Jan. 30, 2007

Why White People Like Barack Obama

The New Republic: Race May Be An Issue, But It's Good News For Obama

  • Video Notebook: Report, Then Decide

    Only On The Web: Katie Couric discusses the false claim that Sen. Barack Obama attended a radical Muslim school. Couric believes journalists should refrain from repeating unsourced gossip.

  • Video Obama Reacts To Bush Speech

    Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., was one of several presidential hopefuls listening to the State of the Union address. He tells Harry Smith he felt the president failed to make the case for his Iraq plan.

  • Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., has often highlighted his multiracial background. Photo

    Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., has often highlighted his multiracial background.  (AP)

(The New Republic)  This column was written by Peter Beinart.
In 1994, two sociologists went to Red Hook, Brooklyn, to solve a mystery. Red Hook abutted the East River, and along the waterfront sat shipping companies and warehouses — all in need of low-skilled labor. Next door sat a housing project teeming with exactly that. But the locals — primarily African Americans — didn't get hired. Instead, the jobs went to workers from outside the neighborhood, often Caribbean immigrants. Employers, wrote The New Yorker's Malcolm Gladwell in summarizing the sociologists' findings, "had developed an elaborate mechanism for distinguishing between those who they felt were 'good' blacks and those they felt were 'bad' blacks." Were the employers racist? Yes and no. They clearly held anti-black stereotypes. And they discriminated against those who conformed to them, even by association. But they discriminated in favor of blacks who defied those stereotypes. A man named Bruce Llewellyn described the phenomenon this way: "White people love to believe they're fair."

As it happens, Llewellyn wasn't talking about Red Hook. He was talking about his cousin, Colin Powell — whose prospective presidential bid enjoyed mass white support roughly a decade ago. Like the employers in Red Hook, whites discriminated in Powell's favor because he challenged their negative stereotypes of blacks. First, he had succeeded in a respected white institution: the military. Second, he was the child of immigrants, a man whose family history highlighted America's opportunities, not its racism. Third, he wasn't ideologically radical. And, fourth, he didn't look or sound stereotypically black. No one was blunter about this than Powell himself. Asked in 1995 to explain his appeal to whites, he volunteered that "I speak reasonably well, like a white person," and, visually, "I ain't that black."

Barack Obama would never put it that way. But he surely understands the uncomfortable subtext behind the adoration being showered upon him by white America. Obama, too, succeeded at a prestigious white institution: Harvard Law School. He, too, is a child of immigration, able to declare in his 2004 Democratic convention speech — in words that could have come from Michael Dukakis or Joe Lieberman (but not from a descendant of slaves, without heavy irony) — that "in no other country on Earth is my story even possible." And he, too, doesn't sound or look too black. Fifteen years ago, a State University of New York political scientist named Nayda Terkildsen doctored photos of a fictitious gubernatorial candidate to make him lighter- or darker-skinned and then showed them to Kentucky focus groups. "The dark-skinned black candidate," she noted, "was evaluated much more harshly than his lighter skinned peer." Powell knew what he was talking about.

In U.S. politics, as in Red Hook, there are no "good" blacks without "bad" blacks. In the mid-'90s, reporters frequently compared Powell with Jesse Jackson: a man who fit all the stereotypes he defied. Today, it probably helps Obama that Al Sharpton, with his 2004 presidential run, became the "president of black America." For many white Americans, it's a twofer. Elect Obama, and you not only dethrone George W. Bush, you dethrone Sharpton, too.

But being the "good" black is tricky. The more whites love you, the more you must reassure your own community that you are still one of them. And the more you do that, the more you jeopardize your white support. In 2002, when the highly articulate, light-skinned, Yale-educated Cory Booker ran for mayor of Newark, New Jersey — becoming a darling of the white press — incumbent Sharpe James used that support against him, tarring him as inauthentically black. Last fall, when the well-spoken, light-skinned, St. Albans-educated Harold Ford Jr. ran for Senate in Tennessee, his family's political prominence in the Memphis black community made such accusations impossible. But it was those very connections — to a family viewed negatively by many whites — that may have cost him the race.

For Obama, walking the tightrope is a little easier. Unlike Booker, Obama's African American wife, his connection to the black church, and his work as a community organizer give him racial credibility. But, unlike Ford, he has no obvious ties to Jackson/Sharpton style "bad" blacks. And, compared with Powell, he benefits enormously from changes in the political climate. The first big change is the collapse of crime as a political issue. In the 1980s and early '90s, Democrats had to adopt ultra-hard line stances on crime to reassure anxious white voters. And blacks had to go even further. Had Obama run for president in 1992, he would have had do to something akin to Bill Clinton's infamous execution of mentally retarded murderer Ricky Ray Rector — which would have hurt him with blacks. Today, by contrast, he can largely oppose the death penalty with hardly anyone seeming to mind.

The second big change is welfare reform, which has significantly de-racialized the debate over taxing and spending. Because of welfare reform, the percentage of whites saying "poor people have become too dependent on government assistance" has dropped markedly. That's good news for all Democrats, but especially for Obama, who would be particularly vulnerable to suspicions that he was trying to redistribute money from whites to blacks.

But Obama doesn't merely benefit from the decline of racially saturated issues like welfare and crime. He also benefits from the fact that, as racial polarization has declined, religious polarization has increased. When the culture war was primarily about race, black candidates were inherently divisive (and when they tried to reach out, they risked seeming insufficiently black). Today, however, it is white liberals who seem divisive, because they are perceived as secular. Black liberals, by contrast, are considered authentically devout, and, thus, bridge-builders. In the '80s, it would have been virtually impossible for a black candidate with substantial black support to credibly promise to span America's cultural divide. Today, it is at the heart of Obama's appeal.

Does this mean that U.S. politics have transcended race? Not at all. In a presidential campaign, as in Red Hook, blacks must still defy white stereotypes to succeed. What has changed is that defying those stereotypes doesn't require moving as far to the right. That's hardly utopia, but it's progress. And, for Obama in 2008, it may be enough.

By Peter Beinart
If you like this article, go to www.tnr.com, which breaks down today's top stories and offers nearly 100 years of news, opinion, and analysis.



If you like this article, go to www.tnr.com, which breaks down today's top stories and offers nearly 100 years of news, opinion, and criticism.

Video and Galleries from Opinion

Add a Comment See all 42 Comments
by bluestardad January 30, 2007 12:35 PM PST
Make the Congress and the Administration define who the enemy is in Iraq. The Neocons cannot tell you who we are sending our troops to fight. It is a sure bet that the Chicken Hawks are not going to go fight. Saudis are aiding the Sunnis and Iran is aiding the Shiites and the 12 former members of Saddam%u2019s regime are running scared hiding in caves! So how do we tell our troops to fire upon? Why is America even there? OK here is your chance, don%u2019t just set in front of your computer and complain spouting meaningless rants of sludge, do something about it! This is the contact address for your Senator! Send them a message of your opinion. All Class Two Senators are up for Reelection in 2008. Be respectful even if they do not deserve it because their office does! http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm
Reply to this comment
by susieq_13 January 30, 2007 12:42 PM PST
Race should not matter. I'm tired of everyone being racist.
Reply to this comment
by oleander8 January 30, 2007 12:45 PM PST
I resent the headline of this article as well as the very suggestion that "white" people have definable reason for liking (or disliking) this man. Keep race out of it. It isn't relevant.
Reply to this comment
by karlimhof January 30, 2007 12:57 PM PST
B4 you comment of this racist article - want to know where it comes from ??

Martin Peretz owner of the New Republic

his political worldview, are devoted primarily to one argument -- that Arabs and Muslims are primitive savages and barbarians, and that the notion of a 'moderate Muslim' or even a civilized Arab is all but a myth. The majority of Peretz's posts, with varying degrees of explicitness, is devoted to bolstering that claim."

Wow - sounds fishy to me. Why does CBS print such trash ???
Reply to this comment
by gwlafayette January 30, 2007 1:12 PM PST
Give me a break. He is the epitomy of modern racism and colored priveledge. His success is due to the fact that the father that abandoned him was black and that he was raised white. CBS has shown blantant bias towards him, while they insult Mitt Romney for being Mormon. Barack Hussein Obama is the worst possible person to be our president now. If he does win, expect white men to start behaving like other "oppressed minorities" do.
Reply to this comment
by bluestardad January 30, 2007 1:19 PM PST
whogivesashit?
Reply to this comment
by caddillackid January 30, 2007 2:04 PM PST
I wonder if Jesus is too black for white America, needless to say our savior is not white, who in the hell cares what white america thinks? Who the hell are they? Take the blacks, mexicans, latinos combined; whites are now the minority in this country, again who cares what they think.
Reply to this comment
by caddillackid January 30, 2007 2:17 PM PST
CBS has got to find better stories to report on...most of us really don't want to read about this stuff. I got on word for this story....tacky.
Reply to this comment
by spencejg January 30, 2007 2:42 PM PST
I don't get it -- why can't it be that we all like Obama because he's an intelligent politician who just might have a handle on what the American public really does want. Maybe white America and all the rest too just want someone to run for the Presidency who will respond to what matters.
Reply to this comment
by bigwhtpony January 30, 2007 2:55 PM PST
No, no....CBS has it wrong AGAIN! The title should be: Why White Liberals Like Obama

The reason is they have some sort of white guilt complex or something.

Reply to this comment
by karlimhof January 30, 2007 3:06 PM PST
Why does CBS put such an article on-line where literally thousands (maybe 10's of thous.) read it???

Martin Peretz the owner of The New Republic is a vicious racist his political worldview, are devoted primarily to one argument -- that Arabs and Muslims are primitive savages and barbarians, and that the notion of a 'moderate Muslim' or even a civilized Arab is all but a myth. The majority of Peretz's posts, with varying degrees of explicitness, is devoted to bolstering that claim."

Is this part of the "divide and rule" game ????

Reply to this comment
by mswolfestock January 30, 2007 3:08 PM PST
Why I like Obama: He's not Hilary Clinton. If you must know I'm a white 50-something woman, and a life-long Democrat. I never could stand Hilary . . . I'm also a US Army veteran and I will never forgive Hilary for saying (on 60 Minutes, way back in the early Nineties, I think), "I loathe the military." C'mon, ya'll have been smoking too much wacky weed or guzzling too many martinis if you don't remember this. Bill Clinton was successful in spite of Hilary, not because of her. I wouldn't mind having a woman in the White House, but not Hilary . . . Obama is our best chance for serious change, which this country needs so badly.
Reply to this comment
by duckswill January 30, 2007 3:43 PM PST
Insightful, but Harold lost because he was single and the miscegenation card was used efectively.
Reply to this comment
by kalatur1 January 30, 2007 3:48 PM PST
Who even knows Obama's position on the issues. We are too busy congratulating ourselves for being color blind.

It seems to me the bar is set pretty low if Obama is so high in the polls with almost no experience, no claims to fame other than seeming vaguely "honest" and "trustworthy".
Reply to this comment
by whatithink-2009 January 30, 2007 3:50 PM PST
"Race should not matter. I'm tired of everyone being racist."

- I agree, but unfortunately it is still. This is me just being a realist. Additionally, like a drug or alcohol problem, most who suffer are in denial. There are a lot of lingering problem still left over from many centuries of racial misunderstanding. One of those is calling Obama black. He is actually as white as he is black. This notion that being 50% black and 50% white makes you 100% black is something out of the 1700s when slaveholders needed to make more slaves and decided that their sperm would work just fine and was free to use.

Reply to this comment
by whatithink-2009 January 30, 2007 3:51 PM PST
To Kalatur1,

The bar was set pretty low already thanks to GW. No experience is actually better than bad experience.
Reply to this comment
by whatithink-2009 January 30, 2007 3:52 PM PST
To Duckswill,

I think the title is a bit off. But, if you read the story, there are some truths in it.
Reply to this comment
by tokra1 January 30, 2007 3:54 PM PST
Caddilackid says: "who in the hell cares what white america thinks? Who the hell are they? Take the blacks, mexicans, latinos combined; whites are now the minority in this country, again who cares what they think."
Mr. Caddilackid - I don't know what planet you are living on - but in THIS world the USA has a population of 300 million. 220 million of those are white, 36 million are black, 39 million are hispanic and the other 5 million are Asian or Native American. 220 million out of 300 million are NOT a minority in any strectch of the imagination. I suggest you check the US census data before you post outlandish racist statements. How would you like to read a statement like "Who in the hell cares what blacks think"? I don't imagine you'd like it at all - you would probably consider it a racist statement. Well, it is. And so is yours. This country has had enough of racist claptrap. Wise up.
Reply to this comment
by fascistusa January 30, 2007 4:09 PM PST
why White People like Obama..

HE'S NOT BUSH.
Reply to this comment
by AgentGGG January 30, 2007 5:16 PM PST
This editorial shows an unhealthy obsession with racial stereotyping and categorization. Maybe its not the race, but simply the behavior, communication skills, and intelligence that matters. Politicians of all races will accept that these values are universal and uniformly applied.

We should get off the race infatuation and focus on human qualities that are positive and desired.
Reply to this comment
by dogsoul January 30, 2007 5:21 PM PST
...liberals focus on all things superficial - everything comes down to how it looks, how it makes you look, or how it feels; rarely does any substantive matter factor into the discussion. While you may well disagree with thier views, it is clear to any observer that people like Powell, Rice, Clarence Thomas & other minorities have received Republican backing on the basis of their qualifications and/or how well they reflect the Republican viewpoint. Obama may be a great guy, heck Pelosi might be a great speaker - but at the end of the day it doesn't matter to liberals... because all they see is your gender, your race, your class, etc... Diversity is a virtue & a goal unto itself that requires no further examination... everything else is secondary.
Reply to this comment
by cmp271 January 30, 2007 6:15 PM PST
It is interesting that Obama has to worry about this. He is a very credible candidate. Is well spoken and educated. He is also self made. This rubs Jackson and Sharpton all wrong because he is supposed to come to them for their support, after all they know all the answers, and resent his new kid on the block popularity. Obama also shows them up as look at me I am also black and I have made it, why can't you. It also shows the difference in how white parents and black parents raise their kids. He was "raised white." I will vote for him if he is on the ballot. it is time for the blacks of America to stop beating the boring drum of slavery and racism and all the other garbage in between. Step up to the plate and be Americans-trust me the blacks in Africa don't want you back or want to even know you!!!!

It is down to laziness why blacks don't do better. Look at Bill Cosby, he made it and what he says is absolutley "RIGHT!"
Obama doesn't have to defend himself to anyone or any race, he needs to be just himself.
Reply to this comment
by drsweener January 30, 2007 7:11 PM PST
Where did you read that, Redneck's Illustrated?
Reply to this comment
by cmayes2 January 30, 2007 7:50 PM PST
What is acting white, I've never understood that. So, if you ride a fine car, is educated, don't say yo'mama, then that's white; so,if you do the above then you're black. In other words white man have excepted that how we are portrayed on TV and in books is how we are. Well, that's not how we are, and have never been. We've always owned land, bought houses ( my parents built their first house from the ground in the early 1950's). It was 12 of us and we all finished high school, and entered institutions of higher learning. There's different goups of Black people, as their are different groups of whites.
Reply to this comment
by destardi2 January 30, 2007 8:31 PM PST
I live in Chicago; Obama has potential, but he's only been in office for 2 full years. I am a progressive, liberal, whatever, and it disgusts me to see extreme leftists push for Obama, based on race...and to some degree, one poster is correct in saying people "only see race." I agree in the sense that Obama is deemed "white enough," or how about "proper enough," and he's called BLACK, when in fact he's of a black African, and Caucasion background.

It disgusts me how a man who has darker skin than others, is perceived as "black," and "proper(white)" manners, so therefore he is electable.

I disagree that only liberals see things like this, because conservatives do the same hero-worshipping on other characteristics; it's the human way, unfortunately.

Obama is not ready; he's not done much, he hasn't said much, and he's not all that. His record is identical to Hillary Clinton's, and I rest my case.
Reply to this comment
by cmp271 January 30, 2007 9:45 PM PST
This is for swe190n, does it matter what race I am? Jackson and Sharpton are always bringing up race, it has no place. Thank you for making me a Saint, as long as I am not associated with being a New Orleans Saint....

There are some rather darker shades out there who would also be great candidates. what is odd is we never look at whites and say "he or she is too dark or light to be considered." So why do we do this to blacks. By the way the blacks have been in America too long to be called African American, and so have the whites who want to be known as Irish or Italian American. We get diluted after awhile-know what I mean??? Obama can say he is African, his Daddy is really from there. Who knows where some of the brothers have been or who their Mama's are, same for the ladies (oh ladies-Mercedes-lol).

Thank you for thinking I am black (or am I really white or other?). I have successfully achieved bridging the race gap.
Reply to this comment
by jipoku January 30, 2007 9:52 PM PST
Other than age and being born in the U.S., there are few prerequisites for becoming president. It's a tough job, but it's the kind of job where we don't know what kind a president a person will be until after they are already president. When we vote, we're trying to guess as well as we can who will do the best job with all that we know about the candidate in an unforeseeable future. Is Obama the best person for the job? I don't know. But two years as a Senator versus four years or forty years won't change a person's natural ability to lead and grapple with today's complex world.

I think trying to explain why someone has presidential buzz is an utterly useless conversation. Some say that the reason that Obama is in the running for president is because he's black. But I would argue that the reason why people considered electing almost every other major presidential candidate up to this point is because of their race--white and not black, Asian or Latino. There are probably tens, if not hundreds, of people who could run the country better than the Dimwit in Chief currently in the office. But being considered for president is due a little bit to skill and experience but a whole lot more to political savvy, image and plain old serendipity.
Reply to this comment
by josefremonde January 30, 2007 11:38 PM PST
White American elected a man with a low IQ and little or no political experience and many are
happy with his disasterous reign. Senator Obama
certainly could not do worse. Notwithstanding he has an above average IQ. Whites like him because "HE IS NOT BLACK." Obama is the son of a
white Jewish American mother and an East African father and has no DNA or racial kinship to black
Americans who do not descend from Jews nor East
Africans. Moreover, Obama grew up in Indonesia
and Hawaii and was reared up by his white material grandparents. His life experiences are light years away from black America. These facts do not make black America happy but if black America is expecting a Jesse Jackson type
to one day be elected president is never going to happen. Barack Obama is the nearest thing to black you are ever going to get for the presidency.
Reply to this comment
by davey214 January 31, 2007 12:19 AM PST
The man would make a nice president if he wasn't a democrat or abortionist.
Reply to this comment
by knyghtwolf January 31, 2007 3:44 AM PST
No racism going on in this forum eh? Why does race or skin color have to factor in at all? How about whether or not the candidate actually has the ABILITIES to lead a country such as ours? Will that ever factor in to the equation?
Reply to this comment
by bluestardad January 31, 2007 7:09 AM PST
As long as he portrays himself as an American and not something else America will support him. But it is scary what Rove will do with this guy!
Reply to this comment
by big_helmet January 31, 2007 7:33 AM PST
Only if he were running against the likes of a Hugo Chavez would he get my vote.
Reply to this comment
by bigwhtpony January 31, 2007 9:55 AM PST
1/31/07 - I just read where Obama said, "the arguments of liberals are more often grounded in reason and fact."

I now know the he is an unintelligent man and not fit to be president of KFC let alone the United States.

Anyone with half a brain knows that liberal arguments are illogical and emotional with little or no basis in actual fact. Every argument they have comes from Al (I'm Fired) Frankin and liberal blogs. They never have original ideas of their own.

Reply to this comment
by vancouverboo January 31, 2007 10:11 AM PST
Racism is the answer.

Whites like him because he's black.

Blacks like him because he is black.

Racists, all.

The Blacks are voting for one of their own because they think they will get something out of it.

The Whites are voting for him because they think It's the "nice" thing to do.
Reply to this comment
by gunownerdan January 31, 2007 10:36 AM PST
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA.
He seems to be ashamed of his middle name, I wonder if there's any relation to Saddam.....
Reply to this comment
by getserious1 January 31, 2007 11:22 AM PST
josefremonde:

CBS news has estimated Bush's IQ at about 124, which is well above normal...so who is it to whom you refer to as to having a lower than average IQ???
****
Just because you do not like the man and his policies and his actions in office is no reason to start making up lies about him, this just causes you to lose credibility.
****
Reply to this comment
by notconvinced-2009 January 31, 2007 3:10 PM PST
Back in the day of slavery when the black woman gave birth to the master's child, that child took on the race of the mother no matter what the race of the father was, by all rights Obama should be classified as WHITE. Whether Obama is white or black is not important to me, I feel that at this time it is NOT the right time for him to run for the highest office; When we as U.S. citizens cast THIS vote, we must keep in mind that whomever we put in office will have to serve eight years, we should be very cognitive of how we CAST this vote. I believe Mr. Obama would make a wonderful vice-president, thus giving him the experience for his run in 2020, yes "W" showed us that you do not have to have experience to be president, and you see where we are with the lack of experience and compassion in our elected leader, please let us not make this mistake again. Racisim is alive and striving in the world I exist in, we can close our eyes to it, but it still exist, when "W" addressed the NAACP he made mention of that
FACT, please let us stop lying to ourselves, and just be the best person we can be.
Reply to this comment
by josiegeo February 1, 2007 7:59 AM PST
I'm shocked & amazed by some of the ignorance I've been reading here. Race, nor his middle name have anything to do why Obama will have my vote. It was the speech that he gave at the Democratic Convention a few yrs ago. It literally made me stop in my tracks, I said then and there, "that kid needs to run for president." The fact that he is NOT a seasoned politician is another thing I find refreshing and trustworthy. I love what he said... I can't quote exactly, but we are not black, white, liberal, or conservative, we are Americans. I'd like to see that catch on. United we stand, as Americans... divided, I'm afraid, we are falling.
Reply to this comment
by realadam1 February 1, 2007 2:12 PM PST
This is absolutely ridiculous. The ignorance displayed here is a harsh reminder of how shallow and foolish people can be.
Instead of examining actual issues or considering a candidate's abilities as a leader, people love to focus on the trivial aspects, like race or middle names. This kind of approach to politics is detrimental to our country.
Listen to Obama's statements, see his actions, hear his key note speech, and then judge him. It is so perplexing to me that there is a man who is so passionate, so sincere, and so bright running for office, and yet all the public seems to see is some black guy with a muslim name.
I feel like great leaders are few and far between. Passionate, visionary leaders, that honestly care about this country and the people. Leaders that are loved by their people. When is the last time Americans have seen such a man?
Well, here stands Obama, in the wake of one of the most disappointing presidential terms in history. He offers fresh ideas, American unity, a new path from our current self destructive situation. A Harvard grad, with an incredible background. He is intelligent, charismatic, and, a man that wants to see good things happen in this country.
Yet, all I hear is, "Hes a black guy. And I heard his middle name is Hussein. Im not voting for some black terrorist." Be smarter than that!
He would very likely be one of the greatest American leaders we have seen, and people refuse to pay attention because of his middle name?
Reply to this comment
by gray_owl_55 February 1, 2007 3:50 PM PST
The mear fact that Sen. Obama is percieved as an "acceptable" black man by white people is itself evidence that race still matters. Do we make as big a deal out of it when blacks or hispanics support a white candidate? NO!

Racism is no longer as overt as it once was. It has become institutionalized. A black person in the justice system is percieved guilty until proven innocent. Black schools do not recieve the same resources white schools recieve because of local and state govt funding policies. Black homeowners and business are "red-lined" by lending institutions and subject to preditory lending practices. Regardless of education or income level if a black professional walks in a store wearing athletic gear it is assumed that they are another one of "those people". My point is these things make it easier for whites to say I'm not a racist, I haven't done anything to blacks. But you do reap the benefit of not having to overcome these obsticals and therefore gain an advantage simply by being born white.

America have never honestly acknowledged and taken responsibility for the inhumane way it treated African-Americans for 200 years.
Reply to this comment
by cdegolier February 1, 2007 7:18 PM PST
By saying Obama acts "white" what exactly do you mean? He doesn't talk like boys in the hood, doesn't use ebonics, in other words he acts and sounds educated. Why does that mean he is acting "white"? There are plenty of educated black men and women who chose to speak in complete sentences and pronounce words correctly without making up new ones.

Frankly I would never ever vote for anyone that uses ebonics, talks or acts like boys in the hood because frankly people who talk and act like that regardless of your race sound and look stupid.
Reply to this comment
by josiegeo February 2, 2007 3:15 AM PST
For Gray Owl: Is it possible to look forward for a little while? I'm only a 2nd generation American, my ancestors did not have slaves, nor did they defeat the American Indians. History is full of injustices. It saddens me to think that any human could treat another in the ways that history has recorded. Perhaps it is time to move forward, to find our common binds, appreciate or minimally learn from our differences. If it helps, I am sorry for slavery, sorry for the Holocost, sorry for the American Indians. I am sorry for all of the injustices in the world. May we PLEASE move on? I look beyond the color of skin, these constant reminders make it increasingly more difficult. I can't help but wonder how much these "reminders" actually keep racism alive.
I repeat, what encourages and nourishes the respect I have for Barack Obama has nothing to do with the shade of his skin, nothing to do with the mistakes of early America. It has everything to do with where I believe he could lead our country in today's struggling times.
Reply to this comment
See all 42 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
  • Viewed
  • Commented
Latest News
Featured Blogs