January 2, 2007 1:28 PM
- Text
Alcohol May Lower Risk Of Heart Attack
- Adele's Grammy Comeback After Vocal Cord Surgery
- Treating Sleep Apnea in Kids Improves Behavior, Quality of Life
- Chemo May Not Harm Unborn Baby
- C-Sections Not Always Best for Small Babies
- CDC: Doctors Increasingly Prescribe Exercise
- Osteoporosis Medication Linked to Unusual Thigh Fractures
- More from WebMD »
Dr. Andrew Sussman on The Early Show's Healthwatch. (CBS)
(WebMD)
A drink or two a day isn't bad for men with high blood pressure — and may lower their risk of heart attack, according to new research.
The finding comes from a long-term study of nearly 12,000 male doctors, dentists, and pharmacists with high blood pressure.
Many doctors now warn men with high blood pressure not to drink alcohol, which is known to raise blood pressure. That recommendation may have to change, say researchers Joline W.J. Beulens, MSc, of the University Medical Center in Utrecht, Netherlands, and colleagues.
Every four years from 1986 to 2002, the men in the Dutch study filled out questionnaires about alcohol use, diet, and health.
Men who drank moderately — one or two drinks per day — had a lower risk of heart attack. However, their risk of heart disease and death from any cause was no lower than that of men who did not drink.
"Men with hypertension who drink moderately and safely may not need to change their drinking habits," Beulens and colleagues conclude.
In an editorial accompanying the study, National Cancer Institute researcher Anne C.M. Thiebaut, Ph.D., and colleagues warn doctors and patients to take the findings with a grain of salt. Thiebaut and colleagues note that self-report surveys—particularly those on nutrition — are notoriously prone to reporting errors. That is, people who actually consume very little of something often over-report their consumption. And those who actually consume a great deal of something often under-report.
This is particularly true of surveys on alcohol use.
"The uncertainties surrounding measurement error should send a strong message to those who formulate recommendations about nutrition," Thiebaut and colleagues suggest. "The discretion of silence may be preferable to the valor of setting recommendations."
The Beulens study and the Thiebaut editorial appear in the January issue of Annals of Internal Medicine.
By Daniel DeNoon
Reviewed by Louise Chang, M.D
The finding comes from a long-term study of nearly 12,000 male doctors, dentists, and pharmacists with high blood pressure.
Many doctors now warn men with high blood pressure not to drink alcohol, which is known to raise blood pressure. That recommendation may have to change, say researchers Joline W.J. Beulens, MSc, of the University Medical Center in Utrecht, Netherlands, and colleagues.
Every four years from 1986 to 2002, the men in the Dutch study filled out questionnaires about alcohol use, diet, and health.
Men who drank moderately — one or two drinks per day — had a lower risk of heart attack. However, their risk of heart disease and death from any cause was no lower than that of men who did not drink.
"Men with hypertension who drink moderately and safely may not need to change their drinking habits," Beulens and colleagues conclude.
In an editorial accompanying the study, National Cancer Institute researcher Anne C.M. Thiebaut, Ph.D., and colleagues warn doctors and patients to take the findings with a grain of salt. Thiebaut and colleagues note that self-report surveys—particularly those on nutrition — are notoriously prone to reporting errors. That is, people who actually consume very little of something often over-report their consumption. And those who actually consume a great deal of something often under-report.
This is particularly true of surveys on alcohol use.
"The uncertainties surrounding measurement error should send a strong message to those who formulate recommendations about nutrition," Thiebaut and colleagues suggest. "The discretion of silence may be preferable to the valor of setting recommendations."
The Beulens study and the Thiebaut editorial appear in the January issue of Annals of Internal Medicine.
SOURCES: Beulens, J. Annals of Internal Medicine, January 2007; Vol. 146: pp. 10-19. Thiebaut, A. Annals of Internal Medicine, January 2007; Vol. 146: pp. 65-67.
By Daniel DeNoon
Reviewed by Louise Chang, M.D
Popular Now in Health
- Cancer drug reverses Alzheimer's in mice: Study
- Norovirus outbreak hits Rider University in N.J
- Marijuana-smoking motorists twice as likely to crash
- Electric shocks to brain may boost memory: Study
- America's pets also have an obesity epidemic
- Skin cancer self-exam: What to look for (PHOTOS)
- 4.5 million Americans over 50 have artificial knees
- Measles patient at Super Bowl prompts health alert
- Caffeine inhalers - the next club drug?
- America's sodium problem: Not from salty snacks?
- Chinese mom gives birth to 15-pound baby
- Things You Didn't Know About Your Penis
- PICTURES: 15 Shocking Sexual Fetishes
- Let's Move! campaign turns 2 today: Is it working?
- John Dye Dies: What Killed "Angel" Star?
- Woman spotlights uterus didelphys on talk show
- Drinking soda raises risk for asthma, COPD: Study
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- Assad cousin wins case to unfreeze Swiss millions
- Missoula company makes deal to build ocean sensors
- Skaters still hold hope for Dutch skating marathon
- Serbia urges citizens to save power in big freeze
on Facebook
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
- Beyonce and Jay-Z post first photos of Blue Ivy Carter
- Occupy protestors kicked out of CPAC
on CBS News






