ARAB JABOUR, Iraq, Jan. 18, 2007

U.S. Troops Go It Alone In South Baghdad

Predominantly Shiite Iraq Force Not Welcome In Sunni Area; Americans Search Out Deadly Enemy Alone

  • U.S. Army Capt. Jason Good, Charlie Company Commander, 1st Squadron, 40th Cavalry, on patrol in Arab Jabour, southern Baghdad.

    U.S. Army Capt. Jason Good, Charlie Company Commander, 1st Squadron, 40th Cavalry, on patrol in Arab Jabour, southern Baghdad.  (CBS/Cami McCormick)

  • Interactive New Plan For Iraq

    Key elements of the plan, excerpts from the president's speech, reaction and more.

  • Who's Who Congress Reacts To Plan

    Reaction to President Bush's new Iraq stategy, which includes an increase in troops.

  • Interactive Iraq: A Turning Point?

    New Congress, change at the Pentagon, study group report; what does the future hold?

(CBS)  "It takes us a while, mentally, to adapt to the fact that when you see a 15- or 16-year-old kid he could very well be the individual that's placing the improvised explosive device in the road, or behind the sniper rifle," Odom said. "That's conceptually, mentally, difficult to grasp, particularly for our young soldiers who haven't seen that before and are now coming to grips with it."

With the daily threat to military vehicles and personnel from IEDs and small arms fire, the 1st Squadron has brought with it a special dismounted Charlie Company. This is its first deployment. It includes small counter-sniper teams that search for gunmen.

The team also performs reconnaissance, traveling muddy roadways where IEDs are often hidden in sandbags to fool U.S. forces, or they're detonated, most recently, by strings of Christmas tree lights.

Tanks and Stryker vehicles now line one of the most dangerous routes, civilian vehicles have been banned and palm trees have been cleared on either side of the road by U.S. tanks.

Once the unit reaches a spot near the Tigris River where weapons caches were recently found, the two dozen or so soldiers set out on foot through the muddy fields, jumping ditches, and taking cover behind mounds of dirt or in the reeds along the river.

Enemy gunmen fire twice in the vicinity of the soldiers. In both cases the Americans escape (although the company's machine gunners open fire and give chase in one instance). An IED explodes in the distance and some of the soldiers pause briefly to look toward the smoke.

The unit commander says the action that day was typical.

American forces are at the forefront of the battle here against Sunni insurgents. As in Anbar province, U.S. commanders are generally clear who the enemy is. But unlike in Anbar, where the U.S. military has enlisted local sheikhs, the Americans here have no visible Iraqi support.

While an Iraqi army battalion works with the 1st Squadron, its 300 men fall far short of what the total number should be — closer to 700.

"They're being attacked the same way Coalition forces are," said Odom. He says their makeup is slightly more Sunni than most Iraqi battalions, but it's still only accounts for 30 percent of the 300 men.

More Sunnis will also be needed for a local police force.

"Getting police in here to operate effectively will depend on having at least a 50 percent composition of Sunnis. They're working very hard to make the police force representative in the areas that it operates in and to be equally representative of all the religious and ethnic groups. It will be extremely important," said Odom.

Col. Garrett calls it his biggest challenge.

"We can go in and clear any area but until there is an Iraqi security structure to come in behind us, and establish a long term presence, true progress in this area will be difficult to achieve," said Garrett.

© MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 20 Comments
by mh4cbs1 January 19, 2007 3:33 AM EST
CBS interactive on Bush - "Forging a New Course"
"New Plan in Iraq"

STOP your endless BUSH Cheerleading! Maybe in 2002 and 2003 Americans bought your corporate media propaganda hook,line and sinker, and were so confused by your in-bed reporters that Bush was able to Lie his way into invading Iraq.

But face it, there is NOTHING new in the Bush plan! So stop calling it NEW. How stupid do you think people are? Maybe they were before, but the American Sheeple are waking up! Your pro-Bush bias just won't fly any more.

Reply to this comment
by j-whitman January 18, 2007 5:52 PM EST
What was it our "Decider" said in his last speech ?? -- "It's Iraq's Plan" -- Not according to Maliki.

Another itty-bitty lie to America & Troops
Reply to this comment
by exusmcsgt January 18, 2007 3:03 PM EST
It really tickles me to hear the NeoCon contention that opposition to the war undermines our troops morale.

I remember, as a young Marine in Viet Nam, reading of the dissent here at home and thinking to myself "Hell yes! Get me out of this ridiculous boondoggle."

I was glad to see that some at home had the common sense to speak the truth.
Reply to this comment
by clestes-2009 January 18, 2007 2:51 PM EST
Have US troops every been anything else except on their own??
Reply to this comment
by dallison7 January 18, 2007 2:41 PM EST
So, the facts are very clear. Our young men and women are fighting Iraq's civil war for them. GET OUR TROOPS OUT NOW!!! Lets Stop this stupid political bul*sh*t. The neo-cons are still at the same silly game, coining new buzz words. Now they came up with "reinforcements" to mask what is happening. Our idiot-in-chief is a traitor to our country and needs to be removed from office, tried and sentenced. PLEASE GO TO: www.impeachbush.org
Reply to this comment
by bluestardad January 18, 2007 2:34 PM EST
These troops will always go it alone until Congress pulls them out.
Reply to this comment
by exusmcsgt January 18, 2007 1:53 PM EST
Hober_Mallow -

Bush HAD a diplomat in Powell but ran him off as Bush believes in sabre-rattling, not diplomacy.
This is evident in his selections for our two most important diplomatic posts. He chose Bolton as ambassador to the UN and then moved his Hawk #2 Rice (Cheney is Hawk #1) from National Security to State.

Understandably, this administration has no diplomatic successes to it's credit.
Reply to this comment
by January 18, 2007 1:45 PM EST
billserey


this war was started on a pack of lies, it is all about corporate American interest. About oil & money, yet soldiers should blindly follow orders, when what is going on is actually against the Nuremberg laws, and is an illegal invasion of a country. Yet you believe the troops must stay the course.

I don't know, I thought most of us taught our kids to stand up for what is just, and is correct. That if they realized something they where involved in was wrong, the solution was to get uninvolved, and do what they can do to solve the problem.


The violence in Iraq needs to end or slow dramatically, which means America and all the massive weapons they have there, need to come home.
Like Vietnam, mainstream propaganda states things will become more violent in Iraq if America leaves. How the hell will things get more violent when the majority of firepower belongs to the occupying armies that will be leaving. You need fire power like Americas, tanks, helicopter gunships, planes & bombs falling from the sky; in order to level whole cities like Falluja. The Iraq%u2019s don't have those tools or scale of weapons, so how will it get more violent when less weapons of large scale, and less firepower will be available for use ?


peace
Reply to this comment
by hober_mallow January 18, 2007 1:33 PM EST
By the by, has Condoleezza Rice ever gotten an agreement on ANYTHING?
She flies all over the place, talks to all the foreign leaders, but never seems to have anything to show for it.
I'd say Rice is a pretty poor Secretary of State.
Or am I missing something here.
Reply to this comment
by exusmcsgt January 18, 2007 1:26 PM EST
The "war" in Iraq was "lost" on election day 2004.

Posted by Tuckerndfw at 10:16 AM

I beg to differ. The war in Iraq was lost on March 20, 2003, the day we invaded. The situation in Iraq has been in a downward spiral ever since.
Reply to this comment
by exusmcsgt January 18, 2007 1:23 PM EST
grumpas-

You are correct. Just look at what happened in Yugoslavia when Tito's dictatorship ended. But the US can not turn back the clock, so we'll all watch Iraq degenerate into secular states - much to the glee of Iran - regardless of how much more we invest in this boondoggle.
Reply to this comment
by tuckerndfw January 18, 2007 1:16 PM EST
The "war" in Iraq was "lost" on election day 2004.

The GOP is incapable of governing or advising anyone else how to govern.

The only way to "win" the "war" in Iraq is to enlist the aid of the same people Bozo Bush (a war criminal) is demonizing.


Bozo Bush (and the GOP) is responsible for murdering over 3,000 American soldiers and tens of thousands of civilians.

If Saddam deserved to be hanged for "crimes against humanity," what does Bozo Bush deserve?
Reply to this comment
by grumpas January 18, 2007 1:16 PM EST
The only thing that will get Iraq back to normal is another Saddam Hussein! Complete with secret police, death squads and etc. That is literally the only way to control out of control religious fundamentalist's! But, another 210,000 isn't going to do the job either! Bush doesn't have the guts to bring back the draft. That is when he will have a full scale insurrection at home! A lot of us will not send our children or grandchildren to fight for his lies! That is above and beyond the call of duty! I feel pity for the soldier's who are being asked to fight and die for nothing now! There should be limits on what a country can ask of it's fighting men. Dying for an out-of-control President isn't one of them. One can accept death when it's for our freedom and etc! But, that isn't the case here! That lie went out the window a long time ago! They are being asked to fight and die for George's mistake! Because he can't admit to the lie! He won't admit to it until the public forces him!
Reply to this comment
by exusmcsgt January 18, 2007 12:49 PM EST
The troops who are protesting and calling to go home need to re-read General Order #1, or they should be charged accordingky ubder the UCMJ
Posted by billserey at 09:26 AM : Jan 18, 2007

Beacuse our warriors are young and have demonization of the enemy fed to them 24/7 doesn't mean that they are all so stupid as to not resent being asked to give their all for a foregone useless conclusion.

I don't know if you ever served, but I can tell you from experience, there is nothing so demoralizing as being asked to sacrifice yourself so some politician can save face. I've been there.

Why do you think the suicide rate is so high among our warriors?
Reply to this comment
by book54552134 January 18, 2007 12:44 PM EST
What's needed in Iraq is not an additional 21,000 troops but rather, 10 times that amount - 210,000 troops in addition to those already there in order to stabilize the country & prevent a civil war. But that would require a nationwide draft, something the Bush Administration is loathe to do. The Bush Administration has involved the US in the ultimate quigmire in Iraq. It cannot stay there without constantly bleeding it's military & treasury & it cannot leave without risking a regionwide sectarian war resulting in $6.00 a gal gasoline & high fuel costs in the US, & a worldwide depression. So much for Bush's legacy.
Reply to this comment
by billserey January 18, 2007 12:26 PM EST
re committed, right or wrong, I may not agree with the President, we must back our people; ask the troops they agree we must complete the mission. The troops who are protesting and calling to go home need to re-read General Order #1, or they should be charged accordingky ubder the UCMJ
Reply to this comment
by inventagod January 18, 2007 12:18 PM EST
The only reason the Bu$hCo traitors are not swinging from ropes for 9/11 is the deep-down intuition it was done for oil. At a gut level, voters do not want to run out of gas. I hope they don't first run out of freedom. Just an opinion.
Reply to this comment
by inventagod January 18, 2007 12:06 PM EST
Stay the course.

2008 will be a bloodbath for incumbents.

Reply to this comment
by exusmcsgt January 18, 2007 11:27 AM EST
Regarding Rice's attempt to sell Arab leaders on Bubba Dubya's escalation plans, USA Reports:

"Many in the media depicted Rice's visit as a failure. "The whole jet-setting trip turned out to be yet another stage-managed, futile diplomatic exercise ... In effect, Rice returns to Washington empty handed with a lot of false promises rather than optimism," the Doha, Qatar-based Peninsula newspaper wrote in editorial."

Reply to this comment
by exusmcsgt January 18, 2007 11:21 AM EST
"Ninety- to 100-percent of the area's residents either actively or passively support the insurgency".

Considering that this city alone has 120,000 supporters of the insurgency one can see that an additional 21,500 American troops for the entire country of Iraq will have no measurable impact - except for the number of coffins shipped home.
Reply to this comment
See all 20 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more. Watch Now

  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Obama, GOP Clash over cure for Economy

    (326 recent comments)

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: