The Duke Case
Lesley Stahl Talks To Parents Of Accused, Prosecution Forensics Expert
-
Play CBS Video Video Duke Lacrosse Legal Issues In Full: Lesley Stahl investigates discrepancies in the legal issues surrounding the case of three Duke University lacrosse players accused of rape.
-
Video Duke Lacrosse Parents In Full: Lesley Stahl talks to the parents of the Duke University lacrosse players accused of rape. The families are outraged at the district attorney's handling of their sons' cases.
-
Video Brodhead On The Duke Case Only On The Web: Duke University President Richard Brodhead talks to Lesley Stahl about the Duke rape case and defends his decision to cancel last year's lacrosse season.
-
-
David Evans, left, Reade Seligmann, center, and Collin Finnerty (CBS)
-
(CBS)
-
Dr. Brian Meehan (CBS)
-
-
Photo Essay Duke Lacrosse Case Duke lacrosse players were charged with sexual abuse in high profile case that caused tension in Durham, N.C.
-
News Tools 60 Minutes
Email AlertSign up for our 60 Minutes email alert.
"I mean, you felt like someone hit you with a baseball bat. It was almost too much to bear, as we sat there. And he's sitting ten feet away from us," Kathy Seligmann explains.
"He" is District Attorney Nifong, who has declined 60 Minutes' repeated requests for an interview. However, he recently admitted that he was aware of those other DNA findings all along and that his failure to disclose them was simply an oversight. Earlier this month, he rejected the growing criticism of his handling of the case.
"I don’t feel I’m part of the problem. I feel I've assisted in revealing the problem," Nifong said.
But Duke law school Professor James Coleman has been outraged by Nifong's conduct for months and says he may have obstructed justice when he failed to turn over all the DNA evidence.
"So why do you think it wasn’t turned over to the defense? Highlighted? Neon signs going off and on?" Stahl asks.
"Because it discredited her version of what is supposed to have happened that night," Coleman says.
Asked if he is now surprised, Coleman tells Stahl, "I was surprised. I never thought he would have intentionally tried to hide exculpatory evidence. That for me went beyond anything I would have imagined."
If it’s found that Nifong's conduct was "intentional," he could face sanctions or disbarment. He may also face questions about why he didn't interview the accuser about the case until ten months after she made the allegations.
When Nifong's chief investigator finally interviewed her for the first time last month, she said she could no longer be sure she was raped, and so Nifong was forced to drop the rape charge. The accuser has also changed the time frame of the attack, now saying it ended about 12:00 a.m. midnight. But time-stamped photographs taken by a player at the party show her still dancing from 12:01 to 12:04. a.m.
And now she says Reade Seligmann didn’t commit any sex act on her at all. And yet all three players still stand accused of sexual assault and kidnapping.
"My son said, 'Mom, when is it going to stop? When is this insanity going to stop?' Knowing that he was still being charged with crimes that he didn’t do," Kathy Seligmann recalls.
"Yeah, so even at this moment of good news " Stahl remarks.
"Exactly. He said, 'That's crazy. It didn't happen.' Every time you think this is going to end, another crazy story comes up. And you know, to know that you can drop the rape charges, but continue on persecuting these kids. It just doesn’t make sense," Seligmann says.
"I think that this is a case where a prosecutor got in over this head, got into a hole and kept digging. And then went from making mistakes to misconduct," Coleman says.
Asked what this says about Nifong's commitment to justice, Coleman says, "It says he’s indifferent to justice."
Nifong is now under investigation by the North Carolina state bar, accused of dishonesty, fraud and deceit. The indicted players, who were suspended by Duke University, have been offered a chance to return to school.
When Seligmann, Finnerty and Evans were charged with rape last spring, they were all but condemned by the prosecutor, who called them a bunch of hooligans. You can only imagine what it has been like for the parents of the boys, month after month. With each new disclosure that revealed cracks in the case, they have thought the charges would go away.
Stahl spoke to them this week about the toll this has taken on their families, their anger at D.A. Nifong, and their disbelief that despite a lack of DNA evidence, questions about the accuser's credibility, and now the recusal of the prosecutor, their sons are still facing serious charges.
"You have to remember that this has never been about the evidence. Never. If it were about the evidence, nine months ago, this case would've been totally dropped. This is about a man who chose to use a troubled young woman's story of fantastic lies to advance his own political career, which was crumbling. He needed something big. He needed that magic bullet, and he shot it. He shot it at our sons," says David Evans' mother Rae.
"Every mother of a son in this country should be scared to death that this was so easy to perpetrate. All that it's based on is a woman's word and she's changed that story seven, eight, nine times. And we still sit here. Our families have been held hostage of this D.A., of this woman, of the police department," says Kathy Seligmann.
"It's important to keep emphasizing they still face sex assault charges," Stahl remarks.
"We don't know what our futures hold. Our children don’t know what our futures hold," Seligmann replies.
Produced By Michael Radutzky and Tanya Simon
© MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.

- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
... - 51
- next
See all 1006 CommentsDo America a favor and give us some light at the end of the tunnel and bring justice back to the courts. Dismiss this atrocity of a trial which was doomed by unethical behavior on Mr. Nifong's part, prosecute for the lies and revenge on both the strippers part. Unlike Mr. Nifong perhaps you can feed the press the truth, give these young men their reputations back from the condemnation of the groups who call them "rich brats" their obscene jealousies of their privileged lives is sickening. Let America turn the key in the door of justice for all, even if you are rich and white. The tables have turned in this country in a way that can cause an internal revolution in the future, make an example of this travesty and do whats right, not only for these young men and their families, but for all Americans. Unethical behavior, lies and deceit do not add up to without reasonable doubt.
Posted by Hermit22 at 05:11 AM : Jan 21, 2007
You finally concede she lied but somehow still want to justify this blatantly wrong action because "she may have lost her cool" so we'll let her "hit them up for rape" and "let the chips fall where they may"? Did this really come from a sound mind. So acceptoing that you now agree she lied about the rape, if the "chips fell...that the boys were found guilty of a rape you now agree didn't occur, that's okay? You ......I can't even type it. Some one please tell this guy what nonsense this is.
Posted by Hermit22 at 03:19 AM : Jan 21, 2007
Since when is it a crime to act like a jackass? Y Doing something nasty is not illegal per se. Porn movies, smut magazines, STRIPPERS... can all involve doing something nasty but it's a matter of taste not jurisprudence. I didn't say the frat boys acted like the examples I gave. I said even if they did everything I wrote... it still doesn't justify the making of a false accusation. You still don't get it. You never will. If,If, If... the "frat boys" (you can't even get this fact right,it was a lacrosse team party) acted out every example I suggested, do you mean to tell me that woman was still justified in crying rape? It was her only weapon? Her weapon against what? She was already away from the party before she cried rape. She didn't cry rape to get away from the party, she had to be carried out because she was too intoxicated to leave on her own. There are pictures and the testimony of the other dancer to this effect which are unchallenged by even that idiot Nifong.
There was no case on April 10th yet the boys were indited on April 17th! How horrible, how can those men have a clear conscious, what they put those families through.
i have never thought it was anywhere near ok to charge someone with rape if it didn't happen, but after rereading your description of what may be par for the coarse at a strip ain't-no-party,
i can SEE why a woman could just loose her cool and let them have it, hit them up for rape, let the chips fall where they may. That is not right, but she may have felt that was her only weapon. I'm thinking worse of that frat house now that i did at the beginning of this story.
i might be loosing the 3 brain cells i've been opperating on.
i think anyone on a jury should be allowed to ask questions, NOT have to come up with a verdict based on what lawyers squirrel around with.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
... - 51
- next
See all 1006 Comments