Ex-Church Official Jailed For Child Porn
Former Music Director Served At Connecticut Church Attended By President George H.W. Bush
-
Photo
The former music director of Christ Church in Greenwich, Conn., Robert F. Tate, pleaded guilty Monday Jan. 22, 2007 to possession of child pornogprahy. (AFP/Getty Images)
-
Interactive
Expert Tips: Child Safety
Get expert tips on keeping your kids safe. Plus learn the profiles for predators and victims, and check out resources for locating missing children in your state.
-
Interactive
Protecting Children Online
What to say to your child about Web porn and online predators, and how to look for signs of porn on your PC. Plus: warning signs that an adult may be communicating with your child.
Robert F. Tate, 64, of Greenwich, admitted possessing between 150-300 pornographic images of children, some engaging in sexually explicit conduct. Prosecutors said some children in the images were younger than 12 years old.
"Yes, your honor. I regret to say I did it," Tate told a federal judge.
Tate was the longtime music director of Christ Church in Greenwich, where former President George H.W. Bush attended services while growing up. Funeral services for his parents, Prescott Bush Sr. and Dorothy Walker Bush, were held there.
Tate oversaw the church's renowned choir programs, including those involving children. Tate traveled with the choir for performances around the country and in Europe.
Church officials have said they are unaware of any allegations that Tate had acted inappropriately with children. The church has a strict policy that prohibits adults from being alone with children.
Tate has been behind bars since his November arrest in Los Angeles, where he said he was visiting friends.
He was expected to be released on $500,000 bond Monday to travel to an unspecified facility in Pennsylvania, defense attorney Francis O'Reilly said. "Mr. Tate has some psychological issues of an extraordinary nature," O'Reilly said.
At Tate's last hearing in December, President Bush's aunt and other members of the church attended to support Tate.
"I think he's wonderful," Elizabeth Bush, whose husband, Prescott, is President Bush's uncle and former President Bush's brother, said after that hearing. "He's certainly been a wonderful, wonderful choir director for 36 years. He's just the most extraordinarily talented and spiritual person."
Court records accuse Tate of possessing digital images of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct and refer to "apparent foreign travel for purpose of photographing children."
Tate faces up to 10 years in prison and a $250,000 fine when he is sentenced April 12.
Prosecutors say the case is remains open and they are continuing to look into allegations of criminal misconduct.
© MMVII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.



At Tate's last hearing in December, President Bush's aunt and other members of the church attended to support Tate.
"I think he's wonderful," Elizabeth Bush, whose husband, Prescott, is President Bush's uncle and former President Bush's brother, said after that hearing. "He's certainly been a wonderful, wonderful choir director for 36 years. He's just the most extraordinarily talented and spiritual person."
YEP STUPIDITY RUNS IN THE FAMILY
With the Bush family, it's what you BELIEVE that is important, not the cold hard facts. It's what you BELIEVE.
Dubya is the same way. He knows what he believes; to h-e-l-l with everything else. "Don't confuse me with the facts. I know what I believe."
Probably what he meant to say was "Yes, your honor. I regret to say I was caught."
At Tate's last hearing in December, President Bush's aunt and other members of the church attended to support Tate.
"I think he's wonderful," Elizabeth Bush, whose husband, Prescott, is President Bush's uncle and former President Bush's brother, said after that hearing. "He's certainly been a wonderful, wonderful choir director for 36 years. He's just the most extraordinarily talented and spiritual person."
Oh YES the BUSH family supports a pedophile right winger, oh YES, his fellow right wingers just LOVE the dickens out of this TALENTED extraordinary wonderfull and SpiRaTuAL...
...PEDOPHILE
Falls right in line with the church and it's history of protecting this slime.
SURE it does, a bible thumper studies CHURCH music, a bible thumper studies CHURCH choir music, a bible thumper plays music AT a church for 30+ years, a NON bible thumper studies contemporary, rock, blues, classical, jazz music, a non bible thumber plays in NON church facilities for a living.
This guy has bible thumper written all over his boy loving behind,and now his fellow thumpers are coming to his DEFENSE just like all those great christians have done, which is WHY the church has so many LAWSUITS.
Oh, and so what if Mr. Bush's aunt liked the guy? Nobody died and made her queen. Besides, they probably lifted the quote (if it is) out of context and possibly got it before she knew about the offense.
Notice that it is OK to call the associates of this pervert (I'm using the word properly, look it up) 'Bible-thumpers,' but if some Christian were to come out and call him a term starting with 'F' and rhyming with maggot, they'd be derided as a bigot and probably prevented from posting again.
I do see, on re-reading, that the aunt's comment was made after the fact. I stand corrected if anyone caught my error.
It is a daring leap for feelfree1 to say that the decisions of the president of the United States of America result from repeated sexual abuse. I should wonder if said poster has spent any time with those troubled souls who have actually been victimized in this way. Theirs is a long journey of healing, and only the most brazen would use their torment as the topic of public jest.
Re: "It is a daring leap for feelfree1 to say that the decisions of the president of the United States of America result from repeated sexual abuse."
Let's hear your explanation?
Re: "I should wonder if said poster has spent any time with those troubled souls who have actually been victimized in this way."
In fact, I have, and I am very lucky that I was not a victim myself. I apologise if my post was offensive to any of the victims.
And anyway, I should point out that this man isn't gay. Gay people have *** with consenting adults of the same ***, pedophiles have *** with non-consenting children of any ***. So it's automatically inappropriate to call a pedophile a homosexual.
Just saying.
And anyway, I should point out that this man isn't gay. Gay people have s-ex with consenting adults of the same s-ex, pedophiles have s-ex with non-consenting children of any s-ex. So it's automatically inappropriate to call a pedophile a homosexual.
Just saying.
(I can't believe they won't let me use the S word. Even as a noun. lol)
Let's hear your explanation?
I'm not in a position to explain his behavior (if that's what you wanted explained) because I don't have facts that are any more reliable that what I get from the news. Anything I said would be mere conjecture and rumor.
As to why your statement is a daring leap:
1) You don't say what behavior is being explained, 2) You don't show that his behavior is consistent with that of people who have been treated in this way.
To your credit, though, you didn't claim that he WAS abused, and therefore exhibits a certain behavior. You claimed that his behavior would be understood in the light of clerical sexual abuse, IF it had occurred.
Also, I'm genuinely thankful that you have not been victimized in this way. The people I know who have (which includes colleagues, students and my wife) have a lengthy, and probably life-long battle.
OK then, let's compare those two. (Let me say, first, that I am not a person who uses either the F- or the N-word.) Both terms are used derisively by those outside the group toward those inside the group. That's where the comparison breaks down. After that, the N word is a better term than 'Bible-thumper.'
Reasoning: Both terms are used to describe to describe a certain characteristic (real or perceived) of those within the group. Some Christians, when preaching, have emphasized their points by thumping their Bibles (much like another passionate speaker might hit their podium). Because of this, people who don't like their message refer to them as Bible-thumpers. Similiarly, calling a black person a n***er refers to a characteristic. The Latin for black is niger (Spanish is negro), which developed an extra 'g' in the translation. Using the word n***er is essentially equivalent to calling a person 'black,' which is a perfectly good description. So, while all blacks could correctly be described as 'black,' it is not accurate to call all people who adhere to the Bible 'Bible-thumpers' since not all of them do so. Therefore, n***er is a better term than 'Bible-thumper.'
-
by djnechodom
January 23, 2007 1:20 PM EST
- "I really don't think that you can compare the term "Bible-Thumper" with "F-aggot." That's like comparing the term "Bible-Thumper" with the N word."
-
Reply to this comment
-
See all 22 CommentsOK then, let's compare those two. (Let me say, first, that I am not a person who uses either the F- or the N-word.) Both terms are used derisively by those outside the group toward those inside the group. That's where the comparison breaks down. After that, the N word is a better term than 'Bible-thumper.'
Reasoning: Both terms are used to describe to describe a certain characteristic (real or perceived) of those within the group. Some Christians, when preaching, have emphasized their points by thumping their Bibles (much like another passionate speaker might hit their podium). Because of this, people who don't like their message refer to them as Bible-thumpers. Similiarly, calling a black person a n***er refers to a characteristic. The Latin for black is niger (Spanish is negro), which developed an extra 'g' in the translation. Using the word n***er is essentially equivalent to calling a person 'black,' which is a perfectly good description. So, while all blacks could correctly be described as 'black,' it is not accurate to call all people who adhere to the Bible 'Bible-thumpers' since not all of them do so. Therefore, n***er is a better term than 'Bible-thumper.'