February 11, 2009 5:32 PM

Report: Israel Has Plan For Nuclear Strike

(AP)  A British newspaper reported Sunday that Israel has drafted plans to strike as many as three targets in Iran with low-yield nuclear weapons, aiming to halt Tehran's uranium enrichment program. The Israeli Foreign Ministry denied the report.

Citing multiple unidentified Israeli military sources, The Sunday Times said the proposals involved using so-called "bunker-buster" nuclear weapons to attack nuclear facilities at three sites south of the Iranian capital.

Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert's office said it would not respond to the claim. "We don't respond to publications in the Sunday Times," said Miri Eisin, Olmert's spokeswoman.

Israeli Minister of Strategic Threats Avigdor Lieberman also declined to comment on the report.

But Foreign Ministry spokesman Mark Regev denied the report and said, "The focus of the Israeli activity today is to give full support to diplomatic actions and the expeditious and full implementation of Security Council resolution 1737. If diplomacy succeeds, the problem can be solved peaceably."

The United States and its allies accuse Tehran of secretly trying to produce atomic weapons, but Iran claims its nuclear program is solely for peaceful purposes, including generating electricity.

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has condemned as invalid and illegal a United Nations Security Council resolution that imposes sanctions against the Islamic Republic for refusing to halt enrichment.

Though Olmert has not explicitly ruled out a military strike against Iran's nuclear program, he has repeatedly said the issue should be dealt with diplomatically.

Olmert has said that because an Iranian nuclear bomb would affect the entire world, not just Israel, the problem must be solved by the international community.

The Sunday Times reported that the Israeli military officials believed Iran could produce enough enriched uranium to build nuclear weapons within two years.

It reported that Israeli pilots had made flights to the British colony of Gibraltar to train for the 2,000-mile round trip to the Iranian targets.

Asked by The Associated Press on Sunday whether the Israeli air force was training for an attack against Iranian nuclear facility, the Israeli army declined comment.

"I refuse to believe that anyone here would consider using nuclear weapons against Iran," Reuven Pedatzur, a prominent defense analyst and columnist for the daily Haaretz, told the AP in Israel on Sunday. "It is possible that this was a leak done on purpose, as deterrence, to say: 'Someone better hold us back, before we do something crazy.'"

Ephraim Kam, a strategic expert at Tel Aviv University's Institute for National Strategic Studies and formerly a senior army intelligence officer also dismissed the report.

"No reliable source would ever speak about this, certainly not to the Sunday Times," Kam said.

© 2009 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
  • Scott Conroy

    Scott Conroy is a National Political Reporter for RealClearPolitics and a contributor for CBS News.

Add a Comment See all 80 Comments
by josephxmas January 7, 2007 8:58 PM EST
If you didn't think Israel and the US (plus who knows who else) have and had plans to nuke countries they feel threatened by or dislike politically, wake up! The US and Isreal believe might is right and the path to "peace" is strewn with thine enemies' bodies.
Reply to this comment
by exusmcsgt January 7, 2007 6:22 PM EST
miscott-

By your comments I assume that you believe that the Palestinians enjoy having their children and women murdered by the Israelis.........
Reply to this comment
by exusmcsgt January 7, 2007 6:13 PM EST
Rafterman !-

I will also offer the definition of terror:

"violent or destructive acts (as bombing) committed by groups in order to intimidate a population or government into granting their demands"

If you feel the definition does not apply to the nuking of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, so be it. But I certainly do.
Reply to this comment
by exusmcsgt January 7, 2007 6:10 PM EST
miscott-

Would you please be kind enough to cite a reliable, independent reference justifying your statement that Iran plans to nuke Israel?

I can give you one stating that Israel plans to nuke Iran.
Reply to this comment
by exusmcsgt January 7, 2007 6:05 PM EST
miscott-

Nice to know that you find that, in one instance anyway, wikipedia got something right.
Reply to this comment
by exusmcsgt January 7, 2007 6:03 PM EST
Rafterman1-

I have been to Heiwa Koi in Hiroshima and have seen the generational defects caused by our own act of terrorism. I am sure that many will bristle at that reference but consider the definition of terrorism:

"the systematic use of terror especially as a means of coercion"

We obviously murdered hundreds of thousands of Japanese non-combatants as a means of coercing Japan to surrender. If you choose not to see that as terrorism, feel free.

I am not arguing that it was not effective, only that our hands are not so clean so as to enable us to condemn others for employing terrorism for coercion purposes as we have.
Reply to this comment
by miscott57 January 7, 2007 5:48 PM EST
excusmcsgt.no I do not employ a whatever Israel does is justified mentality.Israel HAS done things she should not have done.But I do employ a "my neighbor does not have the right to kill me" mentality.And yes I give kudos to wikipedia when it gets it right. Arab "citizens of Israel".How many Jewish people do you think there are who are citizens of arab countries,with full rights of citizenship?It is not Israeli's who hate the Arabs,for the most part.We just hate getting murdered.And having our women and children murdered.The conflict is not over land.Iran is not threatening to nuke us over land. That would kill "palestinians"Israel too. Iran is threatening to nuke us because they believe "ALLAH" wills it.Israel is far from perfect,but I get so tired of arm-chair generals who think they have the answers.
Reply to this comment
by exusmcsgt January 7, 2007 5:29 PM EST
rharrin1-

"All those arab countries tried that before and all they ended up with was their assses kicked."

Posted by rharrin1 at 02:21 PM : Jan 07, 2007

If true, why did Palestine need to be given back to the Israelis in 1947?
Reply to this comment
by exusmcsgt January 7, 2007 5:26 PM EST
miscott-

Because you employ a "whatever Israel does is justified" mentality, doesn't mean that the rest of the world is also as blind.

I also find it rather humorous that you give kudos to wikipedia after my using it on various occassions to disprove your propaganda. Cute.
Reply to this comment
by miscott57 January 7, 2007 5:08 PM EST
I find it astounding that so many get so upset with Israel and those of us who consider her "home".Even on a blog,voicing my opinion,he wants me to meet his friend "Louie" ! WOW! No America is NOT the "butt-buddie of Israel,But we're bringing "democracy" to Iraq and we think that the only democracy in the middle east should give away half it's country to terrorists,while WE fight a "global war" on terrorism.Now THATS democracy! Unfortunatly, it sounds like the majority has decided that it's better to appease the arabs than to stand and do the right thing. But hey, at least we'll have gas in our cars,right?
Reply to this comment
See all 80 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook