Bush Going For Broke With Troop Surge
60 Minutes Exclusive: President Has Made Up His Mind And Takes Full Responsibility
-
Play CBS Video Video Pres. Bush Candid About Iraq Scott Pelley interviews President Bush after he delivered a major speech to the nation on his new Iraq strategy. Bush traveled from the White House to Fort Benning and to Camp David.
-
Video Bush, Pelley At Camp David Only On The Web: More of President Bush's talk with Scott Pelley, walking the grounds of Camp David and discussing Bush's popularity and how he stays in touch with the average American.
-
President Bush, speaking to Scott Pelley at Camp David. (CBS)
-
In The Spotlight Bush's New Iraq Strategy A glimpse at some of the key elements in President Bush's new plan for Iraq.
-
Who's Who Congress Reacts To Plan Reaction to President Bush's new Iraq stategy, which includes an increase in troops.
-
Interactive Bush Presidency The president's agenda, plus facts, figures, major events and key personalities.
Much of his presidency unfolds at the retreat named for President Eisenhower’s grandson. By our count, this was Bush’s 365th day at Camp David, one year out of his six years in office so far, living and working at the camp first set up by FDR.
60 Minutes wondered why he seems so determined to go his own way when most of the nation doesn’t back his plan.
"I’m not gonna change my principles. I'm not gonna, you know, I’m not gonna try to be popular and change my principles to do so," Bush explains.
"You’re not very popular in the country right now, to be frank," Pelley remarks.
"I’m afraid you're right," Bush acknowledges.
Asked if that gets to him, the president says, "Not really."
"You know that there's a perception in some quarters of the country that you're stubborn," Pelley says.
"Oh, yeah. Well," Bush replies.
Asked if agrees with that, the president asks, "Do I agree that I’m stubborn or do I agree that people think I’m stubborn?"
"People think you do. What do you think?" Pelley asks.
"I think I’m a flexible, open-minded person. I really do. I really do. Take this policy. I spent a lot of time listening to a lot of people because, Scott, I fully understand the decisions I make could affect the life of some kid who wears the uniform. Or could affect the life of some child growing up in America 20 years from now," Bush says.
"You know, a lot of people have asked me to ask you whether all of this is just crushing. It has to be. You read the polls, you know what people are saying, the war has not gone the way you had hoped it would, and they wonder whether it's just crushing on your spirit," Pelley asks.
"Quite the contrary. My spirits are strong, and I’m blessed to be the president," Bush says. "I really am not the kind of guy that sits here and says, ‘Oh, gosh, I’m worried about my legacy.’ I’m more worried about making the right decisions to protect the United States of America. See, we're in a war. People wanna come and attack you and attack our country. I understand criticism. But I’ve got a pretty thick hide."
60 Minutes had some questions that might test that presidential hide.
"You know better than I do that many Americans feel that your administration has not been straight with the country, has not been honest. To those people you say what?" Pelley asks.
"On what issue?" the president replies. "Like the weapons of mass destruction?"
"No weapons of mass destruction," Pelley says.
"Yeah," Bush says.
"No credible connection between 9/11 and Iraq," Pelley says.
“Yeah,” the president replies.
“The Office of Management and Budget said this war would cost somewhere between $50 billion and $60 billion and now we're over 400,” Pelley says.
“I gotcha. I gotcha. I gotcha,” Bush replies.
“The perception, Sir, more than any one of those points, is that the administration has not been straight with…,” Pelley says.
“Well, I strongly disagree with that, of course,” Bush says. “So I strongly reject that this administration hasn’t been straight with the American people. The minute we found out they didn’t have weapons of mass destruction, I was the first to say so.”
“You seem to be saying that you may have been wrong but you weren't dishonest,” Pelley remarks.
“Oh, absolutely. Everybody was wrong on weapons of mass destruction and there was an intelligence failure that we’re trying to address. But I was as surprised as anybody he didn't have them,” Bush tells Pelley.
Produced By Harry Radliffe, Shawn Efran and Graham Messick
© MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
- President Bush does not care about our soldiers. If he did we would be getting out of Iraq, just like Great Britain is.
- Reply to this comment
- Thank you Mr. Pelley for the complete and thorough interview that you did with Mr. Bush. Your questions were relevant, and they were the questions that the American public wanted and needed answers to. In addition, your passion was evident. You are clearly a master at your craft. Thanks again for the interview, and one last thing. Did Mr. Bush curse you out when the cameras and microphones were indeed turned off? I am sure that he did not want another mic incident.
Only in America could a C student become president. Let me clarify, if you are African-American and a C student, you cannot become the CEO of a Fortune 500 company. But, if you are White, you can become president.
Go Obama! Keep hope alive!!!!!
Blessings,
Janice Bishop LeMelle - Reply to this comment
- I was born in 1943. All three of my mother's brothers, my uncles, served in WWII. One of was killed in the Battle of the Bulge and is buried in Belgium. WWII was a necessary and just war.
I opposed the Viet Nam War from the get go because I knew it was totally unnecessary and unwinable -- as the French well knew from prior experience.
I opposed the Iraq War from the get go because I knew it was totally unnecessary and unwinable -- as the British well knew from prior experience.
If you favor waging war then you *** well better have a plan to pay for it. Don't put the burden on future generations because you are afraid to ask the current generation to pay the price.
It's totally insane and irresponsible to wage war and at the same time reduce taxes. No President in our history has ever done that before the Bush-Cheney Regime came along. - Reply to this comment
- Here's a look at what politicians advocating more troops really think of veterans they disable:
http://www.brlsi.org/proceed04/P162.jpg - Reply to this comment
- becky_wwjd
You sound like an very stupid person. It is a shame that you home school your children and you don't know how to spell. You also keep them stupid by not letting them interact with the world except to watch "our great president" - Reply to this comment
- Bush fortot about our Troops in Afaganistan - More Troops Needed
The prospect of a troop increase in Afghanistan, at the same time Bush is ordering 21,500 more troops into Iraq, raises new questions about the military's ability to sustain its war-fighting on two major fronts. There now are about 24,000 U.S. troops in Afghanistan, which Lt. Gen. Karl Eikenberry, the senior American commander here, said is the highest since the war began in October 2001. - Reply to this comment
- Bush wants Iraq to appoligize ??? -- Someone get a net, quick.
- Reply to this comment
- Note to Scott Pelley and all mainstream media:
"PELLEY: The Democrat leadership says, "We wanna support the troops who are on the ground. We just wanna redline the extra 20,000.""
Hey Scott. And the rest of you so-called liberal MSM journo butt-heads listen up too: It's a sign of disrespect to call the Democratic party, its leadership and members the 'Democrat Leadership', the 'Democrat Party' etc. It's the 'DemocratIC leadership' and 'the DemocratIC Party to you, pal. That's a perjorative used by the Republicans. It's as bad as calling Republicans 'Repugs'.
The Democratic Party is now the majority in Congress, won fair and square by election. Show some respect. Do not be intimidated by an Administration representing a shrinking minority in all respects, from representation in Congress to failed policy in Iraq and Afghanistan. Fox News no longer calls the shots, no matter how loud they complain.
"PELLEY: Do you believe as commander-in-chief you have the authority to put the troops in there no matter what the Congress wants to do?
BUSH: In this situation, I do, yeah. Now, I fully understand they could try to stop me from doing it. But I made my decision, and we're going forward."
Now if that doesn't sound like Bush thumbing his nose at the constitution and the American people and provoking a constitutional crisis, I don't know what would. Solid grounds for impeachment, if you ask me. - Reply to this comment
- b48151,,,,, Our troops deserve real working plans,, Not lies,,, Or do you think they do ??
- Reply to this comment
- b481,,,, No, You don't get it -- Lying isn't a good American or patriotic vitrue.
- Reply to this comment
- This is what Bush called Iraq'a plan ??
Just another jackass lie to our nation & troops. - Reply to this comment
- Houser,,, I beleive Cheney would also go down as a result of impeachment investigations on Bush -- Let's bring it on. It's for restoration of our government back to the people.
- Reply to this comment
- To all of those proposing impeachment, please notice the obvious, Cheney would be our president unless he could be impeached as well. If for some reason this did happen, Cheney would appoint a VP that could takeover and grant full an unconditional pardons to both Bush and Cheney. Impeachmnet is not what we need. Oversight, due diligence and huge gonads is what is aclled for at this time. I realize that congress is limited in what they can do to stop this complete imbecile from starting WWIII but they must do whatever it takes to stop his efforts to invade Iran or Syria. If you were impressed with Bush's 60 minutes interview I would ask that you take a competency hearing test.
- Reply to this comment
- b48151, when you've either (1) lost someone in this war for oil, (2) had your leg maimed in something that is complete and total BS, (3) saw someone you knew turned into roadkill before your eyes, or (4) are part of the millitary complex as a NATIONAL GUARDIST, in a war because of some joker's ego stroke, then you can call someone defeatist....otherwise, do me a favor;
Join the millitary, if you support herr bush, or keep you neonazi ideals to yourself! - Reply to this comment
- For some reason Bush still doesn't get it. He needs to listen to the American people and the Iraqis, we don't want to be there and they don't want us there. He should be worrying more about what is going on in the USA instead of over there. BRING OUR SOLDIERS HOME!!!
- Reply to this comment
- As I read some of the responses to what was obviously a heated interview, I can only say that to those who have a brain and question the right or wrong of this action, and of bushe's answers, well, it's nice to see that there are those who still have a brain to think with, and are not buying the lies and ignorance that bush is spewing. For the others who are supportive and complementary of bush, and support the war in all of it's bloody glory, I have two words.
Zieg Hiel. - Reply to this comment
- I find it somewhat laughable that bush goes on Primetime with 60 Minutes to give the public his viepoints of what has become a VietNam for future generations.....although I couldn't stomach the entire interview (make no mistake; I've completely lost respect for the present administration and think that it's no diffrent than either the old Soviet Union under Stalin or the Nazi republic before it went to war), the part that I DID see showed a man that doesn't belong in the Presidency, but needs to be Impeached at the earliest convient time by Ms. Pelosi and Congress......I don't know what planet this guy lives on, but to dismiss the Iran Review Board's findings, the Generals of his own army (before they were "retired" (read:replaced)), and to generally dismiss the viewpoints of the Ameican public itself over a war that is nothing if not for Oil and bushe's ego, is the mark of a complete and total madman.
I sincerely will pray that Congress starts the impeachment process, for the sake of the country. - Reply to this comment
- I find it somewhat laughable that bush goes on Primetime with 60 Minutes to give the public his viepoints of what has become a VietNam for future generations.....although I couldn't stomach the entire interview (make no mistake; I've completely lost respect for the present administration and think that it's no diffrent than either the old Soviet Union under Stalin or the Nazi republic before it went to war), the part that I DID see showed a man that doesn't belong in the Presidency, but needs to be Impeached at the earliest convient time by Ms. Pelosi and Congress......I don't know what planet this guy lives on, but to dismiss the Iran Review Board's findings, the Generals of his own army (before they were "retired" (read:replaced)), and to generally dismiss the viewpoints of the Ameican public itself over a war that is nothing if not for Oil and bushe's ego, is the mark of a complete and total madman.
I sincerely will pray that Congress starts the impeachment process, for the sake of the country. - Reply to this comment
- "I would respectfully disagree. President Mubarak in Egypt has actually slackened his authoritarian ways...the same is true of Yemen and several other states in the region. Even Col. Quadafi in Libya has been implementing reforms...Even the ever reactionary Saudis are now under a new prince who has made, for that nation, significant changes...The facts, reported by a variety of sources, don't seem to support your argument on the backward slide of fledgling democracies in the region. Even Iran, though it elected a nut, still has begun to build real democracy..."
Posted by ourtomorrows at 01:00 AM : Jan 16, 2007
Citations please - just from a quick scan of some human rights non-profits, here are the democracy/press freedom/anti-corruption ranks for some of the countries you mentioned as well as some others to put it the figures into context... (http://www.worldaudit.org/democracy.htm)
Sweden - 4/2/5
USA - 15/11/17
Egypt - 98/92/57
Yemen - 135/132/96
LIBYA (your model for Arabic democracy) - 147 (out of 150 countries!!!!!)/146/90
Saudi Arabia - 119/130/157
Iraq - 130/118/143
Iran - 138/138/90
So in conclusion, yes Iraq could stand to 'improve' like it's 'model' neighbors. But if Saudi Arabia and Egypt are the models of democracy for the middle east, then why did they give rise to the 9/11 terrorists? I'm thinking this 'model' of democracy isn't really one we ought to be looking to for hope... - Reply to this comment
- Above all Bush still doesn't understand the people, here in America or Iraq.... Good night, tomorrow's another day for discussion with more developments.. Right now the soverign nation of Iraq is opposing Bush's "Surge",,, which he calle Iraq's plan - Another lie to our nation & our troops.
- Reply to this comment

