years ago, a State University of New York political scientist named Nayda Terkildsen doctored photos of a fictitious gubernatorial candidate to make him lighter- or darker-skinned and then showed them to Kentucky focus groups. "The dark-skinned black candidate," she noted, "was evaluated much more harshly than his lighter skinned peer." Powell knew what he was talking about.
In U.S. politics, as in Red Hook, there are no "good" blacks without "bad" blacks. In the mid-'90s, reporters frequently compared Powell with Jesse Jackson: a man who fit all the stereotypes he defied. Today, it probably helps Obama that Al Sharpton, with his 2004 presidential run, became the "president of black America." For many white Americans, it's a twofer. Elect Obama, and you not only dethrone George W. Bush, you dethrone Sharpton, too.
But being the "good" black is tricky. The more whites love you, the more you must reassure your own community that you are still one of them. And the more you do that, the more you jeopardize your white support. In 2002, when the highly articulate, light-skinned, Yale-educated Cory Booker ran for mayor of Newark, New Jersey — becoming a darling of the white press — incumbent Sharpe James used that support against him, tarring him as inauthentically black. Last fall, when the well-spoken, light-skinned, St. Albans-educated Harold Ford Jr. ran for Senate in Tennessee, his family's political prominence in the Memphis black community made such accusations impossible. But it was those very connections — to a family viewed negatively by many whites — that may have cost him the race.
For Obama, walking the tightrope is a little easier. Unlike Booker, Obama's African American wife, his connection to the black church, and his work as a community organizer give him racial credibility. But, unlike Ford, he has no obvious ties to Jackson/Sharpton style "bad" blacks. And, compared with Powell, he benefits enormously from changes in the political climate. The first big change is the collapse of crime as a political issue. In the 1980s and early '90s, Democrats had to adopt ultra-hard line stances on crime to reassure anxious white voters. And blacks had to go even further. Had Obama run for president in 1992, he would have had do to something akin to Bill Clinton's infamous execution of mentally retarded murderer Ricky Ray Rector — which would have hurt him with blacks. Today, by contrast, he can largely oppose the death penalty with hardly anyone seeming to mind.
The second big change is welfare reform, which has significantly de-racialized the debate over taxing and spending. Because of welfare reform, the percentage of whites saying "poor people have become too dependent on government assistance" has dropped markedly. That's good news for all Democrats, but especially for Obama, who would be particularly vulnerable to suspicions that he was trying to redistribute money from whites to blacks.
But Obama doesn't merely benefit from the decline of racially saturated issues like welfare and crime. He also benefits from the fact that, as racial polarization has declined, religious polarization has increased. When the culture war was primarily about race, black candidates were inherently divisive (and when they tried to reach out, they risked seeming insufficiently black). Today, however, it is white liberals who seem divisive, because they are perceived as secular. Black liberals, by contrast, are considered authentically devout, and, thus, bridge-builders. In the '80s, it would have been virtually impossible for a black candidate with substantial black support to credibly promise to span America's cultural divide. Today, it is at the heart of Obama's appeal.
Does this mean that U.S. politics have transcended race? Not at all. In a presidential campaign, as in Red Hook, blacks must still defy white stereotypes to succeed. What has changed is that defying those stereotypes doesn't require moving as far to the right. That's hardly utopia, but it's progress. And, for Obama in 2008, it may be enough.
By Peter Beinart
If you like this article, go to www.tnr.com, which breaks down today's top stories and offers nearly 100 years of news, opinion, and analysis.
| If you like this article, go to www.tnr.com, which breaks down today's top stories and offers nearly 100 years of news, opinion, and criticism. |




Martin Peretz owner of the New Republic
his political worldview, are devoted primarily to one argument -- that Arabs and Muslims are primitive savages and barbarians, and that the notion of a 'moderate Muslim' or even a civilized Arab is all but a myth. The majority of Peretz's posts, with varying degrees of explicitness, is devoted to bolstering that claim."
Wow - sounds fishy to me. Why does CBS print such trash ???
The reason is they have some sort of white guilt complex or something.
Martin Peretz the owner of The New Republic is a vicious racist his political worldview, are devoted primarily to one argument -- that Arabs and Muslims are primitive savages and barbarians, and that the notion of a 'moderate Muslim' or even a civilized Arab is all but a myth. The majority of Peretz's posts, with varying degrees of explicitness, is devoted to bolstering that claim."
Is this part of the "divide and rule" game ????
It seems to me the bar is set pretty low if Obama is so high in the polls with almost no experience, no claims to fame other than seeming vaguely "honest" and "trustworthy".
- I agree, but unfortunately it is still. This is me just being a realist. Additionally, like a drug or alcohol problem, most who suffer are in denial. There are a lot of lingering problem still left over from many centuries of racial misunderstanding. One of those is calling Obama black. He is actually as white as he is black. This notion that being 50% black and 50% white makes you 100% black is something out of the 1700s when slaveholders needed to make more slaves and decided that their sperm would work just fine and was free to use.
The bar was set pretty low already thanks to GW. No experience is actually better than bad experience.
I think the title is a bit off. But, if you read the story, there are some truths in it.
Mr. Caddilackid - I don't know what planet you are living on - but in THIS world the USA has a population of 300 million. 220 million of those are white, 36 million are black, 39 million are hispanic and the other 5 million are Asian or Native American. 220 million out of 300 million are NOT a minority in any strectch of the imagination. I suggest you check the US census data before you post outlandish racist statements. How would you like to read a statement like "Who in the hell cares what blacks think"? I don't imagine you'd like it at all - you would probably consider it a racist statement. Well, it is. And so is yours. This country has had enough of racist claptrap. Wise up.
HE'S NOT BUSH.
We should get off the race infatuation and focus on human qualities that are positive and desired.
It is down to laziness why blacks don't do better. Look at Bill Cosby, he made it and what he says is absolutley "RIGHT!"
Obama doesn't have to defend himself to anyone or any race, he needs to be just himself.
It disgusts me how a man who has darker skin than others, is perceived as "black," and "proper(white)" manners, so therefore he is electable.
I disagree that only liberals see things like this, because conservatives do the same hero-worshipping on other characteristics; it's the human way, unfortunately.
Obama is not ready; he's not done much, he hasn't said much, and he's not all that. His record is identical to Hillary Clinton's, and I rest my case.
There are some rather darker shades out there who would also be great candidates. what is odd is we never look at whites and say "he or she is too dark or light to be considered." So why do we do this to blacks. By the way the blacks have been in America too long to be called African American, and so have the whites who want to be known as Irish or Italian American. We get diluted after awhile-know what I mean??? Obama can say he is African, his Daddy is really from there. Who knows where some of the brothers have been or who their Mama's are, same for the ladies (oh ladies-Mercedes-lol).
Thank you for thinking I am black (or am I really white or other?). I have successfully achieved bridging the race gap.
I think trying to explain why someone has presidential buzz is an utterly useless conversation. Some say that the reason that Obama is in the running for president is because he's black. But I would argue that the reason why people considered electing almost every other major presidential candidate up to this point is because of their race--white and not black, Asian or Latino. There are probably tens, if not hundreds, of people who could run the country better than the Dimwit in Chief currently in the office. But being considered for president is due a little bit to skill and experience but a whole lot more to political savvy, image and plain old serendipity.
happy with his disasterous reign. Senator Obama
certainly could not do worse. Notwithstanding he has an above average IQ. Whites like him because "HE IS NOT BLACK." Obama is the son of a
white Jewish American mother and an East African father and has no DNA or racial kinship to black
Americans who do not descend from Jews nor East
Africans. Moreover, Obama grew up in Indonesia
and Hawaii and was reared up by his white material grandparents. His life experiences are light years away from black America. These facts do not make black America happy but if black America is expecting a Jesse Jackson type
to one day be elected president is never going to happen. Barack Obama is the nearest thing to black you are ever going to get for the presidency.
I now know the he is an unintelligent man and not fit to be president of KFC let alone the United States.
Anyone with half a brain knows that liberal arguments are illogical and emotional with little or no basis in actual fact. Every argument they have comes from Al (I'm Fired) Frankin and liberal blogs. They never have original ideas of their own.
Whites like him because he's black.
Blacks like him because he is black.
Racists, all.
The Blacks are voting for one of their own because they think they will get something out of it.
The Whites are voting for him because they think It's the "nice" thing to do.
He seems to be ashamed of his middle name, I wonder if there's any relation to Saddam.....
CBS news has estimated Bush's IQ at about 124, which is well above normal...so who is it to whom you refer to as to having a lower than average IQ???
****
Just because you do not like the man and his policies and his actions in office is no reason to start making up lies about him, this just causes you to lose credibility.
****
FACT, please let us stop lying to ourselves, and just be the best person we can be.
Instead of examining actual issues or considering a candidate's abilities as a leader, people love to focus on the trivial aspects, like race or middle names. This kind of approach to politics is detrimental to our country.
Listen to Obama's statements, see his actions, hear his key note speech, and then judge him. It is so perplexing to me that there is a man who is so passionate, so sincere, and so bright running for office, and yet all the public seems to see is some black guy with a muslim name.
I feel like great leaders are few and far between. Passionate, visionary leaders, that honestly care about this country and the people. Leaders that are loved by their people. When is the last time Americans have seen such a man?
Well, here stands Obama, in the wake of one of the most disappointing presidential terms in history. He offers fresh ideas, American unity, a new path from our current self destructive situation. A Harvard grad, with an incredible background. He is intelligent, charismatic, and, a man that wants to see good things happen in this country.
Yet, all I hear is, "Hes a black guy. And I heard his middle name is Hussein. Im not voting for some black terrorist." Be smarter than that!
He would very likely be one of the greatest American leaders we have seen, and people refuse to pay attention because of his middle name?
Racism is no longer as overt as it once was. It has become institutionalized. A black person in the justice system is percieved guilty until proven innocent. Black schools do not recieve the same resources white schools recieve because of local and state govt funding policies. Black homeowners and business are "red-lined" by lending institutions and subject to preditory lending practices. Regardless of education or income level if a black professional walks in a store wearing athletic gear it is assumed that they are another one of "those people". My point is these things make it easier for whites to say I'm not a racist, I haven't done anything to blacks. But you do reap the benefit of not having to overcome these obsticals and therefore gain an advantage simply by being born white.
America have never honestly acknowledged and taken responsibility for the inhumane way it treated African-Americans for 200 years.
Frankly I would never ever vote for anyone that uses ebonics, talks or acts like boys in the hood because frankly people who talk and act like that regardless of your race sound and look stupid.
-
by josiegeo
February 2, 2007 3:15 AM PST
- For Gray Owl: Is it possible to look forward for a little while? I'm only a 2nd generation American, my ancestors did not have slaves, nor did they defeat the American Indians. History is full of injustices. It saddens me to think that any human could treat another in the ways that history has recorded. Perhaps it is time to move forward, to find our common binds, appreciate or minimally learn from our differences. If it helps, I am sorry for slavery, sorry for the Holocost, sorry for the American Indians. I am sorry for all of the injustices in the world. May we PLEASE move on? I look beyond the color of skin, these constant reminders make it increasingly more difficult. I can't help but wonder how much these "reminders" actually keep racism alive.
-
Reply to this comment
-
See all 42 CommentsI repeat, what encourages and nourishes the respect I have for Barack Obama has nothing to do with the shade of his skin, nothing to do with the mistakes of early America. It has everything to do with where I believe he could lead our country in today's struggling times.