January 2, 2007 8:00 PM
- Text
Folic Acid May Slow Hearing Loss
(WebMD)
a B vitamin already added to U.S. flour -- may slow age-related hearing loss, a Dutch study shows.
Folic acid is also known as folate. Folic-acid deficiency causes birth defects and seems to contribute to heart disease and stroke.
The study looked at 728 Dutch men and women aged 50 to 70. Unlike the U.S., the Netherlands does not require folic acid supplementation of flour.
Participants in the Dutch study had high blood levels of homocysteine. Folic acid reduces homocysteine levels, so the Dutch study participants apparently consumed very little folic acid.
Half the study participants got strong folic acid supplements -- 800 micrograms per day, about twice what one would get in a multivitamin pill. The other participants got an inactive placebo pill.
After three years, those who got folic acid pills had less low-frequency hearing loss than did placebo recipients. The difference was slight: 0.7 decibels. The smallest change in sound intensity most people can notice is 1.0 decibels.
There was no slowing of high-frequency hearing loss. That may be because high-frequency hearing loss begins earlier in life than age 50.
Researchers Jane Durga, PhD, of Wageningen University, Netherlands, and colleagues suggest that by fortifying their flour with folic acid, nations might lessen their citizens' age-related hearing loss.
If a little folic acid from flour is good, would more folic acid be better? That's not known, suggests Robert A. Dobie, MD, of the University of California, Davis. Dobie's editorial accompanies the Durga study in the Jan. 2 issue of Annals of Internal Medicine.
"If this [hearing] benefit applies to the entire population (a big 'if') and continues to accrue each year (another big 'if'), one might expect a 5-decibel reduction in age-related [hearing loss] over a 20-year period," Dobie calculates.
Such a shift would cut the percentage of 75-year-old men who need hearing aids from 33% to 22%.
Dobie notes that much more study is needed to see whether the study results -- seen in people with low folic-acid intake -- might apply to the better-nourished U.S. population.
By Daniel DeNoon
Reviewed by Louise Chang
Folic acid is also known as folate. Folic-acid deficiency causes birth defects and seems to contribute to heart disease and stroke.
The study looked at 728 Dutch men and women aged 50 to 70. Unlike the U.S., the Netherlands does not require folic acid supplementation of flour.
Participants in the Dutch study had high blood levels of homocysteine. Folic acid reduces homocysteine levels, so the Dutch study participants apparently consumed very little folic acid.
Half the study participants got strong folic acid supplements -- 800 micrograms per day, about twice what one would get in a multivitamin pill. The other participants got an inactive placebo pill.
After three years, those who got folic acid pills had less low-frequency hearing loss than did placebo recipients. The difference was slight: 0.7 decibels. The smallest change in sound intensity most people can notice is 1.0 decibels.
There was no slowing of high-frequency hearing loss. That may be because high-frequency hearing loss begins earlier in life than age 50.
Researchers Jane Durga, PhD, of Wageningen University, Netherlands, and colleagues suggest that by fortifying their flour with folic acid, nations might lessen their citizens' age-related hearing loss.
If a little folic acid from flour is good, would more folic acid be better? That's not known, suggests Robert A. Dobie, MD, of the University of California, Davis. Dobie's editorial accompanies the Durga study in the Jan. 2 issue of Annals of Internal Medicine.
"If this [hearing] benefit applies to the entire population (a big 'if') and continues to accrue each year (another big 'if'), one might expect a 5-decibel reduction in age-related [hearing loss] over a 20-year period," Dobie calculates.
Such a shift would cut the percentage of 75-year-old men who need hearing aids from 33% to 22%.
Dobie notes that much more study is needed to see whether the study results -- seen in people with low folic-acid intake -- might apply to the better-nourished U.S. population.
SOURCES: Durga, J. Annals of Internal Medicine, Jan. 2, 2007; vol 146: pp 1-9. Dobie, R.A. Annals of Internal Medicine, Jan. 2, 2007; vol 146: pp 63-64.
By Daniel DeNoon
Reviewed by Louise Chang
Popular Now in Health
- Cancer drug reverses Alzheimer's in mice: Study
- 4.5 million Americans over 50 have artificial knees
- Marijuana-smoking motorists twice as likely to crash
- Skin cancer self-exam: What to look for (PHOTOS)
- Things You Didn't Know About Your Penis
- John Dye Dies: What Killed "Angel" Star?
- HealthPop: Online dating and jaw engraving
- PICTURES: 15 Shocking Sexual Fetishes
- Norovirus outbreak hits Rider University in N.J
- Online dating downsides, romantic tattoo gone wrong: HealthPop Valentine's Day video
- Woman spotlights uterus didelphys on talk show
- Christina Hendricks: Too Big for Hollywood?
- Whitney Houston back in rehab: Why?
- 8 Tips For Losing Weight After Pregnancy
- America's sodium problem: Not from salty snacks?
- Chinese mom gives birth to 15-pound baby
- Caffeine inhalers - the next club drug?
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook Most Discussed Stories
on CBS News
- Diana Ross, Steve Jobs honored at Grammy ceremony
- Diana Ross, Steve Jobs honored at Grammy ceremony
- Before clothes hit runway, designers test makeup
- Callahan scores again, helps Rangers top Caps 3-2
on Facebook Most Discussed Stories
on CBS News






