Jan. 14, 2007

Bush Going For Broke With Troop Surge

60 Minutes Exclusive: President Has Made Up His Mind And Takes Full Responsibility

  • Play CBS Video Video Pres. Bush Candid About Iraq

    Scott Pelley interviews President Bush after he delivered a major speech to the nation on his new Iraq strategy. Bush traveled from the White House to Fort Benning and to Camp David.

  • Video Bush, Pelley At Camp David

    Only On The Web: More of President Bush's talk with Scott Pelley, walking the grounds of Camp David and discussing Bush's popularity and how he stays in touch with the average American.

  • President Bush, speaking to Scott Pelley at Camp David.

    President Bush, speaking to Scott Pelley at Camp David.  (CBS)

  • In The Spotlight Bush's New Iraq Strategy

    A glimpse at some of the key elements in President Bush's new plan for Iraq.

  • Who's Who Congress Reacts To Plan

    Reaction to President Bush's new Iraq stategy, which includes an increase in troops.

  • Interactive Bush Presidency

    The president's agenda, plus facts, figures, major events and key personalities.

Related Links
60 MINUTES
Read the transcript of Scott Pelley's interview with President George W. Bush at the Laurel Cabin on the grounds of Camp David.

(CBS)  This past week, the president of the United States decided to go for broke. Despite national sentiment against the war, despite condemnation on Capitol Hill, President George W. Bush ordered more than 21,000 additional troops to war-a gamble that may be a pivotal moment for his presidency and the country.

In his first interview since his address to the nation, Mr. Bush sat down with Scott Pelley at the presidential retreat, Camp David. 60 Minutes also traveled with the president as he explained his plan to the troops and, then, met with families of Americans killed in action.

Whatever you think of his policy, after this interview you won’t doubt that Mr. Bush is a man determined to go his own way.



In his speech, the president mentioned that mistakes had been made. Asked what mistakes he was talking about, Bush tells Pelley, “Abu Ghraib was a mistake. Using bad language like, you know, ‘Bring them on’ was a mistake. I think history is gonna look back and see a lot of ways we could have done things better. No question about it.”

"The troop levels…," Pelley remarks.

"Could have been a mistake. I…," the president replies.

"Were not - could have been a mistake?" Pelley asks.

"Yeah. And the reason I brought up the mistakes is, one, that's the job of the commander-in-chief; and, two, I don’t want people blaming our military. We got a bunch of good military people out there doing what we’ve asked them to do. And the temptation is gonna be to find scapegoats. Well, if the people want a scapegoat, they got one right here in me ‘cause it's my decisions," Bush says.

"Fair to say there were not enough American troops on the ground to provide security for Iraq?" Pelley asks.

"There’s not enough troops on the ground right now to provide security for Iraq. And that’s why I made the decision I made," Bush replies.

Asked if he thinks he owes the Iraqi people an apology for not doing a better job, Bush says, "Well I don’t, that we didn’t do a better job or they didn’t do a better job?"

"Well, that the United States did not do a better job in providing security after the invasion?" Pelley clarifies.

"Not at all. I think I am proud of the efforts we did. We liberated that country from a tyrant. I think the Iraqi people owe the American people a huge debt of gratitude. That’s the problem here in America. They wonder whether or not there is a gratitude level that’s significant enough in Iraq," Bush replies.

60 Minutes spoke to the president at Laurel Cabin at Camp David, the presidential retreat in the Blue Ridge Mountains of Maryland. It’s a private place for him, rarely seen by the public. And he has never done an interview at Camp David. Laurel Cabin is where the war on terror began; four days after 9/11, his cabinet debated plans there for the invasion of Afghanistan.

"Back then the whole country was with you. And now you seem to have lost them. Why do you think so?" Pelley asks the president.

"The Iraq war hasn’t gone as well as I had hoped at this point in time," he says. "And people are, you know, people are discouraged. They don't apprec- they don't approve of where we are. And so I think it’s where the country is."

Continued



Produced By Harry Radliffe, Shawn Efran and Graham Messick
© MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Recent Segments
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Add a Comment See all 984 Comments
by martialslaw January 18, 2007 2:27 AM EST
President Bush does not care about our soldiers. If he did we would be getting out of Iraq, just like Great Britain is.
Reply to this comment
by jblemel January 17, 2007 12:34 PM EST
Thank you Mr. Pelley for the complete and thorough interview that you did with Mr. Bush. Your questions were relevant, and they were the questions that the American public wanted and needed answers to. In addition, your passion was evident. You are clearly a master at your craft. Thanks again for the interview, and one last thing. Did Mr. Bush curse you out when the cameras and microphones were indeed turned off? I am sure that he did not want another mic incident.

Only in America could a C student become president. Let me clarify, if you are African-American and a C student, you cannot become the CEO of a Fortune 500 company. But, if you are White, you can become president.

Go Obama! Keep hope alive!!!!!

Blessings,
Janice Bishop LeMelle
Reply to this comment
by badgersouth1 January 17, 2007 2:58 AM EST
I was born in 1943. All three of my mother's brothers, my uncles, served in WWII. One of was killed in the Battle of the Bulge and is buried in Belgium. WWII was a necessary and just war.

I opposed the Viet Nam War from the get go because I knew it was totally unnecessary and unwinable -- as the French well knew from prior experience.

I opposed the Iraq War from the get go because I knew it was totally unnecessary and unwinable -- as the British well knew from prior experience.

If you favor waging war then you *** well better have a plan to pay for it. Don't put the burden on future generations because you are afraid to ask the current generation to pay the price.

It's totally insane and irresponsible to wage war and at the same time reduce taxes. No President in our history has ever done that before the Bush-Cheney Regime came along.
Reply to this comment
by martialslaw January 16, 2007 11:08 PM EST
Here's a look at what politicians advocating more troops really think of veterans they disable:

http://www.brlsi.org/proceed04/P162.jpg
Reply to this comment
by ajm5kgm January 16, 2007 8:42 PM EST
becky_wwjd
You sound like an very stupid person. It is a shame that you home school your children and you don't know how to spell. You also keep them stupid by not letting them interact with the world except to watch "our great president"
Reply to this comment
by j-whitman January 16, 2007 7:00 PM EST
Bush fortot about our Troops in Afaganistan - More Troops Needed

The prospect of a troop increase in Afghanistan, at the same time Bush is ordering 21,500 more troops into Iraq, raises new questions about the military's ability to sustain its war-fighting on two major fronts. There now are about 24,000 U.S. troops in Afghanistan, which Lt. Gen. Karl Eikenberry, the senior American commander here, said is the highest since the war began in October 2001.

Reply to this comment
by j-whitman January 16, 2007 6:27 PM EST
Bush wants Iraq to appoligize ??? -- Someone get a net, quick.
Reply to this comment
by cat22listo January 16, 2007 6:20 PM EST
Note to Scott Pelley and all mainstream media:

"PELLEY: The Democrat leadership says, "We wanna support the troops who are on the ground. We just wanna redline the extra 20,000.""

Hey Scott. And the rest of you so-called liberal MSM journo butt-heads listen up too: It's a sign of disrespect to call the Democratic party, its leadership and members the 'Democrat Leadership', the 'Democrat Party' etc. It's the 'DemocratIC leadership' and 'the DemocratIC Party to you, pal. That's a perjorative used by the Republicans. It's as bad as calling Republicans 'Repugs'.

The Democratic Party is now the majority in Congress, won fair and square by election. Show some respect. Do not be intimidated by an Administration representing a shrinking minority in all respects, from representation in Congress to failed policy in Iraq and Afghanistan. Fox News no longer calls the shots, no matter how loud they complain.

"PELLEY: Do you believe as commander-in-chief you have the authority to put the troops in there no matter what the Congress wants to do?

BUSH: In this situation, I do, yeah. Now, I fully understand they could try to stop me from doing it. But I made my decision, and we're going forward."


Now if that doesn't sound like Bush thumbing his nose at the constitution and the American people and provoking a constitutional crisis, I don't know what would. Solid grounds for impeachment, if you ask me.

Reply to this comment
by j-whitman January 16, 2007 6:13 PM EST
b48151,,,,, Our troops deserve real working plans,, Not lies,,, Or do you think they do ??
Reply to this comment
by j-whitman January 16, 2007 6:06 PM EST
b481,,,, No, You don't get it -- Lying isn't a good American or patriotic vitrue.
Reply to this comment
by j-whitman January 16, 2007 5:27 PM EST
This is what Bush called Iraq'a plan ??
Just another jackass lie to our nation & troops.
Reply to this comment
by j-whitman January 16, 2007 5:20 PM EST
Houser,,, I beleive Cheney would also go down as a result of impeachment investigations on Bush -- Let's bring it on. It's for restoration of our government back to the people.
Reply to this comment
by houser123 January 16, 2007 4:29 PM EST
To all of those proposing impeachment, please notice the obvious, Cheney would be our president unless he could be impeached as well. If for some reason this did happen, Cheney would appoint a VP that could takeover and grant full an unconditional pardons to both Bush and Cheney. Impeachmnet is not what we need. Oversight, due diligence and huge gonads is what is aclled for at this time. I realize that congress is limited in what they can do to stop this complete imbecile from starting WWIII but they must do whatever it takes to stop his efforts to invade Iran or Syria. If you were impressed with Bush's 60 minutes interview I would ask that you take a competency hearing test.
Reply to this comment
by kdf_worf January 16, 2007 3:14 PM EST
b48151, when you've either (1) lost someone in this war for oil, (2) had your leg maimed in something that is complete and total BS, (3) saw someone you knew turned into roadkill before your eyes, or (4) are part of the millitary complex as a NATIONAL GUARDIST, in a war because of some joker's ego stroke, then you can call someone defeatist....otherwise, do me a favor;

Join the millitary, if you support herr bush, or keep you neonazi ideals to yourself!
Reply to this comment
by inmom4 January 16, 2007 1:56 PM EST
For some reason Bush still doesn't get it. He needs to listen to the American people and the Iraqis, we don't want to be there and they don't want us there. He should be worrying more about what is going on in the USA instead of over there. BRING OUR SOLDIERS HOME!!!
Reply to this comment
by kdf_worf January 16, 2007 10:13 AM EST
As I read some of the responses to what was obviously a heated interview, I can only say that to those who have a brain and question the right or wrong of this action, and of bushe's answers, well, it's nice to see that there are those who still have a brain to think with, and are not buying the lies and ignorance that bush is spewing. For the others who are supportive and complementary of bush, and support the war in all of it's bloody glory, I have two words.

Zieg Hiel.
Reply to this comment
by kdf_worf January 16, 2007 9:50 AM EST
I find it somewhat laughable that bush goes on Primetime with 60 Minutes to give the public his viepoints of what has become a VietNam for future generations.....although I couldn't stomach the entire interview (make no mistake; I've completely lost respect for the present administration and think that it's no diffrent than either the old Soviet Union under Stalin or the Nazi republic before it went to war), the part that I DID see showed a man that doesn't belong in the Presidency, but needs to be Impeached at the earliest convient time by Ms. Pelosi and Congress......I don't know what planet this guy lives on, but to dismiss the Iran Review Board's findings, the Generals of his own army (before they were "retired" (read:replaced)), and to generally dismiss the viewpoints of the Ameican public itself over a war that is nothing if not for Oil and bushe's ego, is the mark of a complete and total madman.

I sincerely will pray that Congress starts the impeachment process, for the sake of the country.
Reply to this comment
by kdf_worf January 16, 2007 9:46 AM EST
I find it somewhat laughable that bush goes on Primetime with 60 Minutes to give the public his viepoints of what has become a VietNam for future generations.....although I couldn't stomach the entire interview (make no mistake; I've completely lost respect for the present administration and think that it's no diffrent than either the old Soviet Union under Stalin or the Nazi republic before it went to war), the part that I DID see showed a man that doesn't belong in the Presidency, but needs to be Impeached at the earliest convient time by Ms. Pelosi and Congress......I don't know what planet this guy lives on, but to dismiss the Iran Review Board's findings, the Generals of his own army (before they were "retired" (read:replaced)), and to generally dismiss the viewpoints of the Ameican public itself over a war that is nothing if not for Oil and bushe's ego, is the mark of a complete and total madman.

I sincerely will pray that Congress starts the impeachment process, for the sake of the country.
Reply to this comment
by samthetvcat January 16, 2007 4:57 AM EST
"I would respectfully disagree. President Mubarak in Egypt has actually slackened his authoritarian ways...the same is true of Yemen and several other states in the region. Even Col. Quadafi in Libya has been implementing reforms...Even the ever reactionary Saudis are now under a new prince who has made, for that nation, significant changes...The facts, reported by a variety of sources, don't seem to support your argument on the backward slide of fledgling democracies in the region. Even Iran, though it elected a nut, still has begun to build real democracy..."
Posted by ourtomorrows at 01:00 AM : Jan 16, 2007

Citations please - just from a quick scan of some human rights non-profits, here are the democracy/press freedom/anti-corruption ranks for some of the countries you mentioned as well as some others to put it the figures into context... (http://www.worldaudit.org/democracy.htm)

Sweden - 4/2/5
USA - 15/11/17
Egypt - 98/92/57
Yemen - 135/132/96
LIBYA (your model for Arabic democracy) - 147 (out of 150 countries!!!!!)/146/90
Saudi Arabia - 119/130/157
Iraq - 130/118/143
Iran - 138/138/90

So in conclusion, yes Iraq could stand to 'improve' like it's 'model' neighbors. But if Saudi Arabia and Egypt are the models of democracy for the middle east, then why did they give rise to the 9/11 terrorists? I'm thinking this 'model' of democracy isn't really one we ought to be looking to for hope...
Reply to this comment
by j-whitman January 16, 2007 4:37 AM EST
Above all Bush still doesn't understand the people, here in America or Iraq.... Good night, tomorrow's another day for discussion with more developments.. Right now the soverign nation of Iraq is opposing Bush's "Surge",,, which he calle Iraq's plan - Another lie to our nation & our troops.
Reply to this comment
See all 984 Comments
60 Minutes RSS Feed