February 11, 2009 5:28 PM

Iran To Conduct Missile War Games

(AP)  Iran plans three days of military maneuvers, including short-range missile tests, beginning Sunday — its first since the U.N. Security Council imposed sanctions against it in late December, state-run television said.

"The elite Revolutionary Guards plans to begin a three-day missile maneuver on Sunday near Garmsar city," said the broadcast. The city is located in northern Iran on the edge of Kavir desert, about 60 miles southeast of Tehran.

"Zalzal and Fajr-5 missiles will be test fired in the war game," the television quoted an unnamed commander of the guards, as saying. Both are considered short-range missiles.

Iran conducted three large-scale military exercises last year as tensions with the West and the United States rose.

In November, for example, it test-fired dozens of missiles, including the Shahab-3 that can reach Israel, in military maneuvers that it said were aimed at putting a stop to the role of world powers in the Persian Gulf region.

Sunday's maneuvers are to be the first by Iran since the U.N. Security Council imposed limited sanctions on the country on Dec. 23, banning selling materials and technology that could be used in Iran's nuclear and missile programs and freezing assets abroad of 10 Iranian companies and individuals.

Iran regularly holds large maneuvers, often using them to test weapons developed by its arms industry.

The latest Iranian maneuvers also come just days after the U.S. announced it would deploy a second aircraft carrier to the Gulf, the USS Stennis.

That appeared to have alarmed some in Iran's hard-line leadership. A prominent member of a powerful cleric-run body this week warned that the U.S. plans to attack Iran in the coming months, possibly by striking its nuclear facilities.

The United States has said it is focusing on diplomacy but will not rule out other options.

Washington has accused Iran of backing militants fueling Iraq's violence and has tried to rally its Arab allies in isolating Tehran.

Last year, Iran held three large-scale military exercises. In April, Iran tested what it called an "ultra-horizon" missile, fired from helicopters and jet fighters, and the Fajr-3 missile, which can reportedly evade radar and use multiple warheads to hit several targets simultaneously.

While U.S. officials have suggested that Iran is exaggerating the capabilities of its newly developed weapons, Washington and its allies have been watching the country's progress in missile technology with concern.

In October, the U.S. led maneuvers of its own in the Gulf, focusing on surveillance, with warships tracking a ship suspected of carrying components of illegal weapons.

In December 2005, Israel successfully tested its Arrow missile defense system against a rocket similar to Iran's Shahab-3. The Arrow was developed jointly with the United States.

While the Zalzal is a solid fuel missile, the Fajr-5 missile, from the Persian word meaning dawn, is an artillery rocket developed by Iran in early 2006. It includes a mobile platform and its primary role is to engage land targets, with a range of 50 miles.

Iran has recently urged Arab Gulf nations to kick the U.S. military out of the region and join Iran in a new regional security alliance, an offer mostly ignored by the Gulf states.

© 2009 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
  • Scott Conroy

    Scott Conroy is a National Political Reporter for RealClearPolitics and a contributor for CBS News.

Add a Comment See all 26 Comments
by tellitasitis January 22, 2007 9:38 PM EST
WATCH THE 12 MINUTE CLIP


http://www.obsess
ionthemovie.com/trailer.htm

Reply to this comment
by January 22, 2007 3:09 PM EST

must read articles here

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=CHO20070121&articleId=4536
Reply to this comment
by bluestardad January 22, 2007 2:59 AM EST
Nancy Get the Rubber Coats and ropes! Now Iraq is no longer an immediate threat to America, There are no Weapons of Mass Destruction, Saddam Hussein is no longer in power, and a New Elected Government is in office. Mission Accomplished Pull the Troops OUT and come home. If accomplishment of the Original Mission is considered failure in Iraq then who is writing the History here? To encapsulate the countries wish to Withdrawal from Iraq into a Losing Sound Bite argument for staying the Course in Iraq is a Rovian NeoCon Tactic that the Rest of America has rejected on November 7, 2006 and is not buying now. So Republicans take your Neocon, Chicken Hawk Stay the course or people will die bologna and pounditupyourasssideways. Americans are dieing three per day and billions of dollars are being spent so you can set in your offices drink coffee and say YOUR PLAN MR. NEOCON for Iraq did not fail. But it did America saw thru your lies and calls you into account, you are going to jail. Leave Iran alone!
Reply to this comment
by bluestardad January 22, 2007 2:58 AM EST
The same intelligence is telling us Iran is a threat. Hey they said Iraq was too. Do we need anotherdumbassattack? Or did we learn not to trust the Intelligence of our Intelligence departments?
Reply to this comment
by January 21, 2007 8:55 PM EST

to

fredgrad2000



what do you think of 'the opinion of these two American military men'

Scott Ritter was most definitely correct on Iraq, we where lied to; there%u2019s no debate on that now. So give us some debate on Scott Ritter and his opinion on Iran, provide you're sources of info.



Scott Ritter - ex marine and weapons inspector
an interview with him on Iran

http://www.democracynow.org/arti
cle.pl?sid=06/10/16/144204&mode=thread&t
id=25

Iran: Pieces in Place for Escalation
- by Colonel Sam Gardiner
http://www.globalresearch.ca/i
ndex.php?context=viewArticle&code=GAR200
70116&articleId=4483
Reply to this comment
by grazinggoat January 21, 2007 8:44 PM EST
Is Bush still in command of the Army? does he know what he is doing? Are the orders coming from Washington? anymore? at all?
Reply to this comment
by natural302 January 21, 2007 8:42 PM EST
TIME IS UP FOR THE EARTH.
THANKS TO THE MAD MAN G.W.BUSH.
WE NEED TO PUT BUSH OUT NOW!
Reply to this comment
by randalds January 21, 2007 8:38 PM EST
Only the MoveOn.org Soros-ites could ever possibly believe that President Bush is actually the greater danger to the World or us than Ahmadinejad and the apocalyptic mullahs in Iran who are the world terrorists' ATM!! Unbelievable...OR for that matter would think it was a good, sound strategy to leave a second group of suicidal maniacs like Saddam and his cronies in power just because they MIGHT keep Iran's lunatics occupied - only in "crazy lefty world" are 2 brutal, terror-supporting regimes better than one!! Thanks for the laughs though guys!!
Posted by fredgrad2000 at 05:33 PM : Jan 21, 2007


Now THIS is a serious koolaid drinker from the right. What next? Is he going to start telling us how Saddam was behind 9-11? Or maybe that we're still going to be greeted as liberators, once they stop killing us. Still it's nice to have another right wing loony pop up every now and then to show how crazy to really are.
Reply to this comment
by fredgrad2000 January 21, 2007 8:33 PM EST
Only the MoveOn.org Soros-ites could ever possibly believe that President Bush is actually the greater danger to the World or us than Ahmadinejad and the apocalyptic mullahs in Iran who are the world terrorists' ATM!! Unbelievable...OR for that matter would think it was a good, sound strategy to leave a second group of suicidal maniacs like Saddam and his cronies in power just because they MIGHT keep Iran's lunatics occupied - only in "crazy lefty world" are 2 brutal, terror-supporting regimes better than one!! Thanks for the laughs though guys!!
Reply to this comment
by randalds January 21, 2007 7:46 PM EST
Randall you mean like China drilling for oil just outside US waters in the gulf of mexico? So that gives us the right to harass the chineese?

Posted by cbscrash07 at 04:29 PM : Jan 21, 2007

No? I don't understand your reference here. If the Chinese are outside of territorial waters then of course we don't. The goal of the new carrier strike force is to do things like violating Iranian waters, etc., to provoke a response so Bush can use that response as a reason to attack. This is not just my opinion, but it is also what General Mccafferty said and he is supported by several other retired generals in this.
Reply to this comment
See all 26 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook