WASHINGTON, Jan. 25, 2007
Too Old To Run?
At 70, McCain's Age And Health Factor In Bid For Presidency
-
Play CBS Video
Video
McCain On Bush's Speech
Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., who has his own presidential ambitions, speaks with Harry Smith about President Bush's sixth State of the Union address.
-
Video
McCain Supports Troop Increase
CBS News RAW: Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., expressed his support for the president's plan to boost America's military presence in Iraq. McCain has advocated an increase in troop levels.
-
Video
McCain Blasts President Bush
Only On The Web: Bill Plante reports Sen. John McCain supports the Iraq war, but has harsh words for President Bush. This is a significant departure for McCain, who may seek the presidency.
-
Photo
Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., if elected in 2008, would be would be the oldest person ever inaugurated as president. (AP Photo/Matt York)
-
Who's Who
2008 Republican Hopefuls
McCain and Giuliani head up the Republican pack chasing the presidency.
"I am older than dirt and have more scars than Frankenstein," John McCain likes to say.
It always gets a laugh, though I don't suppose his mother, who is 94, and her twin sister appreciate it very much. If he is older than dirt, what does that make them? Older than lava?
If McCain, 70, runs and wins, he would be the oldest person ever inaugurated as president. As is evident from the scar on the left side of his face, he has had malignant melanoma, the most invasive and dangerous form of skin cancer. (One in every 60 Americans is at risk for developing invasive melanoma in their lifetimes.)
I talked to McCain recently and asked him about his health. He said it was good. "I hiked the Grand Canyon rim-to-rim last August with my son, Jack," he said.
I tried to imagine that. The last time I saw it, the Grand Canyon was seriously deep.
How on earth do you hike a thing like that rim-to-rim? I asked.
"Down and up!" he said. "It takes three days."
John Kennedy, who at 43 became the youngest person ever elected president, and who was always associated with "vig-ah," in fact had serious diseases that were kept from the public.
As was revealed in 2002, Kennedy was sick from age 13 through the rest of his life, was on chronic-pain medication throughout his presidency and had Addison's disease, an endocrine disorder that until 1940 was a terminal illness. Kennedy survived it through cortisone injections, which at the time only rich people could afford.
Dr. Jeffrey Kelman, who examined Kennedy's medical records in 2002, said, "He was never healthy. I mean, the image you get of vigor and progressive health wasn't true."
The point being: Electing a young person to the presidency is no guarantee that he or she will be healthy or stay healthy.
The media often demands the release of medical records these days, and the candidates sometimes comply. There were so many false rumors circulating about McCain's health when he ran for president in 2000, that he released 1,500 pages of medical and psychiatric records. They showed him to be in good health and not nuts. (And how many presidential candidates can say that?)
"We'll probably have to do that again," McCain told me of the record release.
Do you think all candidates should release their medical and psychiatric records? I asked.
I thought he would jump on that and say yes, just to put pressure on the other presidential campaigns, but he did not.
"I don't know," he said. "I think probably in my case it was a little more unique because of my POW status and the war injuries and the fact that people were spreading rumors that I was crazy and disabled both. So we'll probably have to do that again."
You think the rumors will start again? I asked.
"They already have!" he said.
But I don't think that is going to be McCain's problem. It isn't his health but rather his demeanor that worries some people.
The Iraq war, which he strongly supports, has disturbed and dismayed him. He told The Washington Post it was a "train wreck." He told me it was a "witch's brew." He visits wounded soldiers and Marines when they come back home for treatment and if any civilian feels the pain of the military, it is McCain.
And it is showing.
Last April, I wrote of a campaign swing McCain made through New Hampshire and Iowa, "Though McCain said he enjoyed himself, he was not the rollicking campaigner of six years ago. At a number of stops, he was largely subdued and sometimes almost somber."
Last Sunday, on "Meet the Press with Tim Russert," McCain seemed to have moved from almost somber to almost gloomy.
In my recent interview, I suggested to him that the laughing, joking John McCain of his last presidential campaign seemed to be AWOL.
"It's hard to make jokes; we are a nation at war," he said. "There are great national security challenges that we face. But I also believe, as Ronald Reagan did, that America's greatest days are ahead of us. It's going to be an upbeat campaign and an optimistic one."
And will you still come to the back of the bus and goof off with the press like before? I asked.
"If I changed that," McCain said with a smile of old, "I would probably get death threats."
By Roger Simon
TM & © 2007 The Politico & Politico.com, a division of Allbritton Communications Company.





- 1
- 2
- next
See all 59 CommentsHe actively supported and supports the unlawful and unnecessary invasion and occupation of Iraq, even after it has been shown Iraq was not threatening anyone.
McCain is unqualified to hold elective office due to his support for war crimes and war criminals.
The unlawful invasion of Iraq was a war crime.
John McCain knows that Iraq is unpopular but he's more interested in seeing that we are successul in Iraq because he knows the consequences if we are not......... he does this even though it may cost him a shot at being President........there is no up side to his positon UNLESS one appreciates honesty.
Pander Bear!
I think flip-flopping on the issues matters more than age. The pundit-class LOVES McCain, even though hardcore conservatives have never trusted him and he's rapidly losing the independents and moderates due to his recent flip-flopping and pandering to the right. His still milking that maverick straight talking image even though its woefully out of date.
I duly respect McCain's service, but I agree that it's time to dedicate his energies to his family.
Our heartfelt thanks for all you've done, Senator. At the most, stay where you are, for you can be effective there. We will try to put in a president who will listen and benefit from your experience. We need a leader who can physically bear the duties of that office.
that creepy expression you saw was saying "with this mess, I'm never going to get elected"
Even a wise old man can be dead wrong. Americans are not going to buy his rabid pro-war position.
well, all I know is he sold out to Bush, and is an incredible phony, and goodness, he was nearly DEAD on Russert's show last week, and then FELL ASLEEP when Bush was talking about Iraq. Outside of his age - he's just a sucky "Bob Dole II" - boring, outdated, and too cozy with the Bush Regime. Shame on him.
cafepress.com/warisprofitable - this warisprofitable sight had things I never even heard bush say, it's amazing what the net can do for your education!
............
............
Look for Edwards to take the nomination along with somebody like Barack Obama...
Posted by ANGRYliberal at 03:47 PM : Jan 25, 2007
HA LOL That fool. Bring em on!!! HA That would be the biggest landslide in history in favor of the democratic candidate.
remember when santorum came on national news announcing he had found the WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION - 15 year old rusty cannisters!
What a joke that was!
armed forces. Can you imagine being a soldier and having to salute
that ***??? She is nothing but a power hungry %#*&^(*&$#%^. The
Clintons are a ruthless power hungry couple and people of this
country see that. Those two have been involved in a lot of dirty
***. I once heard an interview with a woman who was part of
Clinton's cabinet when he was the Governor of Arkansas. This
interview took place before Clinton took his first oath of office as
president after being elected. She talked about how ruthless both of
them were. She said that anyone who crossed either of them either
wound up dead or had their lives ruined. Take a look at the list of
people that were involved with the Clintons in one way or another
that have died or had their lives ruined.
http://www.etherzone.com/body.html
I am certain that Bush's "surge" ids nothing more than a "buildup" that will last as long as Bush, and his cronies want us to stay in Iraq which, by the way. takes the spot light off certain "close to home" issues that bear serious scrutiny.
If you consider youth and vitality as important, consider a vote towards 60 year old Mitt Romney, his demographic (Mormon) has his life expectancy to age 86, healthy and vigor all the way.
I want a President with a bit more self-respect, no matter what his age. I was all for McCain before, but he's shown himself to be a huge disappointment the last 6 years.
Mitt Romney. If you are not a Mormon, read up on the cult. Romney believes, in his heart, that the ultimate truth was revealed to his prophet, Joseph Smith, by a 'talking' white salomander. (That's a lizard of type, by the way)
Just what we need, another nut-case in the whitehouse.
Sold your SOUL you Captain Crunch look alike.
WE NEED A REVOLUTION.
Why would anyone want to elect another political animal with no conscience.
Making friends with the religious wackos of the right
For the war - now he calls it a "train wreck" a "witch's brew." In that case how are 21K more targets going to help?
His release of 1,500 pages of medical and psychiatric records. They showed him to be in good health and not nuts. HUM!@#$%^&* Nuts? maybe not but a flip flopping egotist Yes.
His star reached its nadir long ago and its now crashing back to earth.
............
Mr. McCain is on the wrong side again. And all he has to do is look at the polls to see that the American people are smart enough to understand what is going on.
It would be a pro-working class media for one thing; and its news, outside of editorials, would be concerned about and for working people's struggles to form unions, defend their rights, and talk about their concerns and issues. The old, and still printing, "independent socialist" Monthly Review would be an excellent example of a true left-wing media publication. I recommend their website.
CBS has a more broader and general news mission. CBS also springs from and is financially supported by capitalist culture. "Left" is about social-democracy and socialism amongst other things and only secondarily about liberalism. (ergo left doesn't equal liberal and vice versa) The Left's orgins were forged in the crucible of anti-imperialist and anti-Robber Baron struggles. Its ideological struggle was further advanced in the later 20th century during the 60s. CBS is hardly connected to that history. Folks who throw out those "it's 'left wing'" accusations should know what they are talking about before they express stupid opinions that, as usual, heap additional shame on the ignorance and perfidiousness of the conservative movement which prefers the politics of delusion, disinformation, jingoism, ignorance and childish magical thinking than sanity Signed: former ABC worker
It would be a pro-working class media for one thing; and its news, outside of editorials, would be concerned about and for working people's struggles to form unions, defend their rights, and talk about their concerns and issues. The old, and still printing, "independent socialist" Monthly Review would be an excellent example of a true left-wing media publication. I recommend their website.
CBS has a more broader and general news mission. CBS also springs from and is financially supported by capitalist culture. "Left" is about social-democracy and socialism amongst other things and only secondarily about liberalism. (ergo left doesn't equal liberal and vice versa) The Left's orgins were forged in the crucible of anti-imperialist and anti-Robber Baron struggles. Its ideological struggle was further advanced in the later 20th century during the 60s. CBS is hardly connected to that history. Folks who throw out those "it's 'left wing'" accusations should know what they are talking about before they express stupid opinions that, as usual, heap additional shame on the ignorance and perfidiousness of the conservative movement which prefers the politics of delusion, disinformation, jingoism, ignorance and childish magical thinking than sanity Signed: former ABC worker
-.......the ultimate truth was revealed to his -prophet, Joseph Smith, by a 'talking' white -salomander. (That's a lizard of type, by the way)
Wow... you must be on some pretty good dope to make such an out landish statement as this.
Anyway, I thought the subject here was McCain's age.
Age 72 (in 2008), with 4 or 8 years expected to serve, when average age to live is 76, will cause many to pause. Romney's ability to turn around bankrupt/foundering companies/organizations is a big plus to resolve this counties huge deficits. Statistically speaking, we could have this ability around not just for two terms as POTUS, but also as potential adviser for next four presidents, is more hopeful then what McCain's life expectancy and health history is expected to deliver.
I have feeling McCain's age will play against him more then he expects, especially with equal or more capable candidates much younger then he (such as Romney).
PS. The rules of engagement preclude religious bigotry, makes me wonder how your statement past muster.
Nope, just too foolish/useless.
The problem with McCain is that he's tied his political future to a man who has no political future.
- 1
- 2
- next
See all 59 Comments