July 15, 2009 3:01 PM

How Deadly Apollo Fire Helped Save NASA

(CBS/AP)  It was supposed to be a routine launch pad test.

But from the Apollo 1 command module at Pad 34 came a panicked voice saying, "Fire in the cockpit."

Exactly 40 years later, the three Apollo astronauts who were killed in that flash fire were remembered Saturday for paving the way for later astronauts to be able to travel to the moon. The deaths of Virgil "Gus" Grissom, Ed White and Roger Chaffee forced NASA to take pause in its space race with the Soviet Union and make design and safety changes that were critical to the agency's later successes.

"I can assure you if we had not had that fire and rebuilt the command module ... we could not have done the Apollo program successfully," said retired astronaut John Young, who flew in Gemini 3 with Grissom in 1965. "So we owe a lot to Gus, and Rog and Ed. They made it possible for the rest of us to do the almost-impossible."

The memorial service at the Kennedy Space Center Visitors Complex marked the start of a solemn week for NASA — Sunday is the 21st anniversary of the space shuttle Challenger accident, and Thursday makes four years since the space shuttle Columbia disaster.

Chaffee's widow, Martha, and White's son, Edward III, along with NASA associate administrator Bill Gerstenmaier, laid a wreath at the base of the Space Mirror Memorial, a tall granite-finished wall engraved with the names of the Apollo 1, Challenger and Columbia astronauts and seven other astronauts killed in accidents.

Audio: CBS News correspondent Peter King reports on the 40th anniversary of the tragic Apollo 1 fire.
Chaffee, 69, remembered feeding her two children hot dogs for dinner that night in 1967 and knowing something was wrong when astronaut Michael Collins showed up at her home to tell her about the accident.

"My first reaction was, 'What could have happened? He's not flying,"' Martha Chaffee recalled before the ceremony.

NASA also hadn't considered the countdown drill hazardous, anticipating accidents only in space. Fire rescue and medical teams were not at the launch pad. No procedures had been developed for the type of emergency the Apollo 1 crew faced. The work levels around the spacecraft contained steps, sliding doors and sharp turns that hindered emergency responses.

An investigation said the fire most likely started in an area near the floor around some wires between the oxygen panel and the environmental control system. The 100 percent oxygen environment made it highly combustible and internal pressure made it impossible for the astronauts to open the command module's inner hatch.

The astronauts died from inhaling toxic gases.

Before his death, Grissom, the second astronaut in space, had been so disappointed with problems in the new spacecraft that at one point he hung a lemon over it, said Lowell Grissom, the astronaut's younger brother.

After the tragedy, the command module's hatch was changed so it opened outward, flammable materials in the cabin were replaced, wiring problems were fixed and a mixture of nitrogen and oxygen replaced the all oxygen atmosphere.

Apollo 1's legacy contributed to the safety culture at NASA and the successful lunar landings, said Edward White III, whose father conducted the first U.S. spacewalk in 1965.

"The safety that came out of Apollo 1 is still here today," he said.

Describing it as "one of the most significant relics in the history of the space program," Lowell Grissom urged that the Apollo 1 spacecraft be moved from a warehouse in Virginia to the launch pad where the astronauts perished.

"As we remember their deaths ... let us renew our dedication to the quest for which they died, reaching for the stars for all mankind," Grissom said.

Astronaut Grissom understood the hazards he and his fellow pilots faced, and his own words seem to reach out beyond his death to comfort and inspire others: "If we die, we want people to accept it ... We are in a risky business and we hope that if anything happens to us, it will not delay the program. The conquest of space is worth the risk of life."

© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
  • David Morgan

    David Morgan is a senior editor at CBSNews.com and cbssundaymorning.com.

Add a Comment
by rennin1 January 30, 2007 10:37 AM EST
Ok, immediately after this post I'm throwing away my car, my computer, my clothes, and all the other unnatural things in my life that start with the letter "C". That way there will be one less person available to help pay taxes needed to support natural manned space exploration...
;-)
Reply to this comment
by actornaught January 30, 2007 2:31 AM EST
ren, sorry, but your logic is all over the map. if all those things reflect some kind of sign that we shouldn't explore space, than throw away your cars because they go too fast for our fragile bodies. While you're at it, throw away your computer, because your brain wasnt meant to be augmented. I can easily keep going, so you end up living naked in that tree.

We were given minds to manipulate our environment, 'beasts of the field' & all. Some minds wants absolute answers, and that's how you get them to move outside of society and blow themselves up for virgins. Don't bother refuting the degree or details, you're all the same.
Reply to this comment
by rennin1 January 29, 2007 11:53 PM EST
Ok, Google for 'space exploration loss'. Google returns 1,240,000 hits. You're right rf35, that's not nothing, but it sure is a lot of losses.

As for God leaving man in trees... you should know that tribes in Papua, New Guinea live in trees to this day. So, the fact that mankind engages in space exploration says nothing about whether people still live in trees. Living in trees as not unnatural, whole tribes of people still do it. However, manned space exploration is entirely unnatural. Doing it simply emphasizes mankinds inability to breathe, remain warm, avoid radiation, avoid meteorite collisions, and remain sane in the unnatural environment of space.
Reply to this comment
by rf35 January 29, 2007 3:48 PM EST
If you think no practical things have come from space exploration, manned or otherwise, just Google "space exploration benefits." Then tell me they died for nothing.
Reply to this comment
by actornaught January 29, 2007 2:02 PM EST
We honor our best and brightest and what they do, and they will do it knowing the risks. They know the benefits of these programs are many, far reaching, and for all mankind. The best is yet to come.

If God had not meant for us to go to space, he would have left us living in trees.
Reply to this comment
by antoniof123 January 29, 2007 11:15 AM EST
I think it was a very well done story to remember something that I watched all my life.
Reply to this comment
by Syndicate January 28, 2007 9:40 PM EST
This tragedy is just another example of what can happen when government agencies don't share information. The Air Force had several high altitude manned ballon experiments in the 50's. They learned not to use a 100% oxygen environment in the ballon capsule. This was never passed on to NASA and resulted in the Apollo 1 fire. It is only fair to point out the Soviets considered everyone expendable. A lot of thier astronauts never returned home. And thier nuclear submarines never had the shielding or saftey concerns of thier American counter parts. One corrious fact is the all NASA space accidents have occured in the same week. Challenger blew up this day in 1986. On Febuary First we will remember Columbia.
Reply to this comment
by dmorg4 January 28, 2007 7:21 PM EST
the whole space thing is just a big black money
hole there is no life out there i dont think
there has been hardly any practical thing that benifets man kind come from the exploration of
space only advace is these comunication satilites
and they dont need manned vehicals to do that
just a waste of money those men died for nothing
Reply to this comment
by linuxgirl-2009 January 28, 2007 4:35 PM EST
this just proves humainty's wonderful capabliity to honor the fallen by working to corrects the mistakes of the past. we honor these guys everytime we explore the limits of our own planet
Reply to this comment
by rennin1 January 28, 2007 2:58 PM EST
This just proves that if God had wanted man to be in space he wouldn't have put him on Earth in the first place.
Reply to this comment
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook