WASHINGTON, Jan. 18, 2007

Retired Generals Slam Bush's Iraq Plan

Troop Buildup Called "A Fool's Errand" By Commander In First Gulf War

  • Video Republicans Don't Support Plan

    Bob Schieffer analyzes the situation in Congress and says few Republicans think President Bush's new Iraq strategy is a good plan.

  • Video Rebellion On Iraq Plan

    The Senate has proposed a bi-partisan resolution opposing the President Bush's plan to raise troop levels in Iraq. Bill Plante reports that the White House is not pleased.

    • Retired Army Lt. Gen. William Odom, second left, tesitifies before the Senate Senate Foreign Relations Committee on Jan. 18, 2007. Also testifying are retired Gen. Joseph Hoar, second right, retired Gen. Barry McCaffrey, right, and retired Gen. Jack Keane, left.

      Retired Army Lt. Gen. William Odom, second left, tesitifies before the Senate Senate Foreign Relations Committee on Jan. 18, 2007. Also testifying are retired Gen. Joseph Hoar, second right, retired Gen. Barry McCaffrey, right, and retired Gen. Jack Keane, left.  (GETTY)

    • Sen. Chuck Hagel, R-Neb., center, is flanked by Democratic Sens. Joe Biden of Delaware and Carl Levin of Michigan at a news conference on Capitol Hill on Jan. 17, 2007, to discuss the Senate resolution opposing an Iraq troop buildup.

      Sen. Chuck Hagel, R-Neb., center, is flanked by Democratic Sens. Joe Biden of Delaware and Carl Levin of Michigan at a news conference on Capitol Hill on Jan. 17, 2007, to discuss the Senate resolution opposing an Iraq troop buildup.  (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)

    Previous slide Next slide
  • Interactive New Plan For Iraq

    Key elements of the plan, excerpts from the president's speech, reaction and more.

  • Who's Who Congress Reacts To Plan

    Reaction to President Bush's new Iraq stategy, which includes an increase in troops.

  • Interactive 110th Congress

    The balance of power shifts and new leadership takes control as the latest session convenes.

(CBS/AP) 
At a news conference, Pelosi read those words aloud approvingly, and said, "That resolution will be supported by Democrats in the House."

At the same time, Pelosi offered no indication that Congress will be able to prevent Mr. Bush from carrying out his plan.

She did not directly address the issue when asked, and Rep. Steny Hoyer, D-Md., the House majority leader, said, "As a practical matter, we know that the president has the constitutional authority ... to increase the troops."

Democratic leaders in both houses have said repeatedly they will not support any attempt to cut off funds for troops who already have been deployed.

Democratic leaders have not said when they intend to seek votes on their legislation, and Senate Republicans have maneuvered successfully to avoid the spectacle of a repudiation of the president before he delivers his annual State of the Union address next Tuesday.

Sen. Joseph Biden, the Delaware Democrat who chairs the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said the panel will debate the measure criticizing Mr. Bush's troop escalation on Wednesday.

Republicans in both houses are expected to draft alternative legislation, in part to give members of their rank-and-file a measure to support rather than merely oppose what Democrats draft. Officials said one possibility under discussion is an alternative that supports the troop increase as long as the Iraqi government meets certain conditions, although no final decisions have been made.

Whenever the votes occur, administration supporters have expressed fears that the president faces a bipartisan repudiation of significant proportions.

So far, Sens. Chuck Hagel of Nebraska and Olympia Snowe of Maine are the only Republicans to announce their backing for the Senate measure. A third lawmaker, Sen. Gordon Smith, R-Ore., signaled during the day he is giving serious consideration to joining them.

"Senator Smith is opposed to a troop surge," said his spokesman, R.C. Hammond. "He is very open to serious ways that Congress can influence the president's Iraq strategy."

Another Republican critic of Mr. Bush's policy, Sen. Norm Coleman of Minnesota, said: "I don't support the surge in Baghdad, but there are some things in the resolution I don't agree with, and so we're kind of looking at language."

Mr. Bush's meeting with lawmakers was his third session in as many days as he struggles to build support for an increase in troops for a war that is opposed by the public and played a role in the Republican setbacks in last fall's elections.

In addition, National Security Adviser Stephen Hadley traveled to the Capitol to meet with House Republicans.

Complicating Mr. Bush's political predicament is al-Maliki, who has said in recent days that the United States is not providing enough training and equipment for Iraqi forces.

"He's been constantly asking for an upgrade of troops as well as equipment, and we're providing that," Mr. Bush told Belo Corp. television in an interview. "We may not be providing as quickly as he wants. But nevertheless it's a good sign when the prime minister says just give us the capabilities, and that's precisely what my new strategy and new plan is attempting to do."

The president defended al-Maliki against skeptics by saying that Iraqi forces now are going after all people "who are fomenting the violence."

Democrats have grown increasing critical of Mr. Bush's Iraq policy. "This president has taken the nation through a failed war," said Sen. Robert C. Byrd in remarks on the Senate floor.

Hagel, long a critic of the war, said the administration's plans are doomed. "We are in a box, and putting our soldiers and Marines in more of a box and asking them to do things they cannot do," he said.

Presidential politics is also part of the equation, CBS News senior White House correspondent Bill Plante reports. Many of those who spoke against the troop surge have ambitions for '08: Hagel; Sen. Sam Brownback, R-Kan.; Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Conn.; and Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y.

The committee's senior Republican, Sen. Richard Lugar of Indiana, said the Democratic-inspired legislation was unlikely to have any impact on Mr. Bush.

Describing the environment as politically charged, Lugar said, "We risk having reasoned debate descend into simplistic sloganeering."


© MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 214 Comments
by vincan-2009 January 21, 2007 5:38 PM EST
We are in a terrible war. The election showed that the country - democrats, republicans and independents - want the war to end and want to have real representation in Congress. Now is the time for all members in the House and Senate to think about the people, our troop lives and families, and the Iraqi people. More troops is not going to change this Iraq situation from what it is. Please consider doing the people's business instead of a psychopath president/vice president who won't listen and won't hear anything they don't like. Help this country out from under the criminal decisions that have been made for enrichment of the richest corporations and people. We are sick of it.
Reply to this comment
by annd2302 January 21, 2007 5:18 AM EST
feelfree1

Bull ***, I say scalp them all if you can get through all the layers of towels.
Reply to this comment
by macusweil January 20, 2007 1:09 AM EST
Troop Buildup Called "A Fool's Errand" By Commander In First Gulf War -- PERFECT!!

A real commander in chief would have won this war years ago. Its taken a knuckle head like Dubba a while but he has run one the greatest military engines on earth into the ground. He could not win it with 50,000 or even 75,000 more. It was lost the day the looting started and baby Bush gave orders to do nothing.
Reply to this comment
by garnetqueen January 19, 2007 7:19 PM EST
This war was a tragic mistake, and this president wants to send more troops? It won't get any better, it's getting worse by the minute.
Reply to this comment
by feelfree1 January 19, 2007 4:46 PM EST
gdmoore2,

Re: "Boy, it is hard to read stuff like that about my country, feelfree1. Hard to read. Hard to think that way. And hard to admit that it is not far off. What a mess."

Agreed. Thanks for the comment.
Reply to this comment
by exusmcsgt January 19, 2007 3:33 PM EST
FARTKNOCKER2-

It is not a lie that Cheney was Haliburton's CEO prior to joining the adminitration. Check some facts yourself, if you're capable of doing so.
Reply to this comment
by exusmcsgt January 19, 2007 2:19 PM EST
docpeter-

Even more ironic that Bubba Dubya continues to overrule career military experts considering he didn't even make his National Guard drills, eh?
Reply to this comment
by frankly6 January 19, 2007 12:51 PM EST
lieberman18

We've got plenty of homegrown Nazi Thugs to worry about. Just look in the mirror.

Reply to this comment
by grumpas January 19, 2007 12:43 PM EST
lieberman18 kind of venom fueled hatred defies all mean's of rational response! He just rants on and on like a lunatic! All of us love our country lieberman18, probably a whole lot more than folks like you ever have! You made it clear several years ago what you think of our system of government! We care enough about our country to not set by quietly while fascist's like yourself destroy democracy! You have become so amoured with the criminal George W Bush you have lost your perspective! It happened in Germany years ago when people like you choose to overlooked crimes Hitler was committing for what you considered the betterment of the country! Well, I hate to be the one to tell you! A lot of us are not planning on following der fuhrer quietly over the cliff!
Reply to this comment
by frankly6 January 19, 2007 12:40 PM EST


At this point the only rational explanation for Bush's strategy or seeming lack there of is that he wants to prolong the war. After all, Halliburton, big oil and other GOP connected companies are making huge profits.

Reply to this comment
by docpeter-2009 January 19, 2007 12:24 PM EST
Marine Gen. Joseph *** said, "This administration's handling of the war has been characterized by deceit, mismanagement and a shocking failure to understand the social and political forces that influence events in the Middle East,"


Retired Gen. Barry McCaffrey said, "They're going to try to muscle this thing out in the next 24 months with an urban counterinsurgency plan that I personally believe, with all due respect, is a fool's errand."

So GWB has decided he understands and knows more than those schooled and trained in war. The GWB administration knows and understands all the concepts involved with winning the war without ever really participating in war.

Why does he have advisers if all he is going to do is ignore their advice? Some would consider this the mark of the fool. Wasn't it Einstein who said only a fool would continue to make the same mistake over and over again and expect different result?
Reply to this comment
by long_rider January 19, 2007 12:10 PM EST
Everyone knows that Iraq is this is another Viet Nam, and we know what the result will be. Congress is doing nothing, and will continue to do so, because the chimp can, and will, veto all of their attempts. The only answer is to get the chimp, and his buddies, out of office.

The American people don't protest, they just want to keep using their credit cards, think happy happy thoughts, and complain. We accept the fact that the news media is controled, and distorts facts, and often does not report meaningful stories.

We get stories about movie stars being arrested, about rich people, and what they like - who really cares.

There is an Army LT. Wantada who is making a statement and willing to give up his freedom in doing so. He is being railroaded by the government. Yet not one word of this in the main stream news.

Americans have to go to Washington and protest, Americans should look A Lt. Watada's case and support him.

Impeach the chimp.
Reply to this comment
by bluestardad January 19, 2007 11:43 AM EST
If the Generals do not support this and only Bush Yes men are going to carry it out Congress Must act to cut off funding for this war or revoke the authorization for the President to fight in Iraq.
Reply to this comment
by bluestardad January 19, 2007 11:42 AM EST
Guys: Once again Liberman18 a paid provocateur like bushrocks1, and Jane1234 ect. I fell for it too but don%u2019t engage them and they will change their name and go away for awhile. Don%u2019t waste your intellect.
Reply to this comment
by exusmcsgt January 19, 2007 11:38 AM EST
hungry1968-

The way lieberman18 seethes, I wouldn't be surprised that he spent his youth torturing small animals.
Reply to this comment
by hungry1968 January 19, 2007 11:35 AM EST
lieberman18

I would really like to reply to your post, but I find myself speechless. Your ignorance is so deeply rooted, I'm afraid that anything I post would just be wasted on your narrow, closed, little mind.
Reply to this comment
by exusmcsgt January 19, 2007 11:18 AM EST
"The proposed solution is to send more troops and it won't work. The addition of 21,000 troops is too little and too late," former Marine Gen. Joseph *** said."

For all you NeoCons who have told me over the last several weeks that I have no understanding of military strategy for having said the same thing since the surge plan's first mention, enjoy.
Reply to this comment
by lieberman18 January 19, 2007 11:03 AM EST
Listen to all of the Nazis bay and moan and screech like pygmy monkeys. Except that pygmy monkeys have more brains.

Probably all of you hate this country. Good, if you live here, you can kindly leave. If not, stay where you are. If you country, like France, is ever invaded by scores of Islamic Nazi thugs, you deserve them - unless of course, you choose to join 'em. We don't need to send in the Marines then. And don't beg for them either. Too many American boys and girls dot graves in European countries.

But that was illegal too, right?

If you do live here, kindly consider, no, you need to turn your homes over to those Native Americans you took from them. And be sure to tell your heroes Pelosi, Byrd, Kerry, Clinton, and Obama -not to mention the drunk intern killer that they should do the same.

If you don't, you are nothing but little hypocritical babies.
Reply to this comment
by skyk-2009 January 19, 2007 10:01 AM EST
It should be obvious to anyone who can think that Bush and his Fascist Government was intent on using 9/11 to invade and occupy Iraq. The intention was to NEVER leave that country and to use it in much the same way we used South Korea. In the Fascist Mind we could just take over that country, create a "Friendly" Government and pretty much do as we like. That is a failed policy from LONG ago and those who put it into place and carried it out, need to be brought to justice for they have killed HUNDREDS of THOUSANDS of Human's for NO REASON at all.
Reply to this comment
by gdmoore2 January 19, 2007 6:49 AM EST
Boy, it is hard to read stuff like that about my country, feelfree1. Hard to read. Hard to think that way. And hard to admit that it is not far off. What a mess.
Reply to this comment
See all 214 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Iran OKs 10 New Uranium Enrichment Sites

    (254 recent comments)

Exclusive Webshow

Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more. Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: