What You Can't See Can Kill You
Some Medical Groups Say Microscopic Soot Can Lead To Fatal Diseases
-
Play CBS Video
Video
Deadly Pollution You Can't See
Some researchers have been criticizing the government for ignoring the health hazards caused by soot. They claim it leads to thousands of deaths every year. Wyatt Andrews reports.
-
Video
Valley Of Pollution
The air in California's San Joaquin Valley is so polluted that it's affecting a whole generation of kids who have developed asthma. John Blackstone reports.
-
Photo
Particle pollution can damage your lung, some medical agencies say. (CBS)
-
Interactive
Air Pollution
Explore air pollution throughout the US and and find out which cities have the worst air quality.
-
Interactive
Oil and Gas:
Fossil FuelsLearn more about energy costs and usage in your state and get the latest prices for gasoline.
The power company, First Energy, said it was a maintenance accident — and, according to local residents, warned them not to eat anything dusted by the soot.
The accident, which had the power company power-washing a town, was an unusually severe and visible example of what Americans breathe — in much smaller amounts — every day. And not just from power plants: Trucks, cars and even fires produce microscopic soot particles and chemicals that can damage your lungs.
"Particle pollution, soot, kills people," says Janice Nolan with the American Lung Association
The American Lung Association is one of many leading medical groups demanding that the Bush administration adopt stricter controls on microscopic soot. These groups cite overwhelming evidence linking microscopic particles to fatal diseases.
Tens of thousands of people die "every year, from soot-based heart attacks, cancer, strokes," Nolan says.
Despite that evidence, when the Environmental Protection Agency had the chance to set a tough new annual emissions standard for soot this year, the agency declined. The EPA also declined a request by CBS News to explain that decision on camera, but in a written statement said, "EPA's air-quality standards are the most health-protective in U.S. history. ..."
Dr. Roger McClellan, an EPA adviser, agrees with the agency; he says none of the research cited by critics proves that tougher standards will save lives.
"They are just stretching the scientific data. And I think that has been used excessively to try to scare the public into thinking these are real deaths," McClellan says.
However, in a 20-2 vote last year, an independent committee of scientists advising the EPA said tighter annual control on microscopic soot would save lives.
When EPA dismissed this, critics said the Bush administration was ignoring science to go easy on industry.
Meanwhile, the power company in Shippingport is now telling residents it's safe to eat vegetables if they're washed. But remember, the black rain that fell that day was pollution you could see. On every other day, it's what you can't see that could kill you.
©MMVI, CBS Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Video and Galleries from CBS Evening News
- Latest in CBS Evening News
- Non-Jackson News You May Have Missed
- Questions Remain in Jackson's Death
- No Problems With Jackson Crowd Control



From Publishers Weekly
"Something in the wind" has a literal rather than a literary connotation for journalist Brown. That "something" is composed of unseen toxic particlescarcinogens, compounds akin to nerve gas, unknown combinations of hazardous chemicals, the infamous MIC of the Bhopal disasterwafted on the wind far from their points of origin. Of approximately 204 dangerous compounds, the EPA regulates seven, according to the author. In Laying Waste, he looked at the Love Canal and other areas of ground pollution. Here he examines contaminated air and its travels throughout the country. Not a place in the U.S. is free of toxic clouds: pesticide residues from the cotton fields of Texas and Mississippi have turned up on Isle Royale in Lake Superior; along the Gulf coast, petrochemicals produce a breathtaking miasma, and the chances of contracting cancer there are one in three. Brown charges that EPA policy favors polluters and that neither government nor industry is willing to take responsibility for clean air. Perhaps this crusading book will help spur us to action."