Jockeying For Position On Iraq
White House Wannabes In Both Parties Maneuver For Advantage In Wake Of President's Troop Buildup Plan
-
Play CBS Video
Video
Bush: Blame Me For Mistakes
President Bush takes responsibility for mistakes made in Iraq.
-
Video
Bush's Plans To Secure Baghdad
In his speech, President Bush said military commanders have reviewed plans to stem the violence in Baghdad. A new effort puts a greater Iraqi military and police presence in the city.
-
Video
Durbin: Wrong Way On Iraq
Sen. Richard Durbin says President's Bush's "new direction" is actually moving America in the "wrong direction" on Iraq.
-
Photo
President Bush addressed the nation on his new strategy for Iraq on Jan. 10, 2007. (CBS)
-
Interactive
Iraq Study Group Report
Bipartisan commission warns that situation is "grave and deteriorating."
-
Interactive
Iraq: A Turning Point?
New Congress, change at the Pentagon, study group report; what does the future hold?
-
Interactive
Battle For Iraq
The government, the insurgency, key players, background and photos.
It's almost as if President Bush's actual address on Iraq Wednesday night was a mere afterthought.
Pundits and politicians have been debating his expected proposals since before the Democrats' official takeover of Congress last week.
Official pre-reactions from members of Congress and those thinking of running for president flooded the airwaves and reporters' in-boxes earlier this week.
And throughout the day on Wednesday, snippets of the president's speech were handed out, culminating in the entire speech being posted on the Drudge Report at 8:22 pm EST - 39 minutes before the White House wanted it out there.
But finally, after all that buildup, Mr. Bush went on with his remarks as scheduled and let all of America know what Washington had been buzzing about for days - that he's changing his "strategy in Iraq," a change that includes the much-maligned commitment of "more than 20,000 additional American troops to Iraq."
The president acknowledged those Democrats - and Republicans - who have spent the past days maligning him saying, "Honorable people have different views, and they will voice their criticisms. It is fair to hold our views up to scrutiny."
But what Mr. Bush didn't refer to in his 2,900-word speech is what the media have been chewing on the past several days: the political implications of this proposal here at home.
First off, polls showed that the wave that washed the congressional Democrats into power was due in large part to the war in Iraq. In response, Democrats will be holding week after week of hearings on the war.
Democrats also been mulling over legislation that would actually have some teeth - from threats to cut funding for more troops to an idea that Massachusetts Sen. Edward Kennedy proposed Tuesday: forcing a congressional vote any time the president wants to increase the number of troops.
That's easier said than done, however. So in the meantime, the newly emboldened Dems are eager to get Republicans on the record on Iraq, not just to have the upper hand now - but for the next election as well.
For instance, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid indicated he's going to bring a non-binding resolution to the floor next week that says the Senate disagrees with sending more troops to Iraq. If it's non-binding, what's the point?
"If there is a bipartisan resolution saying, 'We don't support this escalation of the war,' then the president's going to have to take note of that," Reid told reporters.
That's one reason. But it will also put the 21 Republican senators who are up for re-election in 2008 on the spot, giving those who vote against it an opening for their opponents next year.
In fact, four of those senators are on the record already saying they're not fans of the troop increase: Sens. Norm Coleman, R-Minn.; Susan Collins, R-Maine; Gordon Smith, R-Ore.; and John Warner, R-Va.
The ripple effect of the president's proposal is also evident in the nascent 2008 presidential race, with the liberal group MoveOn.org going as far as running a TV ad in Iowa and New Hampshire next week against yet-to-announce candidate Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz.
McCain has not been shy about his support for the president's plan, unlike some of his other potential rivals.
Interestingly, the Republicans who are comfortable with their standing among conservatives are the ones bucking the president, while those who feel the need to burnish their conservative credentials are coming out in support of the troop escalation.
For instance, Kansas Sen. Sam Brownback, a darling of the right who will announce his White House candidacy next week, said in a statement, "I do not believe that sending more troops to Iraq is the answer."
On the other hand, former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani and former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney - both who have something to prove to conservatives - felt the need to publicly announce their support of the president.
Meanwhile, the Democratic candidates and candidates-to-be have been trying to out-sound bite each other with criticism of the Bush plan.
Former Sen. John Edwards has even gone so far to label the president's plan "the McCain Doctrine" - a dig at the presumed Republican front-runner.
Even though Mr. Bush spent most of his 20-minute speech detailing his changes and not directly talking about the domestic political implications of the war and his proposal, he did briefly seem to acknowledge the long-term political effects and attempt to deflect criticism away from potentially vulnerable members of his party.
"The situation in Iraq is unacceptable to the American people - and it is unacceptable to me," Mr. Bush said. "Where mistakes have been made, the responsibility rests with me."
© MMVII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.



If you think the troop buildup is only about Iraq, I believe you are wrong. It is a stern notice to Iran and Syria, who are actively supplying our enemies, and the enemies of democracy in Iraq, before Iran gets the Bomb.
Pay attention to all the words in this magnificent speech. To these thugs. You are messen with fire. Hands off. Step Back. Or else. Big Mistake for them.
Hamiltongrad
Bush is the real enemy of Democracy. He violates the constitution and place himself above national and international law. His foreign policies have increased radicalism and terrorism around the world.
Give me a freakin break! Go get 'em George! Let's kill every damned terrorist. Problem is, we'll still be saving the democrats' sorry *****...
Give me a freakin break! Go get 'em George! Let's kill every damned terrorist. Problem is, we'll still be saving the democrats' sorry *****...
Give me a freakin break! Go get 'em George! Let's kill every damned terrorist. Problem is, we'll still be saving the democrats' sorry *****...
Posted by PoetFromNapa at 01:39 AM : Jan 11, 2007
Got your gun and plane ticket for Iraq? Besides the war in Iraq never had anything to do with Bush's trumped up "War on terror". Iraq never attacked us. There were no terrorists in Iraq when we invaded them. The only way it's related to terrorism now is that, thanks to Bush, it's now a perfect training ground for terrorists from all over the world to come to. Many of them even enlist in the local police or army and get the finest weapons training in the world, from us.
I agree with the wonderful comment from Hamiltongrade ( see infra) We are getting stronger. The enemy is given notice, and that enemy is not just in Iraq a, but in Syria, and Iran, and probably the West Bank and Gaza/ You guys, hd better watch out.
Bush has given notice. We are serious. We have the will, and the power. There is no border to run to, if you are the enemy.
God Bess Pres. Bush and our miliary leaders, They are doing the right thing. God Bless our troops.
Yes ! Re Kennedy blow hard. How come there is the Kennedy Family Trust in Tahiti ? TAHITI Not in US ? Because..... far less taxes of course. While the good Senator brays about the "rich" paying their fair share, I guess the "super rich" don't. Come on Senator. Come on CBS and Big money media..give us a break/
CBS---PLEASE DO STORY ABOUT KENNEDY FAMILY TRUST IN TAHITI !!! Clear the AIR once and for all.
Won't we all feel better "moving on" after the Senator is confronted, apologises, and asks for forgiveness, goes to a H and R tax course and retreat for treatment, re emerges a "new man" all slim and trim, does diet book, goes on the Letterman, has a few laughs, CBS morning show, dooking tips to stay thin, talks about diet tips and such, and is re elected , a new man. AN INSPIRATION TO US ALL !!!!
I personally think, IT IS ABOUT TIME.
-
by gunnerv1
January 12, 2007 9:27 AM PST
- Hi abby59, welcome home I retired in '86 as E-8 Gunner's mate
-
Reply to this comment
-
See all 23 Comments