January 16, 2007 9:00 PM
- Text
Calcium May Reduce Colon Cancer Risk
- Treating Sleep Apnea in Kids Improves Behavior, Quality of Life
- Chemo May Not Harm Unborn Baby
- C-Sections Not Always Best for Small Babies
- CDC: Doctors Increasingly Prescribe Exercise
- Osteoporosis Medication Linked to Unusual Thigh Fractures
- Some Men May Inherit a Higher Risk of Heart Disease From Dad
- More from WebMD »
(WebMD)
Calcium seems to protect high-risk people from developing the polyps that can lead to colorectal cancer — and the benefits appear to last long after calcium supplementation ends.
Patients with a history of nonmalignant polyps took either 1,200 milligrams of calcium in supplement form or a placebo daily for four years in a study previously reported by researchers from Dartmouth Medical School. Calcium use was associated with a 17 percent lower relative risk for polyp recurrence.
This risk reduction not only persisted in the years after treatment ended, but it seemed to strengthen, the Dartmouth researchers report in a newly published follow-up that included 822 of the 930 original study subjects.
During the first five years after the end of treatment, 31.5 percent of patients in the calcium group developed new polyps, compared with 43.2 percent of the study participants who did not take calcium. The protection did not appear to extend beyond five years, however.
The findings are published in the Jan. 17 issue of the Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
"It really does look like calcium interferes with carcinogenesis [cancer development] in the large bowel," researcher John A. Baron, M.D., tells WebMD. "The fact that this reduction in risk persisted for years after people stopped taking calcium is really amazing."
Polyps are growths in the colorectal area. Some polyps can become cancerous tumors.
But Baron says it is still not clear if the benefits of taking calcium supplements outweigh the risks among men — because some studies have linked the treatment to an increase in prostate cancer risk.
The American Cancer Society recommends that adults aged 19 to 50 take in 1,000 milligrams per day of calcium, and that those over 50 get 1,200 milligrams. But the guidelines stress that the calcium should come primarily from food sources and not supplements.
The nutrition guidelines, which were updated in 2006, also state that because of the possible increased risk of prostate cancer with high calcium intake, "it may be wise for men to limit their daily calcium intake to less than 1,500 milligrams per day until further studies are done."
University of Arizona epidemiology professor Maria Elena Martinez, Ph.D., worries that the findings from the Dartmouth follow-up study will drown out this warning.
"Americans tend to think that if some is good then more is better," she tells WebMD. "But for men at least, we have to keep in mind that more isn't better in this case and that taking calcium supplements in high doses may even be dangerous."
Another concern, Martinez says, is that people will get the idea that all they need to do to prevent colorectal cancer is take calcium supplements or eat calcium-rich foods.
Though the Dartmouth findings show calcium to be modestly protective against colorectal cancer, another major study published in 2006 failed to show a protective benefit.
Calcium and vitamin D supplements proved to be somewhat protective for bone density in the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) trial. But no difference in colorectal cancer risk was seen for an average of seven years of follow-up among women who took calcium and Vitamin D and those who did not.
In an editorial accompanying the Dartmouth study, Martinez points out that despite the fact that polyp removal through screening is a highly effective way to prevent colorectal cancer, most people either aren't getting the message or are ignoring it.
"If you want to prevent colon cancer, the best thing you can do is get a colonoscopy when you turn 50 and make sure that you have follow-up colonoscopies as needed," she tells WebMD. "That isn't as easy as popping a pill, but it is true."
By Salynn Boyles
Reviewed by Louise Chang, M.D
Patients with a history of nonmalignant polyps took either 1,200 milligrams of calcium in supplement form or a placebo daily for four years in a study previously reported by researchers from Dartmouth Medical School. Calcium use was associated with a 17 percent lower relative risk for polyp recurrence.
This risk reduction not only persisted in the years after treatment ended, but it seemed to strengthen, the Dartmouth researchers report in a newly published follow-up that included 822 of the 930 original study subjects.
During the first five years after the end of treatment, 31.5 percent of patients in the calcium group developed new polyps, compared with 43.2 percent of the study participants who did not take calcium. The protection did not appear to extend beyond five years, however.
The findings are published in the Jan. 17 issue of the Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
"It really does look like calcium interferes with carcinogenesis [cancer development] in the large bowel," researcher John A. Baron, M.D., tells WebMD. "The fact that this reduction in risk persisted for years after people stopped taking calcium is really amazing."
Polyps are growths in the colorectal area. Some polyps can become cancerous tumors.
But Baron says it is still not clear if the benefits of taking calcium supplements outweigh the risks among men — because some studies have linked the treatment to an increase in prostate cancer risk.
The American Cancer Society recommends that adults aged 19 to 50 take in 1,000 milligrams per day of calcium, and that those over 50 get 1,200 milligrams. But the guidelines stress that the calcium should come primarily from food sources and not supplements.
The nutrition guidelines, which were updated in 2006, also state that because of the possible increased risk of prostate cancer with high calcium intake, "it may be wise for men to limit their daily calcium intake to less than 1,500 milligrams per day until further studies are done."
University of Arizona epidemiology professor Maria Elena Martinez, Ph.D., worries that the findings from the Dartmouth follow-up study will drown out this warning.
"Americans tend to think that if some is good then more is better," she tells WebMD. "But for men at least, we have to keep in mind that more isn't better in this case and that taking calcium supplements in high doses may even be dangerous."
Another concern, Martinez says, is that people will get the idea that all they need to do to prevent colorectal cancer is take calcium supplements or eat calcium-rich foods.
Though the Dartmouth findings show calcium to be modestly protective against colorectal cancer, another major study published in 2006 failed to show a protective benefit.
Calcium and vitamin D supplements proved to be somewhat protective for bone density in the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) trial. But no difference in colorectal cancer risk was seen for an average of seven years of follow-up among women who took calcium and Vitamin D and those who did not.
In an editorial accompanying the Dartmouth study, Martinez points out that despite the fact that polyp removal through screening is a highly effective way to prevent colorectal cancer, most people either aren't getting the message or are ignoring it.
"If you want to prevent colon cancer, the best thing you can do is get a colonoscopy when you turn 50 and make sure that you have follow-up colonoscopies as needed," she tells WebMD. "That isn't as easy as popping a pill, but it is true."
SOURCES: Grau, M.V. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Jan. 17, 2007; Vol. 99: pp. 129-136. John A. Baron, M.D., Dartmouth Medical School, Lebanon, N.H. Maria Elena Martinez, Ph.D., professor of epidemiology, Arizona Cancer Center, University of Arizona, Tucson. American Cancer Society: "Guidelines on Nutrition and Physical Activity for Cancer Prevention, 2006." WHI Calcium and Vitamin D Study, NIH News, Feb. 15, 2006.
By Salynn Boyles
Reviewed by Louise Chang, M.D
Popular Now in Health
- America's sodium problem: Not from salty snacks?
- Caffeine inhalers - the next club drug?
- Chinese mom gives birth to 15-pound baby
- Norovirus outbreak hits Rider University in N.J
- Electric shocks to brain may boost memory: Study
- STD rates rise among elderly: Why?
- Skin cancer self-exam: What to look for (PHOTOS)
- Scottish twins, 102, are world's oldest: Guinness
- Measles patient at Super Bowl prompts health alert
- America's pets also have an obesity epidemic
- Drinking soda raises risk for asthma, COPD: Study
- Things You Didn't Know About Your Penis
- PICTURES: 15 Shocking Sexual Fetishes
- Dr. Liar? Study finds dishonest docs common
- Egg recall in 34 states over Listeria concerns
- McDonald's scraps "pink slime" from burgers
- Woman spotlights uterus didelphys on talk show
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- Bernanke: Weak housing has hurt consumer spending
- Alexion rises after solid 4Q report and outlook
- Shares of Exide Technologies tumble on outlook
- NY's AG isn't backing down from Wall Street probe
on Facebook
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
- Tenn. father charged with murdering couple who"unfriended" daughter on Facebook
- Josh Powell had "incestuous" images on his home computer, authorities say
on CBS News






