Cheney Fires Back At Hagel Accusations
VP Says Nebraska Senator's War Critique Makes It Hard "Not To Speak Ill Of A Fellow Republican"
-
Play CBS Video Video Cheney Goes On Attack Vice President Dick Cheney criticized those who oppose the proposed troop increase in Iraq and said the president does not need Congress's approval to carry out his plan. Bob Orr reports.
-
(AP)
-
Who's Who 2008 Republican Hopefuls McCain and Giuliani head up the Republican pack chasing the presidency.
"Let's say I believe firmly in Ronald Reagan's 11th commandment: Thou shalt not speak ill of a fellow Republican," Cheney said. "But it's very hard sometimes to adhere to that where Chuck Hagel is involved."
Cheney's comments came in a Newsweek interview released Sunday.
Hagel, a potential presidential candidate, has been outspoken in his criticism that the Republican White House lacks a coherent strategy in Iraq.
His "ping-pong" remark came Wednesday as the Senate Foreign Relations Committee debated a nonbinding resolution that condemned President George W. Bush's troop buildup in Iraq. Hagel co-sponsored the measure, which the committee approved in a 12-9 vote. He was the only Republican to vote for it.
In the interview, Cheney also said he doesn't spend any time worrying about how the public or the media view him. When pressed to react to personal criticism from people with whom he has worked before, Cheney said: "Well, I'm vice president and they're not."
© MMVII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
- Netadmin 1; We've stood shoulder to shoulder before and we'll do it again whenever necessary to defend our Homeland!! That's the beauty of having been in the service, you learn there are opinions other than yours!
Posted by bm6005 at 05:26 PM : Jan 29, 2007
Amen bro! - Reply to this comment
- karlimhof,
your address please, because you're going straight to meet those virgins or you're going back to roachistine. your choice.
Posted by lieberman18 at 07:04 PM : Jan 29, 2007
You think it's wrong for someone not to post their name and address on an open forum like this? As the great Bugs Bunny once said "What a maroon!". Only a complete idiot would put there name and address on an open forum! Who do you think we are? Republicans? - Reply to this comment
- Amen to Katncandy regarding Hagel. I am totally impressed with him. I'm in a neighboring state and I'd love to trade do-nothing Allard for Chuck. I will probably vote for him if he runs. I really like no-nonsense people and he strikes me as such!
- Reply to this comment
- I'm a constituent of Chuck Hagel. I voted for him. I follow what he does and he is a dogged, quiet diplomat who is virtually unknown inside this country compared to outside. He has made many trips to the Middle East, especially Afghanistan and Iraq. He's wise, conscientious and honest. This isn't about winning or losing. In his opinion (and mine) we already won. Now it's up to the Iraqis.
- Reply to this comment
- lieberpansy
by the way... we don't say "protect a flag".
WE say "the flag", or "our flag"
Anyway, the only flag you would know and have allegiance to is that American-paid for one with the funny star on it. - Reply to this comment
- lieberpansy writes:
"and calls me a coward, it sometimes takes more guts to organize support troops rallies or to try and protect a flag on your college campus when anti-war demostrators are trying to burn it down."
Remember in the "Gladiator" when Commodus is whining because his father won't let him be Caesar and has to admit he hasn't the qualities required; but says "Courage, I have courage, but not on the battlefield, but there are other forms of courage...."
lieberwhiner - go protect the israeli flag - in israel please. - Reply to this comment
- Cheney, one of four in a field of 435, who opposed head start. Yes, you are vice president, but look who selected you. Republicans should be very ashamed, not necessarily for thier war position, but because of thier incompetance, greed, discompassionate and mean-spirited nature.
- Reply to this comment
- lieberman18 - if i did meet you - you can bet it wouldn't be to kick your butt - it would be to exchange ideas.
- Reply to this comment
- lieberman18 -
your apology isn't necessary - for what it is worth - speak your mind - i am big enough to handle it my friend. everyone here on this site should be man or lady enough to realize everyone has an opinion - that is what makes America great. - Reply to this comment
- netadmin1
Don't engage liebersheiser and he'll get tire of reading his own posts. He comes here to scrap with his perceived enemy. He's incapable of a civil, intelligent exchange. Why do you give him what he wants? Let him rant. - Reply to this comment
- "And one who didn't send B-52s to bomb Serbs instead of Bin Laden."
Clarify it for me...You've brought this up several times. What exactly is the problem with bombing the serbs? Is it because there is no oil there? And the only purpose it served was to try and prevent genocide? Ahhhhhhhhhh. Got it. Carry on. - Reply to this comment
- Nederland, Colorado!!
- Reply to this comment
- What about ******** Cheney's service record? Zero, zip, nada. He was too busy sucking up to Nixon's crew along with Stein and co. What about Wolfowitz, Kristol, Perle, etc. By your definition of not serving ala Clinton they're all cowards too!! And an Amen to that brother!
- Reply to this comment
- actual address, bm - your call, friend.
and...please have the guts to denounce Cliton in the same vernacular you've denounced a PRO-MILITARY President.
And one who didn't send B-52s to bomb Serbs instead of Bin Laden. - Reply to this comment
- When I went to college I helped found a vet fraternity Chi Gamma Iota (XGI). In our by-laws we specifically would not allow anyone who served less than 180 days of active service, read that National Guard!! Now it's a different story today what with the Guard serving in Iraq and I hold no grudge towards today's Guard. However; when Shrub was in the guard it was specifically cause he was a child of privilege and a rich man's son. Go screw yourself 18!!
- Reply to this comment
- karlimhof,
your address please, because you're going straight to meet those virgins or you're going back to roachistine. your choice. - Reply to this comment
- bm6005
You got that right brother. - Reply to this comment
- Netadmin 1; We've stood shoulder to shoulder before and we'll do it again whenever necessary to defend our Homeland!! That's the beauty of having been in the service, you learn there are opinions other than yours!
- Reply to this comment
- karlimhof
liberman18 doesn't need to apology - he's too gutless - he just needs to go away. - Reply to this comment
- lieberman18 -
you know, I may not agree will everything people on this site say or believe, and I sure don't expect them to agree with everything I say or believe, but, make no mistake about it, I sure would stand shoulder to shoulder with them and defend this nation for a just cause. I too am a veteran of the war in Nam. I guarantee you this too - you better hope no one finds out who you really are - because you wouldn't be around long. The people you call losers wold lose you. And I didn't use one cuss word either. - Reply to this comment
The road ahead in Afghanistan, and the crucial decision Obama faces.



