WASHINGTON, Jan. 18, 2007
Pelosi Turns Up Heat On Global Warming
Speaker Forcing Legislative Action On Climate Change
-
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Cal., is moving to create a special committee to recommend legislation for cutting greenhouse gases. (AP)
-
Interactive Global Warming The greenhouse effect, a look at the Kyoto Protocol and a history of the Earth's climate.
-
Interactive 100-Hour Agenda A look at legislation new Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi wants the chamber to pass swiftly.
-
Face The Nation Madam Speaker Watch an exclusive interview with Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi on Face The Nation.
She's moving to create a special committee to recommend legislation for cutting greenhouse gases, most likely to be chaired by Rep. Edward Markey, D-Mass., a Democratic leadership aide said Wednesday.
Markey has advocated raising mileage standards for cars, trucks and SUVs and is one of the House's biggest critics of oil companies and U.S. automakers,
Pelosi has discussed the proposal with at least two Democratic committee chairmen: fellow Californian Henry Waxman of Oversight and Government Reform, and West Virginia Rep. Nick Rahall, who heads the Natural Resources panel. Pelosi intends to announce the move this week, said the leadership aide, who spoke on condition of anonymity because not all of the details have been worked out.
The move, to some degree, would sidestep two of the House's most powerful Democratic committee bosses, in shaping what's expected to be at least a yearlong debate on global warming:
Rahall said he had spoken with Pelosi about the idea of a new select committee. Rahall's panel oversees energy development on public lands, including coal, oil and natural gas as well as cleaner, non-carbon sources such as geothermal and windmills.
"I've been assured that no legislative jurisdiction would be taken away from any committee," Rahall said. "No legislative responsibility would be shifted from any committee."
As chair of Energy and Commerce, Dingell oversees the Clean Air Act — and would have the most to lose by letting another panel take the lead. The panel's staff chief, Dennis Fitzgibbons, a former auto company lobbyist, said Dingell was philosophically opposed to Pelosi's plan.
"He has always been cool to the idea, because it undermines the fundamental idea for establishing committees in the first place, which is to acquire expertise in a certain area," Fitzgibbons said.
Dingell, asked about the new committee, said, "I have not been officially informed."
Waxman, like Markey a one-time protege of Dingell, said that Pelosi discussed the idea of a special committee with him several days ago. He, too, is a skeptic.
"I believe the existing committees can deal effectively with global warming," he said Wednesday. "But I can also understand why the speaker believes it's important to highlight this issue."
A new committee would give Pelosi a vehicle to push a regulatory scheme for reducing greenhouse gases and pit her against President Bush, who plans to outline his global warming approach in his State of the Union next week. Mr .Bush has repeatedly opposed any mandatory reductions in carbon dioxide emissions, instead advocating voluntary approaches and research on new technologies. Pelosi has supported mandatory reductions with specific target dates for achieving them.
"It's an issue that the speaker thinks is critical to address," said Pelosi spokeswoman Jennifer Crider.
Democratic officials said the committee would be responsible for advising the best legislative approaches while the actual bill-writing duties would likely still be done by Dingell's and Rangel's committees. Among the topics being negotiated are how long the committee should exist and how broad its focus should be, since global climate change affects virtually everything.
Pelosi hasn't shied from taking on other powerful House Democrats. She endorsed the losing effort by Rep. John Murtha, D-Pa., to become majority leader over Rep. Steny Hoyer, D-Md. She also has approved of six-year term limits for committee chairmen over objections from Dingell and other senior Democrats.
She also has a history with Dingell, who backed Hoyer over Pelosi in a 2001 race for the party whip's post. Pelosi backed a Democratic primary challenger to Dingell's re-election the following year.
© MMVII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
More From Politics
Add a Comment See all 86 Comments
- The Earth is warming and would still be warming if man was not here. It is the Earth's cycle and it can not be stopped. Grapes used to grown on Greenland until the Ice Age. Ask any scientist who is not getting paid by someone to research global warming and they will tell you it is normal. Anyone who honestly thinks that we can control the Earth is just ignorant. The Earth controls us, it has alway been incontrol and always will.
- Reply to this comment
- The stats on smoking are undeniable (finally even cigarette companies agree - even if some of those they duped still don't want to believe). The stats on global warming are similarly undeniable.
- Reply to this comment
- USA - let me tell you about a young med student in the pre-cigarette days. He was observing, along with his class, an autopsy on a coal miner's cadaver - because this person had a very unique and rare disease that the teacher said they'd probably never see in their entire careers... lung cancer. Funny how now it's common, and common for smokers and those exposed to them.
- Reply to this comment
- Pelosi talking about "global warming" while California is in a deep freeze is hilarious.
.........
Think of all the money the Poor & Elderly will save on their heating bills.
........... - Reply to this comment
- This reminds me so much of the smoking wars - remember when cigarette companies, and people who just didn't want to believe portrayed it as if there was some real doubt that smoking causes cancer?
Posted by SusanHelit at 07:00 PM : Jan 18, 2007
SusanHelit let me tell you about my father who died (78 yr old)
a couple years ago...he smoked, but quit around early 70's
The nurse who filled out the death certificate
put down the cause of death was smoking (cancer)...
forget the 10-15 drugs he was taking the last several years of his life
forget he was 78+ yr old...
if he smoked, and died of cancer,
the record shows he died because of the smoking... - Reply to this comment
- frankie 6
come around the majiority of the scientist that was on the committe to check on global warming say there is none green peace tried to get scientice to sign on and say man is causing global warming and only 2500 signed on what does that tell you! check your facts it a liberal way of controling the people of the USA. IF you check out what the demcrocated controll congrees want to do is if you talk bad about them they want you to report to them and if you don't you can be fined and jailed for up to 1 year. Did you see the congrees do this when the Republinans controled it? the answer is NO if they tried to the liberal news would be all over them and say they are trying to take away our rights but do you hear the liberal papers talking about what the dem's are tring to do? No you are not - Reply to this comment
- The Medieval Warm Period was a time of unusually warm weather around 800-1300 AD, during the European Medieval period. Initial research on the MWP and the following Little Ice Age (LIA) was largely done in Europe, where the phenomenon was most obvious and clearly documented.
It was initially believed that the temperature changes were global. However, this view has been questioned; the 2001 IPCC report summarises this research, saying "%u2026current evidence does not support globally synchronous periods of anomalous cold or warmth over this time frame, and the conventional terms of 'Little Ice Age' and 'Medieval Warm Period' appear to have limited utility in describing trends in hemispheric or global mean temperature changes in past centuries".[1]
Palaeoclimatologists developing regionally specific climate reconstructions of past centuries conventionally label their coldest interval as "LIA" and their warmest interval as the "MWP".[2][3] Others follow the convention and when a significant climate event is found in the "LIA" or "MWP" time frames, associate their events to the period. Some "MWP" events are thus wet events or cold events rather than strictly warm events, particularly in central Antarctica where climate patterns opposite to the North Atlantic area have been noticed.
The Medieval Warm Period partially coincides with the peak in solar activity named the Medieval Maximum (1100%u20131250). - Reply to this comment
- Going to be a kinda a hard sell when its 35 degrees in California today eh Nancy?
The mini ice age followed a period of global warming also somtime around 1400's. Ask the Europeans about that one. - Reply to this comment
- Yep, we get by with the lightest of effects - Hurricane Katrina and her like, crops destroyed some years, and lots of 'est's' in the weather - hottest summer on record, worst flooding in decades, worst windstorm ever, most snow in a decade (all in the same year!) - minor stuff, compared to what will happen if we keep letting our only home get destroyed.
- Reply to this comment
- Yep, the only true debate is how bad it will be.
For those of us discussing here, probably not much effect. The burden will fall on our children and future generations... - Reply to this comment
- Old rule in gambling - don't bet what you can't afford to lose. Maybe we could survive global warming, maybe we couldn't. I'm not going to mess around with it, when we don't have a second earth to go to if we ruin this one! Environmentalism is just pure self-interest for anyone aware of the facts.
- Reply to this comment
- Global warming means the whole globe gets hotter. Anyone paying attention to the news knows that global warming shows up as more extreme weather - including freezing weather in California, more and worse hurricanes, floods, droughts and so on and so forth.
- Reply to this comment
- Yes, the sun is getting slightly hotter. But not nearly enough to explain the temperature increases on earth. The solar factor will compound the greenhouse gas problem.
Nice try, though. - Reply to this comment
- What's the problem ?? No more long drives to Big Bear,, We can now snowboard & surf in Malibu
- Reply to this comment
- processor2:
Funny. Not. - Reply to this comment
- Out of all the interesting discussions, no one has addressed the fact that the sun is getting hotter. If the sun was getting colder and the earth was getting warmer, there would be the proof of manmade global warming. But, the sun is getting hotter, hence the earth is getting warmer.
- Reply to this comment
- Pelosi talking about "global warming" while California is in a deep freeze is hilarious.
......... - Reply to this comment
- Think of all the money the Poor & Elderly will save on their heating bills.
........... - Reply to this comment
- huskerarmy: I think Scientist are people too. Some as you said have invested thier entire lifes into this. They are as vested as big oil if not more so. I find the lack of any mention of the increase of solor output from the sun to be extremely daming. I think global warming is happening. I don't know the exact cause. I know that the climate of Earth is extremely complicated. So I tend to doubt over simplistic models. Obviously Co2 acts as a green house gas yet methan CH4 is 20 times more reflective. sources of this include cow flatulance to rotting garbage. Water vapor is also a problem. I think they said the next ice age will be due in 100,000 years so I figure will heat up for the next 50,000. I think the best return for our buck in controlling global warming is a satelite array with solor shades. We would be able to control our planets exposure to solor radiation. They only thing I know for sure is that it is a natural process. In that humans are native to the Earth so any thing we do is natural. Just like the organisms that created the oxygen rich atmosphere. Or the ones that produce algea blooms. Earthlings polute its what we do.
- Reply to this comment
- Pelosi talking about "global warming" while California is in a deep freeze is hilarious.
......... - Reply to this comment
The road ahead in Afghanistan, and the crucial decision Obama faces.
