Retired Generals Slam Bush's Iraq Plan
Troop Buildup Called "A Fool's Errand" By Commander In First Gulf War
-
Play CBS Video Video Generals Oppose Bush Plan Four retired generals spoke out on Capitol Hill, doubting President Bush's plan to increase troops in Iraq. David Martin reports.
-
Video Republicans Don't Support Plan Bob Schieffer analyzes the situation in Congress and says few Republicans think President Bush's new Iraq strategy is a good plan.
-
Video Rebellion On Iraq Plan The Senate has proposed a bi-partisan resolution opposing the President Bush's plan to raise troop levels in Iraq. Bill Plante reports that the White House is not pleased.
-
-
Retired Army Lt. Gen. William Odom, second left, tesitifies before the Senate Senate Foreign Relations Committee on Jan. 18, 2007. Also testifying are retired Gen. Joseph Hoar, second right, retired Gen. Barry McCaffrey, right, and retired Gen. Jack Keane, left. (GETTY)
-
Sen. Chuck Hagel, R-Neb., center, is flanked by Democratic Sens. Joe Biden of Delaware and Carl Levin of Michigan at a news conference on Capitol Hill on Jan. 17, 2007, to discuss the Senate resolution opposing an Iraq troop buildup. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)
-
-
Interactive New Plan For Iraq Key elements of the plan, excerpts from the president's speech, reaction and more.
-
Who's Who Congress Reacts To Plan Reaction to President Bush's new Iraq stategy, which includes an increase in troops.
-
Interactive 110th Congress The balance of power shifts and new leadership takes control as the latest session convenes.
"The proposed solution is to send more troops and it won't work. The addition of 21,000 troops is too little and too late," former Marine Gen. Joseph Hoar said.
Hoar once commanded all American forces in the Middle East and has nothing good to say about the war.
"This administration's handling of the war has been characterized by deceit, mismanagement and a shocking failure to understand the social and political forces that influence events in the Middle East," Hoar said.
Retired Gen. Barry McCaffrey, who commanded a division in the first Gulf War and was consulted by the president in drawing up the new Iraq strategy said, "They're going to try to muscle this thing out in the next 24 months with an urban counterinsurgency plan that I personally believe, with all due respect, is a fool's errand."
It will take political compromise to end Iraq's sectarian violence, and retired Lt. Gen William Odom, who once headed Army intelligence, doubts it will happen.
"The Sunnis certainly are not committed to it, and I don't think the Shiites have ever been committed to it," Odom said.
Even the build-up's lone supporter, former Army Chief of Staff Gen. Jack Keane, acknowledged that success depends on an unknown quantity — the performance of Iraqi Prime Minister al-Malaki and his government.
"Who is Maliki and who is the Maliki government? And I don't believe our government, I don't pretend to speak for them, but I don't believe our government truly knows that answer," Keane said.
At another hearing, reports Martin, the head of the CIA was asked if his analysts think the Maliki government can deliver. He replied, "It's an unknown."
Meanwhile, opposition to the president's plan is also growing on Capitol Hill. Speaker Nancy Pelosi pledged the support of House Democrats for legislation declaring that Mr. Bush's decision to send additional troops to Iraq is "not in the national interest of the United States."
Pelosi's commitment came as Senate Democrats said they intend to begin advancing a nonbinding measure next week that criticizes the White House's new strategy.
Democrats sought to bring public pressure to bear on the president's new policy as Mr. Bush and senior administration officials worked to limit Republican defections.
"He said, 'If you can help us out, I really appreciate your help,'" Sen. Wayne Allard, R-Colo., said after a White House meeting with the commander in chief.
Even a Republican senator who won't speak out against the president for fear it will hurt the war effort told CBS News chief Washington correspondent Bob Schieffer there is virtually no enthusiasm among Senate Republicans for the plan. With the exception of Senators John McCain and Lindsey Graham, the senator said almost no one among Republican senators is enthusiastic about enlarging the force.
Senate Democrats, backed by two Republicans, unveiled legislation Wednesday that criticized Mr. Bush's decision to increase troop levels by 21,500. "It is not in the national interest of the United States to deepen its military involvement in Iraq, particularly by escalating the United States military force presence in Iraq," the nonbinding Senate measure states.
© MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie."





- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
... - 11
- next
See all 214 CommentsBull ***, I say scalp them all if you can get through all the layers of towels.
A real commander in chief would have won this war years ago. Its taken a knuckle head like Dubba a while but he has run one the greatest military engines on earth into the ground. He could not win it with 50,000 or even 75,000 more. It was lost the day the looting started and baby Bush gave orders to do nothing.
Re: "Boy, it is hard to read stuff like that about my country, feelfree1. Hard to read. Hard to think that way. And hard to admit that it is not far off. What a mess."
Agreed. Thanks for the comment.
It is not a lie that Cheney was Haliburton's CEO prior to joining the adminitration. Check some facts yourself, if you're capable of doing so.
Even more ironic that Bubba Dubya continues to overrule career military experts considering he didn't even make his National Guard drills, eh?
We've got plenty of homegrown Nazi Thugs to worry about. Just look in the mirror.
At this point the only rational explanation for Bush's strategy or seeming lack there of is that he wants to prolong the war. After all, Halliburton, big oil and other GOP connected companies are making huge profits.
Retired Gen. Barry McCaffrey said, "They're going to try to muscle this thing out in the next 24 months with an urban counterinsurgency plan that I personally believe, with all due respect, is a fool's errand."
So GWB has decided he understands and knows more than those schooled and trained in war. The GWB administration knows and understands all the concepts involved with winning the war without ever really participating in war.
Why does he have advisers if all he is going to do is ignore their advice? Some would consider this the mark of the fool. Wasn't it Einstein who said only a fool would continue to make the same mistake over and over again and expect different result?
The American people don't protest, they just want to keep using their credit cards, think happy happy thoughts, and complain. We accept the fact that the news media is controled, and distorts facts, and often does not report meaningful stories.
We get stories about movie stars being arrested, about rich people, and what they like - who really cares.
There is an Army LT. Wantada who is making a statement and willing to give up his freedom in doing so. He is being railroaded by the government. Yet not one word of this in the main stream news.
Americans have to go to Washington and protest, Americans should look A Lt. Watada's case and support him.
Impeach the chimp.
The way lieberman18 seethes, I wouldn't be surprised that he spent his youth torturing small animals.
I would really like to reply to your post, but I find myself speechless. Your ignorance is so deeply rooted, I'm afraid that anything I post would just be wasted on your narrow, closed, little mind.
For all you NeoCons who have told me over the last several weeks that I have no understanding of military strategy for having said the same thing since the surge plan's first mention, enjoy.
Probably all of you hate this country. Good, if you live here, you can kindly leave. If not, stay where you are. If you country, like France, is ever invaded by scores of Islamic Nazi thugs, you deserve them - unless of course, you choose to join 'em. We don't need to send in the Marines then. And don't beg for them either. Too many American boys and girls dot graves in European countries.
But that was illegal too, right?
If you do live here, kindly consider, no, you need to turn your homes over to those Native Americans you took from them. And be sure to tell your heroes Pelosi, Byrd, Kerry, Clinton, and Obama -not to mention the drunk intern killer that they should do the same.
If you don't, you are nothing but little hypocritical babies.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
... - 11
- next
See all 214 Comments