Clinton, Obama Neck And Neck In N.H. Poll
Last Month's Poll Had Clinton Up By 23 Points; Giuliani, McCain About Even Among GOP Voters
-
Photo
Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., left, and Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y. (AP)
-
Who's Who
2008 Democratic Hopefuls
Clinton, Obama and Edwards lead the chase for the Democratic nomination.
-
Who's Who
2008 Republican Hopefuls
McCain and Giuliani head up the Republican pack chasing the presidency.
Among participants in the Concord Monitor poll, 22 percent said they would vote for Clinton if the primary was held now, and 21 percent said Obama. That put them slightly ahead of former North Carolina Sen. John Edwards, who was at 16 percent.
Last month, a Monitor poll showed Clinton leading Obama by 23 percentage points.
"I'm not surprised because Barack Obama got five days of constant media attention in New Hampshire," said Jim Demers, a Democratic activist who accompanied Obama throughout his visit. "Obama has demonstrated to the people of New Hampshire that he's a top tier candidate."
On the Republican side, former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani and Arizona Sen. John McCain are about even, with Giuliani at 26 percent and McCain at 25 percent. Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney is next with 10 percent.
The telephone poll of 600 likely voters was conducted Monday through Wednesday by Maryland-based Research 2000 and had a sampling margin of error of plus or minus 4 percentage points. The likely voters for the Democratic and Republican primary totaled 400 respondents each. For those questions, the margin of error was plus or minus 5 percentage points.
In hypothetical general election matchups, Giuliani has a slight lead over Clinton, while Clinton and McCain are about even. Obama is slightly ahead of both Giuliani and McCain. Edwards is tied with McCain and about even with Giuliani.
"There are a lot of independents. These are the same people who loathe Bush, loathe the Iraq war," said Del Ali, president of Research 2000. "But deep down, they don't like Hillary Clinton."
The numbers don't mean much roughly a year before the primary, some experts cautioned. President Bush, for example, held a double-digit lead over McCain in a New Hampshire poll nine months before the 2000 primary.
"You will have this tremendous amount of energy and motion to secure the allegiance of about 5,000 people," said Charlie Arlinghaus, president of the Josiah Bartlett Center for Public Policy. "And nobody else is going to start paying attention until after the summer."
©MMVI, The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.



Obama/Edwards works. Obama/Kerry is nice too. Obama/Clark would be my choice. The best would be Gore/Obama, but that's wet dream, not a ticket. But Hillary on top of the ticket? I'd vote that way because every republican candidate that's declared so far is a piece of sh*it, but she's not my first choice.
Obama IS the new JFK and I hope he has great security, because the real powers that be (the neocons behind Bush) will kill him if they get the chance They'll shoot him dead and blame a lunatic. Of course they are insane themselves, but still.....
"I can't help but feel that if either one of them wins their parties nomination, it would be a guaranteed defeat for the democrats in the next presidential election."
I absolutely agree.
only in this country do you get this kind of ***. I agree with you, but it sickens me. Here is a man twice as morally sound as Clinton. He has a loving wife, well adjusted young girls and he's a beautiful person. There are plenty of white people who have already said they would vote for him...that's what's so astonishing. And some screw up will try to kill him because he's black.
Ignorant, racist people shouldn't be given power.
As an independent voter who favors the Dems I may have to vote for Giuliani depending on who is his running mate. Like Democrats not all Republican's are created equal. It is quite possible that we may not suffer another of Bush's ilk.
Obama lacks the experience required for the most important position in the world. Also, his relations with corrupt politicians in Illinois must be questioned.
Hillary? Well, Hillary is just that, Hillary and nothing more. I see no value there.
I DIDN'T KNOW THAT *** WAS A CENSORED WORK. EVERYONE HAVE BEEN CALLING ME THAT FOR YEARS.
Hillary, the female vote.
Obama, the black and liberal vote.
Edwards, the photogenic, handsome (women) vote.
Now, let's look at qualifications.
Oh yeah, I remember, that has little to do with it.
'Nuff said.
They will "spik no englis", they will have guns, and they will be determined to make America a Spanish-speaking country.
Just ask your favorite politician how many Latinos will be allowed to settle here, and when we will stop.
American Empire is collecting all human garbage from all over the world, especially from Mexico. Our jails are overloaded with Mexican criminals.
They sell drugs, steal cars, trash neighborhoods, and we can not do anything.
I think American Empire will disintegrate in the next 20 or 25 years. The bad part is that disintegration will not be peaceful. More likely, it will be ugly and bloody.
Folks, buy assault weapons while they are available. In a few years, only Latinos will be allowed to have guns in order to protect themselves.
Obama won't beat Hillary or Edwards in my opinion but any Democrat will beat any Republican in 08, as long as Democrats remember that they controlled government for so long because of an education, farmer, labor, civil-rights, senior, small business co-alition which believes in the inherant need for government to provide for the "General welfare" AND the "COMMON DEFENSE". Go HILLARY GO.
Posted by HHHSS at 04:38 PM : Dec 26, 2006
Obama? A "yes person"?
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!
Whew! That's a good one!
How better can the Government and our PROPOGANDA for News control you?
I guess WE THE PEOPLE have to assume that NOTHING will change in the next 2 years. Nothing at all.
Nope. We probably won't see Families spending the holidays
TALKING ABOUT HOW FASCIST OUR COUNTRY IS!!!!
Who the... Who do you think you are????
America is not as racist and gender-biased as you!
I watched "North Country" last night which was based on a true events. It was absolutely shocking how the men kept telling their female co-workers how they don't belong up there...
Calling them all kinds of sexually explicit names in the work place. Assulting them, groping them, bullying them, placing sexual toys in their lunch boxes...
All the while telling them that they have no place there; that it's men's work...
But the entire time. The women just kept on DOING THEIR JOB!
I'm so mad right now I could just spit!
People like you are so closed-minded and plain stupid. You need to take back what you wrote and apologize.
That would be like me saying that well since short people are stupid... They can't be doctors....!
Or maybe a man has no place being a nurse...!
Stop judging people by WHAT they are and give them a chance to show you WHO they are!
I wish that Dr. Martin Luther King was still alive. Whether you hate him or love him. He was right when he said let's judge people by the content of their character you ***.
[I added on the you *** part.]
I meant you stoopid bast*ard "newsletter1".
How dare you say "a woman" or some "half black guy"....?????
What have you done with your life tough guy!?
-
by nyckate
December 27, 2006 3:09 PM PST
- We've seen the damage that can be done by electing a 'popular' candidate through the last 6 really tough years - so sorry - Obama simply does not have the track record to be president and neither does Hillary - she's just starting her second term as Senator. We also don't have the "luxury" of placating those who say its time for a "fill-in-blank" person to be president - the country is in bad shape and needs a knowledgeable, intelligent capable person who can make and understand international and domestic and military policies that are badly in need of fixing.
-
Reply to this comment
-
See all 38 Comments