January 8, 2007 11:52 AM

How To Further The Neocon Mess In Iraq

generic bush iraq war bomb bombing

generic bush iraq war bomb bombing (CBS/AP)

(The Nation)  This column was written by Ari Berman

Weekly Standard editor Bill Kristol walked into the American Enterprise Institute (AEI) yesterday with a big grin on his face, as if to say "they're listening to me again!"

Wolfowitz, Feith, Rumsfeld, Bolton and other architects of the war in Iraq may be gone, but the neoconservatives' stature inside the Bush Administration has hardly diminished. The same people that sold us the war, often under false pretenses, are now leading proponents of escalating the conflict by sending tens of thousands of additional troops.

An event at AEI yesteday brought together the intellectual progenitors of escalation: military historian Fred Kagan, retired General Jack Keane and Senators John McCain and Joe Lieberman. The focus was not on how to clean up the neocons mess, but on how to deepen it.

"The surge must be substantial and it must be sustained," McCain told a packed room. That means keeping an additional 20,000 to 35,000 troops in Iraq for 18 to 24 months. Under such a plan, 160,000 plus troops could be deployed well past 2008 at an untold cost.

Over 300 protestors convened by MoveOn.org gathered outside AEI to protest such a scenario. "John McCain, John McCain, escalation is insane!" they chanted. Around the same time, Democratic leaders Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid sent a letter to President Bush expressing their opposition to any troop increase.

"After nearly four years of combat, tens of thousands of US casualties, and over $300 billion dollars, it is time to bring the war to a close," they wrote to Bush. "We, therefore, strongly encourage you to reject any plans that call for our getting our troops any deeper into Iraq."

But Lieberman, the self-described "Independent Democrat," was having none of that. "The battlefield is in Baghdad and Al-Anbar, not in Washington," Lieberman said. "We need to support the President as he goes forward."

Who needs to support the President? Only 12 percent of Americans want to escalate the war. Most now want the US to get out. Nothing they've heard from the neocons since the beginning of the war has turned out to be right.
"I believed the initial invasion was going to be easy," McCain admitted today, echoing statements he made before the war. "Most of us did. I believed we were going to be welcomed as liberators. We were."

Little wonder why McCain and his fellow neocons can't bear the thought of ending the war they helped start.

Reprinted with permission from The Nation

The Nation
Add a Comment See all 38 Comments
by andy_f90 January 11, 2007 2:39 PM EST
Bill Kirstol and his neocon gang are the godfathers of the Iraqi fiasco.

He has absolutely no credibility who deliberately scared the American people yet still is paraded on the morally bankrupt, Bush "right or wrong" FoxNews channel.

That tells us a lot about the moral state of our nation, esp. letting FoxNews get away with it, much less the President.
Reply to this comment
by andy_f90 January 11, 2007 2:16 PM EST
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-v2f-WC4cjo

Thank you for that and his treatment by the right-wing media its not surprising.
Reply to this comment
by andy_f90 January 11, 2007 1:59 PM EST
As usual the neocons, pro-Israeli, fascist-warmongers who took us to war with Iraq are now planning their next victim: Iran... as Bush was hinting in his address yesterday.

Surely if Iraq had been a "cakewalk" as the Project for the New Israeli (Arrrhmmm, I meant American) Century (PNAC) you would have seen the "democracy through a barrel of the gun" folks preying on Iran and Syria already.

As one respectable Republican (who is not an Israeli apologist NEOCON like Wall Street Journal or FoxNews) said: "The only lesson we learn from history is that we do not learn from history."

Reply to this comment
by shingles1 January 11, 2007 12:24 PM EST
Classyperson says, "-also HARBORING THE TERRIORISTS FOR 9/11 and ALLOWING THEM TO 'TRAIN' AT SALMON-PAK ON A 747 COMMERCIAL AIRLINER??--HOW SOON WE FORGET."

Wrong. This idea that the Salman Pak facility was a terrorist training camp, was spread by Chalabi's INC before the war in order to get us into Iraq. And like most things pushed by the INC, this has turned out not to be true.

The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, the CIA, and the DIA have all concluded that these INC reports of Al Qaeda training at Salman Pak were not credible. The DIA told the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence in 2006, "fabricators and unestablished sources who reported hearsay or thirdhand information created a large volume of human intelligence reporting."

But, like most myths in in the empty cheeto bag infested basements of Wingnutistan, this one just won't die. It continues to be repeated endlessly as "proof" no matter how many times one points out that it doesn't prove ANYTHING.

Anything other than gullibility on the part of its boosters.
Reply to this comment
by bluestardad January 10, 2007 6:11 PM EST
JuanMari; when Genghis Khan's troops took Baghdad they killed everyone in the city. Everyone!
Reply to this comment
by bluestardad January 10, 2007 6:09 PM EST
geo1671; watched it what is apac?
Reply to this comment
by geo1671 January 10, 2007 5:04 PM EST
Here is what is wrong with America-Watch Video and you be the judge
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-v2f-WC4cjo
Reply to this comment
by oibooks January 9, 2007 2:01 PM EST
The tactics proposed by Bush on Baghdad is as old as Genghis Khan and to wage war against it is just as old. Defense to this tactic is simple... Americans occupy , Resistance withdraws... with a warning to it's citizens, that those that collaborate and refuse to help the resistance will die when they return... and since the Americans will not stay forever... it would be better to stay neutral or help the resistance or get out of town. For the Americans it is a waste of time, lives and money... Mr. Bush must read history or better ask somebody to read it for him... and explain, sentence by sentence what it means maybe that way he will understand. Read him ... Vietnam, Algeria, Palestine, Lebanon, South Africa etc. etc. Only fools do not learn from history.
Reply to this comment
by exusmcsgt January 9, 2007 1:17 PM EST
grumpas-

Lieberman is a Jew and obviously hates Muslims (at least in public so as to pander to his Jewish constituents)..
Reply to this comment
by grumpas January 9, 2007 1:07 PM EST
"The battlefield is in Baghdad and Al-Anbar, not in Washington," Lieberman said. It's obvious Lieberman has been into George's crazy weed smoking some of it! I don't know how any intelligent person could buy that nonsense! There is no proof whatsoever that these people are "going to follow us home" if we leave! And we are going to be battling them in this country! This has to be one of the most blantant lies the Bush administration has told yet! Why people even bother repeating it certainly shows the ignorance of some. If Lieberman is so gung ho for war then why isn't he over there????
Reply to this comment
See all 38 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook