The Duke Case
Lesley Stahl Talks To Parents Of Accused, Prosecution Forensics Expert
-
Play CBS Video Video Duke Lacrosse Legal Issues In Full: Lesley Stahl investigates discrepancies in the legal issues surrounding the case of three Duke University lacrosse players accused of rape.
-
Video Duke Lacrosse Parents In Full: Lesley Stahl talks to the parents of the Duke University lacrosse players accused of rape. The families are outraged at the district attorney's handling of their sons' cases.
-
Video Brodhead On The Duke Case Only On The Web: Duke University President Richard Brodhead talks to Lesley Stahl about the Duke rape case and defends his decision to cancel last year's lacrosse season.
-
-
David Evans, left, Reade Seligmann, center, and Collin Finnerty (CBS)
-
(CBS)
-
Dr. Brian Meehan (CBS)
-
-
Photo Essay Duke Lacrosse Case Duke lacrosse players were charged with sexual abuse in high profile case that caused tension in Durham, N.C.
-
News Tools 60 Minutes
Email AlertSign up for our 60 Minutes email alert.
But it all came crashing down with their arrests last spring. They were paraded in perp walks before cameras, their mug shots on the covers of national magazines.
"Who can tell us about the very moment when they heard that their son was indicted?" Stahl asks the group of parents.
"The day the indictment came down, we were sitting in the attorney's offices in Durham, and when I heard the news at first, I – frankly – I collapsed," Phil Seligmann remembers. "Thought I'd suffered a heart attack."
Once the indictment came down, from the very beginning, the players tried to prove their innocence, voluntarily going to the police and giving samples of their DNA.
Reade Seligmann had an alibi for that night – time stamped photos, which appeared to show he had already left the party before the rape could have occurred. Collin Finnerty also had an alibi, but the parents say no one in Nifong's office wanted to hear about it.
"I mean, to this day, no one has spoken to Collin and Reade, or asked them anything about their whereabouts," says Mary Ellen Finnerty.
"Mr. Nifong, actually never even spoke to the attorney. What he did is, he sent out a messenger, or someone who works within his office to say, basically, 'I have no interest in anything you have to show me,'" says Kathy Seligmann.
At first, when the accuser identified David Evans, she said he had a moustache, which he didn't.
"Our lawyers did try repeatedly to show Mr. Nifong that our son did not have a moustache the day before, the week before, the month before the year before. Or that he had it afterwards," says Rae Evans.
The case was fueled by racial tension from the beginning; the first time the boys appeared in court, they were jeered and taunted.
And the Seligmann's felt there was danger inside the courtroom. They say their son Reade got a death threat.
"I had people standing behind me telling me that 'He's not gonna get out of this courtroom alive. You're not gonna get out of this courtroom alive.' In no uncertain terms," Phil Seligmann remembers. "'You're a dead man walking.'" … This is in a court of law."
With no DNA inking the players to a rape, the case rests largely on the credibility of the accuser. Ever since she picked the players out of a photo line-up at the police station, she has given conflicting accounts of the nature of the attack, how long it lasted, and the number of men involved.
60 Minutes has learned that she has a "long psychological history" and that she had taken anti-psychotic medications like Depakote and Seroquel.
"When I'm trying to get over the rage I am thinking about, so deeply, this young woman who has been abused by men all her life. And nobody has abused her more than Mike Nifong," says Rae Evans.
Produced By Michael Radutzky and Tanya Simon
© MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.

- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
... - 51
- next
See all 1006 CommentsDo America a favor and give us some light at the end of the tunnel and bring justice back to the courts. Dismiss this atrocity of a trial which was doomed by unethical behavior on Mr. Nifong's part, prosecute for the lies and revenge on both the strippers part. Unlike Mr. Nifong perhaps you can feed the press the truth, give these young men their reputations back from the condemnation of the groups who call them "rich brats" their obscene jealousies of their privileged lives is sickening. Let America turn the key in the door of justice for all, even if you are rich and white. The tables have turned in this country in a way that can cause an internal revolution in the future, make an example of this travesty and do whats right, not only for these young men and their families, but for all Americans. Unethical behavior, lies and deceit do not add up to without reasonable doubt.
Posted by Hermit22 at 05:11 AM : Jan 21, 2007
You finally concede she lied but somehow still want to justify this blatantly wrong action because "she may have lost her cool" so we'll let her "hit them up for rape" and "let the chips fall where they may"? Did this really come from a sound mind. So acceptoing that you now agree she lied about the rape, if the "chips fell...that the boys were found guilty of a rape you now agree didn't occur, that's okay? You ......I can't even type it. Some one please tell this guy what nonsense this is.
Posted by Hermit22 at 03:19 AM : Jan 21, 2007
Since when is it a crime to act like a jackass? Y Doing something nasty is not illegal per se. Porn movies, smut magazines, STRIPPERS... can all involve doing something nasty but it's a matter of taste not jurisprudence. I didn't say the frat boys acted like the examples I gave. I said even if they did everything I wrote... it still doesn't justify the making of a false accusation. You still don't get it. You never will. If,If, If... the "frat boys" (you can't even get this fact right,it was a lacrosse team party) acted out every example I suggested, do you mean to tell me that woman was still justified in crying rape? It was her only weapon? Her weapon against what? She was already away from the party before she cried rape. She didn't cry rape to get away from the party, she had to be carried out because she was too intoxicated to leave on her own. There are pictures and the testimony of the other dancer to this effect which are unchallenged by even that idiot Nifong.
There was no case on April 10th yet the boys were indited on April 17th! How horrible, how can those men have a clear conscious, what they put those families through.
i have never thought it was anywhere near ok to charge someone with rape if it didn't happen, but after rereading your description of what may be par for the coarse at a strip ain't-no-party,
i can SEE why a woman could just loose her cool and let them have it, hit them up for rape, let the chips fall where they may. That is not right, but she may have felt that was her only weapon. I'm thinking worse of that frat house now that i did at the beginning of this story.
i might be loosing the 3 brain cells i've been opperating on.
i think anyone on a jury should be allowed to ask questions, NOT have to come up with a verdict based on what lawyers squirrel around with.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
... - 51
- next
See all 1006 Comments