Ahmadinejad: Bush 'Most Hated' In World
Iranian President Keeps Up Tirades Against West Despite Losses In Local Elections
-
Photo
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad criticized President Bush, but did not comment on election results that showed Iranians want him to focus on Iran's domestic problems. (AP Photo)
-
Fast Facts
Iran
Learn about the people, economy and history.
-
Interactive
Nuclear Armed World
The world's nuclear weapons powers, missile defense and a history of the nuclear weapons age.
In final results announced Thursday from local elections last week, moderate conservatives opposed to Ahmadinejad won a majority of seats. They were followed by reformists, making a comeback after being driven out of local councils, parliament and the presidency over the past five years.
In the capital Tehran, where Ahmadinejad was mayor before becoming president 16 months ago, his allies grabbed only three of the 15 council seats, while moderate conservatives won seven. Reformists won four, and an independent one. Though the Dec. 15 elections were local, they were the first time the public has weighed in on Ahmadinejad's stormy presidency.
But Ahmadinejad appeared unbowed. He toured cities in western Iran, telling the crowds that Iran will not be intimidated by Western demands to dismantle its nuclear program, and scolding Mr. Bush.
"Oh, the respectful gentleman, get out of the glassy palace and know that you are the most hated person in the eyes of the world's nations and you can't harm the Iranian nation," Ahmadinejad said, according to the official Iranian Republic News Agency.
He said Iran would continue uranium enrichment even under threat of U.N. sanctions. "A nation that has resisted until today will resist until the last step and will defend its rights," he said.
The United States and its allies believe Iran is trying to develop nuclear weapons. Iran denies the allegation, saying its nuclear goal is only to generate electricity.
Ahmadinejad did not comment on the election results. But his hard-line foreign policy, in the absence of a strong domestic agenda or economic program, is believed to have divided the conservative base that voted him into the presidency last year.
The president has sharply escalated Iran's standoff with the United States and its allies over several issues. Besides uranium enrichment, he has sparked international outrage for his calls to eliminate Israel and for casting doubt on the Nazi Holocaust.
Election results outside Tehran also showed a heavy defeat for Ahmadinejad supporters. None of his candidates won seats on the councils in the cities of Shiraz, Bandar Abbas, Sari, Zanjan, Rasht, Ilam, Sanandaj and Kerman, and many councils in other cities were divided like Tehran's.
Similar anti-Ahmadinejad sentiment appeared in final results of a parallel election for the Assembly of Experts, the body of 86 senior clerics that monitors Iran's supreme Islamic leader and chooses his successor.
A big boost for moderates within the ruling Islamic establishment was visible in the large number of votes for former President Hashemi Rafsanjani, who lost to Ahmadinejad in the 2005 presidential election runoff.
Rafsanjani, who supports dialogue with the United States, got the most votes of any candidate from Tehran to win re-election to the assembly.
Opposition candidates demanded that Ahmadinejad pay more attention to unemployment, now estimated at 11 percent, and other economic problems. He has failed to carry through on several domestic campaign promises, including a pledge to send a share of the country's oil revenues to every family and to implement an anti-poverty program.
The moderate daily newspaper Etemad-e-Melli, or National Confidence, urged Ahmadinejad to change his policies if he has any respect for the vote.
"The result of the elections, if there is any ear to listen or any eye to see, demands reconsideration in policies," the paper said in an editorial Thursday.
Conservative lawmaker Emad Afroogh also called on Ahmadinejad to learn a lesson from the vote. "The people's vote means they don't like Ahmadinejad's populist methods," Afroogh told The Associated Press.
Reformist Saeed Shariati also said the results of the election were a "big no" to Ahmadinejad and his allies, who he accused of harming Iran's interests with their hard line.
"We consider this government's policy to be against Iran's national interests and security. It is simply acting against Iran's interests," said Shariati, a leader of the Islamic Iran Participation Front, Iran's largest reformist party. His party seeks democratic changes within the ruling Islamic establishment and supports relations with the United States.
©MMVI The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.



Even Ahmadinejad figure this one out for himself? LOL
And all these efforts at misleading Americans over some stupid election in Iran is such unfortunate PROPAGANDA!
CONSIDER AMERICANS' POSITION!
Our dear leader's public rating is in the USA toilet!
Yet that very poor poll showing has not stopped him; nor has it prevented Americans from blindly following our dear leader further into the abyss!
Elections mean NOTHING MUCH OF ANYTHING!
POWER means EVERYTHING!
Posted by notblue at 11:21 AM : Dec 22, 2006"
Anyone bent on destroying poverty and ignorance is a 'hero' to ALL OF HUMANITY!
I'm not so sure why you are up in arms because Amhadinejad states what is common knowledge? LOL
When you show utter disregard for the lives and limbs of your OWN citizens and for the lives of the hundreds of thousands of Iraqi women, children, old people, etc slaughtered, then it is expected that you will be hated outside your own borders and within.
MAKE CAREFUL NOTE!
1. All the Iranian president ever does is TALK!
2. Our dear leader MURDERS, AND MURDERS MASSIVELY!
3. Talk is CHEAP, VERY CHEAP!
4. Mass murder IS NOT! Neither are the lives of Americans in the Iraqi hell hole!
So get your priorities in life straight, if you can even think at all!
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/11/30/world/main2217846.shtml
Unfortunately CBS decided not to open a blog regarding this question. Many would've contributed...
It's not a good way for ending a year, nor starting one.
Nonetheless, here is a good proof, that intra-religion violence exists (in all religions), and in all sacred spaces. He case here is Vatican.
Have a Merry Christmas and a happy new year, all of you.
Unf
ortunately CBS decided not to open a blog regarding this question.
Posted by grazinggoat at 11:58 AM : Dec 22, 2006"
Thought you realize by now that MAINSTREAM MEDIA ARE PROPAGANDA TOOLS!
The American MAINSTREAM MEDIA ARE BUSINESS ENTITIES FIRST AND FOREMOST!
They are only intent on steering American thinking to the straight and narrow path to ever-increasing American ignorance.
In this way ignorant Americans will do the bidding of the greedy money grubbers who just want to maintain the sickening status quo.
Anything that might paint christian in a bad light or give rise to critical thinking on this religious rubbish IS NOT encouraged!
It's a way to keep people down. So this man is very dangerous - mostly to his own people.
"They are only intent on steering American thinking to the straight and narrow path to ever-increasing American ignorance.
In this way ignorant Americans will do the bidding of the greedy money grubbers who just want to maintain the sickening status quo."
You continue to display an ignorance as deep as your hatred of everything democratic. The story was reported - therefore you and I are not ignorant of the facts reported. America and the rest of the free world formed our own opinion about it. Perhaps you had to check with your local cleric to see what your opinion was on the subject?
Just because you could not spout your flames associated to that article only saved the rest of us from your usual venomous diatribe. Are you Ahmadinejad's daughter by chance?
btw: if you have any manners, you'd keep your comments associated only to this article's thread and not to your own agenda.
Posted by Sevenveils at 01:54 PM : Dec 22, 2006"
I think you mean 'the propaganda was reported'!
What Ahmadinejad stated was common and popular truth and knowledge LONG BEFORE THE IRANIAN ELECTION RESULTS!
That is the fact that Americans would need to know if the mainstream media was intent on informing Americans and not just securing their narrow dollar base for their BUSINESSES!
Americans should know well how hated we have become around the world on account of our asinine actions. In this way, Americans could take corrective measures to improve our image in the market place of the world.
Instead we are just staying the course towards the abyss and worrying about RELATIVELY INSIGNIFICANT IRAN!
You change the topic so quickly! Silly person, you must be confusing yourself.
Your remarks I was referring to was your post in this thread regarding in which you titled:
CBS: Armed Monks Clash Over Vatican Ties.
The world has no love lost for George Bush. But world has shown by popular vote in the United Nations it dislikes Mahmoud Ahmadinejad even more.
You change the topic so quickly! Silly person, you must be confusing yourself.....
CBS: Armed Monks Clash Over Vatican Ties.
Posted by Sevenveils at 02:33 PM : Dec 22, 2006"
LOL
**** you. LOL
It was the other guy who wisely introduced the topic here; because CBS with its christian fundamentalist axe to grind don't want us to go off on the crazy christians who are behaving much like the barbaric s.hittes and sunnis.
With such a wise reply as yours, I can clearly see you a true master of debate. There is no reason to even try to match wits with you. Yes, you are a master debater.
Iraq al-Qaeda 'offers US safe exit'
Iraq al-Qaeda 'offers US safe exit'
http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/5BAF9AB5-AF21-485D-8432-96E64745C600.htm
Are we really losing in IRAQ? This is quite disturbing...
By your line of thinking I believe that would make Clinton, Nixon, Johnson and Kennedy war criminals too. I guess the good ol' USA is nothing but a terrorist government that should be cleansed by fire like Ahmadinejad said; but then its just all talk like someone posted earlier. You know conventional wisdom about barking dogs not biting. Now where is that Mein Kampf.
Democratic elections don%u2019t mean friendly leaders. Ahmadinejad was even more democratically elected than Dumbya, they have no anachronistic electoral college. Chavez was elected and Hammas won the last Palestinian elections. The actions of our arrogant neocon foreign policy have made unfriendly regimes more likely.
It%u2019s not altruism, but Chavez has done something to help the poor in the Northeast US get more affordable heating oil. I haven%u2019t heard of similar efforts by US or other oil companies to match the 40% off the price of the heating oil they produce. Oil co execs believe charity begins at home, their warm, comfortable homes. If poor people freeze to death, there%u2019ll be fewer poor people and clueless leader can claim to have reduced poverty.
-
by borealis3
December 23, 2006 5:56 PM EST
- I'm commenting the UN Security Council's sanctions and the way the U.S. news put it out. This is NBC:
-
Reply to this comment
-
See all 27 Comments"Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad reiterated on Tuesday that possible Security Council sanctions would not stop Iran from pursuing uranium enrichment, a technology that can be used to produce nuclear fuel for civilian purposes or fuel for a nuclear bomb."
See how cleverly CBS put the last sentence to President's mouth, he said nothing about nuclear bombs, this is boo boo journalism at it's worst.
European news also published one important thing, the Iranians rightfully asked today why the UN is not worried about Israeli Nuclear Warheads. Nothing about that here.