September 22, 2009 11:07 AM

What We Learned From Foley

By
Jennifer Hoar
(National Review Online)  This column was written by Gary Bauer
Now that the House ethics panel has released its final report on former Representative Mark Foley's inappropriate contact with male teenage congressional pages, before the scandal is finally put to rest, it would be worthwhile to consider the lessons to be learned from the episode — for Republicans, Democrats, and society at large.

During its probe, the panel interviewed dozens of congressional staffers and concluded that Republicans were negligent in failing to act on years of troubling signs. The panel also found that "political considerations played a role in decisions that were made." It theorized that Republicans didn't act for fear of exposing Mr. Foley's homosexuality, and thus appearing anti-gay, and out of concern that Foley's scandal would affect him "adversely, both politically and personally."

These revelations should stiffen Republicans' resolve to be consistent in promoting conservative values, never placing political correctness or electoral concerns ahead of protecting children. For years, the Republican Party, as the home of values voters, has claimed the mantle of faith and family. For Republicans to retain the allegiance of conservative voters requires that they hold themselves to the highest standards, not only in their public policy positions, but also in their personal conduct, especially on matters of sexuality, family, and children.

But Republicans do not have a monopoly on hypocrisy in the Foley mess. The House ethics report found that Democratic campaign operatives urged newspapers to write about Foley's e-mails to teenage pages in the hope that a scandal would develop before the midterm elections.

An aide to Rep. Rahm Emanuel (D.-Ill.) revealed that Emanuel, as chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, also knew about the e-mails, even though he attempted to deny knowledge of them when the story broke in September.

What's more, the outrage Democrats displayed in the days after the scandal broke rang hollow considering their history of harassing the Boy Scouts for not allowing homosexuals to serve as scoutmasters. Recall that a Boy Scout troop was mercilessly booed at the 2000 Democrat National Convention, and that a majority of congressional Democrats voted against legislation protecting the Scouts' right to hire people who reflect that organization's values.

An inconvenient truth for Democrats is that they are strongly supported by organizations like the ACLU, which consistently argues that age of consent laws need to be dramatically reduced so that what Mr. Foley was attempting to do would be legal. Democrats are also supported by homosexual advocacy groups that routinely give organizations like NAMBLA, the North American Man-Boy Love Association, positions in "gay rights" parades, where they proclaim such slogans as "sex by eight or it's too late."

Further, when former Democratic Congressman Gerry Studds admitted to having an affair with a teenage male House page in the mid-1980s, Congress formally censured him for misconduct; but Studds refused to resign his office, and the voters of his district reelected him repeatedly, while House Democrats rewarded him with a committee chairmanship.



National Review Online
Add a Comment See all 15 Comments
by patriotic9 December 23, 2006 9:55 AM EST
"What we learned from Foley"
1)First lesson we learned that REPUBLICANS just like their GOD-LOVING,HOLY,RELIGIOUS,CONSERVATIVE PRIESTS in the CHURCHES who SEXUALLY MOLEST and SODOMIZE young,little innocent American boys who call them FATHER,are not against a guy who screws boys,They are against the guys who want to have relationship with adults(gay marriage).
2)Second lesson is that all the RELIGIOUS,HOLY GOD-LOVING PEOPLE who oppose the constitution of USA which forbids the involvement of religion into polictics by seaprating CHURCH from STATE,are HYPOCRITES and LIARS.Whether it's BUHS who lied about Iraq WMDs,FOLEY who voted against GAY MARRIAGE and himself was harassing boys on internet,DRUG ADDICT LIMBOUGH,BILL OREILLY who preaches MORAL VALUES to everyone and himself was SEXUALLY HARASSING a female at work and then gave her $10 million to keep her mouth shut.GOD-LOVING,HOLY,CONSERVATIVE,RELIGIOUS PEOPLE who play the game of THE FATHER,THE SON and THE HOLY SPIRIT in the CHURCHES.Holy man is THE FATHER,the boy whose pant is PULLED DOWN by that HOLY MAN in the name of GOD is THE SON and what is inserted in the BACKHOLE of that innocent boy is the HOLY SPIRIT.These RELIGIOUS,HOLY,CONSERVATIVE people are the worst creatures on the face of earth.
Reply to this comment
by hermit22 December 22, 2006 1:25 AM EST
Please print more of Gary Bauer's writing.
Thank you.
Reply to this comment
by bratmobile67 December 21, 2006 2:26 PM EST
I noticed a lot of cynicism in these posts about Foley and his activities. It saddens me that there is not any real emotion,but it is hardly surprising. Why should anyone in america feel shocked, outraged, sympathetic, protective of the child that was the victim of foley? we are only after all DISPOSIBLE, correct? We have a president who was excused from the draft sending our military to die, with no regard to the loss of lives,only to his own personal agenda, we have senate and congress passing legislations that make it more profitable to tear families apart,and steal children, and profitable to experiment on children regardless of the harm to their wellbeing, subjecting these children to mind altering drugs.... So why the uproar now? everyone around Foley knew for years, no one cared to stop these activities because it wasn't convenient to them or profitable for them to."Keep Foley happy he will cooperate and pass the bills we want him to..." For the People, Of the People, By the People? I doubt that.Lisa Lema
Reply to this comment
by bluestardad December 21, 2006 8:55 AM EST
creeper00 well spoken
Reply to this comment
by bluestardad December 21, 2006 8:54 AM EST
We need to send a crate of chickens to congress so they will leave the pages alone.
Reply to this comment
by bluestardad December 21, 2006 8:53 AM EST
When is this pedophyle going to Jail?
Reply to this comment
by sharncedar December 21, 2006 3:30 AM EST
"Both parties aren't worth the powder to blow them both to hell"

I respectfully disagree. It would take about $730 dollars worth of powder, used liberally by a proper firing squad. A very good investment, not at all a waste of taxpayers money. The best investment we could make as a country, think of the dividends - the next Congress would be very hesitant to spend some trillions of dollars of corporate welfare and subsidies to foreign countries, I reckon.
Reply to this comment
by se sanders December 21, 2006 2:55 AM EST
This NRO article stinks with hypocrisy. As if blathering on and on about family values is going to convince any thinking person that the Foley scandal was anything but a Republican lapse in judgment and ethics! And please, don't insult our intelligence with excuses that political correctness forced the Republican leadership to sweep Foley's behavior under the rug!!! The Republicans had years to do something about this man and they did nothing for reasons of expediency, not political correctness.
Reply to this comment
by swingalong December 20, 2006 11:08 PM EST
Yes, more National Review twaddle. As usual they spend most of the time telling about how awful the Democrats are whenever a Republican screws up. Isn't it awful when one side thinks it has cornered the market on morality or decency? Truly Taliban at heart.

By the way, the Boy Scouts of America are a dirty organization that also willfully practices religious discrimination against agnostics and atheists by going after their children and denying them membership. That's their national policy. if a child's mom is heard to say she is an agnostic -- the child is not allowed to join. (I know this first hand.) They, like other hate groups, seek protection from the concept of 'RIGHT OF ASSOCIATION," which no decent organization would touch with a ten-foot pole. They fight fiercely and unapolgetically to band those without the correct religion and they win in court -- just like the American Nazis and the rest of the groups that need to protect their institutionalized hate and discrimination which is usually codified in a carefully written pledge that makes certain people ineligible. It's a sickening organization and anyone that has anything to do with the BSA is making a tremendous ethical error. Oh, but the National Review and the republicans have the morals. I forgot. I must be wrong.

Three cheers for anyone who boos these low lifes -- the Boy Scouts.

NO ONE should join that group no matter what their sexual orientation, religious affiliation, or political party.
Reply to this comment
by tejasdemo December 20, 2006 9:20 PM EST
Typical NRO. More interested in winning then actually solving the countries massive problems.

The reason is because none of the nation's massive problem really affect these zeros.

They have plenty of money. They dont fight in wars. They dont pay any taxes.
Reply to this comment
See all 15 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook