GOP Leader Threatens Filibuster On Iraq
Sen. Mitch McConnell Warns He May Block Legislation Expressing Disapproval Of Bush's Plan
-
Play CBS Video Video New Iraq Plan: Tough Sell As President Bush begins to launch a PR blitz in Fort Benning, Ga., for his Iraq strategy, Congress remains divided. Susan Roberts reports.
-
Video Bush Admits Mistakes In Iraq In outlining his plan for Iraq, President Bush admitted for the first time that the U.S. and Iraq have made mistakes with disastrous results. Bill Plante reports.
-
Video Rice: Stakes In Iraq Are High CBS News RAW: Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice detailed the State Department's role in President Bush's new Iraq strategy. She also had harsh words for Syria and Iran.
-
Interactive New Plan For Iraq Key elements of the plan, excerpts from the president's speech, reaction and more.
-
News Tools Iraq Plan Speech Excerpts A sampling from President Bush's speech to the nation on his new Iraq strategy.
-
Who's Who Congress Reacts To Plan Reaction to President Bush's new Iraq stategy, which includes an increase in troops.
But he also said the United States should know pretty soon whether Iraqis were living up to their part of the deal and increasing their own forces.
In her opening remarks, Rice acknowledged widespread concerns about the war that has gone on almost four years and cost more than 3,000 American military lives.
"I want you to know that I understand and indeed feel the heartbreak that Americans feel at the continued sacrifice of American lives, men and women who can never be replaced for their families, and for the concern of our men and women who are still in harm's way," she said.
But Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Joe Biden of Delaware told her: "Secretary Rice, to be very blunt, I cannot in good conscience support the president's approach."
In a tense exchange, Biden, D-Del., pressed Rice to say whether she was confident that Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki had the capability to provide enough Iraq troops to help in stabilizing the country.
"I think he knows that his government is in a sense on borrowed time," she said.
Biden persisted, asking her again if she was confident al-Maliki would live up to his end of the bargain. "I'm confident," she said.
Meanwhile, after a meeting at the White House, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., expressed both doubts and optimism about the strategy.
"I am concerned about Maliki and his strength. I am concern as to whether these are sufficient number of troops," he said. "But I do think we can succeed."
McCain, a 2008 presidential contender, has been among a handful of lawmakers who have called for more — not fewer — U.S. troops in Iraq.
In her testimony, Rice stressed Iraqi obligations for troops, money and the political will to allow the Bush plan to succeed. She promised oversight, without giving specifics.
"Iraqis are in the lead; we are supporting them," Rice said.
Asked if the new U.S. and Iraqi offensive would go after Muqtada al-Sadr, the anti-U.S. radical Shiite cleric, Gates said, "All lawbreakers are susceptible to being detained or taken care of in this campaign." Sadr is a key ally of Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki.
Meanwhile, a coalition of labor, anti-war groups and liberal organizations was announcing a multimillion-dollar advertising and grass-roots campaign against the commitment of extra troops.
According to a new CBS News poll, following President Bush's speech, 68 percent of Americans — the same number as prior to the speech — said they were uneasy about the president's ability to make decisions about Iraq.
© MMVII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
- If it was OK for Democrats to fillibuster everything for the last 6 years, then it's OK for Republicans to act like Democrats and do the same.
........ - Reply to this comment
- It's the bully way of negotiation republicans brag about. Bring 'em on... yeeeehhaaaa!
- Reply to this comment
- Where are our Statesmen? ONCE we had people who were not only willing to engage those we did not agree with but stood willing to do so. They would sit down and explain why it is better for all of us in this world to try and get along than to be bombing each other and they used the MIGHT of our Military as a tool to convince people. The Fascist Administration of George Bush seems to think that Statesmanship is a weekness but then they thought Saddam and Bin Laden were pals. They think they can build a bigger bomb or faster jet and somehow dictate to all what to think and how to act. God what a horrible mess we have gotten ourselves into with this two bit Southern Fascist!
- Reply to this comment
- JPlo -
Um - the reason the U.S. dollar is decreasing is because of the debt we've had to go into to fund the war - what is it - $375,000,000,000.00 at this point? yes - that's billion with a B.
I think you will find that this figure dwarfs what the Bush Administration budgets for education, for healthcare, or for any of these "Keynsian" programs you seem to hate so much. I'm not saying big government and high spending is good, but as a fiscal conservative Bush fails brilliantly. True fiscal conservatives can only watch in abject horror as this man spends and writes checks that we will be paying or for years to come. THAT is scary. - Reply to this comment
- Amen, Kate, Amen.
Now if we could only get Mr. PLO here to use punctuation! - Reply to this comment
- jebediah76 - Pat Robertson a federal judge?? - now that is a really really scary thought - we're going to have to force them to pass sanity tests from now on!!
I don't disagree with filibusters - I just despise the hypocracy of the GOP who decried them so horribly a short while ago when they thought they had a lock on the entire US government top to bottom - we can't forget who adn what the likes of McConnel, Bush and Rove are - hypocrits through adn through. - Reply to this comment
- JasonPlo -
If you remember - the reason massive government spending was neccessary was that the country was in the middle of a depression? and WHY was it in the middle of a depression? Because Standard Oil and U.S. Steel refused to pay living wages, because the robber barons had all the money and were stamping their feet that the economy was going nowhere, AND they were fighting the rights of workers to organize!
Sounds like your kind already won once - and they gave as the Great Depression. Thanks, but I'll pass on round two.
Of course the U.S. has slightly socialist domestic policies - the alternative is economic anarchy. - Reply to this comment
- Jason_plo - the sunni shiite kurds wars have been on-going for between 8-13 centuries.
Also, Invasion of Iraq had NOTHING to do with the War on Terrorism. The bombing in Somalia does - cause you see that's where AQ is, not saddam controlled Iraq.
And if you think Bush and Rumsfeld were interested in going after AQ then why did htey team up with the Kurds who were the ones who aided AQ and allowed and aided AQ training camps in their part of Iraq which they controlled since the Gulf War? That's right - Bush and Rumsfeld had our guys teamed up and siding with those Kurds who helped those who attacked us on 9-11. - Reply to this comment
- Also - the Nuclear Option in that debate was something no one wanted. Do you think they will get away with the Clinton era shenanigans again? If they were to try it the Dems would push the nuclear option right back across the table - so at the very least it should never be an issue again.
- Reply to this comment
- who says ending the war unsafely quick is American i suppose you just want more deaths to occur to our soldiers it is you who is unamerican fool.
- Reply to this comment
- this government isn't fascist it is more socialist then should be though all thanks to roosevelt real pity he had to listen to Keynsian economics and start major government spending had that not happend our country wouldn't have a declining currency right now.
- Reply to this comment
- so your saying that what the democrats are doing for America is good and that they are American? please they are just as non American as McConnell and by the way sending more troops over will end it quicker duh! the more troops we have over there the faster we can get out because we can't just leave we are winning th war on terrorism granted it is not just held to Iraq or Afghanistan and the war in Iraq is a success we have no hope of stopping the Sunni Shiite war so we can't imagine to try either that was not our goal what we did was hinder Al Quaeda from attacking again quickly or otherwise.
- Reply to this comment
- Reagan is the one who allowed so much government spending and he wasn't the only one Roosevelt did too and need i remind everyone that more people died in Katrina then in Iraq so its not like that many people died in retrospect need i also remind everyone that this is one of the smallest and least costive wars in history granted 1 death is too much but seriously
NEED I REMIND EVERYONE WHY WE WENT TO WAR! THE TWIN TOWERS WERE DESTROYED AND THOUSANDS WERE KILLED THOSE BODIES OF WHICH ARE STILL BEING DUG UP THIS DAY! WE WENT TO WAR BECAUSE THEY DECLARED WAR ON US AL QUAEDA WAS BASICALLY IN CONROLE OF IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN THAT IS WHY WE WENT TO WAR AND ANYONE WHO DARES MENTION IT AGAIN HOW IT IS AN UNWINNABLE WAR MIGHT AS WELL GO TO IRAQ AND GIVE THE AL QUAEDA LEADER THE KEYS TO OUR NATION WE CAN'T JUST GIVE UP JUST A FEW DAYS AGO WE GOT MORE AL QUAEDA MEMBERS TAKEN OUT OH I FORGOT YOU ARE THE PEOPLE WHO SAY THAT 9/11 NEVER HAPPENED AND IT IS ONE BIG HOAX YOU ARE INSANE! nuff said. - Reply to this comment
- I agree NYCkate
THey are terribly whiny - I was simply pointing out the differences between the Judicial filibuster and the conventional, run of the mill Filibuster.
The Fili is a tool of the minority - the debate was equating McConnell's fili to the judicial fili uproar the Reps caused a few years back. Its apples and oranges.
Judicial fili is sour grapes when either side does it. However, the threat of it might just be why Roe v. Wade has yet to be overturned- hell, if Dubya had no oposition he could have made Pat Robertson a supreme court judge! - so count your blessings. - Reply to this comment
- superdem
Not all hillbillies are ignorant and arrogant NEOCONs like Bush and company. I was born in KY and I agree with all your statements... - Reply to this comment
- fascistUSA -
If you don't like America, you can always move to Iraq. - Reply to this comment
- dang superdem!
you're giving hillbilly's a bad name there!
ps
I was born in kentucky.
but you're right. the boil hasn't ripened yet. and absolutely right in saying that they have run this country into the ground. gave away all the money in government coffers to the rich. eased pollution laws and gotten us involved in several conflicts on top of that.
I hope the voters will remember what clinton had done for the economy and they destroyed in practically one fell swoop, but if nothing else americans are patriotic and stubbornly so. and the republicans know how to appeal to that patriotism....along with prejudices and devisive issues.
remember what gulliver's travels said:
"Care and Vigilance, with a very common Understanding, may preserve a Man's Goods from Thieves, but Honesty has no fence against superior Cunning"
and
"whoever could make two ears of corn or two blades of grass to grow upon a spot of ground where only one grew before, would deserve better of mankind, and do more essential service to his country than the whole race of politicians put together"
:) - Reply to this comment
- jebediah76 - for 8 years of Clinton's presidency the GOP refused up-down vote of close to 70% of clinton's nomination - the GOP doesn't care about showing fairness - they are just a bunch of whiney, whingey bullies, then and now.
- Reply to this comment
- Only a week into the new Congress & already radical Republicans are theatening to use their veto. An ominous sign.
It seems to me that, during the past 6 years, there were only a few times that meek & mild Senate Democrats threatened to use their power to filibuster & fewer still that they actually used that power.
This is simply another example of how these boldly aggressive Republicans & the Administration itself will thwart any Democratic efforts to block the Bush Administration's agenda. Between Dubya's veto power & the Senate Republican's aggressive use of the filibuster, the best that can be hoped for in the next 2 years is stalemate. For those who are fed up with the madness we have seen for the past 6 years, they will have to wait another 2 years for a true chance at significant change. It is the price we all must pay for allowing the political situation in this country to get so far out of whack. - Reply to this comment
- M McConnel- Is he a Republican first, an American last. What's good for America. Here we have a president that will go down in history as a oil man (cheney's puppet) that got us in this war. It's Cheney's war! Mr. McConell you have a obligation as a American to do the right thing! Not party- To hell with Republicans and Democrats. Do what your suppose to as a American
- Reply to this comment
Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more.




