NEW YORK, Jan. 25, 2007

Meet Hillary 2.0

Lagorio: Sen. Clinton's Presidential E-Campaign Kicks Off At The Speed Of Broadband

  • Play CBS Video Video Eye To Eye: Hillary Clinton

    Only On The Web: Sen. Hillary Clinton talked with Katie Couric about her candidacy for president. Clinton also discussed her disapproval of President Bush's Iraq plan.

  • Video Clinton: I'm Very Proud

    CBS News RAW: Speaking at a book signing in New York, former President Bill Clinton told the audience he will do anything he can to support Hillary's run for the nation's top office.

  • Video Clinton On White House Race

    A recent CBS poll indicates that Americans may be ready to vote for a woman president, but are they ready to vote for Hillary Clinton? Harry Smith chats with Sen. Clinton about her campaign.

    • Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., waits for a hearing of the Senate Armed Services Committee on Jan. 23, 2007. She declared online three days earlier that she had started a committee to explore the possibility of a presidential run, and has been campaigning online since. Photo

      Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., waits for a hearing of the Senate Armed Services Committee on Jan. 23, 2007. She declared online three days earlier that she had started a committee to explore the possibility of a presidential run, and has been campaigning online since.  (GETTY)

    • Sen. Hillary Clinton made her presidential campaign debut online, in a video posted at HillaryClinton.com on Saturday, Jan. 20, 2007. Photo

      Sen. Hillary Clinton made her presidential campaign debut online, in a video posted at HillaryClinton.com on Saturday, Jan. 20, 2007.  (hillaryclinton.com)

    • A reporter in Washington on Jan. 20, 2007, watches Sen. Hillary Clinton announce on her Web site her decision to take the first step toward a 2008 White House bid that could make her the first woman president of the United States. Photo

      A reporter in Washington on Jan. 20, 2007, watches Sen. Hillary Clinton announce on her Web site her decision to take the first step toward a 2008 White House bid that could make her the first woman president of the United States. "I'm in. And I'm in to win," the former first lady said in a video on her site.  (GETTY)

    Previous slide Next slide
(CBS)  Trippi said blogs are one of the only places campaigns can go to find Web-savvy political wonks who also know the ins-and-outs of the media.

"We are still pioneers here — we are still in the first wagons going across the prairies," he said. "So the only people who were out there on the frontier are the bloggers."

And while there were 1.4 million blogs in 2004, 55 million exist now.

In addition to making them job offers, the campaigns — particularly Clinton's and Edwards' — have been reaching out to blogs like MyDD, PoliticalWire and DailyKos for months to establish communications and send news tips.

Early this week, Clinton also advertised on dozens of political blogs — including a couple prominent conservative blogs.

"Her biggest challenge is to prove to people that she is electable. By appealing across a broad spectrum and reaching across a wide swath of the Internet, she is trying to prove that," Goddard said.

Playing Nice with the MSM

According to a December 2006 Pew study, 70 percent of adults use the Internet, which makes 30 percent of potential voters — or donors — who will never see an e-mail from Clinton or read her campaign blog. Add to that percentage a quarter of Internet users who don't have broadband and won't watch streamed videos.

"(The Internet) is not a replacement," Daou said. "The senator will still be going person to person to meet as many people as possible. I see it as an augmentation."

To cover the media bases, she's also doing as much TV as seems humanly possible: Clinton appeared on several morning shows and every network for an evening news broadcast in the days following her announcement of launching a presidential exploratory committee.

"She's actually executing two communications strategies at the same time," Goddard said. While posturing herself on TV as the go-to Democrat opposing Mr. Bush's Iraq strategy, "she's also trying to get the hard core political junkies, and the best way to get those people is not to go on the evening news. It is to go online."

But experts say (and as most frequent social-networking site users know), portraying oneself online is a lot different than in person. Politicians still seem to be ironing out their online personas.

After her Monday evening online question-and-answer session, Clinton got critiqued for seeming too rigid and dry (though she did profess her love for the film "Out of Africa").

David Weinberger, a fellow at Harvard's Berkman Center who has worked on political campaigns, said Clinton is simply using the new medium to get her message out in her traditional way.

"Her way is a very formal, polished TV type of way," Weinberger said. "That's trying to make the Internet the TV. We are far more interested in imperfection online."

By Wednesday evening, Clinton was making larger gestures, scratching her face, coughing and — make yourself at home — pouring herself a glass of water.

So far, the Web activity of '08 candidates has stuck to low-cost self-promotion. But watch for publicity offensives to turn muddy as months pass. Just ask former Sen. George Allen, whose "macaca" comment was caught on tape and posted online by his competitor, Sen. James Webb, D-Va.

"Video and audio are going to be seen a lot more," Goddard said. "These candidates are going to have to be, even when they're in a room with 12 people, aware that they might be speaking to everyone."

Trippi calls this the power of "gotcha," as in "you weren't paying attention, but my (video-equipped) cell phone was."

By Christine Lagorio
© MMVII, CBS Interactive, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Video and Galleries from Politics

Add a Comment See all 213 Comments
by xsoldier2 January 25, 2007 11:17 AM PST
Greg, If he4d a been doing what he was paid to do, instead worrying about where his next *******, or smelly crack came from, he wouldn4t have had that bloodhound prosecuter on his ***.
And as far as Mr Carter goes, yes a good ex-president, but President? No way man. I remember when he had his experts hack out a plan to free those hostages. The 249th sat on the trucks waiting to go all day. Our primary mission was Rapid Runway Repair. I was 3 months short at the time. When you was at the zoo, the troops back then had benefited from Ronald Regans "rebuilding" or "upgrading" of the army. You guys were getting some nice equipment compared with what we had to use. Back then, with some support from my motor sgt., I found out that my 5 ton dump, c-114 was built in 1962. Hell, it took 6-8 weeks just to get a set of fuel filters for it.
Reply to this comment
by xsoldier2 January 25, 2007 11:18 AM PST
I worked in the White House almost every *** day for 4 years, how many of you believe that the *** first ladies bed had boxes under it that never were moved by a cleaning crew? You must be the same ones that believe in Santa Claus and the tooth fairy. She had Vince Foster Killed my friends because he and her had been having an affair for some 15 years and as Ken Starr got close to that fact and Vince was about to confess he was murdered. Come on boys and girls we all know that you can%u2019t squeeze blood out of a turnip but you can squeeze until something pees. The Clintons were as rotten as 400 year old eggs.



Reply to this comment
by gunownerdan January 25, 2007 11:33 AM PST
Hitlery Clinton is just another rich corporate ***.
The sheep will follow!
Reply to this comment
by xsoldier2 January 25, 2007 11:50 AM PST
Iraqi Chemical Weapons

In a briefing for journalists reported on October 29, 2003, the
director of the National Imagery and Mapping Agency said satellite
images showed a heavy flow of traffic from Iraq into Syria just
before the American invasion in March 2003. Retired Air Force
Lieutenant General James Clapper Jr. said he
believed "unquestionably" that illicit weapons material was
transported into Syria and perhaps other countries. He said "I think
people below the Saddam- Hussein-and-his-sons level saw what was
coming and decided the best thing to do was to destroy and
disperse. ... I think probably in the few months running up to the
onset of the conflict, I think there was probably an intensive effort
to disperse into private hands, to bury it, and to move it outside
the country's borders."

In an exclusive interview with The Sunday Telegraph published on
January 25, 2004, Dr. David Kay, the former head of the Iraq Survey
Group, said there was evidence that unspecified materials had been
moved to Syria shortly before the start of the war to overthrow
Saddam. "We are not talking about a large stockpile of weapons," he
said. "But we know from some of the interrogations of former Iraqi
officials that a lot of material went to Syria before the war,
including some components of Saddam's WMD programme. Precisely what
went to Syria, and what has happened to it, is a major issue that
needs to be resolved."
Reply to this comment
by xsoldier2 January 25, 2007 12:02 PM PST
Sandy was cleaning house and he got caught so bill and hil could once
again beat a wrap before the 911 commission could see those
papers.What would a guy have on another too get that kind of
service????---
Reply to this comment
by xsoldier2 January 25, 2007 12:06 PM PST
Don%u2019t forget that all the terrorists that flew the planes on 9-11 came to this country to start their flight training in the summer of 1996, if you check you find that old %u201CSexless%u201D Billy Bob Joe Clinton was still in his first term. They enjoy the freedom Billy gave them to train for the next 4 years on his watch. Then if you further exam the facts the Democrats had successfully blocked many of George Bush%u2019s nominations for cabinet and key government positions from January of 2001 through September 2001. Only after 9-11 did they let him put his own people in place.
Reply to this comment
by bernieb14 January 25, 2007 12:07 PM PST
Xsoldier2

Nicely put. I don't trust Hillary at all. She's America's number 1 fake! I wish the rest of America could see through her.
Reply to this comment
by janney9 January 25, 2007 12:09 PM PST
would not vote for hillary. she never gives a straight answer. she answers with a question and shakes her head too much. she is too political. not believeable. why would she stay with a cheater. what is bill going to be doing getting more young women under the desk. they are a disgrace to the whitehouse and disgrace to our fighting men. she is not real . crooked
Reply to this comment
by janney9 January 25, 2007 12:11 PM PST
no one in our area will vote for hillary. watch her she sits there and shakes her head. I believe she has an affair with foster. that is why she did not get rid of Bill. both are cheaters. BIll was too busy with women under his desk to pay attention to terriorist. please no more clintons
Reply to this comment
by notohillary January 25, 2007 12:11 PM PST
Why does CBS News find Hillary%u2019s ability to use the internet worthy of its top story of the day? There are so much more important events happening in the world that obviously out shadows Hillary%u2019s efforts to blog on the internet. It is sad to see that CBS has started their %u201CHillary for President%u201D campaign so early. CBS News, you have lost another loyal viewer and reader, goodbye.
Reply to this comment
by xsoldier2 January 25, 2007 12:13 PM PST
The Democrats managed however once again to put the blame on the economy failure to Bush in 2001 simply by failing to print facts about the timing of the demise. I watched it personally again because I was in the Telecommunications industry in 2000 and in July I watched and 10s of thousands were laid off due to the collapse of the dot coms. These were companies that had a lot of money to spend on an industry with no customers. Once the infrastructure was installed they found no customer base for the product. The industry had no choice but to close and lay of close to 800,000 workers in the next two years that started in 2000.

Reply to this comment
by gmcnally2 January 25, 2007 12:19 PM PST
Please Dems do not put Hillary up as my choice. I was seriously considering voting democratic this year. I would vote for anyone but her.
Reply to this comment
by nulook23-2009 January 25, 2007 12:24 PM PST
I would never vote for Mrs.Clinton. She can never answer a question and time after time she's been on the wrong side of many progressive issues. Her husband was president for eight years, " what," were going to have another clinton in the WhiteHouse for four plus years, give me a break. This country is screaming for something fresh. We need to move foward not backward.
Reply to this comment
by one_american January 25, 2007 12:32 PM PST
NOTICE:
USERS PURCHASING HILLARY 2.0 SHOULD BE AWARE OF THE SOFTWARE FLAW DOCUMENTED, BELOW, IN 2002. BE AWARE THAT THIS FLAW STILL EXISTS IN THE SOFTWARE, AND THIS FLAW WILL REMAIN IN ALL FUTURE VERSIONS:

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including Al Qaeda members...

It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."

Senator Hillary Clinton (Democrat, New York)
Addressing the US Senate
October 10, 2002

Reply to this comment
by gladys_over January 25, 2007 12:32 PM PST
NoToBush and No to every moron who is still supporting his dumb a-ss.
Reply to this comment
by one_american January 25, 2007 12:36 PM PST
NOTICE:
USERS PURCHASING HILLARY 2.0 SHOULD BE AWARE OF THE SOFTWARE FLAW DOCUMENTED, BELOW, IN 2002. BE AWARE THAT THIS FLAW STILL EXISTS IN THE SOFTWARE, AND THIS FLAW WILL REMAIN IN ALL FUTURE VERSIONS:

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including Al Qaeda members...

It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."

Senator Hillary Clinton (Democrat, New York)
Addressing the US Senate
October 10, 2002
Reply to this comment
by gladys_over January 25, 2007 12:36 PM PST
The redneck warmongers have come out in force this morning to attack Hillary Clinton.

Reply to this comment
by one_american January 25, 2007 12:38 PM PST
Gladys_Over:

It's just a consumer warning, that's all...
Reply to this comment
by one_american January 25, 2007 12:39 PM PST
NOTICE:
USERS PURCHASING HILLARY 2.0 SHOULD BE AWARE OF THE SOFTWARE FLAW DOCUMENTED, BELOW, IN 2002. BE AWARE THAT THIS FLAW STILL EXISTS IN THE SOFTWARE, AND THIS FLAW WILL REMAIN IN ALL FUTURE VERSIONS:

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including Al Qaeda members...

It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."

Senator Hillary Clinton (Democrat, New York)
Addressing the US Senate
October 10, 2002

Reply to this comment
by gladys_over January 25, 2007 12:40 PM PST
The Democrats who believed that Saddam Hussein had WMDs and ties to al Qaeda, wanted air strikes.

None of them wanted the land invasion that Dubya stupidly launched, that has become a bloody quagmire.

Even Dubya's father knew this quagmire would happen. That's why he said he didn't drive on to Baghdad in the first Gulf War.

Dubya's support now consists only of right wing retards backing one of their own kind to the bitter end.
Reply to this comment
by gladys_over January 25, 2007 12:44 PM PST
RE: "Dubya's support now consists only of right wing retards backing one of their own kind to the bitter end."

After that nasty personal attack on some of my fellow Americans, I will withdraw from the discussion for a while.

I've been reading too many of lieberman18's posts. I'm starting to talk like him. Just because he's a jerk, is no reason for me to be one.
Reply to this comment
by rharrin1 January 25, 2007 12:48 PM PST

Boy you right wing nut jobs are out in force but it won't work anymore you have used all the material over and over ( everybody has caught on to all your dirty tricks )

The only fools are you yourselves.
Reply to this comment
by gunownerdan January 25, 2007 12:57 PM PST
Are most democrats retarded?
Barack Hussein Obama?
Hitlery Clinton?
Get real.
Reply to this comment
by shingles1 January 25, 2007 1:04 PM PST
GunOwnerDan, nice job of parroting RNC talking points about Obama. Tell me again about that FAKE madrassa story.

Hilary Clinton, on the other hand....while the beltway thinks its a great story, and will keep pushing her as the front runner, I don't think she'll do that well in the primaries. Fact is a lot of people (even Democrats) wont vote for her if given a real choice.
Reply to this comment
by shingles1 January 25, 2007 1:09 PM PST
You know, singingrick, I don't really disagree with your list. However, the phrase IN GOD WE TRUST only became the US motto in the mid-1950s.
Reply to this comment
by stevex47 January 25, 2007 1:15 PM PST
One-American,
Even I believed the lies Colin Powell, Rumsfeld and Bush LLC said in front of America. They however knew they were lies. That's part of their crimes. Add in torture, pedophilia, leaking CIA agents and cover-ups and you lose for many years to come.
You are really going to hate 4 years of Hillary aren't you. She'll do more good in 4 days, than Bush LLC did in well, his whole life.
Reply to this comment
by jairod January 25, 2007 1:15 PM PST
ARTICLE XII: You have the right to write stupid things and publish them so that everyone can see what an idiot you are.
Reply to this comment
by consciousnes January 25, 2007 1:20 PM PST
A Clinton is a Clinton is a Clinton.

Would we really want another Clinton in the Whitehouse???????????????
Reply to this comment
by jairod January 25, 2007 1:21 PM PST
Did I hit a nerve? Call the Waahhhmmbulance.
Reply to this comment
by shingles1 January 25, 2007 1:24 PM PST
"Does this really matter shingles1? Maybe someone was trying to get God back in our country like our founding fathers knew was so important...ever think of that?"

Not to argue or belabor the point - the motto was added during the Cold War in order to position the US as a contrast to "Godless Communism".

You yourself mentioned that knowing one's heritage is important. Since the list you posted included the line "In God We Trust" at the end, it made sense to clarify it's origins.
Reply to this comment
by perception5 January 25, 2007 1:28 PM PST
Would we really want another Clinton in the Whitehouse???????????????
Posted by Consciousnes

-NO WAY.
Posted by singinrick

DITTO....... been there done that...... we have facts and history to go off of here..... time to move forward and leave that dirty past......PAST.
Reply to this comment
by one_american January 25, 2007 1:38 PM PST
NOTICE:
USERS PURCHASING HILLARY 2.0 SHOULD BE AWARE OF THE SOFTWARE FLAW DOCUMENTED, BELOW, IN 2001. BE AWARE THAT THIS FLAW STILL EXISTS IN THE SOFTWARE, AND THIS FLAW WILL REMAIN IN ALL FUTURE VERSIONS:

"Every nation has to either be with us, or against us. Those who harbor terrorists, or who finance them, are going to pay a price."

Senator Hillary Clinton (Democrat, New York)
September 13, 2001

Reply to this comment
by stevex47 January 25, 2007 1:41 PM PST
singinrick,
Actually you guys started the name calling most recently with Macaca, oh you forgot, that cost you the congress. The whole flip flop thing which Bush LLC is doing every sentence now. But we'll finish it. Get ready to hear it for hundreds of years to come after what the nutjobs did.
Reply to this comment
by stevex47 January 25, 2007 1:42 PM PST
Singinrick,
What names do you attach to your buddies Foley and Haggard and the CIA leaker Cheney?
Reply to this comment
by stevex47 January 25, 2007 1:45 PM PST
Anybody listened to druggie Limbaugh lately? He is talking soo fast, they must be good drugs. Maybe that convict should run in 08? Yes singinrick?
Reply to this comment
by one_american January 25, 2007 1:46 PM PST
NOTICE:
USERS PURCHASING HILLARY 2.0 SHOULD BE AWARE OF THE SOFTWARE FLAW DOCUMENTED, BELOW, IN 1998, OF BILLYBOB 2.0, A TANDEMLY-RUN SOFTWARE PROGRAM THAT ACCOMPANIES HILLARY 2.0. BE AWARE THAT THIS FLAW STILL EXISTS IN THE SOFTWARE, AND THIS FLAW WILL REMAIN IN ALL FUTURE VERSIONS:


"In the next century, the community of nations may see more and more the very kind of threat Iraq poses now -- a rogue state with weapons of mass destruction ready to use them or provide them to terrorists, drug traffickers or organized criminals who travel the world among us unnoticed.

If we fail to respond today, Saddam and all those who would follow in his footsteps will be emboldened tomorrow by the knowledge that they can act with impunity, even in the face of a clear message from the United Nations Security Council and clear evidence of a weapons of mass destruction program."

President Clinton
Address to Joint Chiefs of Staff and Pentagon staff
February 17, 1998

Reply to this comment
by frankly6 January 25, 2007 1:50 PM PST


You've got to excuse singinrick. He's a true believer to the bitter end. Probably want Bush to speed up Armagedon and the Rapture. He also thinks pro wrestling is real. It's all about good guys and bad guys for him. Hulk Hogan used to be his favorite wrestler. Now it's Bush.




Reply to this comment
by one_american January 25, 2007 1:53 PM PST
You have to excuse frankly6.

He's French.
Reply to this comment
by one_american January 25, 2007 1:57 PM PST
I dub thee...francois6
Reply to this comment
by shingles1 January 25, 2007 1:58 PM PST
One_American, and by quoting the Clintons your point is...?
Reply to this comment
by dallison7 January 25, 2007 1:59 PM PST
I'll say it again. What fun, watching all the neocons run around with their hair on fire. They know they will have a FEMALE commander-in-chief, and her name will be CLINTON!! There is nothing they can do!! They can't stop her!!
Reply to this comment
by one_american January 25, 2007 2:00 PM PST
shingles1:

Bill Clinton said:

"clear evidence of a weapons of mass destruction program".

If Bush lied, then CLINTON LIED, AND HILLARY IS LYING NOW.

Get it?
Reply to this comment
by one_american January 25, 2007 2:01 PM PST
dallison7:

Where was your evil laugh - you know - after your monologue?

MWWWAAAHHHHAAHHHHAHHHHHAAAAAAAAAaaaaa!

Like that.
Reply to this comment
by dallison7 January 25, 2007 2:01 PM PST
I can't wait for the 2009 'State of the union' speech.

"PRESIDENT AND MR. CLINTON"
Reply to this comment
by one_american January 25, 2007 2:04 PM PST
dallison7:

You'll have to wait an eternity.

I'm sorry for you, and your expectations.
Reply to this comment
by one_american January 25, 2007 2:06 PM PST
NOTICE:
USERS PURCHASING HILLARY 2.0 SHOULD BE AWARE OF THE SOFTWARE FLAW DOCUMENTED, BELOW, IN 1998, OF BILLYBOB 2.0, A TANDEMLY-RUN SOFTWARE PROGRAM THAT ACCOMPANIES HILLARY 2.0. BE AWARE THAT THIS FLAW STILL EXISTS IN THE SOFTWARE, AND THIS FLAW WILL REMAIN IN ALL FUTURE VERSIONS:

"In the next century, the community of nations may see more and more the very kind of threat Iraq poses now -- a rogue state with weapons of mass destruction ready to use them or provide them to terrorists, drug traffickers or organized criminals who travel the world among us unnoticed.

If we fail to respond today, Saddam and all those who would follow in his footsteps will be emboldened tomorrow by the knowledge that they can act with impunity, even in the face of a clear message from the United Nations Security Council and CLEAR EVIDENCE OF A WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION PROGRAM."

President Clinton
Address to Joint Chiefs of Staff and Pentagon staff
February 17, 1998
Reply to this comment
by NightSongz January 25, 2007 2:10 PM PST
Sweet! Our next President...it's a shoe-in! I can't wait!
Reply to this comment
by one_american January 25, 2007 2:12 PM PST
nightsongz:

She has to be elected by the public, not CBS.

Sorry for the formality, but it is part of our Constitution.
Reply to this comment
by pandoraboxed January 25, 2007 2:12 PM PST
oh what a glorious day it will be when Hilary has defeated the neo-cons!

I say if all you neo-cons are so interested in Iraq then move there!

Hilary will take care of the important things! her own citizens! Just look at all the mess bush has made.
Iraq & New Orleans, it is still a disaster with only 49% of the schools reopened. What a horrific time to be a American.
We can all say we witnessed the worst president in history, BU$H $UCK$!
Reply to this comment
by NightSongz January 25, 2007 2:13 PM PST
In 2000, Gore was elected by our public but that didn't matter.
Reply to this comment
See all 213 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
  • Viewed
  • Commented
Latest News
Featured Blogs