Jan. 14, 2007
Obama's '08 Decision Coming Soon
Illinois Democrat Says He's Still Considering A Presidential Run
-
Play CBS Video
Video
Obama: 'Constrain' Bush
FTN 01.14.07, part 2: Senator Barack Obama (D-Ill.) tells Bob Schieffer that he wants a phased withdrawal of American troops from Iraq to begin in four to six months.
-
Video
McCain Supports The Surge
FTN 01.14.07, part 1: Senator John McCain (R-AZ) tells Bob Schieffer that he supports the president's Iraq strategy and that Democrats should vote their minds if they really oppose it.
-
Photo
Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., pauses as he answers a reporters questions outside the White House in Washington, Friday, Jan. 5, 2007, after attending a meeting with between President Bush and members of Congress to discuss the president's revised Iraq. (AP)
-
Who's Who
2008 Democratic Hopefuls
Clinton, Obama and Edwards lead the chase for the Democratic nomination.
-
Who's Who
2008 Republican Hopefuls
McCain and Giuliani head up the Republican pack chasing the presidency.
"I will have something to say about that fairly soon," Obama told Bob Schieffer. "Obviously, there's been a lot of talk. It's something that I've been considering. I've said I've been considering it. And we'll be making an announcement fairly soon."
When pressed for a more specific timetable, Obama only smiled and said, "It will be pretty soon."
Obama and Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton have both hired senior aides while courting potential supporters in Iowa, New Hampshire and other key states.
Iowa's caucuses will kick off the nominating campaign in January 2008, to be followed by caucuses in Nevada and primaries in New Hampshire and South Carolina.
Clinton, who is on a weekend trip to Iraq, also has hired staff, met with activists and tried to settle on a Washington-area location for her campaign headquarters.
The moves by the two come as Democratic Senator Chris Dodd launched his campaign this week and New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson prepared to make an announcement before the end of the month.
Obama and Clinton would clearly be the Democratic field's heavyweights — one vying to be the nation's first black president, the other the country's first female chief executive.
© MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Video and Galleries from Face The Nation
- Latest in Face The Nation
- Separating Icons From Heroes
- A Guide To A Successful Father's Day
- Remembering Tim Russert



...........
Obama should change his name though. It sounds too much like Ossama.
Possibly Barack Hussein. Yeah, that sounds better.
BG
http://www.theweeklydonut.org/index.php/2006/12/14/ear-comes-the-other-party/
Here in Chicago he is close to many corrupt acquaintences and political families. Using them is precisely why he is where he is. I would hope that many people who would like to believe tha5t Obama is the right one, to first look into his background more closely.
Look at Obamas relationship with indicted possible felon Antoine "Tony" Rezko, the corrupt Stroger family in Chicago politics, His endorsement of Alexis Giannoulias for Treasuruer of Illinois, whose family bank has allegedly had ties to Mafia members. Obama's relationship with Governor Rod "not business as usual", Blagojevich of Illinois who leaves a lot to be desired.
Granted, Obama is eloquent and says all the things we want to hear. I too wanted him to succeed.
Now, I am afraid that he may have to make some political concessions to old corrupt allies that helped him get where he is. Obama may be or may not be the person we would like to think he is.
Just give it some thought and check it out.
I'm not yet sure enough about Obama to say I'd vote for him or not, but if knowing a "possible felon" and endorsement of someone whose family "allegedly had ties to mafia members" is the worst we can come up with, Obama sounds great! Just to compare, George Bush has not only associated with convicted felons (not just an indicted individual), but has appointed them to government office (e.g. John Poindexter, Elliot Abrams and Oliver North).
If guilt by association were the criteria for election, then the halls of Congress would now be pretty empty, as would the Executive office!
All I am saying is that people outside of Illinois may not be aware of the corrupt people that helped put Obama where he is.
It is our duty as voters to be more objective or we may get more of the same. I did not vote for Bush and cannot stand him and his cohorts.
No, perhaps no one is perfectly clean, but it is up to us, the voters to look at each candidate very carefully.
Don't simply be for Obama because he is black and eloquent. Be objective. Perhaps he is the one, by comparison. I do my homework.
Wow, so it is okay to have felons for friends and perhaps owe your political life to people who may have sway over us?
Wow! Where do we draw the line. So if so and so also had felons for friends it is okay to seek the highest most prestigious position in the world.
Sorry, but I am a lot more discerning than that.
Whew!
Bush dared the libs to come up with another solution besides a troop surge, and all they did was their usual form of politics - bluster, point fingers at republicans, stick to their worn-out rhetoric and show that they haven't changed a bit since Cigar Bill was impeached. They sure don't want anyone to remember how Monica was servicing Bill on his watch while he let Osama bin Laden get away.
Selah
Posted by tibu987
tibu987,
what background are you suggesting to scrutinize?
Actually CNN have already started this dirty job of 'scrutiny'. They discovered that his background were a village in Kenya, Africa, from where his father immigrated to USA and work like every immigrant to raise a family and create a comfortable situation. Now they found the father was a muslim. If that is what you're pointing at, well it's good to know that 80-90% of BLACK slaves who crossed the No-Return Door in Elmina, Ghana, crammed on slavery boat heading to the Americas were muslims, and many are still. So what big deal?
If you are referring to the guy's name is Barrak Obama, well of course you would have wished deep in your soul that his name could be Josh or Moishe, or John, Benedict, Bill or even George ... You know it's not the case and it'd be unwishful this guys proceeds to changing his name in order to comply with the electorate level of comfort. If a change had taken place, THEN I'd scrutinze deeper, way deeper. Obama is presenting quite a great program, and I'd let the democratic process go through.
WHAT EXACTLY IS THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY'S PLAN TO RESOLVE THE CRISIS IN IRAQ AND THE MIDDLE EAST?
No real answer is expected, keep whining the party line.
Selah
Whatever Democrats decide, it's not gonna affect the Iraq war outcome. All decisions are still in the hands of Walking-Liar (though, obviously, he's NOT deciding as per many's view here).
It's up to the clown in white house to get us out of Iraq the same way he got us in, not only that but he's pushing us in another one with Iran.
I'm voting for a real American, Ron Paul. The only real choice I've seen in too long a time.
Ron Paul for '08
You are off on a tangent. Look at my previous three comments.
I am not looking at anything you are suggesting.
Not Africa, not Muslim, not his name, not his being black or white.
What I did say is that he has a brief record in the Illinois Senate and has been promoted and advised by someds pretty sleazy types in Chicago and Illinois.
I was actually for him when I found out that for all his eloquence and his saying all the things we want to hear, he has some political baggage that is pretty low class.
Check it out for yourself. I am doing my homework and I wish that everyone would do theirs before they vote.
John Anderson sounded like a nice guy way back when - but he's in history's dustbin now...just where he belongs.
It's a 2-party system, folks...you'd think you would get used to it by now. Not going to change anytime soon.
Obama's NOT READY, pure and simple. If he runs, he blows his wad and will be relegated, along with Henry Hyde and the rest of Illinois' lackluster pols, to history's crapheap.
As far as 08 I could definitely vote for a Obama Clinton ticket, that would be William Jefferson Clinton for VP not Hillary.
Yep, it's a two party system where according to an on going CNN poll 90% of the American people say it's broken. And I mean broken badly. What choice did it give us the last time? Basically we had Cousins running against each other. Some choice. Both NWO elitist shrills. And I refuse to vote for some NWO witch, who made it her career for eight years, to try to abolish the Second Amendment. No Way.
We the People have awoken. And we're mad as hell. Just wait and see how we vote.
Ron Paul '08
...........
or
Clinton & Gore? - it worked before
www.clintonobama.com
www.clintonedwards.com
and OBAMA as ATTORNEY GENERAL!
January 6, 1964, was a long day for Martin Luther King Jr. He spent the morning seated in the reserved section of the Supreme Court, listening as lawyers argued New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, a landmark case rising out of King's crusade against segregation in Alabama. The minister was something of an honored guest: Justice Arthur Goldberg quietly sent down a copy of Kings account of the Montgomery bus boycott, "Stride Toward Freedom," asking for an autograph. That night King retired to his room at the Willard Hotel. There FBI bugs reportedly picked up 14 hours of party chatter, the clinking of glasses and the sounds of illicit ***--including King's cries of "I'm f--ing for God" and "I'm not a Negro tonight!"
-
by randalds
January 16, 2007 12:48 PM PST
- Give 'em Hall? (sigh) Got to proof read!
-
Reply to this comment
-
See all 46 Comments