Dow
     -89.23
12801.23
-0.69%
|
     -9.31
1342.64
-0.69%
|
     -108.90
14000.51
-0.77%
|
     -23.35
2903.88
-0.80%
|
     -1.03
53.27
-1.90%
|
     +1.09
116.27
+0.95%
|
     +0.01
2.01
+0.42%
February 11, 2009 5:28 PM

Latte In The Forbidden City

(AP)  Managers of China's vast Forbidden City palace are deciding whether to close a Starbucks outlet on its grounds after protests led by a state TV personality, a news report said Thursday.

The Forbidden City, built in 1420, is a 178-acre complex of villas, chapels and gardens that was home to 24 emperors before the end of imperial rule in 1911. It is China's top tourist attraction, drawing some 7 million visitors a year.

"The museum is working with Starbucks to find a solution by this June in response to the protests," the official Xinhua News Agency quoted a palace spokesman, Feng Nai'en, as saying.

A news anchor for China Central Television has led an online campaign to remove Starbucks, which opened in the palace in 2000 at the invitation of its managers, who are under pressure to raise money to maintain the vast complex.

The anchorman, Rui Chenggang, wrote in a CCTV blog that Starbucks' presence "undermined the Forbidden City's solemnity and trampled over Chinese culture."

Starbucks Corp. defended the operation of its palace outlet.

"Starbucks appreciates the deep history and culture of the Forbidden City and has operated in a respectful manner that fits within the environment," the company said in a written statement.

"We have provided a welcome place of rest for thousands of tourists, both Chinese and foreign, for more than six years."

A Starbucks spokesman, Roger Sun, said he could not confirm whether the palace and the company were discussing possibly closing the outlet or give other information.

Feng said the decision will be made as part of a palace renovation that already has seen one-third of its shops removed.

"Whether or not Starbucks remains depends on the entire design plan that will be released in the first half of the year," he said.

The renovation, due to last through 2020, is meant to restore the palace to its imperial-era appearance. Plans call for tearing down a five-story museum and other modern buildings that disrupt the original layout.

CCTV reported on the controversy Thursday on its national midday news, though it failed to mention that the protests were initiated by one of its own employees. The report quoted an unidentified Chinese visitor as saying tourists found it odd that Starbucks was in the palace.

© 2009 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
  • Tucker Reals

    Tucker Reals is a senior news editor and overnight site editor for CBSNews.com, based at CBS News' London bureau.

Add a Comment
by pseudotriton January 18, 2007 10:39 PM EST
As far as I can remember, they have been selling commercial goods (souveniers, food, etc.) in the Forbidden City since it opened to public visits in the late 70's. (I grew up about 2 miles from there.) I can't help but suspect the brawl against Starbucks has some xenophic twist to it. I think one solution would be to Sinocize Starbuck's operation and priducts in the FC in order for it to better blend in with the surrounding. And of course trying to relocate it to a more descreet spot in the FC will also help, but I'm guessing they are already doing that.
Reply to this comment
by trueprogress January 18, 2007 1:50 PM EST
What stick in the muds you are !
I see nothing wrong with having Starbucks, if it makes money, or even a Buick Dealership in the so called Forbidden City. IF THEY WANT IT ! Who are you to judge what the China Gov't decides is right or wrong for their country !

WOW, it is their culture and historical site - Not yours
!!!


Americans, so many times, like to tell other coutries what to do. ?Even what stores they should have !!!

As a Progressive, I am for PROGRESS. I am for all types of liberty and freedom, even if it offends delicate sensibilites.

This is called PROGRESS !
Reply to this comment
by gramljon January 18, 2007 1:36 PM EST
I visited the Forbidden City last year and was enthralled by its ancient history and beautiful architecture and then, I saw it, a Starbucks sign. It ruined the whole experience. Let them have a stand at the entrance to the Forbidden City, but not in the middle of it. It's like putting a McDonalds on the National Mall, right next to the Lincoln Memorial.
Reply to this comment
by jdweymouth January 18, 2007 11:30 AM EST
I lived in China for a while, and disliked it intensely, but I tend to agree with this. Maybe have Starbucks outside, but inside, no. I've been to the Forbidden City, but it was in the middle of (what seemed like) the Siberian winter, so my impression of the place was not so great. It was as cold as the north pole.
Reply to this comment
by oleander8 January 18, 2007 10:58 AM EST
Starbucks could be a little more discreet.
A big paper cup of Starbucks coffee sitting in the middle of the pavilion doesn't do much for the ambience of the place.
Reply to this comment
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook