Jan. 26, 2007

U.S. Will Confront Iran In Iraq, Bush Says

Effort Aimed At Reducing Tehran's Growing Influence Among Shiite Militias

  • Video Iranians Arrested In Iraq

    U.S. soldiers arrested four Iranians in Iraq, two of whom are apparently senior military officials. The U.S. has blamed Iran in the past for supplying weapons to Shiites in Iraq. Jim Axelrod reports.

    • President Bush explains to reporters, Jan. 26, 2007, his decision to authorize U.S. troops to capture or kill Iranian agents in Iraq that are deemed harmful to U.S. soldiers or the Iraqi public.

      President Bush explains to reporters, Jan. 26, 2007, his decision to authorize U.S. troops to capture or kill Iranian agents in Iraq that are deemed harmful to U.S. soldiers or the Iraqi public.  (CBS)

    • Iranian Shahab-3 ballistic missiles roll past during a military parade 22 September 2005 in Tehran, Iran.

      Iranian Shahab-3 ballistic missiles roll past during a military parade 22 September 2005 in Tehran, Iran.  (AFP Photo)

    Previous slide Next slide
  • Interactive Battle For Iraq

    The government, the insurgency, key players, background and photos.

  • Interactive New Plan For Iraq

    Key elements of the plan, excerpts from the president's speech, reaction and more.

  • Fast Facts Iran

    Learn about the people, economy and history.

(CBS/AP) 
During a picture-taking session Friday with Army Lt. Gen. David Petraeus, newly confirmed by the Senate to command U.S. troops in Iraq, Mr. Bush was asked about stepped-up activities in Iraq against Iranian activities thought to be fueling the violence.

He defended the policy, but said it is no indication that the United States intends to expand the confrontation beyond Iraq's borders.

"That's a presumption that's simply not accurate," Mr. Bush said.

But added: "Our policy is going to be to protect our troops. It makes sense."

Five Iranians were detained by U.S.-led forces earlier this month after a raid on an Iranian government liaison office in northern Iraq. The move further frayed relations between the two countries, already tense because of U.S.-led efforts to force Tehran to abandon its suspected nuclear weapons program.

The administration said at the time that U.S. forces entered an Iranian building in Kurdish-controlled Irbil because information linked it to Revolutionary Guards and other Iranian elements engaging in violent activities in Iraq.

But Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari, a Kurd, contended the Iranians were working in a liaison office that had government approval and that the office was in the process of being approved as a consulate. In Iran, Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki said the U.S. raid constituted an intervention in Iranian-Iraqi affairs.

Meanwhile, the United States and Europe are showing concern over reports that Iran is on the verge of launching it's most powerful missile into space attached with a satellite.

In the latest edition of Aviation Week & Space Technology, an Iranian-built space launcher has been built and "will liftoff soon" with a satellite, according to Alaoddin Boroujerdi, the chairman of the Iranian parliament's National Security and Foreign Policy Commission.

The U.S. believes Iran is using some derivation of its Shahab 3 missile, which, in its current form, can hit Israel, Saudi Arabia and southern Turkey from central Iran.

However, fears are that future upgrades in weapons technology will give Iran an Intercontinental Ballistic Missile (ICBM) that features a range of approximately 2,500 miles.

The magazine reports that Iran's latest missile has strong resemblances to North Korea's missile program and experts fear Iran will eventually build a clone of North Korea's Taepodong 2C/3, which was tested last July.

The news of Iran's alleged attempt to launch a missile comes as U.N. officials said Friday that Iran plans to start installing thousands of centrifuges in an underground facility next month.

The move would pave the way to large-scale uranium enrichment, a potential way of making nuclear weapons.

The officials, who demanded anonymity because the information was confidential, emphasized that Iranian officials had not officially said the country would embark on the assembly of what will initially be 3,000 centrifuges at Natanz. But they said senior officials have informally told the International Atomic Energy Agency the work would start next month.

"The combined effort of U.N. Security Council resolutions regarding Iran's nuclear program, today's General Assembly resolution condemning Holocaust denials, and a confrontation with Iranian militants in Iraq, may create enough pressure on Ahmadinejad to back down," said CBS News foreign affairs analyst Pamela Falk said of Iran's president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. "It also could lead to a dangerous military confrontation."

© MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 120 Comments
by hasselhoff20 January 28, 2007 10:05 PM EST
Ok, this is so obvious, i could have told you this was going to happen about two years ago. The whole Middle East is going to be at war with the U.S. and Israel. I don't think there is a way to stop this unless someone gets nuked. We cannot take on another military conflict. We are fighting too many fronts. I believe Bush will try to do what he can to attack Iran. We can't stop it, he won't listen to his own people. And our own people are dumb enough to join the military and fight. I don't get it. We did this to ourselves. Bring it on! Iran is doomed.
Reply to this comment
by grazinggoat January 28, 2007 5:08 PM EST
RandalDS,
Don't give up, my friend, don't give up. Unfortunately, you will be deceived. Walking-Liar has no other choice but to bend down to decisions made in Jerusalem. He is just a puppet. He doesn't make decisions, he just accepts them.
Reply to this comment
by randalds January 28, 2007 6:11 AM EST
Don't like it. Tough Sh*t. You prefer future 9/11s instead...
Posted by lieberman18 at 06:04 PM : Jan 26, 2007

Yes, I prefer more 9-11's over a nuclear war. To go for the nuclear option is immoral and unforgivable. If Bush does it he will be recorded not as a hero, but as the most hated man in human history. As the largest mass murderer in the history of mankind. I hope he understands that. I mean REALLY understands that. He is already one of the most hated and despised men who ever lived. I wonder if he wants to cement that black, sick and disgusting reputation? Does he really want to write his name along side of Caligula, Nero, Hitler and Pol Pot? Is he that mentally ill? Yes. I tell you yes he really is that insane.
Reply to this comment
by randalds January 28, 2007 5:03 AM EST
*** well about time. Any Iranian caught inside Iraq with no legitimate reason - and that should be most of them should be dosed with gasoline and set on fire.

That would be a clear-cut message to Ahmedinejedad that from now on any Americans killed will resort in any number of Iranian and Al Qaeda operatives being rendered the same.

Now, you lib crybabies and the real fascists out there, care to cry Abu Gharib or Gitmo - after today's news of murdered innocent pets and GIs tortured and killed, it might be a good idea if you shut your fascist mouths - and urged a swift victory - with nukes if necessary.

Don't like it. Tough Sh*t. You prefer future 9/11s instead...
Posted by lieberman18 at 06:04 PM : Jan 26, 2007

Got to be one of the most irrational as*sholes on the internet.
Reply to this comment
by j-whitman January 27, 2007 4:23 PM EST
So,, Bush will start treating Iranians as he does al Queada ?? --- That means he will redeploy troops & resources away from them again.
Reply to this comment
by skyk-2009 January 27, 2007 3:37 PM EST
Processor2 PLEASE tell you that YOU don't actually BELIEVE Sir Lies-A-Lot? LOL What in the WORLD would make anyone with a BRAIN believe Sir Lies-A-Lot? Bush wouldn't know the truth if it jumped up and bit him in the butt and YOU believe him? LOL Man have I got some land to sell you!! ROFLMAO Cheap too.... Oh Okay it's a little wet but anyone as easy as you won't mind!! ROFLMAO
Reply to this comment
by skyk-2009 January 27, 2007 3:33 PM EST
Shouldn't it be the right and responsibility of the PEOPLE of Iraq to confront citizens of Iran in Iraq? I do believe we have a Dictator who has completely lost his mind. He wants another war so bad he can't stand it.... has to have someway to cover up for the Incompetence in Iraq and the FACT that he's getting the living Hell stomped out of him, so he does what EVERY Southern Fascist does, finds someone else to blame for the failure!! The mear FACT that Roadside Bombs are being planted and are killing our Kids who are trying to "Give" freedom to these folks should tell us more than anything this Klan Man says. IF the people of IRAQ wanted to live in PEACE and Freedom they would be out there pointing out those bombs to us, THEY would not be PLANTING them. It should be obvious to anyone with a brain that SIGNIFICANT Groups and NUMBERS of the folks we set free are trying to KILL us.... That in itself makes Bush and Cheney LIARS. Now we're supposed to believe them about Iran? Man if any of you fascist swallow that one you really are MORE stupid than you appear.
Reply to this comment
by dallison7 January 27, 2007 12:26 PM EST
A tyrant (Latin tyrannus, from Greek %u03C4%u03CD%u03C1%u03B1%u03BD%u03BD%u03BF%u03C2 t}rannos) possesses absolute power through the people in a state or in an organization: one refers to this mode of rule as a tyranny.
Reply to this comment
by bluestardad January 27, 2007 11:27 AM EST
OK here is your chance, don%u2019t just set in front of your computer and complain spouting meaningless rants of sludge, do something about it! This is the contact address for your Senator! Send them a message of your opinion. All Class Two Senators are up for Reelection in 2008. Be respectful even if they do not deserve it because their office does! http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm
Reply to this comment
by bluestardad January 27, 2007 9:43 AM EST
It is common knowledge that these Iraqi units are infiltrated by all types of Insurgents, Terrorist, and Execution Death Squads members of Both Religions. Those people who support this Surge of Troops in Iraq are forcing American Soldiers to sleep with the enemy in small units exposing them to undue kidnap threat. Americans soldiers who are captured by these enemies are without mercy, tortured and mutilated beyond recognition by their captors. Still our political leadership are planning to send these Brave Men and Women in to this environment. If American proceeds with this deployment and breaks down small American Units to live and work with these Iraqi Death Squad Units our troops will be kidnapped and handed over to such beheadings, torture and captivity as has never been seen before on Cable, Internet, and National Television. If you support this surge in troops and the tactics it brings you are responsible for every one of these deaths.
Reply to this comment
by jabberwock11 January 27, 2007 9:32 AM EST
"So who will begin the bombing of Iran, the US or Israel?"

There is the minor issue of a declaration of war as specified by the constitution. At least the Iraq ware was rubber stamped by congress. I doubt this is possible at this stage of the game, so that leaves us with an undeclared war as in Vietnam. It will be interesting to see if it gets that far. If it does I%u2019m sure we can expect another disaster. However my thoughts are its more likely going to be Israel if it happens.
Reply to this comment
by karlimhof January 27, 2007 7:29 AM EST
There are no more great leaders in America; but there once were. Here some one-liners in the days of Jefferson &Co. ;

...to secure these Rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed, that whenever any form of Government becomes Destructive of these Ends, IT IS THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO ALTER OR TO ABOLISH IT...

Then Jefferson goes on to list the grievances against "King George" some of them applicable and relevant today;

But here's one line we all have to read again from our Delaration of Independence;

"A Prince, whose Character is thus marked by every act which may define a TYRANT, is unfit to be the Ruler of a FREE PEOPLE.

Congress! Awake! Impeach Bush & Cheney now.
Reply to this comment
by book54552134 January 27, 2007 5:29 AM EST
"US Will Confront Iran in Iraq, Bush Says"
Is that also the reason for all the recent deployment of US carrier groups in the Persian Gulf & Arabian Sea, George?
So who will begin the bombing of Iran, the US or Israel?
And how can that possibly improve the overall quagmire the US finds itself in over there?
Reply to this comment
by exusmcsgt January 27, 2007 2:38 AM EST
Too little, too late. The Neocons left the door swinging wide open for Iran when they took out Hussein.

Picking off an agent here and there will not stop Iran's expansion into SE Iraq now that the man that kept them at bay for decades is gone.
Reply to this comment
by jms_cheung January 27, 2007 1:41 AM EST
The so-called tough stance towards iranian terrorists in Iraq is unfortunately TOO LATE since the US had lost above 3000 precious soldiers/marines!! Search & Destroy all Iranian and Shiites/Mehdi militants should be done few years ago! when Saddam Hussein fell (now is too late!)
Better Late than Never...get the work done !...
wipe out all militants....and have a balanced
Iraqi Army equally comprised of Sunnis/Kurds and Shiites (not just Shiites like now)...who will keep the nation peaceful. Iran and Syria must not be spared the US BOMBINGS if they insist to continue EXPORTING terrorists & weapons to support the terrorists in Iraq !!
Reply to this comment
by processor2 January 26, 2007 11:37 PM EST
GOOD

If Iran's agents' can kill American troops, then those same troops should, by all means, have the right to defend themselves and shoot back.

When I was in combat in the 1990's during Clinton's war (Bosnia), believe me, I shot back at anything that was shooting at me.

..........

Reply to this comment
by Syndicate January 26, 2007 11:32 PM EST
About Dam time.
Reply to this comment
by dargay January 26, 2007 11:03 PM EST
great, now bush picks a fight with iran. what a fool.
Reply to this comment
by feelfree1 January 26, 2007 9:40 PM EST
notblue,

Re: "Please, all you left wing genious's who think Bush is the idiot, tell us the new plan for success. We have heard the lets leave today plan, then what would the next few steps be?"

Thanks for asking.

Here is a four-point plan for resolving the Bush regime's nightmares and debacles in Iraq/Afghanistan/U.S./elsewhere: (Part 1 of 2)

1) Jail the Bush-puppet, while he awaits war-crimes proceedings, along with Cheney, Rumsfeld, Feith, Wurmser, Gonzales, Baker, Perle, Ashcroft, Frum, Armitage, Rice, Kristol, Tenet, Libby, Abizaid, Murdock, Khalilzad, Myers, Poindexter, Kagan, Negroponte, Wolfowitz, and all of the other people, who have so badly disgraced our country, by waging fraud-based illegal war of aggression.

These people have also conspired to aggressively undermine our own Constitution, primarily at the behest of Corporate greed and religious delusion, resulting in several crippling moral, military, and economic defeats for the U.S. These people represent the greatest terrorist threat to the globe at the moment, by far.

2) Compel any politician who cooperated with the criminal Bush League, to step down in disgrace (by way of torch-bearing angry mob, if necessary).
Reply to this comment
by feelfree1 January 26, 2007 9:40 PM EST
(Part 2 of 2)

3) Apologize to the world for our country%u2019s many grave mistakes, and beg the world community to provide security forces and observers in Iraq, Afghanistan, and the U.S., while we immediately withdraw all U.S. troops and agents from foreign positions, and hold fresh and legitimate elections in all three countries.

4) Seize and liquidate the assets of war profiteering corporations like Halliburton, Bechtel, Exxon-Mobile, Blackwater, Chevron-Texaco, Wackenhut, the Lincoln Group, the Carlysle Group, FOX, General Electric, and Lockheed-Martin, and use the proceeds to create a reparations fund for the many surviving victims of the %u2018Project for a New American Century%u2019 plan for global fascism. The potential recipients would include victims in Iraq, Afghanistan, the U.S., and elsewhere.
Reply to this comment
See all 120 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more. Watch Now

  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Lambert: Offering No Apologies

    (489 recent comments)

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: